EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS OF THE PLAGUE

1

 

EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS OF THE PLAGUE

1. Gabriele de Mussi: Istoria de Morbo or History of the Pestilence (1348)

Gabriele de Mussi (1280-1356) was an Italian notary from Piacenza, who either travelled himself to Caffa (a Genoese trading post in the Crimea), or, more plausibly, acquired his detailed information on the spread of the Black Death from eye witnesses of the Mongols’ siege against Caffa. According to de Mussi, the plague was transmitted intentionally by the Mongols, who hurled cadavers of people infected with the disease into the besieged city-port. The Genoese fleeing from Caffa brought the disease to Italy. If accurate, this is one of the earliest recorded instances of biological warfare.

In 1346, in the countries of the East, countless numbers of Tartars [Mongols] and Saracens

[Muslim Turks] were struck down by a mysterious illness which brought sudden death. Within

these countries broad regions, far-spreading provinces, magnificent kingdoms, cities, towns and

settlements, ground down by illness and devoured by dreadful death, were soon stripped of their

inhabitants. An eastern settlement under the rule of the Tartars called Tana, which lay to the

north of Constantinople and was much frequented by Italian merchants, was totally abandoned

after an incident there which led to its being besieged and attacked by hordes of Tartars who

gathered in a short space of time. The Christian merchants, who had been driven out by force,

were so terrified of the power of the Tartars that, to save themselves and their belongings, they

fled in an armed ship to Caffa, a settlement in the same part of the world which had been

founded long ago by the Genoese.

 

Oh God! See how the heathen Tartar races, pouring together from all sides, suddenly advanced

upon the city of Caffa and besieged the trapped Christians there for almost three years. There,

hemmed in by an immense army, they [the Christians] could hardly draw breath, although food

could be shipped in, which offered them some hope. But behold, the whole army was affected by

a disease which overran the Tartars and killed thousands upon thousands every day. It was as

though arrows were raining down from heaven to strike and crush the Tartars’ arrogance. All

medical advice and attention was useless; the Tartars died as soon as the signs of disease

appeared on their bodies: swellings in the armpit or groin caused by coagulating humors,

followed by a putrid fever.

 

The dying Tartars, stunned and stupefied by the immensity of the disaster brought about by the

disease, and realizing that they had no hope of escape, lost interest in the siege. But they ordered

corpses to be placed in catapults and lobbed into the city in the hope that the intolerable stench

would kill everyone inside. What seemed like mountains of dead were thrown into the city, and

the Christians could not hide or flee or escape from them, although they dumped as many of the

bodies as they could in the sea. And soon the rotting corpses tainted the air and poisoned the

water supply, and the stench was so overwhelming that hardly one in several thousand was in a

position to flee the remains of the Tartar army. Moreover one infected man could carry the

poison to others, and infect people and places with the disease by look alone. No one knew, or

could discover, a means of defense.

 

 

2

 

Thus almost everyone who had been in the East, or in the regions to the south and north, fell

victim to sudden death after contracting this pestilential disease, as if struck by a lethal arrow

which raised a tumor on their bodies. The scale of the mortality and the form which it took

persuaded those who lived, weeping and lamenting, through the bitter events of 1346 to 1348—

the Chinese, Indians, Persians, Medes, Kurds, Armenians, Cilicians, Georgians, Mesopotamians,

Nubians, Ethiopians, Turks, Egyptians, Arabs, Saracens and Greeks (for almost all the East has

been affected)—that the last judgement had come.

…As it happened, among those who escaped from Caffa by boat were a few sailors who had

been infected with the poisonous disease. Some boats were bound for Genoa, others went to

Venice and to other Christian areas. When the sailors reached these places and mixed with the

people there, it was as if they had brought evil spirits with them: every city, every settlement,

every place was poisoned by the contagious pestilence, and their inhabitants, both men and

women, died suddenly. And when one person had contracted the illness, he poisoned his whole

family even as he fell and died, so that those preparing to bury his body were seized by death in

the same way. Thus death entered through the windows, and as cities and towns were

depopulated their inhabitants mourned their dead neighbors.

But as an inhabitant I am asked to write more of Piacenza so that it may be known what

happened there in the year 1348. Some Genoese who fled from the plague raging in their city

betook themselves hither. They rested at Bobbio, and there sold the merchandise they had

brought with them. The purchaser and their host, together with all his family and many

neighbors, were quickly stricken with disease and died. One of these, wishing to make his will,

called a notary, his confessor, and the necessary witnesses. The next day all these were buried

together. So greatly did the calamity increase that nearly all the inhabitants of Bobbio soon fell a

prey to the sickness, and there remained in the town only the dead.

 

In the spring of 1348 another Genoese infected with the plague came to Piacenza. He sought out

his friend Fulchino della Croce, who took him into his house. Almost immediately afterwards he

died, and the said Fulchino was also quickly carried off with his entire family and many of his

neighbors. In a brief space the plague was rife throughout the city. I know not where to begin;

everywhere there was weeping and mourning. So great was the mortality that men hardly dared

to breathe. The dead were without number, and those who still lived gave themselves up as lost,

and prepared for the tomb.

George Deaux ed., The Black Death 1347 (New York 1969) pp. 75ff

***

 

 

3

 

2. Giovanni Bocaccio, The Decameron (1348)

The Italian writer Giovanni Boccaccio (1313-1375) lived in Florence while the city was being

devastated by the plague. The experience inspired him to write The Decameron, a story of seven

women and three men who fled the diseased city seeking refuge in a countryside villa. In his

introduction to the book, Boccaccio gives a graphic description of the effects of the plague on his

city. He depicts the outbreak with its high mortality rates, and how that was a catalyst for many

social and cultural changes. He also describes the shattering effects of the fast and painful death

on the bodies but also on the mental, emotional and spiritual states of those affected.

 

The onset and spread of the plague

In the year of our Lord 1348, there happened at Florence, the finest city in all Italy, a most

terrible plague – whether owing to the influence of the planets, or perhaps it was sent by God as a

just punishment for our sins. It had broken out some years before in the Levant, and after passing

from place to place, and making incredible havoc all the way, reached the west; where, in spite

of all the means that knowledge and human foresight could suggest as to keeping the city clear

from filth, including the exclusion of all suspected persons; notwithstanding frequent

consultations what else needs to be done; nor omitting prayers to God and frequent processions;

in the spring of that year, it began to show itself in a sad and terrible manner. And, different from

what it had been in the east, where bleeding from the nose was the fatal prognostic, here there

appeared certain tumors in the groin, or under the armpits, some as big as a small apple, others as

an egg; and afterwards purple spots in most parts of the body: in some cases large but few in

number, in others cases smaller but more numerous, however both sorts the usual messengers of

death.

 

To cure the malady, neither medical knowledge nor the power of drugs was of any effect;

whether because the disease was in its own nature mortal, or that the physicians (the number of

whom, taking quacks and women pretenders into the account, had grown very much) could form

no just idea of the cause, nor consequently ground a true method of cure; whichever was the

reason, few or none escaped; but they generally died the third day from the first appearance of

the symptoms, without a fever or other bad circumstance attending.

 

And the disease, by being communicated from the sick to the well, seemed daily to get ahead,

and to rage the more, as fire will do by laying on fresh combustibles. It spread not only by

conversing with, or coming near the sick, but even by touching their clothes, or anything that

they had before touched. Such, I say, was the quality of the pestilential matter, as to pass not only

from man to man, but, what is more strange and has been often known, that anything belonging

to the infected, if touched by any other creature, would certainly infect, and even kill that

creature in a short space of time.

 

Common reactions

This occasioned various fears and devices amongst those people who survived, all tending to the

same uncharitable and cruel end; which was to avoid the sick, and everything that had been near

them; expecting by that means to save themselves.

 

 

4

 

Other held it best to live temperately, and to avoid excesses of all kinds, shut themselves up from

the rest of the world; eating and drinking moderately of the best, and diverting themselves with

music, and such other entertainments as they might have within doors.

 

Still others maintained free living to be a better preservative, and would draw back from no

passion or appetite they wished to gratify, drinking and reveling incessantly from tavern to

tavern, or in private houses; which were frequently found deserted by the owners, and therefore

common to everyone; yet avoiding, with all this irregularity, to come near the infected.

 

And such at that time was the public distress that the laws, human and divine, were not regarded:

for the officers to enforce them were either dead or sick or in want of persons to assist them;

everyone did just as he pleased.

 

Another sort of people chose a method between these two; not confining themselves to rules of

diet like the former, and yet avoiding the intemperance of the latter; but eating and drinking what

their appetites required, they walked everywhere with perfumes and sprays to smell; as holding it

best to corroborate the brain: for they supposed the whole atmosphere to be tainted with the stink

of dead bodies, arising partly from the distemper itself, and partly from the fermenting of the

medicines within them.

 

Others of a crueler disposition deemed it safer to avoid the plague altogether: men and women in

great numbers left the city, their houses, relations, and effects, and fled into the country (as if the

wrath of God had been restrained to visit those only within the walls of the city).

 

Traditional customs overlooked

I pass over the little regard that citizens and relations showed to each other- for their terror was

such that a brother even fled from his brother, a wife from her husband, and, what is more

uncommon, a parent from his own child. On which account the numbers that fell sick could have

no help but what the charity of friends, who were very few. From this desertion of friends, and

the scarcity of servants, an unheard-of custom prevailed: no lady, however young or handsome,

would disdain being attended by a man-servant, whether young or old it mattered not; and to

expose herself naked to him, the necessity of the distemper requiring it, as though it was to a

woman; which might make those who recovered less modest for the time to come. And many

lost their lives who might have escaped had they been looked after at all.

 

From mere necessity, many customs were introduced, different from what had been before

known in the city. It had been usual, as it now is, for the women who were friends and neighbors

to the deceased, to meet together at his house, and to lament with his relations; at the same time

the men would get together at the door, with a number of clergy, according to the person’s

circumstances; and the corpse was carried by people of his own rank, with the solemnity of

candles and singing, to that church where the person had desired to be buried. This custom was

now laid aside; far from having a crowd of women to lament over them, great numbers passed

out of the world without a single person by their bed; few had the tears of their friends at their

departure; for even the women had learned to postpone every other concern to that of their own

lives. Nor was a corpse attended by more than ten or a dozen, nor were those citizens of credit,

but fellows hired for the purpose; who would put themselves under the bier, and carry it with all

 

 

5

 

possible haste to the nearest church; and the corpse was interred, without any great ceremony,

wherever they could find room.

 

Mass burials

With regard to the lower sort, and many of a middling rank, the scene was still more affecting;

for they staying at home either through poverty, or hopes of succor in distress, fell sick daily by

thousands, and, having nobody to attend them, generally died. Some breathed their last in the

streets, and others shut up in their own houses, and only the stench that came from them made

their deaths known to the neighborhood. And, indeed, every place was filled with the dead. A

method now was adopted by the neighbors, as pity for the dead, to clear all the houses, and lay

the dead bodies at the doors; and every morning great numbers might be seen brought out in this

manner; from whence they were carried away on biers, or tables, two or three at a time; and

sometimes it has happened that a wife and her husband, two or three brothers, and a father and

son, have been laid on together. There was no one to follow and shed a few tears over them; for

things were come to that pass, that men’s lives were no more regarded than the lives of so many

beasts. The consecrated ground no longer containing the numbers which were continually

brought thither, especially as they were desirous of laying everyone in the parts allotted to their

families; they were forced to dig trenches and to put them in by hundreds, piling them up in

rows, as goods are stowed in a ship, and throwing in little earth till they were filled to the top.

 

What more can I say? That between March and July, it is pretty certain that upwards of a

hundred thousand souls perished in the city only. What magnificent dwellings, what noble

palaces were then depopulated to the last person! What families extinct! What riches and vast

possessions left, and no known heir to inherit! What members of both sexes in the prime and

vigor of youth, who in the morning were in perfect health, after dining heartily with their friends

here, have supped with their departed friends in the other world!

“The Black Death, 1348,” Eye Witnesses to History, www.eyewitnesstohistory.com (2001)

***

3. Robert of Avesbury, (1349)

One reaction to the pestilence ravaging Europe in the late 1340s came from the Brotherhood of Flagellants (a group which also included women). These men and women thought that public self- whipping performed as a penitential rite might lessen God’s wrath against the sinful world and thus put an end to the untold suffering of the multitudes. Flagellation had been practiced in monasteries as a method of spiritual discipline, but had never before been turned into a public spectacle. The movement was active especially in the German-speaking areas. The Flagellants were not popular in England, but a large contingent of these public penitents did cross the English Channel in 1349 and came to London. Sir Robert of Avesbury witnessed their ritual and left a vivid description of it.

 

The pestilence which had first broken out in the land occupied by the Saracens became so much

stronger that, sparing no dominion, it visited with the scourge of sudden death the various parts

of all the kingdoms. […] It began in England in Dorsetshire, and immediately advanced from

 

http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/

 

6

 

place to place, attacking people without warning. Very many of those who were attacked in the

morning were carried out of human affairs before noon. And no one whom it [the pestilence]

willed to die did it permit to live longer than three or four days. […] And reaching London, it

deprived many of their life daily, and increased to so great an extent that from the feast of the

Purification [February 2 nd

, 1349] till after Easter [April 12 th

, 1349] there were more than two

hundred bodies of those who had died buried daily in the cemetery which had been then recently

made near Smithfield, besides the bodies which were in other graveyards.

 

In that same year of 1349, about Michaelmas [September 29], over six hundred men came to

London from Flanders, mostly of Flemish origin. Sometimes at St Paul’s and sometimes at other

points in the city, they made two daily public appearances wearing clothes from the thighs to the

ankles, but otherwise stripped bare. Each wore a cap marked with a red cross in front and behind.

 

Each had in his right hand a scourge with three tails. Each tail had a knot and through the middle

of it there were sometimes sharp nails fixed. They marched naked in a file one behind the other

and whipped themselves with these scourges on their naked and bleeding bodies.

 

Four of them would chant in their native tongue and, another four would chant in response like a

litany. Thrice they would all cast themselves on the ground in this sort of procession, stretching

out their hands like the arms of a cross. The singing would go on and, the one who was in the

rear of those thus prostrate acting first, each of them in turn would step over the others and give

one stroke with his scourge to the man lying under him.

 

This went on from the first to the last until each of them had observed the ritual to the full tale of

those on the ground. Then each put on his customary garments and always wearing their caps

and carrying their whips in their hands they retired to their lodgings. It is said that every night

they performed the same penance.

Norman Cohn ed., The Pursuit of the Millennium: Revolutionary Millenarians and Mystical Anarchists of the Middle Ages (1970)

The Impact of Mechanization

135 THE IMPACT OF MECHANIZATION (1889)

hour giving but a single turn to his knife, which separates a joint. . . . A hundred others are on the same floor with him, each doing what may seem a trilling portion of the work, but before the carcass, which came in on one side in quarters, leaves the room, it is entirely bere{t of bones, and then wheeled away in small pieces ready for the curing and the canning. . . . In this cise the division is made into the various pieces familiar to household providers, viz., loiru, ribs . . . “Extra mess” is composed of chucks, plates, rumps and flanks, and the time of curing is twenry-four days. All hams are cut into three pieces, or”one-set”; time of curing, sixty days. Plates are cut into five pieces. Loins, ribs, and shoulders are also sold to the city butchers. “Prime” tallow is made from the kidney and caid fat only, while “regular” tallow is made from the other fat, bones and trimmings. Glue factories and fertilizing establish- ments use up the bones and refuse, and the hides find their way to the tan- neries. Not a scrap of the animal is wasted, or fails to yield some revenue to the buver.

1 3 6

T h e l m p a c t o f M e c h a n i z a t i o n ( 1 8 8 9 )

The rapid adaptation oJ machinery Jor mass production created signifcant transforma- tions in the Aweican econoffiy in the post-CivilWar period.The author oJ thefol- Iowing exeerpt, Dauid A.Welk, realized the consequences of the machine age for both the business community anil society. His background as an inuentor, publisher of scien- tfic information, political actiuist, and a foremost economist who aduised Presidents Uncoln, Carfeld, and Crant on business and eurrency natters gave Wells a unique per- spectiue to obserue the technological changes taking place anil to analyze their implica- tions. In his book Recent Economic Changes, WeIk ofered a coffifttentary on the grouing size of businesses and how that afected the nature of enterprise. Wells was also among the ftst eeonomists to retognize that machines dkplaced workers-creating “technologieal unemployment”-4nfl that business was changing American society. His obseruations indicate that both business and society were adjusting to the technological progress of the time.

Q u e s t i o n s t o C o n s i d e r

1. According to DavidA.Wells, what were the most dramatic changes tak- ing place?

2. For what reasons does’Wells call these changes a “total revolution”?

3. To what extent can the common person participate in the economic advances described here?

4. In what ways would the American people respond ro rhe new methods of doing business?

 

 

3 1 0 C H A P T E R 1 8 T H E E X P A N S I O N O F B I G B U S I N E S S

Machinery is now recognized as essential to cheap production. Nobody can produce effectively and economically without it, and what was formerly known as domestic manufacture is now almost obsolete. But machinery is one of the most expensive of all products, and its extensive purchase and use require an amount of capital far beyond the capacity of the ordinary individ- ual to furnish. There are very few men in the world possessed of an amount of wealth suficient to individually construct and own an extensive line of rarlway or telegraph, a first-class steamship, or a great factory. It is also to be remembered that, for carrying on production by the most modern and effec- tive methods, large capital is needed, not only for machinery but also for the purchasing and carrying of extensive stocks of crude material and finished products.

. . . Hence, from such conditions have grown up great corporations or stock companies, which are only forms of associated capital organized for effective use and protection. They are regarded to some extent as evils; but they are necessary as there is apparendy no other way in which the work of production and distribution, in accordance with the requirements of the age, can be prosecuted. The rapidiry however, with which such combinations of capital are organizing for the purpose of promoting industrial and commer- cial undertakings on a scale heretofore wholly unprecedented, and the ten- dency they have to crystalize into something far more complex than what has been farniliar to the public as corporations, with the impressive names of syndicates, trusts, etc., also constitute one of the remarkable features of mod- ern business methods. It must also be admitted that the whole tendency of recent economic development is in the direction of limiting the area within which the inlluence of competition is effective.

And when once a great association of capital has been effected, it becomes necessary to have a mastermind to manage it-a man who is competent to use and direct other men, who is fertile in expedient and quick to note and profit by any improvements in methods of producrion and variatioru in prices. Such a man is a general of industry and corresponds in position and func- tions to the general of an army.

‘What, as a consequence, has happened to the employees? Coincident

with and as a result of this change in the methods of production, the modern manufacturing system has been brought into a condition analogous to that of a military organization, in which the individual no longer works as inde- pendently as formerly, but as a private in the ranks, obeying orders, keeping step, as it were, to the tap of the drum, and having nothing to say as to the plan of his work, of its final completion, or of its ultimate use and disaibu- tion. In short, the people who work in the modern factory are, as a rule, taught to do one thing*to perform one, and generally a simple, operation;

David A.Wells, Reant &onomk Chargo (NwYork, 1889),91-94,98, 109, 111

 

 

136 THE IMPACT OF MECHANIZATION (1889) 3 1 1

and when there is no more of that kind of work to do, they are in a measure he$less. The result has been that the individualism or independence of the producer in manufacturing has been in ^ great degree destroyed, and with it has also in a great degree been destroyed the pride which the workman for- merly took in his work-that fertility of resource which formerly was a spe- cial characteristic ofAmerican workmen, and that element of skill that comes from long and varied practice and reflection and responsibility. Not many years ago every shoemaker was or could be his own employer.The boots and shoes passed direcdy from an individual producer to the corxumer. Now this condition of things has passed away. Boots and shoes are made in large facto- ries; and machinery has been so utilized, and the division of labor in connec- tion with it has been carried to such an extent, that the process of making a shoe is said to be divided into sixry-four parts, or the shoemaker of to-day is only the sixry-fourth part of what a shoemaker once was. . . .

Another exceedingly interesting and developing feature of the new situa- tion is tlut, as machinery has destroyed the handicrafts and associated capital has placed individual capital at a disadvantage, so machinery and associated capi- tal in turn, guided by the same cofirmon influences, now war upon machin- ery and other associated capital. Thus the now well-ascertained and accepted fact, based on long experience, that power is most economically applied when applied on the largest possible scale, is rapidly and inevitably leading to the concentration of manufacturing in the largest establishments and the gradual extinction of those which are small. . . .

The same influences have also to a great degree revolutionized the nature of retail trade. . . . Experience has shown that, under a good organization of clerks, shopmen, porters, and distributors, it costs much less proportionally to sell a large amount of goods than a small amounr; and that the buyer of large quantities can, without sacrifice of satisfactory profit, afford to offer to his retail customers such advantages in respect to prices and range of selection as almost to preclude competition on the part of dealers operating on a smaller scale, no matter how otherwise capable, honest, *61 diligent they may be.The various retail trades in the cities and larger towns of all civilized countries are accordingly being rapidly superseded by vast and skillfully organized estab- lishments . . . which can sell at little over wholesale prices a great variery of merchandise, dry goods, manufactures of leather, books, stationery furs, ready-made clothing, hats and caps, and sometimes groceries and hardware, and at the same time give their customers far greater conveniences than can be offered by the ordinary shopkeeper or tradesman. . . .

From these specimen experiences it is clear that an almost total revolu- tion has taken place, and is yet in progress, in every branch and in every rela- tion of the world’s industrial and commercial system. Some of these changes have been eminendy destructive, and all of them have inevitably occasioned, and for a long time yet will continue to occasion, great disturbances in old methods and entail losses of capital and changes of occupation on the part of individuals. . . ,

FRENCH History HOMEWORK

1. Among the factions of the Third Republic that followed the Franco-Prussian War, who were the Communards?

  Those who wished to see the return of the empire and were also known as Bonapartists
  Followers of the Sedan army general Marshal McMahon.

 

  Supporters of Adolphe Thiers, leader of the Third Republic.
  Those who reverted to the ideals of the Revolution: separation of Church and State and the reinstitution of the Revolutionary calendar.

 

2. Which of the following was  not  one of the crises of the Third Republic?

  The Panama Affair
  Boulangisme

 

  The execution of Prime Minister Laval
  The Dreyfus Affair

 

3. Which queen ruled as regent until her son, Louis XIV, came of age and ascended to the throne?

  Clothilda
  Aliénor d’Aquitaine

 

  Anne d’Autriche (Anne of Austria)
  Mariguerite de Navarre

 

4. Which French king was the last under the Ancien Régime and the one to fall victim to the French Revolution?

  Louis XVI
  Henri IV

 

  Louis XVIII
  François I

 

5. Which 19th-century leader expanded and consolidated the French railway system, modernized the banking system, and among many other public works and social programs, promoted the building of the Suez canal?

  The Baron von Haussmann
  Louis-Philippe

 

  Napoleon III
  Napoleon I

 

6. Celtic people who inhabited the land now known as France were called _____.

  Gauls
  Franks

 

  Vikings
  Basques

 

7. Which king constructed the Chateau of Versailles?

  Louis XVI
  François I

 

  Charles X
  Louis XIV

8. Who is the patron saint of France?

  Marie Antoinette
  Philippe Le Bel

 

  Jeanne d’Arc (Joan of Arc)
  Marianne

 

 

 

9. The feudal practice of commendatio whereby a vassal takes an oath of allegiance to his lord began in France under which royal dynasty?

  The Capetians
  The Carolingians

 

  The Visigoths
  The Merovingians

 

10. Who founded the French Academy in 1635?

  Jacques du Tremblay
  Cardinal de Mazarin

 

  Cardinal Fleury
  Cardinal de Richelieu

 

11. What was Joan of Arc’s role in French history and why was she burned at the stake in 1431?

12. How far did the Carolingian Empire extend at its greatest point? Under whose leadership did this expansion occur?

13. What internal and external circumstances brought about the dissolution of the Carolingian Empire in the early years of the 10th century?

Why Are People Religious

Please review this assignment tutorial for help filling out this worksheet.

 

1) Select one aspect of culture from the list . Once you’ve made your selection, please delete all other options.

 

Religion

 

 

 

Week Three Assignment Worksheet

 

Page 2 of 2

 

2) Select a source to use for Part I of the paper. You will be using your textbook and the article by Miner for this part of the paper, but for this worksheet, include the source you found through your own research. Review the tutorial on Evaluating sources and enter your reference in the space below.

Reference entry in APA format:

 

“Why Are People Religious” (Richly H. Capro, reduction of anxiety, 7.1)

 

 

 

 

3) Include the reference for Part II that corresponds to the topic you’ve chosen. Copy and paste the reference entry from the table (e.g., if you chose Education, you would use the article by Jonsson for Part II). Ryan, L. (2011). Muslim women negotiating collective stigmatization: ‘We’re just normal people.’ Sociology, 45(6), 1045-1060. Retrieved from the SAGE Journals Online database.

 

 

 

4) Summarize the main points from each of your sources. See this guide for help with summarizing your sources.

Summary of your source for Part I (include one to two paragraphs, totaling at least 300 words). Enter your summary in the space below. This source basically tells how and why people are religious. There are man y reason on why biggest reasons why people are religious. Fear is another big reason why people are religious and also why they are afraid to question their religion. A lot of people just accept their religion because it is their tradition and can’t tell them wrong. Some people just want answers because they just don’t know.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary of your source for Part II (include one to two paragraphs, totaling at least 300 words). Enter your summary in the space below. This source talks about how individuals react to Muslim women were looked at in a different light after the 9/11 attacks. It interviews diverse women who practice the Muslim religion to show others that they are in fact, normal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

5) Write a working thesis statement based on your sources. See this example .

Working Thesis Statement: There are many reason why people are religious I will try and breakdown the reason why and explain them.