Criminal Minds

Rubric for NUR2488 A1&B1 Presentation on Criminal Minds: Due 11/20 @ 2359

Be sure each section is clearly delineated and covered in a 3–5-page body paper, double spaced, Plus a Care Plan HINT: Use the Headings provided – if you can’t find something, record as “unable to find” or guess as to what the answer may be (and say you are guessing). References and citations in APA 7 format (see example link);

Reporter’s name (you): Date:
Infamous Person: ___/30 points
1. Identify and present significance of: (Use these Numbered/ underlined headings)

A. childhood (2pts)

B. Late-adolescence (2)

C. Early 20’s (2)

D. Family Influence (2)

 
 

2. Diagnosis/treatment – (1)

 
 

Substance Abuse/ alcohol involved(1)

 
 

4. The Infamous Act/ Traumatic event/ Crime (2)

 
 

Incarceration/ Jail Where? (1)

 
 

6. Death or current circumstances (1)

 
 

How are all the above events tied together? (2)

 
 

How do the effects of an underlying (often untreated) Mental Illness contribute to a Human Being’s demise? (2)

 
 

9. What characteristics of a serial Killer do you see in your criminal? Consider these characteristics:

(Antisocial behavior, Arson, Torturing small animals, Poor family life, Childhood Abuse, Substance abuse, Voyeurism, Intelligence [hi or low], Shiftlessness). (2)

 
 

10 . Where could health care personnel/teachers have intervened in this child’s life to prevent this tragedy if it were NOW? Paragraph of Your opinion. (2)

 
 

11 Wanted poster (Like in the Old West) (1)

Example: https://s3.amazonaws.com/thumbnails.venngage.com/template/044f0593-a7ec-48ad-8560-6edda19ad66c.png

 
12.Choose 3 priority(3 part) NANDAMental Health Nursing diagnoses. The nursing care plan should include (4)

· Use MH Care Plan template and complete

· HINT: See Varcarolis or Ackley (Care Plan book)

 
13. @ least References and citations in APA 7 format (1) and paper submitted Sunday 11/20/22 (1)

APA 7 example: https://guides.rasmussen.edu/ld.php?content_id=51945674

Psychology Mod 6

Assessments Content

  1. Instructions
    Researchers must protect participants and be aware of appropriate methods for obtaining information. What ethical considerations are important to research? In about 2 pages, write an analysis of the ethical concerns in the 3 diverse psychological research studies below. Be sure to include a paragraph of overall ethical consideration.
    This paper should be 2-3 pages in length and use APA formatting (cover page, paper body formatting, citations, and references: see Rasmussen’s APA guide in the Resources tab, or by clicking here. Prior to submitting your paper, be sure you proofread your work to check your spelling and grammar. If you use any outside sources, please cite those sources in APA citation format. Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2012). Contesting the ‘nature’ of conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo’s studies really show. Plos Biology, 10(11), doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001426 Larsen, K. S. (1974). Conformity in the Asch experiment. The Journal Of Social Psychology, 94(2), 303-304. doi:10.1080/00224545.1974.9923224 Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B. J., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J., & … Shoda, Y. (2011). ‘Willpower’ over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive And Affective Neuroscience, 6(2), 252-256. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq081

Discuss The Concept Of “Difference.”

For years, the term diversity has been associated with specific parameters such as race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, etc. It is important that we continue to understand those dimensions of diversity to evolve our conversation to more global aspects of our cultural selves. The graphic (click link to) illustrates many dimensions of diversity that you may or may not have thought about.
https://rickladd.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/dimensions-of- diversity.png
1) Think of diversity in all of its dimensions and discuss the concept of “difference.” What does it mean to be “different”? How do you determine who or what is different? Be sure to address the following:
2) In your family (extended, or otherwise), community, and workplace, what dimensions do you think of when you think someone is “different” than you? Do you focus on different dimensions depending on those three contexts?
3) Of those dimensions you think of, which can be changed and which cannot be changed?
4) Of those dimensions you think of, which are visible and which are non-visible? What are the advantages and disadvantages to having non-visible dimensions of diversity rather than visible ones?
Your initial discussion post should be at least 400 words.

Biomedical Ethics

Florida National University

Biomedical Ethics: Week 5

Critical Reflection Paper: Chapter 9

 

ObjectiveTo critically replicate you’re thoughtful of the readings and your competence to rub on them to your Health care ethics.

ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES (10%):

Students will judgmentally appraise the readings from Chapter 9 on your textbook. This assignment is intended to help you assessment, examination, and spread over the readings to your healthcare ethics as well as become the foundation for all of your remaining assignments.

You need to read the article (in the additional weekly reading resources localize in the Syllabus and also in the Lectures link) assigned for week 1 and develop a 2-3-page paper reflecting your appreciative and ability to apply the readings to your ethics. Each paper must be typewritten with 12-point font and double-spaced with standard margins. Follow APA format 7th Edition, when referring to the selected articles and include a reference page.

EACH PAPER SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

 

1. Introduction (25%) Provide a short-lived summary of the undertone (not a description) of each Chapter and articles you read, in your own words.

2. Your Critique (50%)

*What is your response to the content of Chapter 9?

*What did you absorb about Ethics and Safe patient handling? Mention and explain two examples where you can apply them.

* What are the ethics arguments for advocacy on SPHM programs and behaviors?

*For the Professional role you have right now: what are the implications of this chapter for you?

3. Conclusion (15%)

Fleetingly recapitulate your thoughts & postulation to your analysis of the articles and Chapter you read. How did these articles and Chapters impact your thoughts about the principles of ethics?

Evaluation will be based on how clearly you respond to the above, in particular:

a) The clarity with which you critique the articles;

b) The depth, scope, and association of your paper; and,

c) Your conclusions, including a description of the impact of these articles and Chapters on any Health Care Setting.

Originality: SafeAssign submission required 

 

ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS

Assignments Guidelines 1.0 Points 10%
Introduction 2.5 Points 25%
Your Critique 5.0 Points 50%
Conclusion 1.5 Points 15%
Total 10 points 100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSIGNMENT GRADING SYSTEM

A 90% – 100%
B+ 85% – 89%
B 80% – 84%
C+ 75% – 79%
C 70% – 74%
D 60% – 69%
F 50% – 59% Or less.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Gisela LLamas