The Spanish who settled in Florida and New Mexico were primarily

Page 1 – Multiple Choice Questions

1. Question: (TCO 4) The Spanish who settled in Florida and New Mexico were primarily

2. Question: (TCO 1) What made Rhode Island unique?

3. Question: (TCO 4) Slave traders from the colonies

4. Question: (TCO 4) The French and Indian War was also called

5. Question: (TCO 2) At the First Continental Congress, delegates, such as Patrick Henry and John Adams, encouraged colonists to think of themselves as

6. Question: (TCO 2) In the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson refers to the natural rights due to every citizen as

7. Question: (TCO 2) Which is an advantage the British had over the Patriots at the beginning of the war?

8. Question: (TCO 1) Why was it difficult to make changes to the Articles of Confederation?

9. Question: (TCO 1) The Three-Fifths Compromise benefited _____ states.

10. Question: (TCO 3) The Corrupt Bargain of 1824 secured the presidency for

11. Question: (TCO 3) The creation of an integrated national economy became known as

12. Question: (TCO3) The bloodiest slave uprising in U.S. History was

13. Question: (TCO 3) Who led the Texans in drawing Santa Anna into a trap at the Battle of Jacinto?

14. Question: (TCO 2) Congress tried to resolve the dispute between the North and the South about slavery in the territories by

15. Question: (TCO 2) In 1856, Border Ruffians attacked

16. Question: (TCO 8) Lee’s smaller army defeated McClellan’s larger force and kept Union troops out of Richmond because

17. Question: (TCO 8) Which of the following characterizes Sherman’s march across Georgia?

18. Question: (TCO 10) Many immigrants came to the U.S. to avoid

19. Question: (TCO 10) How did the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire affect industrial reforms?

20. Question: (TCO 7) The invasion of Belgium turned American opinion against Germany because

21. Question: (TCO 7) What was the name of the agreement that ended World War I?

22. Question: (TCO 11) This trial became a symbol of the conflict within Protestantism between modernists and fundamentalists.

23. Question: (TCO 11) Prohibition was enforced by the

24. Question: (TCO 11) Which economic factors led to the Great Depression?

25. Question: (TCO 7) The three Allied leaders of World War II were

Page 2 – Essay Questions

1. Question: (TCOs 1 and 2) Identify and analyze at least two major actions taken by the English Parliament during the 1760s that angered the colonists, and discuss specifically at least one act that dealt with what the colonists viewed as unfair taxation. Then discuss the significance to the colonists of the Tea Act and the Coercive Acts and why these particularly galled the colonists. Make sure you use enough details to support your answer.

2. Question: (TCO 2) Identify and analyze the Dred Scott decision. Be sure to discuss the political reaction to this decision. Then analyze the election of 1860 and how the controversy over slavery divided the party into northern and southern branches. Analyze the ascendency of Abraham Lincoln to the presidency. Be sure to use enough details to support your answer.

3. Question: (TCOs 6 and 7) Identify and explain at least two causes of World War I. Then analyze the events that drew the United States into World War I. Evaluate America’s contribution to the war effort and to what extent America’s entry contributed to the end of the war. Make sure you use enough details to support your answer.

4. Question: (TCOs 7 and 9) Identify and analyze the main events of the Korean War and Cuban Missile Crisis. Then assess how these events affected the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union. Make sure you use enough details to support your answer.

The Circuit of Culture

The Circuit of Culture

Production

Industry

Expenses

Star and director salaries Below the line Marketing Distribution Studo overhead

Revenues

US box office Overseas box office DVDs

TV – US and International

PPV Premium cable Basic cable Network

Video/computer games Toys Soundtrack Books Theme-park rides Cross-promotional tie-ins (Happy Meals, etc)

Creators

Producers Director Screenwriters Actors Director of photography Editor Composer Art director Costume designer Makeup director Visual effects supervisor and so on . . .

Representation

Form

Screenplay

Narrative structure Characterization Dialogue

Visual design

Location Costumes Makeup Set decoration

Cinematography

Camera angle and framing Camera movement Lighting Image (lens, film stock, color, etc)

Editing

Shot length Degree of continuity/discontinuity Structure of time (compression, flashback, real-time, etc.)

Sound Diagetic

Dialogue Foley Motivated music

Nondiagetic (soundtrack)

Visual effects

CGI Computer-controlled cameras Miniatures Matte paintings

Acting Star image Acting style

Genre Adherence to/variation from generic expectations Hybridity

Ideology

Individual vs. community Nature vs. culture/technology Violence and its consequences Inequality Utopian or dystopian?

Reception

Critics Reviews Scholarship

Public

Box office Cinescore and other marketing surveys Online discourse Ethnographic research

Fans

Online communities Conventions Fan fiction Fan films

Identity

Race/ethnicity

Class

Gender

Sexuality

Age

Religion

Nation

Region

Cosmopolitanism

Regulation

Intellectual property regime

Trade agreements

Tax policy and subsidies

Censorship

Anti-trust law

Who Killed Reconstruction?

Reconstruction DBQ

 

North or South:

Who Killed Reconstruction?

 

 

“Is This a Republican Form of Government?

 

Is This Protecting Life, Liberty, or Property?”

 

http://www.negroartist.com/HARPERS%20WEEKLY/images/THIS%20A%20REPUBLICAN%20FORM%20OF%20GOVERNMENT_jpg.jpg

Source: Harper’s Weekly

September 1, 1868

 

 

 

Overview: The twelve years after the Civil War proved to be a difficult time for America. Called Reconstruction by historians, this era saw an increase of freedom for former slaves. However, there was also great resistance to change. In 1877, attempts to reconstruct the South officially ended, leaving white-only governments in power. This DBQ asks you to decide who, North or South, was most responsible for the end of Reconstruction.

Background

North or South: Who Killed Reconstruction

…the slave went free; stood a brief moment in the sun; then moved back again toward slavery. -W.E.B. Dubois

1876 was an exciting year for America. It was the 100th anniversary of The Declaration of Independence and America was on the move. Homesteaders and ranchers were filling up the land west of the Mississippi River. Railroads were being built at an astounding rate. It seemed the United States was creating enough opportunity that all Americans and millions of immigrants could pursue their hopes for happiness just as Thomas Jefferson had envisioned 100 years earlier.

So it is a great irony of history that the election of 1876 officially crushed the American dream for millions of black Americans. This election saw Rutherford B. Hayes, the Republican candidate and eventual winner, square off against Samuel J. Tilden, the Democratic nominee. Although Tilden won the popular vote by a wide margin, election results in Florida, South Carolina, and Louisiana were so close that a winner could not be determined. If these three states went for Hayes, he would win the Electoral College vote and become President.

Talk of a new Civil War was in the air as the opponents in the disputed states submitted separate sets of electoral ballots. An informal agreement, now called The Compromise of 1877, avoided the crisis by granting Hayes the Presidency. In return, Hayes promised to remove the last Federal soldiers from the South, almost guaranteeing that all-white governments would rise to power. The dream of Reconstruction was officially dead.

For a while, however, it had seemed that the dream of Reconstruction might be realized. The 13th Amendment ended slavery. The 14th Amendment gave black Americans citizenship and civil rights. A Military Reconstruction Act was passed to make sure African-Americans’ new rights were protected. Black churches were founded. Public schools were built for black children, and universities like Howard, Fisk, Morehouse, and Hampton were founded for black students seeking higher education. Sixteen African-Americans were elected to Congress and numerous others served at state and local levels. Finally, the 15th Amendment was ratified making it illegal to deny someone the right to vote based on race. Indeed, real progress was made.

However, in the early 1870s, the tide shifted. Southern states began to elect governments dedicated to whites-only rule. Between 1870 and 1876 all but three Southern states turned back Reconstruction efforts. When Rutherford B. Hayes agreed to remove federal soldiers, he was simply putting an end to an already dying effort. But dying or dead, what had gone wrong? Your job is to read the documents that follow and answer the question: North or South: Who killed Reconstruction?

 

1. Why was 1876 an important year for America? ________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2. Who ran for President in 1876? What were their political parties? ________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

 

3. An “irony” is something you don’t expect, something that doesn’t seem to fit. What was the irony of history

that occurred in 1876? ______________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

4. What was the Compromise of 1877? Who got what? ____________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

5. Describe each of the following Amendments to the Constitution.

a. 13th Amendment: ________________________________________________________________________

b. 14th Amendment: ________________________________________________________________________

c. 15th Amendment: ________________________________________________________________________

Document A

 

Source: In the years following the Civil War – throughout the South -state, city, and town governments passed laws to restrict the rights of free African-American men and women. These laws were often called “Black Codes.” The example below of “Black Codes” comes from laws passed in Opelousas, Louisiana immediately after the Civil War.

 

1. “No negro or freedmen shall be allowed to come within the limits of the town of Opelousas without special permission from his employers. Whoever breaks this law will go to jail and work for two days on the public streets, or pay a fine of five dollars.”

 

2. “No negro or freedman shall be permitted to rent or keep a house in town under any circumstances. No negro or freedman shall live within the town who does not work for some white person or former owner.”

 

3. “No public meetings of negroes or freedmen shall be allowed within the town.”

 

4. “No freedman shall be allowed to carry firearms, or any kind of weapons. No freedman shall sell or exchange any article of merchandise within the limits of Opelousas without permission in writing from his employer.”

 

5. “Every negro is to be in the service of (work for) some white person, or former owner.”

 

Document Analysis

 

6. How did black codes restrict the freedom of freedmen? _________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Document B

http://www.mrssearsweb.net/texas_1.jpg Document Analysis

 

7. Based on the document above and your knowledge of U.S. history, what was the real end result of sharecropping?

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Document C

 

Source: Albion Tourgee, Letter on Ku Klux Klan Activities. New York Tribune, May 1870.

 

Note: Tourgee was a white, Northern soldier who settled in North Carolina after the War. He served as a judge during Reconstruction and wrote this letter to the North Carolina Republican Senator, Joseph Carter Abbott.

 

 

It is my mournful duty to inform you that our friend John W. Stephens, State Senator from Caswell, is dead. He was foully murdered by the Ku-Klux in the Grand Jury room of the Court House on Saturday… He was stabbed five or six times, and then hanged on a hook in the Grand Jury room… Another brave, honest Republican citizen has met his fate at the hands of these fiends…

I have very little doubt that I shall be one of the next victims. My steps have been dogged for months, and only a good opportunity has been wanting to secure to me the fate which Stephens has just met… I say to you plainly that any member of Congress who, especially if from the South, does not support, advocate, and urge immediate, active, and thorough measures to put an end to these outrages…is a coward, a traitor, or a fool.

 

http://orgs.bsc.edu/libref/Hubbs_podcast/images/image012.jpg

Source: Independent Monitor, September 1, 1868.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Document Analysis

 

8. What group(s) is the KKK threatening? ______________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________

9. According to Tourgee, what types of people are being attacked by the KKK? Why would the KKK attack

these people? _____________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 10. How do these documents help answer the DBQ question? _______________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Document D

Source: Abram Colby, testimony to a joint House and Senate Committee in 1872.

 

Note: Colby was a former slave who was elected to the Georgia State legislature during Reconstruction.

 

Colby: On the 29th of October 1869, [the Klansmen] broke my door open, took me out of bed, took me to the woods and whipped me three hours or more and left me for dead. They said to me, “Do you think you will ever vote another damned Radical ticket?” I said, “If there was an election tomorrow, I would vote the Radical ticket.” They set in and whipped me a thousand licks more, with sticks and straps that had buckles on the ends of them.

 

Question: What is the character of those men who were engaged in whipping you?

 

Colby: Some are first-class men in our town. One is a lawyer, one a doctor, and some are farmers… They said I had voted for Grant and had carried the Negroes against them. About two days before they whipped me they offered me $5,000 to go with them and said they would pay me $2,500 in cash if I would let another man go to the legislature in my place. I told them that I would not do it if they would give me all the county was worth… No man can make a free speech in my county. I do not believe it can be done anywhere in Georgia.

http://www.issues4life.org/images/jimcrow2.jpg

 

Source: Harper’s Weekly, October 21, 1876.

 

 

 

 

Caption: “Of Course he wants to vote the Democratic ticket.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Document Analysis

 

11. Why did the KKK attack Abram Colby? _____________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________

12. According to Colby, what types of people make up the KKK? ___________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________

13. What seems to be the ultimate goal of the KKK? ______________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________

14. What is the main idea of the cartoon? _______________________________________________________

Document E

 

Source: Gerald Danzer et al., The Americans, McDougall Littell, 1998.

 

…in the 1870s, Northern voters grew indifferent to events in the South. Weary of the ‘Negro Question’ and ‘sick of carpet-bag’ government, many Northern voters shifted their attention to such national concerns as the Panic of 1873 and corruption in Grant’s administration….Although political violence continued in the South… the tide of public opinion in the North began to turn against Reconstruction policies.

 

Source: Kenneth Stampp, The Era of Reconstruction, 1865-1877, Vintage, 1967.

 

Meanwhile southern Democrats gained strength when Congress finally removed the political disabilities from most of the prewar leadership. In May 1872, because of pressure from the Liberal Republican, Congress passed a general amnesty act which restored the right of office holding [and voting] to the vast majority of those who had been disqualified…After the passage of this act only a few hundred ex-Confederates remained unpardoned.

 

Document Analysis

 

15. Explain the phrases “weary of the ‘Negro Question’” and “‘sick of carpet-bag’ government.”

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

16. Why might increased anger about the corruption in government lead to less interest in government

attempts to reconstruct the South? ___________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

17. How did the restoration of voting rights to white Southerners undermine efforts to preserve and protect

the voting rights of the freedmen? ____________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Document F

 

Source: Heather Cox Richardson, The Death of Reconstruction: Race, Labor and Politics in the Post-Civil War North, 1865-1901. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2001.

 

In the fall of 1873, even the staunchly (firmly) pro-Grant and pro-freedman Boston Evening Transcript ran a letter … arguing that “the blacks, as a people, are unfitted for the proper exercise of political duties…. The rising generation of … blacks needed a period of probation and instruction; a period … long enough for the black to have forgotten something of his condition as a slave and learned much of the true method of gaining honorable subsistence and of performing the duties of any position to which he might aspire.

 

Northern artist’s portrayal of the South Carolina State Legislature during Reconstruction.

 

http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium-large/colored-rule-in-a-reconstructed-state-everett.jpg Source: The Cover of Harper’s Weekly, March 14, 1874

 

Document Analysis

18. According to the letter from the Boston Evening Transcript, why did some people believe blacks were unfit to be government officials? How does this letter show racism existed in the North? ___________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

19. How do this cartoon & letter help explain why Northerners lost interest in Reconstruction?

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

20. How does the image above depict black politicians in the South? __________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Document G

 

 

 

 

Document Analysis

 

21. How was it possible that Hayes “won” the election of 1876? _______________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

 

22. How did this disputed election lead to the end of Reconstruction? __________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

1

World War One Op-Ed

2/4/2020 Opinion | Goodbye, Iowa – The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/04/opinion/iowa-caucuses-democrats.html 1/2

https://nyti.ms/2UoGDV3

Goodbye, Iowa The special treatment must end.

By David Leonhardt Opinion Columnist

Feb. 4, 2020, 9:28 a.m. ET

This article is part of David Leonhardt’s newsletter. You can sign up here to receive it each weekday.

Iowa should never go first again.

It should never go first again because it is an overwhelmingly white, disproportionately older state that distorts the presidential nominating process. In the 2020 campaign, Iowa’s outsize role has already helped doom two black candidates (Cory Booker and Kamala Harris) and given a boost to candidates whose main appeal has been among white voters (like Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar). Iowa’s Democrats look nothing like the nation’s Democrats, as Michael Tomasky explained in a Times Op-Ed.

Iowa should never go first again because its caucus excludes even some of its own citizens from voting. Absentee voting is not allowed. Thousands of people with disabilities can’t participate, as Ari Berman (a native Iowan) of Mother Jones noted. Neither can many people who work at night or need to take care of children, as Judd Legum wrote in his newsletter. And the votes from Iowa’s metropolitan areas don’t count as much as votes from rural areas.

Iowa should never go first again because the caucus is rife with strange, complicated rules. One example: Somebody’s vote — even for one of the leading candidates — typically does not count if it comes in a place where that candidate doesn’t get at least 15 percent of the local vote. “These rules are complicated,” The Times’s Nate Cohn noted. “There are ordinary people out there trying to make sense of these rules in running these caucuses.” Many of them struggled.

Iowa should never go first again because last night it botched its caucus when the entire nation was watching, giving the lie to the state’s longtime claim that it is better at conducting democracy than the rest of us. Last night, The Times’s Sydney Ember and Reid Epstein wrote, was “an epic collapse of the rickety system Iowa has relied on for decades.”

The Democratic Party can easily fix this situation, as Tomasky (who’s the editor of the journal, Democracy) laid out. Iowa has enjoyed a half-century of an outsize role in presidential campaigns, with all of the extra influence and economic activity that has come with that role. It’s time for the special treatment to end.

As soon as the 2020 campaign is over, the Democratic Party (and ideally the Republicans too — although Democrats shouldn’t wait) should begin creating a fairer, more inclusive, more competent process. Iowa will no doubt object and try to protect its status, as it has long done. The Democratic Party shouldn’t back down.

And when Iowa finally does report its 2020 results, don’t give them too much attention. If there is one silver lining to last night’s mess, it’s that Iowa has undermined its own influence.

For more …

Amy Walter, The Cook Political Report: “Every four years I say: ʻThese Caucuses are a mess. No way can they survive.’ And, every 4 years, here we are again.”

My colleague Frank Bruni, about last night: “Hours after the actual, physical caucusing at hundreds of locations across the state had finished, there were no official results, just reports that a newly intricate manner of counting was laborious, that a newly developed app for it wasn’t working as planned, that a backup phone line was jammed and that the campaigns had been asked to join in on a pair of emergency conference calls with state Democratic officials.”

Dave Wasserman, an election analyst for NBC News and The Cook Political Report, said the partial results reported made him think either Bernie Sanders or Pete Buttigieg won. Elizabeth Warren likely finished second or third, and Joe Biden probably finished fourth or fifth, Wasserman said.

If so, that’s a good encapsulation of the trouble with Iowa. Biden has led in almost every national poll of Democrats, largely on his strength among African-American and Latino voters — who, of course, are largely irrelevant in Iowa. That doesn’t mean Biden will hold his lead as voters pay more attention. He may not. But it does mean that a nearly all- white caucus is a poor guide to public opinion.

Politico’s Tim Alberta, who moderated a recent Democratic debate, pointed out that New Hampshire, which votes next week, has similar problems: “You know how, in pro sports, a series doesn’t start until the home team loses? Well, a Democratic primary doesn’t start until blacks and Hispanics vote.”

If you are not a subscriber to this newsletter, you can subscribe here. You can also join me on Twitter (@DLeonhardt) and Facebook.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/
https://www.nytimes.com/by/david-leonhardt
https://www.nytimes.com/by/david-leonhardt
https://www.nytimes.com/newsletters/opiniontoday?action=click&module=Intentional&pgtype=Article
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/26/opinion/iowa-new-hampshire-primary.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/02/opinion/iowa-new-hampshire-primary.html
https://twitter.com/AriBerman/status/1224499120586612736
https://popular.info/
https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/1224533312745672705
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/04/us/politics/iowa-caucus-problems.html?action=click&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/02/opinion/iowa-new-hampshire-primary.html
https://twitter.com/amyewalter/status/1224550882454507520
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/04/opinion/iowa-caucus-2020.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
https://twitter.com/Redistrict/status/1224650173739040768
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html
https://twitter.com/TimAlberta/status/1224522872577720323
https://www.nytimes.com/newsletters/david-leonhardt
https://twitter.com/DLeonhardt
https://www.facebook.com/DavidRLeonhardt/
https://www.facebook.com/nytopinion
http://twitter.com/NYTOpinion
https://www.instagram.com/nytopinion/

 

2/4/2020 Opinion | Goodbye, Iowa – The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/04/opinion/iowa-caucuses-democrats.html 2/2

David Leonhardt, a former Washington bureau chief for The Times, was the founding editor of The Upshot and the head of The 2020 Project, on the future of the Times newsroom. He won the 2011 Pulitzer Prize for commentary, for columns on the financial crisis. @DLeonhardt • Facebook

 

https://www.nytimes.com/projects/2020-report/index.html
https://twitter.com/DLeonhardt
https://www.facebook.com/DavidRLeonhardt