Wk 4 – Social Inequality In The Media

December 1, 2022/in Uncategorized /by SK

Assignment Content

Watch 30–60 minutes of a production from current media that illustrates examples of social stratification and inequalities, such as a sitcom, drama, movie, or documentary. Examples include productions like Blackish, Sons of Anarchy, Family Guy, Empire, CSI, BlacKkKlansman, Chicago Fire, Orange is the New Black, NCIS, When They See Us, Pose, Game of Thrones, or Law & Order. Contact your instructor for approval if you are unsure if a certain media production fits the assignment.
Take notes while you watch to record examples of the behavior patterns that reflect social stratification and inequality.

Refer to the Reading Guide: Deviance, Social Stratification, and Inequality for more information on theoretical perspectives on these topics to assist with this assignment.

Write a 400- to 600-word paper in which you discuss the TV show or film as it relates to race, gender, and social class stratification. Include the following:
- Provide the name of the show or film you selected and a brief summary of the plot and setting of the story.
- Identify and describe at least one example of social deviance that you observed. Which social structures or norms could have contributed to this act of deviance?
- Identify and describe at least two examples of sociological inequalities that you observed. Which social structures or norms could have contributed to these inequalities?
- Indicate the theoretical perspective—functionalist, conflict, or symbolic interactionist—that you would use to explain the social inequalities you observed. Explain your reasons for choosing this perspective.
- Make connections between the social stratification of class, race, and gender that you observed in the TV show or film, and the ways that it represents inequality in our society.
- Submit your assignment.

Chapter 12 Quiz – Gain Compliance with the Law

December 1, 2022/in Uncategorized /by SK

Chapter 12 Quiz – Gain Compliance with the Law

TRUE/FALSE

1. Crime control policies have traditionally relied on external authority, such as law enforcement and punitive sentence, but procedural justice policies seek to cultivate internally based voluntary obligation

2. Where you have lawfulness you always find legitimacy.

3. Domestic violence offenders had lower recidivism rates when they felt they were treated fairly in the criminal justice system.

4. Procedural justice issues appear to contribute to law-abiding behavior in terms of minor offenses but the effect on serious crimes is not yet known.

5. The most important injustices are the visible action of police that involve beat meetings.

6. Research evidence shows the injustice of racial bias in the criminal justice system to be perceived but not real.

7. In response to the overreach of criminal behavior, some have recommended the law be used sparingly and focus on high consensus offenses that cause harm.

8. A lack of consensus over criminal behavior contributes to the appearance of arbitrary law enforcement which can result in cynicism about law enforcement.

9. The practical consequences of making certain behavior illegal include the development of criminal syndicates as well as the possibility of corruption of the criminal justice system.

10. The flawed crime control strategy underlying decriminalization of public order offenses assumes it would give police more time to concentrate on serious crimes.

11. Thirty seven states prohibit sodomy, but the remaining states have decriminalized it.

MULTIPLE CHOICE

1. The ultimate goal of the CJS and other social institutions is to

maintain an orderly society

hold people accountable for their actions

help people adjust to their social environment

maintain the economic and political social order

all of the above

2. The difference between traditional crime control policies and procedural justice policies is

procedural justice policies demand rigorous evidence-based evaluations of their effectiveness whereas traditional crime control policies did not

liberals and conservatives conflicted over traditional crime control policies but are largely in agreement when it comes to procedural justice policies

traditional policies rely on external coercion to get people to obey the law whereas procedural justice policies seek to cultivate voluntary compliance with the law

traditional crime control policies tend to be expensive to implement and subject to evasion by the courtroom workgroup whereas procedural justice policies are not

3. Tyler argues that a critical factor in people’s complying with the law is

they are aware of the law

they understand the consequences

perceived legitimacy of the law

all of the above

4. What is the difference between lawfulness and legitimacy?

the two terms can be used interchangeably

lawfulness refers to liberal policies while legitimacy refers to conservative policies

lawfulness refers to citizens while legitimacy refers to the justice system

lawfulness refers to behavior while legitimacy refers to perception

5. _____(1)_____ involves case outcomes while _____(2)_____ depends on how people feel they were treated.

(1) lawfulness (2) legitimacy

(1) distributive justice (2) procedural justice

(1) legitimacy (2) cumulative disadvantage

(1) procedural justice (2) perception

6. One of the key variables in people’s satisfaction with a system is the sense that

they have an opportunity to participate and express their point of view

it does not rely on coercive authority as a mechanism for gaining compliance

the system promotes the greatest good for the greatest number

the system itself displays lawful behavior

7. In studies of procedural justice, it was found that offenders who perceived they were treated fairly by criminal justice agents

recidivated at a higher rate

were more likely to accept plea negotiations without an attorney

impacted their level of satisfaction and recidivism rates

only committed minor offenses

8. Tyler’s research found that a sense of justice contributes to law-abiding behavior, but a limitation of the study was that he only asked people about what?

juvenile delinquency

domestic violence

victimless crimes

minor offenses

9. The importance of procedural justice in relation to people’s perceptions has been examined in which part(s) of the criminal justice system?

law enforcement

law enforcement and sentencing

trial proceedings

sentencing and reentry

10. Examples of building relations with the community include

domestic violence treatment programs

sex offender notification

community policing and citizen oversight

juries

11. Racial profiling appears to be

perceived by communities and supported by research evidence

compliant as well as lawful with police departments tracking incidents

not conclusively supported by data, but police departments take proactive steps to reduce incidents

the product of unlawful discrimination

12. There is evidence of significant racial disparity in the enforcement of

murder

gambling

burglary

drugs

13. Decriminalization has generally been a _____(1)_____ policy recommendation, but a number of prominent _____(2)_____ now support the legalization of drugs.

(1) conservative (2) liberals

(1) public (2) police chiefs

(1) liberal (2) conservatives

(1) police chief’s (2) liberals

14. Which of the following is the most accurate statement regarding decriminalization?

decriminalizing all forms of sports betting has been suggested, but not casino gambling

decriminalizing the purchase, possession and use of cocaine but not marijuana has been suggested

decriminalization of sexual activity between adults and between an adult and a 16 year old has been suggested

decriminalization of public drunkenness has been suggested, but not drunk driving

15. The basic assumption underlying decriminalization is the belief that the criminal law in the United States covers __________ behavior.

the wrong

too much

immoral

old fashioned

16. The overreach of the criminal law has several undesirable consequences including

an overburdened justice system with fewer resources for serious crimes

a lack of public consensus over criminalized behavior

a black market and police corruption

all of the above

none of the above

17. A lack of public consensus over criminalized behavior that results from the overreach of the criminal law relates to

lawfulness

procedural justice

legitimacy

distributive justice

18. Many public health experts believe the problems associated with drinking, gambling and sex should be addressed

as social, psychological and medical problems

through strategies involving threats and coercive authority

by the criminal justice system

these are private choices that should not be addressed by the CJS

19. The terms of the decriminalization debate involve what?

whether the law should express basic values of society

the role of the criminal law and moral standards

responding to dramatic values shifts from generation to generation

which ideological beliefs are held by liberals and conservatives

20. The issue regarding the use of the criminal law to express the values of society is

whether this is outdated view of the law that should be modified through decriminalization

whether a government has enough power to change the values of its citizens

Not whether the law should express the values but which values to express

How to criminalize only those behaviors that are considered morally wrong

all of the above

21. Select the most accurate statement regarding the impact of decriminalizing public disorder crimes.

research on zero-tolerance policing indicates that decriminalization will lead to an increase in serious crimes

research on policing indicates that the attempt to decriminalize would be evaded by police and would simply lead to arrests for alternative offenses

decriminalization saves police time and resources but this will not translate to a reduction in serious crime

decriminalization has already been mandated under Easter v. District of Columbia and early research indicates a reduction in serious crime

22. Arrest trends regarding public order offenses indicate that

they have contributed substantially to crime declines in New York City

police have been evading the mandate set forth in Easter v. District of Columbia

they have recently been on the upswing in large urban areas

they have been de-emphasized by police for many years

23. The decriminalization of abortion in the U.S.

occurred in the 1973 Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade

occurred in the 1966 Supreme Court decision Easter v. District of Columbia

has already begun informally as the number of arrests has fallen for years

could never garner enough public support to occur

24. Decriminalization of which type of offense has been argued to have contributed to the recent crime drop?

public disorder crimes

sex between consenting adults

gambling

abortion

25. Sodomy laws

were declared constitutional in Lawrence v. Texas

were declared unconstitutional in Lawrence v. Texas

were declared constitutional in Easter v. District of Columbia

were declared unconstitutional in Easter v. District of Columbia

26. The form of sex between consenting adults that may be connected to predatory crime is

sodomy

fornication

homosexuality

prostitution

27. In states that have created lotteries and authorized casino gambling

many popular forms of illegal gambling continue to flourish

police resources have been freed to focus on more serious crime

evidence consistently indicates that legalized gambling leads to higher crime rates

The legitimacy of the CJS has increased for Native American tribes

28. Benefits of decriminalizing gambling include

a consistent decline in predatory crime

undercutting the economic basis of organized crime

the tendency to also decriminalize prostitution

there are no benefits to decriminalizing gambling

29. The argument that legal gambling leads to an increase in crime is

substantiated by the data collected

less likely to occur in casinos run by Native Americans

more likely to occur in cities with riverboat gambling

unsubstantiated as there is no consistent evidence of the connection

Property Crime And Typologies Performance Task

December 1, 2022/in Uncategorized /by SK

Week 6

Property Crime and Typologies

Performance Task Assignment #2

Quick Links

Scenario

Task

Rubric

Document Library

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

© 2017 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. Page 2 of 30

Scenario Case Number: 0998881 Date: 20 May 2016 Reporting Officer: Colt Winchester Incident Type: Property Crime Address of Occurrence: 222 Citation Way, Happy Town, GA 15486 Witnesses: Clifford Tonell: Store owner, Male, 48, White Bo Foot: Security Officer (Employee), Male, 76, White Andrea Sianturi: Employee, Female, 27, Asian American Susan Bunion: Customer: Female, 35, Asian American Weapon/Objects Used: On May 20, 2016, at approximately 18:00, officers responded to the Socks for Feet Outlet located at 222 Citation Way. According to the Socks for Feet Security Officer Bo Foot, three people entered the store and began walking down the Big Feet area of the store. Security Officer Bo Foot observed suspect one take three dozen pairs of the Big Guy brand socks and place them down his pants. Security Officer Bo Foot then followed the three suspects into the Hammer Toe section of socks where Security Officer Bo Foot observed suspect two place two dozen pairs of the Hang Nail Free brand of socks into suspect three’s purse. As Security Officer Bo Foot approached the suspects the suspects began to run. As Suspect one began to run he bumped Security Officer Foot causing him to fall to the floor. All three suspects ran out of the store into the back parking lot of the store. The store owner Clifford Tonell identified the three suspects as: Suspect (1) Bubba Hurt Suspect (2) Skeeter Redrum Suspect (3) Summer Breeze Please refer to inventory sheet for cost of merchandise stolen. All three suspects were later apprehended and arrested at the Just for Kicks Martial Arts studio located at 626 Felony Drive. All of the property was recovered inside Skeeter Redrum’s 1969 Ford Pinto.

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

Task 1. Your task as the District Attorney is to determine what charges, if any, and the penalties

(refer to Penalty Sheet in the Document Library) for such charges, for all three individuals involved in this incident. You should base your answer on an understanding of the definitions by reviewing the Criminal Code for the State of Georgia: Title 16 Crimes and Offenses: Offenses involving Theft found in the Document Library.

● Please refer to the inventory sheet for the cost of merchandise stolen.

2. Next, examine the crime scenario and give your opinion on whether the crime committed was done by amateurs or professionals. (refer to the Document Library)

3. Identify what type of criminal typology could be applied to the suspects based on your

lesson notes. (refer to the Document Library)

Formatting Requirements:

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

● Be four pages typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one- inch margins on all sides. All the information you need is in the Document Library.

● Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required assignment page length.

Self-Assessment Checklist:

Use this to check your work before you submit your assignment:

 My paper determines what charges, if any, and the penalties for the charges, if any.  My paper presents my opinion about whether the crime(s) committed were done by

amateurs or professionals.  My paper identifies the type of criminal typology that could be applied to the suspects.

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

Rubric Grading for this assignment will be based on the quality of your responses, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 250 Assignment 2: Property Crime and Typologies Performance Task

Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F

Fair 70-79% C

Proficient 80-89% B

Exemplary 90-100% A

1. Determine what charges, if any, and the penalties for such charges, for all three individuals involved in this incident. Weight 25%

Does not determine what charges, if any, and the penalties for such charges, for all three individuals involved in this incident.

Partially determines what charges, if any, and the penalties for such charges, for all three individuals involved in this incident. The charges and penalties need further development and supporting details.

Satisfactorily determines what charges, if any, and the penalties for such charges, for all three individuals involved in this incident. Most of the charges and penalties were determined; additional details would improve this section.

Thoroughly determines what charges, if any, and the penalties for such charges, for all three individuals involved in this incident.

2. Examine the crime scenario and give your opinion on whether the crime committed was done by amateurs or professionals. Weight: 25%

Does not examine the crime scenario and give your opinion on whether the crime committed was done by amateurs or professionals.

Partially examines the crime scenario and starts to present an opinion on whether the crime committed was done by amateurs or professionals.

Satisfactorily examines the crime scenario and gives an opinion on whether the crime committed was done by amateurs or professionals. More supporting details about your opinion would improve this section.

Thoroughly examines the crime scenario and gives a solid, well-supported opinion on whether the crime committed was done by amateurs or professionals.

3. Identify what type of criminal typology could be applied based on your lesson notes. Weight: 25%

Does not identify what type of criminal typology could be applied.

Partially identifies what type of criminal typology could be applied. Additional details about the type of criminal typology would improve this section.

Satisfactorily identifies what type of criminal typology could be applied. Most of the details about criminal typology were provided.

Thoroughly identifies what type of criminal typology could be applied.

4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. Weight: 25%

More than 6 errors present.

5-6 errors present. 3-4 errors present. 0-2 errors present.

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

Document Library

CLERKS OFFICE: HAPPY TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT

INCIDENT INFORMATION FORM

Date:

20 May 2016

Case Number:

0998881

Reporting Officer:

Colt Winchester

ARRESTED DOB HEIGHT WEIGHT RACE GENDER PRIORS

BUBBA HURT 01/05/1990 6’05 290 lbs W M Y

SKEETER REDRUM

05/14/1992 6’0 185 lbs W M Y

SUMMER BREEZE

07/05/1996 5’07 145 lbs W F Y

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

CLERKS OFFICE: HAPPY TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT

INCIDENT INFORMATION FORM

WITNESS(S)

Date:

20 May 2016

Case Number:

0998881

Reporting Officer:

Colt Winchester

NAME ADDRESS PHONE # OCCUPATION AGE RACE GENDER

Clifford Tonell

110 FELONY DRIVE, HAPPY TOWN, GA.

444-555-777 STORE OWNER SOCKS FOR FEET 48 W M

Bo Foot

111 MISDEMEANOR DRIVE , HAPPY TOWN, GA.

444-111-3333

SECURITY OFFICER EMPLOYEE SOCKS FOR FEET

76 W M

Andrea Sianturi

136 FELONY CIRCLE HAPPY TOWN, GA.

444-999-4444 RETAIL SALES SOCKS FOR FEET 27 A F

Susan Bunion

128 FELONY LN. HAPPY TOWN, GA. 444-999-5555

CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTRUCTOR HAPPY TOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE

35 A F

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

SOCKS FOR FEET OUTLET INVENTORY SHEET

MAY 20, 2016

ITEM DESCRIPTION COST PER

PAIR OF SOCKS

PAIRS

MISSING TOTAL

MENS SOCKS BIG GUY BRAND $12.00 36 $432.00

MENS SOCKS HANG NAIL FREE $10.00 24 $240.00

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

STATE OF GEORGIA CRIMINAL HISTORY

Subject Name(s) BUBBA HERT (AKA) HURT, BUBBA BEAUREGARD Subject Description FBI Number State Id Number DOC Number

618079JA8 GA183246 (GA) 146023-A (GA)

Social Security Number Driver’s License Number

666-66-6666 S0055-2826-4895-L (GA)

Miscellaneous Numbers

Unknown

Sex Race Skin Tone

Male White Medium

Height Weight Date of Birth

6”05’ (2016-03-16) 290 Pounds (2016-03-16) 1990-01-05

Hair Color Eye Color Fingerprint Pattern

Black (2016-03-16) Brown (2016-03-16) COPO1317161817131918 (FPC)

Scars, Marks, and Tattoos

Code Description, Comments, and Images

Unknown Code (2016-03-16) SCAR LEG, RIGHT (GA00782800) Embedded Image (GA0782800;) (2016-03-16) Prison intake photo

Unknown Code (2016-03-16) SCAR CALF, RIGHT (GA0415000) Contact agency for image

PRCD L EAR (NCIC; (2016-03-16) PIERCED EAR, LEFT (GA0415000) Contact agency for image

Blood Type Medical Condition

Unknown Code Unknown Drug abuse

Place of Birth Citizenship Ethnicity

Georgia US (1990-01-05) White

about:blank

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

Marital Status Religion

Single (2016-03-16) Unknown (2016-03-16)

Employment

Employment as of 1985-09-11

Occupation Metal stamping

Employer Happy Metals, Inc.

Mailing Address 1000 Violation Road Happy County Happy, GA 001133 US

Residence

Residence as of 2016-05-11

Mailing Address 6025 N Misdemeanor St. Happy Town, GA.

Telephone 444-012-5469

Fingerprint Images

Type Comments and Images

Ten print set (1985-09-11) Contact agency for image (GA0415000)

Palmprint Images

Type Comments and Images

Both palms (1985-09-11) Contact agency for image (GA0415000) Juvenile

Photo Images

Type Comments and Images

Mugshot (2016-05-11) Contact agency for image (GA0415000)

DNA Data

Encoding Method Data and Comments

STR (1989-03-28) DNA locus data table follows (GA013415Y)

Locus Value Locus Value

Amelogenin X, Y CSF1PO 11, 12

D13S317 11 D16S539 12

D18S51 12, 17 D21S11 29.1, 32.2

D3S1358 14, 17 D5S818 11, 12

D7S820 9, 12 D8S1179 11

FGA 22, 24 TH01 6, 7

TPOX 8 vWA 14, 16

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

Criminal History

Cycle 001

Tracking Number 04151984375826

Earliest Event Date 2016-02-01

Arrest (Cycle 001)

Arrest Date 2016-02-01

Arresting Agency GA0415000

Subject Name(s) HURT, BUBBA BEAUREGARD

Offender ID Number 169591 (Police Dept)

Arrest Type Adult

Charge

Charge Number 01

Agency GA0415000

Charge Description SHOPLIFTING

Statute GA 943.10

NCIC Offense Code 2299

Counts 01

Severity Misdemeanor

Charge

Charge Number 02

Agency GA0415000

Charge Description UNIFORM CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT

Statute GA 161.41

NCIC Offense Code 3562

Counts 01

Severity Felony

Prosecutor Disposition (Cycle 001)

Prosecutor Agency GA041013A

Subject Name(s) Hurt, Bubba Beauregard

Charge Charge Number 01

Agency GA041013A

Charge Description Shoplifting

Statute GA 943.10

NCIC Offense Code 2299

Counts 01

Severity Felony

Disposition NO PROSECUTION (2016-03-13; Dismissed)

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

Charge Charge Number 02

Agency GA041013A

Charge Description UNIFORM CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT

Statute GA 161.41

NCIC Offense Code 3562

Counts 01

Severity Misdemeanor

Disposition NO PROSECUTION (2016-03-13; Dismissed)

Court Disposition No data supplied

Sentencing No data supplied

Corrections No data supplied

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

MEMORANDUM

To: Patrol Division From: Chief of Police Rodney Hurt Date: February 2, 2016 Subject: PROACTIVE EXPECTATIONS

The purpose of this memorandum is to establish increase patrols in Zone III of Happy Town. Both City Council and the Mayor are receiving numerous complaints from citizens in regards to the increase crime in Happy Town. In addition a recent News Article criticized our police professionalism.

As a result of a news story, and the concerns from our city leaders effectively immediately there will be designated patrol officers working with Vice and Narcotics to increase visibility and take a proactive approach in resolving this issue.

We will be closely monitoring the progress for the upcoming months to ensure the citizens of our city that they are safe. Remember, when it comes to enforcement efforts, our emphasis should be the quality of your service.

Rodney Hurt

Chief of Police Happy Town

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AMATUER AND PROFESSIONAL CRIMINALS

Setting aside our disgust at the disruption of our value system, there are three major differences between the professional property offender (thief) and an “amateur” thief. First, the professional has a diminished moral capacity and multiple victims, while the amateur’s damage is much more limited. Secondly, the professional plans ahead, has a modus operandi, and an outlet for his booty (fence). Thirdly, the professional can only be stopped by incarceration, while the amateur will stop when his situation changes, because his theft is often a crime of sociological pressure and temporary opportunity (addiction, extreme poverty, underlying psychological problems, etc.). In sum, the professional must be combated with all the forces of law, while the amateur needs more sociological and psychological help to get his behavior back on track. So the law’s identifying the difference is essential to the sociological remedy.

https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/explain-major-differences-between-professional-

372874

Georgia Codes

TITLE 16 – CRIMES AND OFFENSES

CHAPTER 8 – OFFENSES INVOLVING THEFT

ARTICLE 1 – THEFT

§ 16-8-1 – Definitions

O.C.G.A. 16-8-1 (2010) 16-8-1. Definitions As used in this article, the term: (1) “Deprive” means, without justification: (A) To withhold property of another permanently or temporarily; or (B) To dispose of the property so as to make it unlikely that the owner will recover it. (2) “Financial institution” means a bank, insurance company, credit union, building and loan association, investment trust, or other organization held out to the public as a place of deposit of funds or medium of savings or collective investment. (3) “Property of another” includes property in which any person other than the accused has an interest but does not include property belonging to the spouse of an accused or to them jointly.

§ 16-8-2 – Theft by taking

O.C.G.A. 16-8-2 (2010) 16-8-2. Theft by taking A person commits the offense of theft by taking when he unlawfully takes or, being in lawful possession

https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/explain-major-differences-between-professional-372874

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

thereof, unlawfully appropriates any property of another with the intention of depriving him of the property, regardless of the manner in which the property is taken or appropriated.

§ 16-8-3 – Theft by deception

O.C.G.A. 16-8-3 (2010) 16-8-3. Theft by deception (a) A person commits the offense of theft by deception when he obtains property by any deceitful means or artful practice with the intention of depriving the owner of the property. (b) A person deceives if he intentionally: (1) Creates or confirms another’s impression of an existing fact or past event which is false and which the accused knows or believes to be false; (2) Fails to correct a false impression of an existing fact or past event which he has previously created or confirmed; (3) Prevents another from acquiring information pertinent to the disposition of the property involved; (4) Sells or otherwise transfers or encumbers property intentionally failing to disclose a substantial and valid known lien, adverse claim, or other legal impediment to the enjoyment of the property, whether such impediment is or is not a matter of official record; or (5) Promises performance of services which he does not intend to perform or knows will not be performed. Evidence of failure to perform standing alone shall not be sufficient to authorize a conviction under this subsection. (c) “Deceitful means” and “artful practice” do not, however, include falsity as to matters having no pecuniary significance, or exaggeration by statements unlikely to deceive ordinary persons in the group addressed.

§ 16-8-4 – Theft by conversion

O.C.G.A. 16-8-4 (2010) 16-8-4. Theft by conversion (a) A person commits the offense of theft by conversion when, having lawfully obtained funds or other property of another including, but not limited to, leased or rented personal property, under an agreement or other known legal obligation to make a specified application of such funds or a specified disposition of such property, he knowingly converts the funds or property to his own use in violation of the agreement or legal obligation. This Code section applies whether the application or disposition is to be made from the funds or property of another or from the accused’s own funds or property in equivalent amount when the agreement contemplates that the accused may deal with the funds or property of another as his own. (b) When, under subsection (a) of this Code section, an officer or employee of a government or of a financial institution fails to pay on an account, upon lawful demand, from the funds or property of another held by him, he is presumed to have intended to convert the funds or property to his own use. (c)(1) As used in this subsection, the term “personal property” means personal property having a replacement cost value greater than $100.00, excluding any late fees and penalties, and includes heavy equipment as defined in paragraph (2) of Code Section 10-1-731 and tractors and farm equipment primarily designed for use in agriculture. (2) Any person having any personal property in such person’s possession or under such person’s control by virtue of a lease or rental agreement who fails to return the personal property within five days, Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays excluded, after a letter demanding return of the personal property has been mailed to such person by certified or registered mail or statutory overnight delivery, return receipt requested, at such

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

person’s last known address by the owner of the personal property or by the owner’s agent shall be presumed to have knowingly converted such personal property to such person’s own use in violation of such lease or agreement. (3) In the event that any personal property is not returned as provided for in the lease or rental agreement and the court orders the lessor or renter to pay replacement costs, replacement costs shall include but not be limited to: (A) The market value of the personal property. The market value shall be established by the owner of the property by providing from a supplier of such or reasonably similar personal property a current quotation of the value of the personal property which is of like quality, make, and model of the personal property being replaced. The value to be awarded shall be the higher of: (i) The value on the date when the conversion occurred; or (ii) The value on the date of the trial; (B) All rental charges from the date the rental agreement was executed until the date of the trial or the date that the property was recovered, if recovered; and (C) Interest on the unpaid balance each month at the current legal rate from the date the court orders the lessor or renter to pay replacement costs until the date the judgment is satisfied in full. (4) If as a part of the order of the court the lessor or renter is placed on probation, supervision of said probation shall not be terminated until all replacement costs, fees, charges, penalties, interest, and other charges are paid in full. All payments relative to this Code section shall be made to the appropriate court of jurisdiction and the court shall make distribution to the owner within 30 days of receipt thereof. (5) In the event that the owner incurs any expenses in the process of locating a lessor or renter who did not return any personal property according to the lease or rental agreement, the court shall provide that the lessor or renter reimburse the owner for those expenses which may include, but not be limited to, credit reports, private detective fees, investigation fees, fees charged by a law enforcement agency for such services as police reports, background checks, fees involved with swearing out a warrant for incarceration, and any other bona fide expenses.

§ 16-8-5 – Theft of services

O.C.G.A. 16-8-5 (2010) 16-8-5. Theft of services A person commits the offense of theft of services when by deception and with the intent to avoid payment he knowingly obtains services, accommodations, entertainment, or the use of personal property which is available only for compensation.

§ 16-8-5.1 – Circumstances permitting inference of intent to avoid payment; exceptions

O.C.G.A. 16-8-5.1 (2010) 16-8-5.1. Circumstances permitting inference of intent to avoid payment; exceptions The trier of fact may infer that the accused intended to avoid payment due for the rental or lease of any personal property in any prosecution pursuant to Code Section 16-8-2, relating to theft by taking; 16-8-3, relating to theft by deception; 16-8-4, relating to theft by conversion; or 16-8-5, relating to theft of services; if a person knowingly: (1) Used false identification; (2) Provided false information on a written contract; (3) Made, drew, uttered, executed, or delivered an instrument for the payment of money on any bank or other depository in exchange for present consideration, knowing that it would not be honored by the

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

drawee; (4) Abandoned any property at a location that is not the location agreed upon for return and that would not be reasonably known to the owner; (5) Returned any property to a location that would not reasonably be known to the owner without notifying the owner; or (6) Returned any property at a time beyond posted business hours of the owner. No person shall be convicted under Code Section 16-8-2, relating to theft by taking; 16-8-3, relating to theft by deception; 16-8-4, relating to theft by conversion; or 16-8-5, relating to theft of services; where there was an agreement to delay payment for such property or services or the accused makes payment in full within two business days after returning the property or obtaining the services.

§ 16-8-5.2 – Retail property fencing; forfeiture; related matters

O.C.G.A. 16-8-5.2 (2010) 16-8-5.2. Retail property fencing; forfeiture; related matters (a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) “Retail property” means any new article, product, commodity, item, or component intended to be sold in retail commerce. (2) “Retail property fence” means a person or entity that buys, sells, transfers, or possesses with the intent to sell or transfer retail property that such person knows or should have known was stolen. (3) “Value” means the retail value of the item as stated or advertised by the affected retail establishment, to include applicable taxes. (b) A person commits the offense of retail property fencing when such persons receives, disposes of, or retains retail property which was unlawfully taken or shoplifted over a period not to exceed 180 days with the intent to: (1) Transfer, sell, or distribute such retail property to a retail property fence; or (2) Attempt or cause such retail property to be offered for sale, transfer, or distribution for money or other things of value. (c) Whoever knowingly receives, possesses, conceals, stores, barters, sells, or disposes of retail property with the intent to distribute any retail property which is known or should be known to have been taken or stolen in violation of this subsection with the intent to distribute the proceeds, or to otherwise promote, manage, carry on, or facilitate an offense described in this subsection, shall have committed the offense of retail property fencing. (d) (1) It shall not be necessary in any prosecution under this Code section for the state to prove that any intended profit was actually realized. The trier of fact may infer that a particular scheme or course of conduct was undertaken for profit from all of the attending circumstances. (2) It shall not be a defense to violating this Code section that the property was obtained by means other than through the commission of a theft offense if the property was explicitly represented to the accused as being obtained through the commission of a theft. (e) Any property constituting proceeds derived from or realized through a violation of this Code section shall be subject to forfeiture to the State of Georgia except that no property of any owner shall be forfeited under this subsection, to the extent of the interest of such owner, by reason of an act or omission established by such owner to have been committed or omitted without knowledge or consent of such owner. The procedure for forfeiture and disposition of forfeited property under this subsection shall be as provided for under Code Section 16-13-49. (f) Each violation of this Code section shall constitute a separate offense.

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

§ 16-8-6 – Theft of lost or mislaid property

O.C.G.A. 16-8-6 (2010) 16-8-6. Theft of lost or mislaid property A person commits the offense of theft of lost or mislaid property when he comes into control of property that he knows or learns to have been lost or mislaid and appropriates the property to his own use without first taking reasonable measures to restore the property to the owner.

§ 16-8-7 – Theft by receiving stolen property

O.C.G.A. 16-8-7 (2010) 16-8-7. Theft by receiving stolen property (a) A person commits the offense of theft by receiving stolen property when he receives, disposes of, or retains stolen property which he knows or should know was stolen unless the property is received, disposed of, or retained with intent to restore it to the owner. “Receiving” means acquiring possession or control or lending on the security of the property. (b) In any prosecution under this Code section it shall not be necessary to show a conviction of the principal thief.

PENALTIES FOR THEFT

§ 16-8-12 – Penalties for violation of Code Sections 16-8-2 through 16-8-9

O.C.G.A. 16-8-12 (2010) 16-8-12. Penalties for violation of Code Sections 16-8-2 through 16-8-9 (a) A person convicted of a violation of Code Sections 16-8-2 through 16-8-9 shall be punished as for a misdemeanor except: (1) If the property which was the subject of the theft exceeded $500.00 in value, by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than ten years or, in the discretion of the trial judge, as for a misdemeanor; (2) If the property was any amount of anhydrous ammonia, as defined in Code Section 16-11-111, by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than ten years, a fine not to exceed the amount provided by Code Section 17-10-8, or both; (3) If the property was taken by a fiduciary in breach of a fiduciary obligation or by an officer or employee of a government or a financial institution in breach of his or her duties as such officer or employee, by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than 15 years, a fine not to exceed the amount provided by Code Section 17-10-8, or both; (4) If the crime committed was a violation of Code Section 16-8-2 and if the property which was the subject of the theft was a memorial to the dead or any ornamentation, flower, tree, or shrub placed on, adjacent to, or within any enclosure of a memorial to the dead, by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than three years. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as to cause action taken by a cemetery, cemetery owner, lessee, trustee, church, religious or fraternal organization, corporation, civic organization, or club legitimately attempting to clean, maintain, care for, upgrade, or beautify a grave, gravesite, tomb, monument, gravestone, or other structure or thing placed or designed for a memorial of the dead to be a criminal act; (5)(A) The provisions of paragraph (1) of this subsection notwithstanding, if the property which was the subject of the theft was a motor vehicle or was a motor vehicle part or component which exceeded $100.00 in value or if the theft or unlawful activity was committed in violation of subsection (b) of Code Section 10-1- 393.5 or in violation of subsection (b) of Code Section 10-1-393.6 or while engaged in telemarketing conduct in violation of Chapter 5B of Title 10, by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than ten years or, in

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

the discretion of the trial judge, as for a misdemeanor; provided, however, that any person who is convicted of a second or subsequent offense under this paragraph shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year nor more than 20 years. (B) Subsequent offenses committed under this paragraph, including those which may have been committed after prior felony convictions unrelated to this paragraph, shall be punished as provided in Code Section 17- 10-7; (6)(A) As used in this paragraph, the term: (i) “Destructive device” means a destructive device as such term is defined by Code Section 16-7-80. (ii) “Explosive” means an explosive as such term is defined by Code Section 16-7-80. (iii) “Firearm” means any rifle, shotgun, pistol, or similar device which propels a projectile or projectiles through the energy of an explosive. (B) If the property which was the subject of the theft offense was a destructive device, explosive, or firearm, by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than ten years; (7) If the property which was the subject of the theft is a grave marker, monument, or memorial to one or more deceased persons who served in the military service of this state, the United States of America or any of the states thereof, or the Confederate States of America or any of the states thereof, or a monument, plaque, marker, or memorial which is dedicated to, honors, or recounts the military service of any past or present military personnel of this state, the United States of America or any of the states thereof, or the Confederate States of America or any of the states thereof, and if such grave marker, monument, memorial, plaque, or marker is privately owned or located on privately owned land, by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than three years if the value of the property which was the subject of the theft is $300.00 or less, and by imprisonment for not less than three years and not more than five years if the value of the property which was the subject of the theft is more than $300.00; (8) If the property that was the subject of the theft was a vehicle engaged in commercial transportation of cargo or any appurtenance thereto, including without limitation any such trailer, semitrailer, container, or other associated equipment, or the cargo being transported therein or thereon, by imprisonment for not less than three years nor more than ten years, a fine not less than $5,000.00 nor more than $50,000.00, and, if applicable, the revocation of the defendant’s commercial driver’s license in accordance with Code Section 40- 5-151, or any combination of such penalties. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “vehicle” includes without limitation any railcar; or (9) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1) of this subsection, if the property of the theft was ferrous metals or regulated metal property, as such terms are defined in Code Section 10-1-350, and the sum of the aggregate amount of such property, in its original and undamaged condition, plus any reasonable costs which are or would be incurred in the repair or the attempt to recover any property damaged in the theft or removal of such regulated metal property, exceeds $500.00, by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years, a fine of not more than $5,000.00, or both. (b) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (5) of subsection (a) of this Code section, any person who commits the offense of theft by deception when the property which was the subject of the theft exceeded $500.00 in value and the offense was committed against a person who is 65 years of age or older shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not less than five nor more than ten years. (c) Where a violation of Code Sections 16-8-2 through 16-8-9 involves the theft of a growing or otherwise unharvested commercial agricultural product which is being grown or produced as a crop, such offense shall be punished by a fine of not less than $500.00 and not more than the maximum fine otherwise authorized by law. This minimum fine shall not in any such case be subject to suspension, stay, or probation. This minimum fine shall not be required in any case in which a sentence of confinement is imposed and such sentence of confinement is not suspended, stayed, or probated; but this subsection shall not prohibit imposition of any otherwise authorized fine in such a case.

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

§ 16-8-14 – Theft by shoplifting

O.C.G.A. 16-8-14 (2010) 16-8-14. Theft by shoplifting (a) A person commits the offense of theft by shoplifting when he alone or in concert with another person, with the intent of appropriating merchandise to his own use without paying for the same or to deprive the owner of possession thereof or of the value thereof, in whole or in part, does any of the following: (1) Conceals or takes possession of the goods or merchandise of any store or retail establishment; (2) Alters the price tag or other price marking on goods or merchandise of any store or retail establishment; (3) Transfers the goods or merchandise of any store or retail establishment from one container to another; (4) Interchanges the label or price tag from one item of merchandise with a label or price tag for another item of merchandise; or (5) Wrongfully causes the amount paid to be less than the merchant’s stated price for the merchandise. (b)(1) A person convicted of the offense of theft by shoplifting, as provided in subsection (a) of this Code section, when the property which was the subject of the theft is $300.00 or less in value shall be punished as for a misdemeanor; provided, however, that: (A) Upon conviction of a second offense for shoplifting, where the first offense is either a felony or a misdemeanor, as defined by this Code section, in addition to or in lieu of any imprisonment which might be imposed, the defendant shall be fined not less than $250.00 and the fine shall not be suspended or probated; (B) Upon conviction of a third offense for shoplifting, where the first two offenses are either felonies or misdemeanors, or a combination of a felony and a misdemeanor, as defined by this Code section, in addition to or in lieu of any fine which might be imposed, the defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than 30 days or confinement in a “special alternative incarceration-probation boot camp,” probation detention center, diversion center, or other community correctional facility of the Department of Corrections for a period of 120 days or shall be sentenced to monitored house arrest for a period of 120 days and, in addition to either such types of confinement, may be required to undergo psychological evaluation and treatment to be paid for by the defendant; and such sentence of imprisonment or confinement shall not be suspended, probated, deferred, or withheld; and (C) Upon conviction of a fourth or subsequent offense for shoplifting, where the prior convictions are either felonies or misdemeanors, or any combination of felonies and misdemeanors, as defined by this Code section, the defendant commits a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than ten years; and the first year of such sentence shall not be suspended, probated, deferred, or withheld. (2) A person convicted of the offense of theft by shoplifting, as provided in subsection (a) of this Code section, when the property which was the subject of the theft exceeds $300.00 in value commits a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than ten years. (3) A person convicted of the offense of theft by shoplifting, as provided in subsection (a) of this Code section, when the property which was the subject of the theft is taken from three separate stores or retail establishments within one county during a period of seven days or less and when the property which was the subject of each theft exceeds $100.00 in value, commits a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than ten years. (c) In all cases involving theft by shoplifting, the term “value” means the actual retail price of the property at the time and place of the offense. The unaltered price tag or other marking on property, or duly identified photographs thereof, shall be prima-facie evidence of value and ownership of the property. (d) Subsection (b) of this Code section shall in no way affect the authority of a sentencing judge to provide for a sentence to be served on weekends or during the nonworking hours of the defendant as provided in Code Section 17-10-3, relative to punishment for misdemeanors.

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

§ 16-8-16 – Theft by extortion

O.C.G.A. 16-8-16 (2010) 16-8-16. Theft by extortion (a) A person commits the offense of theft by extortion when he unlawfully obtains property of or from another person by threatening to: (1) Inflict bodily injury on anyone or commit any other criminal offense; (2) Accuse anyone of a criminal offense; (3) Disseminate any information tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt, or ridicule or to impair his credit or business repute; (4) Take or withhold action as a public official or cause an official to take or withhold action; (5) Bring about or continue a strike, boycott, or other collective unofficial action if the property is not demanded or received for the benefit of the group in whose interest the actor purports to act; or (6) Testify or provide information or withhold testimony or information with respect to another’s legal claim or defense. (b) In a prosecution under this Code section, the crime shall be considered as having been committed in the county in which the threat was made or received or in the county in which the property was unlawfully obtained. (c) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution based on paragraph (2), (3), (4), or (6) of subsection (a) of this Code section that the property obtained by threat of accusation, exposure, legal action, or other invocation of official action was honestly claimed as restitution or indemnification for harm done in the circumstance to which such accusation, exposure, legal action, or other official action relates or as compensation for property or lawful services. (d) A person convicted of the offense of theft by extortion shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than ten years.

§ 16-8-17 – Intent to cheat or defraud a retailer

O.C.G.A. 16-8-17 (2010) 16-8-17. Intent to cheat or defraud a retailer (a)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, a person who, with intent to cheat or defraud a retailer, possesses, uses, utters, transfers, makes, alters, counterfeits, or reproduces a retail sales receipt or a Universal Product Code label which results in a theft of property which exceeds $300.00 in value commits a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than three years or by a fine or both. (2) A person convicted of a violation of paragraph (1) of this subsection, when the property which was the subject of the theft resulting from the unlawful use of retail sales receipts or Universal Product Code labels is taken from three separate stores or retail establishments within one county during a period of seven days or less and when the property which was the subject of each theft exceeds $100.00 in value, commits a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than ten years. (b) A person who, with intent to cheat or defraud a retailer, possesses 15 or more fraudulent retail sales receipts or Universal Product Code labels or possesses a device the purpose of which is to manufacture fraudulent retail sales receipts or Universal Product Code labels will be guilty of a felony and punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than ten years.

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

§ 16-8-18 – Entering automobile or other motor vehicle with intent to commit theft or felony

O.C.G.A. 16-8-18 (2010) 16-8-18. Entering automobile or other motor vehicle with intent to commit theft or felony If any person shall enter any automobile or other motor vehicle with the intent to commit a theft or a felony, he shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years, or, in the discretion of the trial judge, as for a misdemeanor.

§ 16-8-21 – Removal or abandonment of shopping carts; posting of Code section in stores and markets

O.C.G.A. 16-8-21 (2010) 16-8-21. Removal or abandonment of shopping carts; posting of Code section in stores and markets (a) As used in this Code section, “shopping cart” means those pushcarts of the type which are commonly provided by grocery stores, drugstores, or other merchant stores or markets for the use of the public in transporting commodities in stores and markets and incidentally from the store to a place outside the store. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to remove a shopping cart from the premises, posted as provided in subsection (d) of this Code section, of the owner of such shopping cart without the consent, given at the time of such removal, of the owner or of his agent, servant, or employee. For the purpose of this Code section, the premises shall include all the parking area set aside by the owner or on behalf of the owner for the parking of cars for the convenience of the patrons of the owner. (c) It shall be unlawful for any person to abandon a shopping cart upon any public street, sidewalk, way, or parking lot other than a parking lot on the premises of the owner. (d) The owner of the store in which the shopping cart is used shall post in at least three prominent places in his store and at each exit therefrom a printed copy of this Code section, which copy shall be printed in type no smaller than 12 points. (e) Any person who violates subsection (b) or (c) of this Code section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

ARTICLE 2 – ROBBERY

§ 16-8-40 – Robbery

O.C.G.A. 16-8-40 (2010) 16-8-40. Robbery (a) A person commits the offense of robbery when, with intent to commit theft, he takes property of another from the person or the immediate presence of another: (1) By use of force; (2) By intimidation, by the use of threat or coercion, or by placing such person in fear of immediate serious bodily injury to himself or to another; or (3) By sudden snatching. (b) A person convicted of the offense of robbery shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than 20 years.

(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code section, any person who commits the offense of robbery against a person who is 65 years of age or older shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished

http://policy.mofcom.gov.cn/GlobalLaw/english/flaw!fetch.action?id=61cc65cc-9403-4d8a-bdab-

4513b24c8861&pager.pageNo=1#georgia-title-16-chapter-8-article-2

http://policy.mofcom.gov.cn/GlobalLaw/english/flaw!fetch.action?id=61cc65cc-9403-4d8a-bdab-4513b24c8861&pager.pageNo=1#georgia-title-16-chapter-8-article-2

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

What are the Different Types of Georgia Theft? ▪ Theft by taking: This means that a person unlawfully took possession of any item or piece of property

that belongs to another. It does not matter how the item was taken. This is the simplest form of Georgia theft, and if you have another person’s property and deprive them of it you can be charged and found guilty of theft by taking.

▪ Theft by deception: This means that you were able to get something from another by deceitful means. This includes billing someone for a service that was not done, accepting payment for something you know will not be done, or selling property or an item without disclosing that there is a lien or loan still on it. Georgia theft by deception is more complex due to the intention of theft involved to deceive another out of their property or money which may involve confirming another’s wrong assumption about a fact or event when you know it is wrong.

▪ Theft by conversion: Georgia theft by conversion means that you took someone’s money to apply it in some manner for them, such as a deposit or payment, and instead you used it for your own purposes. For example, an officer or an employee of a government or financial institution does not apply your payment to the intended account, but rather, pockets the money for their own use. In addition, Georgia theft by conversion also applies to rental property that you are using; if you do not return such property when the owner demands it back then you have committed theft by conversion.

▪ Theft of services: In Georgia theft of services involves receiving a service, entertainment or an accommodation with no intention of paying for it. This includes not paying for maid service, not paying for a hotel room or meal, or item that requires payment of some sort. Georgia theft law ensures that service providers are able to collect the fee they are due by making the theft of services a crime.

▪ Theft by receiving stolen property: This type of theft is a crime which involves receiving stolen goods whether or not you are aware that they are stolen. You have committed a Georgia theft crime if you receive, get rid of, or keep property that you know or should know is stolen.

▪ Theft of lost or mislaid property: Many people may not realize that this is a crime under Georgia theft law. If, for example, you find a lost wallet and make no effort to return it to its rightful owner, then you have now committed theft of lost or mislaid property. Effort needs to be made to return the property under the law.

▪ Shoplifting: Shoplifting has its own specific punishments under Georgia theft law. Shoplifting includes any attempt to conceal an item, change the listed price, or failing to pay in full for an item removed from a store. Unlike the other Georgia theft crimes, a misdemeanor conviction involves stealing an item under $300; a felony shoplifting conviction involves stealing items that are worth more than $300.

http://atlantacrimelawyer.com/georgia-theft-laws-carry-punishments-fines-jail-time-legal-representation-

critical/

http://atlantacrimelawyer.com/georgia-theft-laws-carry-punishments-fines-jail-time-legal-representation-critical/

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

CRIMINAL TYPOLOGIES

Occasional Property Crimes

Most occasional property criminals lack a past official history of criminality. They exhibit little

progressive knowledge of criminal techniques or of crime in general. In contrast to career criminals

or even conventional criminals, crime is not their sole or major means of livelihood, and they do not

view themselves as criminal. Not identifying with criminal behavior, they have little of the vocabulary

or “street sense” of the conventional criminal.

Under the category of occasional property offenses, discussion will center on shoplifting, vandalism,

motor vehicle theft, and check forgery. (Professional crimes of these types will be discussed later.)

Surprisingly, there have not been many studies that focus on occasional and ordinary property

offenders (Hepburn, 1984; Shover, 1983).

Shoplifting

The polite term for shoplifting used by the retail trade industry is “inventory shrinkage”—quite

literally, goods have disappeared or shrunk from the total of accountable inventory. The slang term

“five-finger discount” is a less polite term for this same process. While shoplifting is perhaps as

ancient as trade or bartering, the post-World War II emergence of a consumer society and of large

retail chains has created both a greater desire and a greater opportunity for retail theft. Inventory

shortage costs in the United States account for about 2 percent of retail sales; the actual proportion

may be considerably higher, depending on location, product, and clientele. Hollinger and Davis

(2002) estimate the average retail firm loses 1.7 percent of gross revenues to “inventory shrinkage.”

Shrinkage refers to the losses that are due to shoplifting, employee theft, vendor fraud, and

administrative error. About one third of these losses are due to shoplifting. The average shoplifter is

caught with $200 worth of merchandise, and the U.S. retail industry loses an estimated $10 billion

per year to shoplifting. Many shoplifters are not motivated by need, as illustrated in the case of

actress Winona Ryder, shown in Photo 10.1.

The classic study on shoplifting is Mary Owen Cameron’s The Booster and the Snitch: Department

Store Shoplifting (1964), which was based on store records and arrest data in the late 1940s; later

research by L. E. Cohen and Stark (1974) supports her findings (see also Klemke, 1992). Cameron

distinguishes between “boosters” (or “heels”)—professional shoplifters—and “snitches,” amateur

shoplifters.

Boosters (to be discussed later in this chapter) are like other professional criminals in carefully

planning and skillfully executing their thefts and in concentrating on expensive items that can be

quickly converted to cash by prearrangement with a “fence” (dealer in stolen goods). On a

continuum of shoplifters, between the booster and the snitch are “shadow” professionals (Hellman,

1970; Stirling, 1974, p. 120), individuals who in an avocational manner supplement their legitimate

incomes by stealing. The majority of shoplifters are snitches, amateurs or individuals who do not

view themselves as criminals. According to Cameron (1964), most are females and the vast majority

have no official history of previous recorded criminal involvement. One example is the highly

publicized case of Oscar nominee Winona Ryder, who was arrested at Saks Fifth Avenue in Beverly

Hills for shoplifting. She stole $5,560.40 worth of designer merchandise. Acquitted of burglary, she

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

was convicted of grand theft and vandalism. Authorities believe that most shoplifters have the money

to pay for their stolen items. One illustration of that is the case of Claude Allen. Convicted in 2006,

Allen was at the time an assistant to George W. Bush on domestic policy. He perpetrated a

fraudulent return scheme at Washington, D.C.–area stores. Taking purchased merchandise to his

car, he would return to the store later with his receipt and select duplicate items of what he had just

bought and request a refund for them. His take in 2005 was estimated at $5,000. His salary that year

at the White House was $161,000 (Rohrlick, 2007).

The most likely to be shoplifted in the United Kingdom in 2011 were choice cuts of meat, expensive

bottles of alcohol, and hi-tech items such as electric toothbrushes and smart phones (G. Smith,

2011). Similar, small and expensive items are the most coveted in the United States. The rate of

male shoplifters was only slightly higher than the female rate. While there were more adult

shoplifters than juveniles, the latter were more frequently caught. Shoplifting increases during the

Christmas shopping season, while shoplifting arrest rates increase in March (Spring Break). An

annual survey conducted by Richard Hollinger of the University of Florida on behalf of ADT Security

Services estimated the losses for inventory shrinkage in 2006 to be $40.5 billion and that 47 percent

of this ($19 billion) was due to shoplifting (“Shoplifting Costs U.S. Retailers,” 2007).

Most snitches steal small, inexpensive items for their own personal use. In most instances, they

have on their person sufficient funds to cover the stolen items. Such snitches come from all walks of

life. Nettler (1982, Vol. 3) indicates, for instance, that “theories of poverty and low education and

shoplifting would surprise store owners in university towns who experience three times the amount

of theft as stores in other neighborhoods” (p. 106). Most snitches simply do not anticipate being

caught. In the past when snitches were apprehended, most stores avoided lawsuits or possible

adverse publicity by releasing the offenders after brief admonishment. When apprehended, snitches

usually attempt to rationalize or excuse their behavior. For the middle-class offender with a

psychology bent, “kleptomania”—a compulsion to steal—becomes a handy rationalization.

Adventure, excitement, need, greed, or simply available opportunity or inadequate security may

prove to be more likely reasons. Cameron (1964) claims that most snitches, when caught and faced

with an unacceptable criminal self-image, cease shoplifting.

Sensormatic Electronics assumes that shoplifting tends to increase during recessions—“when the

going gets tough, some of the tough go shoplifting” (A. Newman, 1990). Sensormatic produces a

variety of equipment, including security tags attached to articles that will set off alarms if the article is

taken from the store without the tag having been removed by a salesperson. Dabney, Hollinger, and

Dugan, in “Who Actually Steals? A Study of Covertly Observed Shoplifters” (2004), used closed-

circuit television to observe shoppers and recorded their demographic and behavioral

characteristics. A significant number (8.5 percent) were determined to be shoplifters. They found that

juveniles and young adults were not more likely to shoplift. Middle-aged shoppers (35–54) were the

most common shoplifters. More research is needed in order to confirm this finding. A number of

states have passed antishoplifting statutes that enable retailers to stick shoplifters with some of the

cost of security. “Civil demand” letters are sent to the accused shoplifters or their parents asking for

payment of a $100 to $200 penalty in addition to the returned merchandise in exchange for the

retailer not suing for civil damages (Schellhardt, 1990).

Offenses against property, among the earliest to be punished under formal legal systems, include a wide variety of violations usually labeled larceny (theft). These offenses can be committed by a

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

variety of criminal types, two of which are discussed and contrasted in this chapter: occasional property criminals and conventional property criminals. Career criminality is characterized by identification with crime, criminal self-concept, group support, association with other criminals, progression in criminality, and crime as a sole means of livelihood. While occasional property offenders are the antithesis of career criminals, conventional property violators are on the bottom rung of the ladder of career criminality. Occasional property offenders commit their crimes relatively infrequently, irregularly, crudely, and without identifying themselves as criminals. Conventional criminals commit their offenses more regularly and tend to aspire to career criminality. Occasional property criminal behavior includes most, but not all shoplifting, vandalism, motor vehicle theft, and check forgery. Cameron distinguishes between two types of shoplifters: boosters (professionals) and snitches (amateurs). The majority of snitches have no previous criminal history, do not identify with criminality, and are deterred from future activity when threatened with formal legal processing. Vandalism, the willful destruction of the property of others, has been identified by Andrew Wade as consisting of three types: wanton (senseless), predatory (criminal), and vindictive (hateful). Wanton vandalism by juveniles is the most common type and usually represents an extension of play activity. Motor vehicle theft also consists of a variety of types: joyriding, short-term transportation, long-term transportation, and profit. Joyriders, who borrow a car for temporary adventure, illustrate well the occasional property criminal. Check forgers have been distinguished by Lemert as consisting of two types: naive check forgers and systematic check forgers. The former, who are occasional property criminals, write bad checks as a means of resolving a temporary crisis. The bad check writing is a result of closure, or limited possibilities for solving this problem. Conventional property criminals are those who commit larceny-theft and burglary on a fairly persistent basis, constituting a rudimentary form of career criminality. Such offenders are less skilled and organized than their professional counterparts and represent about half of the prison inmates in the United States. Most will eventually reduce or cease their “careers” by their mid-twenties. Burglary involves the unlawful entry of a structure in order to commit a felony or theft. This may include actual forcible entry, unlawful entry without force, or attempted entry. As a rule, burglars attempt to avoid violence. Marilyn Walsh identifies types of burglars. These include professionals, known burglars, young burglars, juvenile burglars, and junkies, in decreasing order of sophistication and organization. Other characteristics of burglars and burglary were described separately by Scarr, Repetto, and Pope. Indispensable to property criminals and particularly burglars is the fence, a dealer in stolen property. Successful police “stings,” or anti-fencing operations, were described. Most conventional offenders are nonspecialists; they “hustle,” or take advantage of various criminal opportunities. Larceny-theft, which includes a broad category of property crimes, makes up over half of the index offense total and as a category constitutes a “wastebasket concept,” a catch-all. Property offenses are more characteristic of youthful offenders, who tend to commit crimes in groups. Arson, which has since 1979 been included as a UCR index offense, involves any willful or attempted malicious burning of another’s property. Arson is described as a special-category property offense because of the variety of motivations involved, including (according to McCaghy’s typology) profit, revenge, vandalism, crime concealment, sabotage, and excitement. Comparisons of criminal careers of occasional versus conventional property criminals demonstrate that only the latter exhibit any level of commitment to criminality, and even they are often youthful offenders whose property criminality peaks at age 16, halves by age 20, and continues to decline thereafter. Societal reaction to occasional offenders is relatively mild, but it is relatively strong against conventional property offenders. Anthropological field research, such as that by Shover, suggests that programs aimed at identifying and getting tough with “career criminals” must be careful to examine the interplay among employment, threatened incarceration, and aging of offenders lest they get tough at the very time that most will mature out of crime. In sociology, professionals are those in occupations who possess useful knowledge and claim a service orientation for which they are granted autonomy. In this light, the term may be an inappropriate tag with which to designate skilled, able grifters or intensive career criminals. It is so widely used in the literature, however, that not to use the concept would be more confusing than to employ it. Sutherland’s classic 1937 work on the subject, The Professional Thief, describes some characteristics of professional criminals as including crime as sole livelihood,

CRJ 105 – Crime and Criminal Behavior

planning, technical skills, codes of behavior, high status, and an ability to avoid detection. Professional crime is a sociological rather than a legal entity. The argot (specialized jargon) of the professional criminal world uses Depression-era U.S. terms. Some examples include cannons (pickpockets), heels (sneak thieves), boosters (shoplifters), and the con (confidence games). A continuum model of professional crime presents crime as professional to the degree that it possesses the following characteristics: sole livelihood, extensive career, skill, high status, avoidance of detection, criminal subculture, planning, and “the fix.” The fix refers to the ability to avoid prosecution by compromising the criminal justice process. The term scam refers to various criminal techniques or hustles. Professional crime differs from occupational/corporate crime in that, in the former, crime is the sole purpose of a business. Some examples of professional crime from Edelhertz’s typology were presented, most of which are examples of fraud. Some professional crime might be described as semiprofessional in that it involves less skill and planning. Sometimes called bunko or flim flam or short con operations, these scams include the pigeon drop, the badger scam, the bank examiner’s scam, postal frauds, circus grifting, boojo (a gypsy con game), and various home-improvement frauds. The big con involves far more skill, more elaborate planning, higher- status victims, and much larger rewards for the criminal. Ponzi schemes are frauds in which early investors in a nonexistent product are paid high dividends on the basis of money obtained from later investors. Pyramid schemes require investors to seek a chain of other investors in order to reap a promised high return. Examples of big con operations also included religious cons. Various professional criminal trades were discussed in the chapter. These included boosters, cannons, professional burglars, box men, fences, paper hangers, robbers, arsonists, and auto thieves. Descriptions of careers of professional criminals are methodologically limited by the need to rely on case studies and popular sources for many accounts. Most professional criminals seek anonymity, know the police and members of organized crime, are very deliberate in plying their trade, and avoid conspicuous consumption. They avoid rough stuff and “heat” and attempt to minimize risks. Requiring skill and contact with others, most seek subcultural support as suggested in Sutherland’s “differential association” theory. The professionalization of criminal justice has appeared to reduce many of the previous opportunities available in professional crime. The President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice pointed to the importance of two essential elements that explain the success of professional crime: “the fence” and “the fix.” The high cost of legal defense also may be responsible for a portion of the decline of such crime.

https://strayer.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781483306919/cfi/22!/4/2/38/8/18/4@0:100

CRJ 105 – Crime And Criminal Behavior

December 1, 2022/in Uncategorized /by SK

Your task is to write a report for the Chief of Police Rodney Hurt. He will use the report for his news conference in regard to the public’s concern for the increase in crime over the past five years. In the report, you will include the following:

1. A definition and description of the Uniform Crime Report.

2. A description of the data-gathering strategy for your report and a rationale for why you chose this technique

3. A discussion of the crime trends comparing Happy Town, Frown Town, Smooth Town, and Cool Town over the past five years.

Your report should clearly describe all the details necessary for the Chief’s news conference. Your answers will be judged not only on the accuracy of the information you provide, but also on how thoroughly the information is covered, how effectively the report is organized, and how well your writing reflects the conventions of standard written English. While your personal values and experiences are important, please answer all the questions in this task solely on the basis of the information provided in the Document Library. (The Document Library is included in this assignment document.)

Formatting Requirements: Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

● Be four pages typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one inch margins on all sides. All the information you need is in the Document Library.

● Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, professor’s name, course title, and date. The cover page is not included in the required assignment page length.

Self-Assessment Checklist:

Use this to check your work before you submit your assignment:

 My paper defines and describes the Uniform Crime Report.

 My paper describes a data-gathering strategy and explains why I used this strategy.

 My paper discusses the crime trends comparing Happy Town, Frown Town, Smooth Town, and Cool Town over the past five years.

CRJ 105

–

Crime and Criminal Behavior

CRJ 105

–

Crime and Criminal Behavior

CRJ 105

–

Crime and Criminal Behavior

Week 4

Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Performance Task

Assignment #1

Quick Links

SCENARIO

TASK

RUBRIC

DOCUMENT LIBRARY

Scenario

In June of 2016 you begin your first week as an intern at the Happy Town Police Department. As an intern, you develop a good rapport with Police Chief Rodney Hurt.

On the second week of your internship you begin to ask questions (of the police officers you have been working with at the department) concerning the Uniform Crime Rate. You tell them you are taking a class at Strayer University and are interested in gaining a better understanding of statistics and the application of statistics to law enforcement.

The following day you are greeted by Sergeant Gunn. She provides you with Part I crime data over the past five years that were submitted to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for the Uniform Crime Report. The Part I information provided to you by Sergeant Gunn is a compilation of crime data drawn from four areas: Happy Town, Frown Town, Smooth Town, and Cool Town.

After a review of the crime trends, you are alarmed at the rate of crime reported in these four towns. You are now curious to dig a little deeper and make some comparisons across the data provided to you.

Task

1. A definition and description of the Uniform Crime Report.

2. A description of the data-gathering strategy for your report and a rationale for why you chose this technique

3. A discussion of the crime trends comparing Happy Town, Frown Town, Smooth Town, and Cool Town over the past five years.

Formatting Requirements:

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

· Be four pages typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with oneinch margins on all sides. All the information you need is in the Document Library.

· Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, professor’s name, course title, and date. The cover page is not included in the required assignment page length.

Self-Assessment Checklist:

Use this to check your work before you submit your assignment:

· My paper defines and describes the Uniform Crime Report.

· My paper describes a data-gathering strategy and explains why I used this strategy.

· My paper discusses the crime trends comparing Happy Town, Frown Town, Smooth Town, and Cool Town over the past five years.

Rubric

Grading for this assignment will be based on the quality of your responses, logic/organization of the report, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 150	Assignment 1: UCR Performance Task
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 70% F	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Define and describe the UCR report. Weight: 25%	Does not define and describe the UCR report.	Partially defines and describes the UCR report but could use more supporting details.	Satisfactorily defines and describes the UCR report.	Thoroughly defines and describes the UCR report.
2.Describe a datagathering strategy and provide a rationale for why you chose that strategy. Weight: 25%	Does not select or incompletely describes a data-gathering strategy. Does not provide a rationale for why you chose that technique.	Partially describes a data-gathering strategy and provides a rationale for why you chose that technique. The description of the strategy and rationale need further development and supporting details.	Satisfactorily describes a datagathering strategy and provides a rationale for why you chose that technique. Some additional supporting details would improve this section.	Thoroughly describes a datagathering strategy and provides a wellsupported rationale for why you chose that technique.
3. Discuss the crime trends comparing Happy Town, Frown Town, Smooth Town, and Cool Town over the past five years. Weight: 25%	Does not submit or incompletely discusses the crime trends comparing Happy Town, Frown Town, Smooth Town, and Cool Town over the past five years.	Partially discusses the crime trends comparing Happy Town, Frown Town, Smooth Town, and Cool Town over the past five years. Some of the trends were discussed, but this section would be improved by addressing more of the trends.	Satisfactorily discusses the crime trends comparing Happy Town, Frown Town, Smooth Town, and Cool Town over the past five years. Most of the trends were addressed with supporting details, but not all of them.	Thoroughly discusses the crime trends comparing Happy Town, Frown Town, Smooth Town, and Cool Town over the past five years. All the major trends were addressed and well-supported.
4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. Weight: 25%	More than 6 errors present.	5-6 errors present.	3-4 errors present.	0-2 errors present.

Document Library

HAPPY TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT

CRIME STATISTICS

2010 – 2015

Year	Population1	Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter	Forcible rape	Robbery	Aggravated assault	Burglary	Larceny- theft	Motor vehicle theft
2015	125,336	7	12	56	86	18	214	21
2014	132,426	7	12	53	83	19	205	22
2013	140,326	6	8	49	82	17	198	18
2012	161,331	5	4	50	80	18	201	20
2011	173,111	4	3	48	75	14	161	21
2010	168,010	0	2	36	72	10	162	17

FROWN TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT

CRIME STATISTICS

2010 – 2015

Year	Population1	Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter	Forcible rape	Robbery	Aggravated assault	Burglary	Larceny- theft	Motor vehicle theft
2015	111,002	0	2	26	53	14	126	18
2014	110,830	0	2	34	65	15	143	22
2013	110,750	2	1	26	61	17	141	18
2012	110,350	2	2	23	57	18	142	20
2011	110,111	0	1	19	55	14	139	21
2010	108,350	0	2	8	53	10	140	17

SMOOTH TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT

CRIME STATISTICS

2010 – 2015

Year	Population1	Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter	Forcible rape	Robbery	Aggravated assault	Burglary	Larceny- theft	Motor vehicle theft
2015	156,336	5	5	10	80	18	161	18
2014	148,426	4	4	8	75	19	167	17
2013	147,326	3	4	7	78	17	163	18
2012	145,331	5	3	9	77	18	162	20
2011	145,111	4	3	7	75	14	161	21
2010	120,010	0	5	8	78	10	162	17

COOL TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT

CRIME STATISTICS

2010 – 2015

Year	Population1	Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter	Forcible rape	Robbery	Aggravated assault	Burglary	Larceny- theft	Motor vehicle theft
2015	175,336	0	2	26	53	14	126	18
2014	165,486	0	2	34	65	15	143	22
2013	154,126	2	1	26	61	17	141	18
2012	143,231	2	2	23	57	18	142	20
2011	133,119	0	1	19	55	14	139	21
2010	128,010	0	2	8	53	10	140	17

Happy Town Tribune

Monday, March 12, 2016 Blackboard support 1-877-642-2999

CRJ 105

–

Crime and Criminal Behavior

CRJ 105

–

Crime and Criminal Behavior

Page 2 of 14

Major crimes in Happy Town go up in 201 5

By Tamara Fearless, Special to the Happy Town Tribune

March 5, 2016

Happy Town, GA. — Happy Town had a five percent increase in major crimes reported in 2015, due to an increase in thefts, according to recently released statistics. In crimes categorized as Part 1 offenses – such as murder, criminal sexual assault, aggravated assault and battery, burglary, theft and arson – theft and arson were the only categories that increased. There were 214 thefts reported in 2015, compared with 167 the year before. One arson was reported in 2014. “Crime goes in cycles”, Police Chief Rodney Hurt stated at yesterday’s news conference.

Shoplifting a Problem at the Socks for Feet

By Tamara Fearless, Special to the Happy Town Tribune March

5, 2016

Happy Town, GA. — Three people were arrested Friday after police say a shoplifting incident led officers to drugs and a stolen gun. Happy Town Police say two men stole three dozen pairs of socks from Socks for Feet and were stopped in the parking lot. A third suspect was found in a vehicle outside the store.

According to a release, investigators found a substantial amount of crack cocaine and marijuana in the suspects’ possession.

Officials later searched a vehicle and hotel room connected with the suspects and found a stolen handgun and more marijuana, according to a release. They also found an unregistered handgun during the search.

The suspects were arrested on charges of theft of property, possession with intent to deliver cocaine, possession with intent to deliver marijuana, felon in possession of a firearm and felony firearms. They will be identified pending formal arraignment.

Uniform Crime Reporting

By Tamara Fearless, Special to the Happy Town Tribune March 5, 2016

The Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program has been the starting place for law enforcement executives, students of criminal justice, researchers, members of the media, and the public at large seeking information on crime in the nation. The program was conceived in 1929 by the International Association of Chiefs of Police to meet the need for reliable uniform crime statistics for the nation. In 1930, the FBI was tasked with collecting, publishing, and archiving those statistics.

Today, four annual publications, Crime in the United States ,

National Inciden t – Based Reporting Syste m , Law

Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted , and Hate Crime Statistics are produced from data received from over 18,000 city, university/college, county, state, tribal, and federal law enforcement agencies voluntarily participating in the program. The crime data are submitted either through a state UCR Program or directly to the FBI’s UCR Program.

In addition to these reports, information is available on the Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) Program and the Hate Crime Statistics Program, as well as the traditional Summary Reporting System (SRS) and the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS).

https://ucr.fbi.gov /

Police Chiefs Son Arrested Again

Happy Town , GA. — The son of Happy Town’s Police Chief has found himself on the wrong side of the law again after being charged with multiple charges on Tuesday.

Online arrest records show 24-year-old Bubba Hurt, the son of Chief Rodney Hurt, was arrested at the Socks for Feet.

It is his second arrest in less than a year. Last July, Hurt turned himself into authorities after he was accused of leaving a bar without paying his tab.

Police said the charges stemmed from a dispute over a bill at the Ugly Monkey Party bar on West Prison Street.

Frown Town Times

Monday, March 12, 2016 Blackboard support 1-877-642-2999
Police: Crime down 17 percent in Frown Town By Mangum Force, Special to the Times March 4, 2016 Frown Town, GA. — Frown Town police are reporting a 17 percent drop in the village’s annual crime rate – a change authorities attribute to criminal investigations, arrests and community involvement. “We really rely on the business community and the citizens to help us fight crime,” said Frown Town’s Police Chief Kirby Berretta, who has led the department since 2004. “The more eyes and ears you have out there, the safer the community will be.” Chief Berretta’s statement came while addressing students at Berretta stated “it gives our town something to Strayer University. Chief smile about.”		Sources of Crime Statistics By Mangum Force, Special to the Times March 4, 2016 How much crime is there? An examination of the UCR and its relationship to sources of data on crime and criminals is useful. An examination of the Uniform Crime Report and its relationship to other sources such as the National IncidentBased Reporting System (NIBRS) are extremely useful for understanding crime and criminals. It is unclear whether an accurate estimate of the amount of crime committed is possible, for several reasons. For one, not all crimes that are committed are discovered. In addition, some crimes may be known only to the perpetrators, in which case the victim is unaware of loss. Perhaps there is no identifiable victim, as in the case of a gambling violation. The further a source of statistics is from the “crimes committed” category, the less useful it is as a measure of the extent of crime. Not all crimes that are discovered are reported to the police; similarly, not all reported crimes are recorded by police. https://strayer.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781483306919/cfi /6!/4/2/20/4@0:65.1

The Crime Indexes: Violent and Property Crime By Mangum Force, Special to the Times March 4, 2016 Historically, the UCR has been divided into two parts. Part I crimes consist of the index crimes, major felonies that are believed to be serious, to occur frequently, and to have a greater likelihood of being reported to the police. The index offenses are as follows: 1. Murder and non-negligent manslaughter 2. Forcible rape 3. Robbery 4. Aggravated assault 5. Burglary 6. Larceny-theft 7. Motor vehicle theft 8. Arson https://strayer.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781483306919/ cfi/6!/4/2/20/4@0:65.1

		Additional Sources of Crime Statistics By Mangum Force, Special to the Times March 4, 2016 In addition, some law enforcement agencies may purposely conceal recorded crimes; some offenses may be unfounded crimes or defined by investigating officers as not constituting a criminal matter. For instance, when a complainant reports an attempted burglary, investigating officers may conclude that there is not enough evidence to support that a crime took place. Despite this problematic relationship between crimes recorded and crimes committed, the UCR until recently represented the best statistics available on crime commission and, as will be discussed later in this chapter, still represents one of the best sources. Once we move beyond crimes recorded as a measure of crime commission, we are getting further removed from the accurate measurement of crime. Thus, arrest statistics, indictments, convictions, incarcerations, and other dispositions such as probation and parole are not as useful. Such statistics have much more to do with police efficiency or allocations to the criminal justice system and general societal policies toward crime control policy than they do with measuring the extent of the crime problem. https://strayer.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781483306919/cfi/6!/4/2/20/ 4@0:65.1

Smooth Town Daily

Monday, March 12, 2016 Blackboard support 1-877-642-2999

Major Crimes Down

in S mooth Town

By Tamara Justice, Smooth Town Daily reporter

February 6, 2016

Smooth Town, GA. — Major crime in Smooth Town is at its lowest in at least five years, according to preliminary statistics from the Smooth Town Police Department. The drop stems from a decline in property-related crimes to 260 last year, well below the five-year average of 225, data shows. There were 120 crimes against people in 2012, just slightly above the five-year norm. “Compared to other communities our size, we have a very low crime rate and we’re very proud of that and we want to continue that,” said

Police Chief Wesson. Police Chief Wesson further stated “hopefully it will be smooth sailing for the rest

of the year.”

What are Part I and Part II

Index Crimes

By Tamara Justice, Smooth Town Daily reporter

February 6, 2016

The violent crime index consists of:

1. Murder and non-negligent manslaughter

2. Forcible rape

3. Robbery

4. Aggravated assault

The property crime index consists of:

1. Burglary

2. Larceny-theft

3. Motor vehicle theft

4. Arson

Part II crimes are non-index offenses and are not used in the calculation of the crime rate. These include the following:

· Simple assault

· Forgery and counterfeiting

· Fraud

· Embezzlement

· Receiving stolen property

· Vandalism

· Illegal carrying of weapons

· Prostitution and related offenses

· Sex offenses (e.g., statutory rape)

· Drug law violations

· Liquor law violations

· Public drunkenness

· Disorderly conduct

· Vagrancy

· Curfew violations/loitering

· Runaways

· All other violations of state and local laws

(except traffic violations)

https://strayer.vitalsource.com/#/books/978148330

6919/cfi/6!/4/2/20/4@0:65.1

Smooth Town a Safe Town

By Tamara Justice, Smooth Town Daily reporter

February 6, 2016

Smooth Town, GA. — This midsize township of

156,000 in Hipster County takes one of the top spots.

In addition to a low rate of violent crime, the community had the lowest rate of property crime. Overall, the crime rate was a whopping 97% lower than its Georgia peers. Smooth Town is a four-minute drive from Fort Cool Breeze and a 10-minute drive to Lollipop Amusement Park. The median household income here was 15 percent higher than the median for the state.

COol Town News

Monday March 12, 2016 Blackboard support 1-877-642-2999

Cool Town crime rate

lowest in years, police say

By Shirley Morris, Cool Town News reporter

February 19, 2016

Cool Town, GA. — Cool Town authorities are crediting the work of police officers and a partnership with the community for helping them reach a 2015 crime rate that is the lowest in five years. The city’s overall crime rate fell by four percent in 2015, according to police department statistics, which marks an

18 percent drop in the past two years. Violent crime offenses in 2015, which include crimes against people, fell by a little more than four percent, while property crime remained the same. Police Chief Luger stated “it was also

due to everyone staying cool.”

What is The Crime Rate?

By Shirley Morris, Cool Town News reporter

February 19, 2016

The crime rate is a calculation that expresses the total number of index crimes per 100,000 population:

Index Crimes/Population × 100,000 = Crime Rate

As previously indicated, in 2004 the FBI decided to drop the additional calculation of the crime index rate. The purpose of an index (like the Dow Jones Industrial Average or the Consumer Price Index) is to provide a composite measure, one that does not rely too heavily on any one factor. An index also allows controlling for population size, thus permitting fair comparisons of different-sized units. As noted earlier, it is this UCR crime rate that one reads about in the newspaper, with accounts of crime either rising or falling by a given percentage. A principal difficulty with the UCR crime rate as an index of crime in the United States is that it is an unweighted index. That is, each crime, whether murder or bicycle theft, is added into the total index with no weight given to the relative seriousness of the offense. Thus, no monetary or psychological value is assigned. For instance, a city with 100 burglaries per 100,000 population and one with 100 homicides per 100,000 population would have the same crime rate.

https://strayer.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781483306919/cfi/6!/4/2/ 20/4@0:65.1

Cool Town, Is It Really

“Cool”?

By Shirley Morris, Cool Town News reporter

February 19, 2016

Cool Town, GA. — This Hipster County community is the fourth suburb to make the top five in the state. Cool Town tied Old Dog Town for the lowest rate of violent crime, and

it had the sixth lowest rate of property crime in this study. Cool Town is very affluent with 2.7 times the state’s median household income. It also had a highly educated population of 68 percent with a bachelor’s degree.

DATA GATHERING STRATEGIES

The qualitative methods most commonly used in evaluation can be classified in three broad categories:

· In-depth Interview

· Observation Methods

· Document Review

CRIMINOLOGY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH: METHODS

Those interested in the study of criminology and criminal justice have at their disposal a wide range of research methods. The particular research method to use is entirely contingent upon the question being studied. Research questions typically fall into four categories of: (1) descriptive, (2) exploratory, (3) explanatory, and (4) evaluative (Schutt). Descriptive research attempts to define and describe the social phenomena under investigation. Exploratory research seeks to identify the underlying meaning behind actions and individual behavior.

Explanatory research seeks to identify the cause(s) and effect(s) of social phenomena.

Evaluation research seeks to determine the effects of an intervention on individual behavior. These four areas of research are not mutually exclusive; rather, they are designed to be used interactively in order to gain a deeper understanding of the question under investigation.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/law/legal – and – political – magazines/criminology – and – criminal – justice – research – methods

HIERARCHY RULE

There is a significance to the order in which the Part I offenses are presented, with criminal homicide being the highest in the hierarchy and arson being the lowest. The Part I offenses are as follows:

1. Criminal Homicide

a. Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter

b. Manslaughter by Negligence

2. Forcible Rape

a. Rape by Force

b. Attempts to Commit Forcible Rape

3. Robbery

a. Firearm

b. Knife or Cutting Instrument

c. Other Dangerous Weapon

d. Strong-arm—Hands, Fists, Feet, etc.

4. Aggravated Assault

a. Firearm

b. Knife or Cutting Instrument

c. Other Dangerous Weapon

d. Hands, Fists, Feet, etc.—Aggravated Injury

5. Burglary

a. Forcible Entry

b. Unlawful Entry—No Force

c. Attempted Forcible Entry

6. Larceny-theft (except motor vehicle theft)

7. Motor Vehicle Theft

a. Autos

b. Trucks and Buses

c. Other Vehicles

8. Arson

The experience of law enforcement agencies in handling UCR data shows that, for the most part, offenses of law occur singly as opposed to many being committed simultaneously. In these single-offense situations, law enforcement agencies must decide whether the crime is a Part I offense. If so, the agency must score the crime accordingly. However, if several offenses are committed at the same time and place by a person or a group of persons, a different approach must be used in classifying and scoring. The law enforcement matter in which many crimes are committed simultaneously is called a multiple-offense situation by the UCR Program. As a general rule, a multiple-offense situation requires classifying each of the offenses occurring and determining which of them are Part I crimes. The Hierarchy Rule requires that when more than one Part I offense is classified, the law enforcement agency must locate the offense that is highest on the hierarchy list and score that offense involved and not the other offense(s) in the multiple-offense situation.

The Hierarchy Rule applies only to crime reporting and does not affect the number of charges for which the defendant may be prosecuted in the courts. The offenses of justifiable homicide, motor vehicle theft, and arson are exceptions to the Hierarchy Rule.

Page 10 of 14

Wk 4 – Social Inequality In The Media

Assignment Content

Chapter 12 Quiz – Gain Compliance with the Law

Property Crime And Typologies Performance Task

CRJ 105 – Crime And Criminal Behavior

Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Performance Task

Scenario

Task

Rubric

Document Library

HAPPY TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT

FROWN TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT

SMOOTH TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT

COOL TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT

Happy Town Tribune

Shoplifting a Problem at the Socks for Feet

Police Chiefs Son Arrested Again

DATA GATHERING STRATEGIES

CRIMINOLOGY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH: METHODS

HIERARCHY RULE

Experience

Our mission

Latest Posts

Talk to us...