Conflicting View Essay

Students, please

Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.

Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part I Prewriting Due Week 3 and worth 30 points

When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking by playing the “Believing Game.” The Believing Game is about making the effort to “believe” – or at least consider – the reasons for an opposing view on an issue.

The assignment is divided into two (2) parts. In Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you will first read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes: “The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” at  http://www.procon.org/sourcefiles/believinggame.pdf . Next, you will review the Procon.org Website in order to gather information. Then, you will engage in prewriting to examine your thoughts.

Note: In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write an essay geared towards synthesizing your ideas.

Part I – Prewriting: Follow the instructions below for this prewriting activity. Use complete sentences and adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.

1. Select one (1) of the approved topics from the  www.procon.org  Website and state your position on the issue.

2. From the Procon.org Website, identify three (3) premises (reasons) listed under either the Pro or Con section – whichever section  opposes  your position.

3. For each of the three (3) premises (reasons) that  oppose  your position on the issue, answer these “believing” questions suggested by Elbow:

a. What’s interesting or helpful about this view?

b. What would I notice if I believed this view?

c. In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?”

The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:

· Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.

· Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.

· Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

· This course requires use of  Strayer Writing Standards (SWS) . The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.

· This prewriting assignment has no page requirement. There is no requirement at this time to include references in the assignment.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

· Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.

· Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.

· Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic.

 

 

 

 

Name: Week 2 Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Prewriting

Description: PHI210 Week 2 Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Prewriting

 

· Grid View

· List View

  Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Select one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website and state your position on the issue. Points:

(0%)

Did not submit or incompletely selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; did not submit or incompletely stated your position on the issue.

Points:

3.9 (13%)

Insufficiently selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; insufficiently stated your position on the issue.

Points:

4.5 (15%)

Partially selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; partially stated your position on the issue.

Points:

5.1 (17%)

Satisfactorily selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; satisfactorily stated your position on the issue.

Points:

(20%)

Thoroughly selected one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website; thoroughly stated your position on the issue.

2. Identify three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section from procon.org. Points:

(0%)

Did not submit or incompletely identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section from procon.org.

Points:

5.85 (19.5%)

Insufficiently identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section from procon.org.

Points:

6.75 (22.5%)

Partially identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section from procon.org.

Points:

7.65 (25.5%)

Satisfactorily identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section under “Con” from procon.org.

Points:

(30%)

Thoroughly identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section “from procon.org.

3. Provide answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position. Points:

(0%)

Did not submit or incompletely provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position.

Points:

7.8 (26%)

Insufficiently provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position.

Points:

(30%)

Partially provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position.

Points:

10.2 (34%)

Satisfactorily provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position.

Points:

12 (40%)

Thoroughly provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position.

4. Use complete sentences and adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling. Follow SWS Style format. Points:

(0%)

Did not complete the assignment or had more than 9 errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Points:

1.95 (6.5%)

Had 8-9 errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Points:

2.25 (7.5%)

Had 6-7 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Points:

2.55 (8.5%)

Had 4-5 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Points:

(10%)

Had 0-3 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

The rubric total value of 0.00 has been overridden with a value of 0 out of 30.0.

Name:Week 2 Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Prewriting

Description:PHI210 Week 2 Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Prewriting

 

Exit

 30 points

When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking by playing the “Believing Game.” The Believing Game is about making the effort to “believe” – or at least consider – the reasons for an opposing view on an issue.

The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.
In Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you will first read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes: “The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” at http://www.procon.org/sourcefiles/believinggame.pdf. Next, you will review the Procon.org Website in order to gather information. Then, you will engage in prewriting to examine your thoughts.

Note: In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write an essay geared towards synthesizing your ideas.

Part I – Prewriting: Follow the instructions below for this prewriting activity. Use complete sentences and adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.

  1. Select one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website and state your position on the issue.
  2. From the Procon.org Website, identify three (3) premises (reasons) listed under either the Pro or Con section – whichever section opposes your position.
  3. For each of the three (3) premises (reasons) that oppose your position on the issue, answer these “believing” questions suggested by Elbow:
    1. What’s interesting or helpful about this view?
    2. What would I notice if I believed this view?
    3. In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?”

The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:

  • Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
  • Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
  • Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
  • This prewriting assignment has no page requirement. There is no requirement at this time to include references in the assignment.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.
  • Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logi

Examples of diaspora populations

Assignment Details

Diaspora can be defined as follows (Diaspora, 2018):

Any group migration or flight from a country or region; any group that has been dispersed outside its traditional homeland, especially involuntarily, as Africans during the trans-Atlantic slave trade; and any religious group living as a minority among people of the prevailing religion.

Examples of diaspora populations could include Jewish people all over the world; African-Americans and others of African descent brought to the Americas in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade; and refugee groups driven from their homes as a result of civil war.

In this assignment, you will identify, describe, and examine the issue of radicalization. Review RAND Corporation’s Conference Study on radicalization of diaspora risk populations. Another available resource is the article, Radicalisation in the Diaspora: Why Muslims in the West Attack Their Host Countries (WP).

In 3 pages, address the following:

  • Discuss why some diaspora populations are at risk of radicalization. Identify some risk factors that make these populations vulnerable to radicalization.
  • Identify some potential public policy approaches to mitigate radicalization. Develop some recommendations for implementation. When proposing policies, make sure that they are not too broad and are designed to specifically address the issues that you have identified.
  • Discuss how potential policy approaches suited for mitigating risk populations with one worldview may not be suited for mitigation of other risk populations espousing other worldviews.
    • Discuss what factors may shape a particular worldview for members of the diaspora populations that you have discussed.

Be sure to reference all sources using APA style

 

References

Diaspora. (2018). In, Dictionary.com. Retrieved from https://www.dictionary.com/browse/diaspora

RAND. (n.d.). National Security Research Division. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/nsrd.html

Waldmann, P. K. (2010, March 15). Radicalisation in the diaspora: Why Muslims in the West attack their host countries (WP).http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/portal/rielcano_en/contenido?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/elcano/elcano_in/zonas_in/international+terrorism/dt9-2010

Capital Punishment

course Project (Research Paper)
The Research Paper must be a minimum of 4,000 words in length, but must not exceed 6,000 words. The paper requires a minimum of 10 different references. It will be typewritten, double spaced-standard margins, and follow the APA style format. The paper will be submitted through Chalk and Wire, which is linked to Turnitin. No previously submitted papers, articles, reports or projects, in whole or part, to anyuniversity or college will be accepted. It is expected that this will be the student’s original work. No morethan 15% of your entire document can be quoted. The research paper is comprised of three parts: the topic selection, the annotated outline, and the final paper. Combined, these three parts make up 25% of the overall grade for this course.

please see attached for references

  • Running head; CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

    CAPITAL PUNISHMENT 2

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Capital Punishment

    Name

    Institutional Affiliation

    Date

    Capital Punishment

    Reitz, K. R., & Klingele, C. M. (2019). Model Penal Code: Sentencing—Workable Limits on Mass Punishment. Crime and Justice48(1), 255-311.

    The authors provide data that contains the number of people under death sentence, executed persons and the status of the death penalty at both state and federal level. The information was obtained from the department of corrections and jurisdiction who authorized death penalty in the year 2016.The authors also add that by the end of 2016 34 states and the federal government had authorized death penalties which includes Wyoming and New York. Further, the article provides some of the methods of executing capital punishment which includes state authorized lethal injection that acts as a method for execution, nitrogen hypoxia, firing squad, hanging, electrocution and hanging.

    The article is of great importance for my study since it will provide statistics on the number of people subjected to capital punishment, states that allow capital punishment and the methods of executing the capital punishment.

    Warrington, M. (2018) Justice and Capital Punishment

    Warrington in his study is against capital punishment, he argues that it is violation right to life and right to liberty. The author also adds that this capital punishment may be legal but questions its ethics. The author draws to the attention that this type of punishment may be legal but unethical because it violates against the rights of humanity. Also innocent life’s can be taken and the state can use it as a weapon to subdue others into problems. The author adds that the government is supposed to protect its citizens. Warrington also argues that every human being has a value hence it is not acceptable to sacrifice a person’s life.

    The article is of great importance in my study because it will provide information on other people’s perspective on the issue of capital punishment.

    Seeds, C. (2018). Disaggregating LWOP: Life without parole, capital punishment, and mass incarceration in Florida, 1972–1995. Law & Society Review52(1), 172-205.

    The author provides a brief history of capital punishment. He states that capital punishment began in the year 1601 in United States in Jamestown. The author points the five types of execution that were passed under the eight amendments such as the use of lethal gas, lethal injection, electrocution, firing squad and hanging. The author also claims that the purpose of capitals punishment was to prevent other people from committing such crimes. The authors also state that most states have currently abolished the use of capital punishment.

    The article is important for my study because I will get to understand the history of capital punishment.

    Burgason, K. A. (2010). Examination of the Death Penalty: Public Opinion of a Northeast Tennessee University Student Sample.

    The author argues that some states have abolished the use of capital punishment and is just reserved for those cases that are concerned with murder. Death penalty is currently a controversial issue as it has resulted on a debate on whether it is an appropriate means of punishment. The author also argues that use of capital punishment has been used by decision and law makers, politicians as a platform of election. An example provided by the author is the General Social Survey which are some of the major polls that is focused on death penalty. The purpose of the author in this article was to provide citizen opinions on death penalty as a means of punishment. The study found out that some people support capital punishments especially on those crimes concerning murder.

    The article is important for my study because I will get to understand the opinions of various individuals on the issue of capital punishment.

    Johnson, D. T. (2015) Retention and reform in Japanese capital punishment U. Mich. JL Reform49, 853

    The author argues that the overall trend of capital punishment is currently declining, for instance in United States seven states have abolished the use of capital punishment to execute justice. Further the author adds that the United States and Japan are the only developed nations that execute capital punishment.

    The article is important for my study as it will provide information on how other states execute capital punishment apart from the United States.

    Dieter, R. C. (2017). Changing Views on the Death Penalty in the United States. In Conference on Alternatives to the Death Penalty.

    The author conducted a study on the changing views of death penalty in United States. The authors point out that death penalty achieved its purpose in the 1990’s and the number increased in 1998 and 1999.The public were the opinion that death penalty should be applied frequently .Further the author argues that capital punishment is currently on the decline in United States due to wrongful convictions and lethal injection process. Also the public support for death penalty has significantly declined.

    The article is important for the study because it will provide more information of current trends on capital punishment.

Draft of American Justice System (Section I)Assignment

2-2 Final Project Milestone One: Draft of American Justice System (Section I)AssignmentTask: Submit to complete this assignment

Review the case you have chosen for your final project. Submit an analysis of the American justice system. Include an overview of the case you have chosen and address the following questions regarding the American justice system in bullet point format.

  1. Identify the implications of the procedural laws when mitigating both domestic and international crime. How do the legal requirements involved in processing a case impact the ability to combat criminal activity?
  2. What rights and responsibilities do American citizens have according to procedural laws?
  3. How does the enforcement of procedural laws differ when applied to people who are not legal U.S. citizens?
  4. According to the American justice system, what are the rights and responsibilities of people who are not U.S. citizens?

Use elements of the case you have chosen, and any additional resources necessary, to illustrate the impact of citizenship on the investigation and prosecution of a criminal according to the American justice system.

This milestone will inform your final project. To complete this assignment, review the Final Project Document and the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric document.

 

THIS IS THE SUBJECT THAT I HAVE CHOSEN FOR MY FINAL PROJECT!!

Purchase Order Scam Leaves a Trail of Victims

Fake Purchase Order scam e-mail

Nigerian criminals behind purchase order frauds use fake or stolen e-mail addresses to deceive retailers. They also dupe individuals who are the victims of online romance or work from home scams to re-ship merchandise out of the country, as seen above.

What began as a scheme to defraud office supply stores has evolved into more ambitious crimes that have cost retailers around the country millions of dollars—and the Nigerian cyber criminals behind the fraud have also turned at-home Internet users into unsuspecting accomplices.

FBI investigators are calling it purchase order fraud, and the perpetrators are extremely skillful. Through online and telephone social engineering techniques, the fraudsters trick retailers into believing they are from legitimate businesses and academic institutions and want to order merchandise. The retailers believe they are filling requests for established customers, but the goods end up being shipped elsewhere—often to the unsuspecting at-home Internet users, who are then duped into re-shipping the merchandise to Nigeria.

“They order large quantities of items such as laptops and hard drives,” said Special Agent Joanne Altenburg, who has been investigating the cyber criminals since 2012 out of our Washington Field Office. “They have also ordered expensive and very specialized equipment, such as centrifuges and other medical and pharmaceutical items.”

Our investigators have found more than 85 companies and universities nationwide whose identities were used to perpetrate the scheme. Approximately 400 actual or attempted incidents have targeted some 250 vendors, and nearly $5 million has been lost so far.

The scam has several variations, but basically it works like this:

  • The criminals set up fake websites with domain names almost identical to those of real businesses or universities. They do the same for e-mail accounts and also use telephone spoofing techniques to make calls appear to be from the right area codes.
  • Next, the fraudsters—posing as school or business officials—contact a retailer’s customer service center and use social engineering tactics to gather information about the organization’s purchasing account.
  • The criminals then contact the target business and request a quote for products. They use forged documents, complete with letterhead and sometimes even the name of the organization’s actual product manager. They request that the shipments be made on a 30-day credit—and since the real institution often has good credit, vendors usually agree.
  • The criminals provide a U.S. shipping address that might be a warehouse, self-storage facility, or the residence of a victim of an online romance or work-from-home scam (see sidebar). Those at-home victims are directed to re-ship the merchandise to Nigeria and are provided with shipping labels to make the job easy.
  • The vendor eventually bills the real institution and discovers the fraud. By then, the items have been re-shipped overseas, and the retailer must absorb the financial loss.

“Once the merchandise has been shipped to Nigeria, it is nearly impossible to get it back,” Altenburg said. “Small and mid-size businesses and universities are being targeted all over the country.”

Although the cyber criminals are practiced at deception, there are ways to spot the fraud, according to Special Agent Paula Ebersole in our Washington Field Office. “The most important thing is to independently verify shipping addresses,” she said, “no matter how legitimate a website or e-mail looks.”

Businesses should also be on the lookout for e-mails that contain unusual phrases or spellings, indicating that messages were not written by a fluent English speaker. And bogus phone numbers provided by the fraudsters are rarely answered by a live person. “That should raise a red flag,” Ebersole said.

“If your business has been scammed,” she added, “time is of the essence. If you report the theft to local authorities or the FBI before the merchandise is shipped out of the country, there is a chance the items can be located and returned.”

In addition to investigating these crimes, Ebersole and Altenburg are also getting the word out to the business community about purchase order fraud through the Domestic Security Alliance Council, a security and intelligence-sharing initiative between the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the private sector. “We want to make everyone aware of this potential threat,” Ebersole said.

At-Home Victims

E-mail and Internet ads offering lucrative work-from-home jobs are everywhere online, and so are match-making websites. But many online offers of employment and romance are scams—and those who fall for them might end up helping African cyber criminals carry out purchase order fraud.

“These criminals are experts at posing as an employer or romantic interest online,” said Special Agent Joanne Altenburg. “They gain the trust of individuals looking for work or a romantic relationship, and after a period of social engineering, those individuals are convinced to serve as re-shippers on behalf of the subject. They almost never suspect they are doing anything illegal.”

These secondary victims agree to accept packages sent directly to them and then re-ship them overseas, thinking it is either part of their job or they are doing a favor for their romantic interest. “A lot of these people don’t believe it when I tell them they are being scammed,” Altenburg said. “The criminals are very good at what they do.”

Indicators of Fraud

Businesses can avoid becoming victims of purchase order fraud by being aware of several fraud indicators:

  • Incorrect domain names on websites, e-mails, and purchase orders. The scammers use nearly identical domain names of legitimate organizations, but in the case of a university, for example, if the URL does not end in .edu, it is likely fraudulent.
  • The shipping address on a purchase order is not the same as the business location. Likewise, if the delivery address is a residence or self-storage facility, it should raise red flags.
  • Poorly written e-mail correspondence that contains grammatical errors, suggesting that the message was not written by a fluent English speaker.
  • Phone numbers not associated with the company or university, and numbers that are not answered by a live person.
  • Orders for unusually large quantities of merchandise, with a request to ship priority or overnight.

If you are the victim of purchase order fraud, it’s important to contact local law enforcement and the FBI. You should also report the crime to the Internet Complaint Center (IC3). If the fraud is discovered before the goods are shipped to Nigeria, there is a good chance the merchandise can be recovered. More than $1 million worth of merchandise has been recovered, thanks to businesses quickly discovering the fraud. More on IC3.