Action Results Based On Analysis And Critique Of Major Event Paper PowerPoint Presentation

After Action Results based on Analysis/Critique of Major Event Paper PowerPoint Presentation

HURRICANE KATRINA

The student will summarize his or her findings in an audio/visual PPT presentation. The student will use PowerPoint to build their narrated presentation and convert it into a Windows Media Video WMV (Converting PPT to WMV), to present and record his or her critique. A minimum of ten narrated content slides are required. The student will at the minimum use the same headings as required in the written analysis. The presentation be at least ten minutes long and should last no more than 30 minutes maximum. References will be included on the last slide. Once submitted for grading the student will email his or her PPT video to the rest of the class for their review. The student does not have to show him or herself in the video unless they wish to.

After Action Results based on Analysis/Critique of Major Event Paper PowerPoint Presentation HLSC 500

Paper PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

 

Criteria Levels of Achievement
Content

(70%)

Advanced

92 to 100%

Proficient

84 to 91%

Developing

1 to 83%

Not present Total
Content Mastery 51 to 55 points:

Presentation provided an in to depth and comprehensive analysis of a major event (disaster, incident, catastrophe or preplanned event) starting with an overview of the event.

46 to 50 points:

Presentation provided an analysis of a major event (disaster, incident, catastrophe or preplanned event) starting with an overview of the event.

1 to 45.5 points:

Presentation provided a rudimentary or incomplete analysis of a major event (disaster, incident, catastrophe or preplanned event) starting with an overview of the event.

0 points:

Not present

 
Analysis & Clarity 41.5 to 45 points:

Presented an in to depth and comprehensive analysis of the use of all phases of emergency management (mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery and the subcomponents found in each phase) as much as is applicable to each based on the event.

37.5 to 41 points:

Presented an analysis of the use of all phases of emergency management (mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery and the subcomponents found in each phase) as much as is applicable to each based on the event.

 

1 to 37 points:

Presented an incomplete or rudimentary analysis of the use of all phases of emergency management (mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery and the subcomponents found in each phase) as much as is applicable to each based on the event.

0 points:

Not present

 
Reasoning & Support 37 to 40 points:

Presentation thoroughly discussed the

recommendations for improvements in any areas found to be lacking. Recommendations were substantial.

33.5 to 36.5 points:

Presentation discussed the

recommendations for improvements in any areas found to be lacking. Recommendations were adequate.

1 to 33 points:

Presentation provided an incomplete or rudimentary discussion of recommendation for improvements in any areas found to be lacking. Recommendations were lacking.

0 points:

Not present

 
Structure (30%) Advanced

92 to 100%

Proficient

84 to 91%

Developing

1 to 83%

Not present Total
Spelling and Grammar 14 to 15 points:

Grammar, writing, and spelling were near error free. Color, background, visuals depictions etc. added to the presentation. The slides were succinct, informative but not busy. Audio was used and was clear. Presentation was professionally delivered.

12.5 to 13.5 points:

Grammar, writing, and spelling were not distracting. Color, background, visuals depictions etc. added to and did not take away from the presentation. The slides were not too busy nor void of information. Audio was used and was generally clear. Presentation was appropriately delivered.

1 to 12 points:

Grammar, writing, and spelling were distracting. Color, background, visuals depictions etc. took away from the presentation. The slides were busy and lacked information. Audio was not used and / or was generally not clear. Presentation was lacking in delivery.

0 points:

Not present

 
APA Formatting 14 to 15 points:

Minimal errors (1 to 2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA.

12.5 to 13.5 points:

Few errors (3 to 4) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA.

1 to 12 points:

Numerous errors (5+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA.

0 points:

Not present

 
Required Sources 14 to 15 points:

Included a 5+ excellent scholarly sources.

12.5 to 13.5 points:

Included a minimum of 4 to 5 scholarly sources.

1 to 12 points:

Included a minimum of 1 to 3 sources. Sources were not scholarly or appropriate.

0 points:

Not present

 
Presentation Length 14 to 15 points:

PowerPoint contains 10+ or more full slides of content not including the cover and reference slides. The length of the PPT Mix/Video and the presentation fell within established guidelines within reason. No more than 30 minutes maximum. At least 10 minutes long at a minimum.

12.5 to 13.5 points:

PowerPoint contains 10 full slides of content not including the cover and reference slides. The length of the PPT Mix/Video and the presentation fell within established guidelines within reason. More than 32 minutes but not less than 12 minutes.

1 to 12 points:

PowerPoint contains 9 or less full slides of content not including the cover and reference slides. The length of the PPT Mix/Video and the presentation did not fall within established guidelines. More than 35 minutes or less than 10 minutes long.

0 points:

Not present

 
Professor Comments:   Total: /200

Ethics In Corrections Paper

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper that addresses the following questions:

  • What are 2 ethical issues related to the prison system? Provide examples.
  • Do you feel it is ethical to privatize prisons versus traditional government-run facilities? Provide an explanation for your argument.
  • What consequences should be faced by correctional officers who violate ethical codes of conduct?
  • Do community corrections programs place too much burden and risk on communities and citizens? Are some programs better for community placement than others? Explain your answer.
  • Is there ever a circumstance in which you feel physical punishment is appropriate? Explain your response.

Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.

Contemporary Organizational Theories And Management Systems-Police Admin

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Part II
Organizational Perspectives

Chapter 5
Contemporary Organizational Theories and Management Systems

 

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Learning Objectives

Understand how contemporary management theories differ from classical organizational theory.

Know the three events that served as the foundation of human relations theory.

Understand systems theory and the components of the police system.

Discuss total quality management and how it applies to modern police departments and community policing.

Know the various structures that are used in police departments.

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Introduction

  • Mechanistic organization
  • Fairly inflexible
  • Characterized by hierarchy, formalization, and centralized authority
  • Organic organization
  • More open
  • Allow employees greater input and responsibility in decision making, especially at the lower levels in the organization
  • Supposedly more responsive to community needs

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Human Relations Organizational Theory

  • Management engaged in a social process that combines techniques and people to mutually benefit the organization and the employee
  • Managers spend a substantial amount of time dealing with human problems
  • Functions of the Human Relations Organizational Theory:
  • Motivates people to higher performance
  • Helps us understand people and their relationship to work
  • Helps people reach their fullest potential

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

The Genesis of Human
Relations Theory

  • Hawthorne Experiments: Lighting/Mgmt attentive to workers
  • Signaled a need for management to harness worker energy and ideas so that management and workers could mutually benefit
  • Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs theory of motivation
  • Identified a hierarchy of five levels of employee needs
  • As one level of need is satisfied, it is no longer a motivator; managers must find other ways of motivating employees.
  • Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y
  • Theory X implied that managers must constantly control, punish, and manipulate employees.
  • Theory Y depicted a worker who was willing to work and failed to be productive only when management failed to provide the proper work atmosphere.

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

© 2012 Delmar Cengage Learning

© 2012 Delmar Cengage Learning

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Human Relations Philosophy

  • Workers are viewed as whole individuals.
  • Managers are required to use their experience and intuition from an interdisciplinary perspective.
  • Higher productivity and greater human satisfaction require employee participation in the organization.
  • Communication is the nervous system of the organization.
  • The employee has a job-oriented role and an informal group-oriented role.
  • Cooperation in the form of teamwork is an indispensable management practice if the organization is to survive.
  • Employees are diversely motivated.
  • The work situation is a complex social system of interrelated elements.
  • Human relations management skills can be developed.

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Participatory Management

  • Allows subordinates to participate in making and planning their own responsibilities and the operation of their own units
  • Usually encouraged in matters affecting the officer’s job performance
  • When subordinates’ feelings, concerns, and ideas are expressed to their supervisors, the process of management is improved.

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Contributions of the Neoclassical or Human Relations Model

  • The introduction of behavioral sciences in an integrated fashion into the theory of organization
  • Showed the informal organization’s influence on the formal structure of organizations
  • People have an effect on management and their organization.

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Weaknesses of the Neoclassical or Human Relations Model

  • Informal groups are uncommon as a natural occurrence in organizations.
  • The majority of workers do not belong to informal groups.
  • People cannot function without some level of structure.
  • Research found that a reward system required both monetary and social components.

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Bridging Classical and Human Relations Theories

  • Mixed Structures
  • Contingency Theory

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Mixed Structures

  • Mechanistic or traditional structures
  • Appropriate work settings where repetitive tasks are performed
  • Organic systems
  • Appropriate for nonrepetitive work environments
  • Long-linked technology
  • Process by which individual work groups contribute a part to the total

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Contingency Theory

  • Advises that organizations are embedded in an environment
  • The environment places demands and pressures on the organization, resulting in change in operations and structure.
  • Institutional theory
  • Organizations change not to be more effective, but to give the appearance of effectiveness.

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

The Systems Model of Organizational Management

  • Emphasizes the relationship between the police agency and its environment
  • Concentrates on the parts, not the whole
  • Emphasizes open construction of organizations
  • Focuses on organizational processes and outcomes
  • Attempts to mediate between classical and human relations approaches

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Characteristics of an Open System

  • Environmental awareness and importation of energy and resources
  • Conversion of energy into goods and services
  • Outputs
  • Cyclical character of processes
  • Negative entropy (Not disorganized)
  • Feedback
  • Functional steady state or dynamic homeostasis
  • Movement toward growth and expansion
  • Equifinality

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Total Quality Management

  • A management orientation that ensures the organization and its members are committed to continuous improvement and to completely meeting customer needs.
  • To achieve maximum effectiveness:
  • Services must be of the highest quality.
  • Quality is the overarching objective.
  • Customers’ opinions should be the chief determinant of quality.
  • The client is the reason the organization exists in the first place.
  • Culture, customers, counting.

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Organizational Structure and
Police Administration

  • Vertical Structure
  • Used by traditionally organized police departments
  • Specialized units operate independently from other units
  • Control and communication comes from chains of command
  • Decision making is centralized by upper echelons of department
  • Matrix Structure
  • Separate operations are decentralized across geographic areas
  • Driven by geographical area and workload

© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning

Organizational Structure and
Police Administration (cont.)

  • Horizontal Structure
  • Activities are organized around core processes
  • Substantially reduces levels of hierarchy and bureaucracy
  • Team Structure
  • Use permanent and temporary teams to solve problems and deliver services
  • Community policing has resulted in some departments adopting team arrangements

Theory and the Real World

 Theory and the Real World

Research serves as a guide by which to study, describe, and quantify an array of social and physical phenomenon. Theory, which is best described as a set of propositions or hypotheses that specify the relationship among a subset of variables, serves as a way of offering an intellectualized general commentary on that which is observed. Using material found in Chapter 3 of this week’s required reading, describe how theory is applicable to a research study. Answer the questions:

  • How does theory inform a research study?
  • How can a generalized theory remain timely enough to be applicable to new or innovative studies?

Your initial post should be at least 400 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references.

Guided Response: Review your colleagues’ posts, and substantively respond to at least three of your peers by Day 7. Consider some specific measures by which theory can be applied to the development and conduct of a research problem, as well as the application of what is learned through a research study. Each of your responses should be at least 200 words in length. Continue to monitor the discussion forum until 5:00 p.m. (Mountain Time) on Day 7, and respond with robust dialogue to anyone who replies to your initial post.