Ethical Implications Of Implementing Religion Or Spirituality Into Therapy

In 1,250-1,500 words, describe the ethical implications of implementing religion or spirituality into therapy. Be sure to address the following four topics:

  1. Competence
  2. Multiple relationships
  3. Imposing religious values in therapy
  4. Informed consent

Also consider the ethical decisions made from the Christian worldview by referring to the GCU Statement on the Integration of Faith and Work.

Use a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources as well as the textbook and the APA Code of Ethics with APA formatted in-text citations and references. Refer to the informed consent document.

Attached the GCU statement that is needed for the paper. I will add info from the book later on.

1

INTEGRATION OF FAITH, LEARNING AND WORK AT GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY

G rand Canyon University is a Christ-centered educational institution that seeks to promote the common good by intentionally integrating faith, learning and work. The university’s initiative to integrate faith stems from its

mission to educate students from a distinctively Christian perspective and prepare them for careers marked by kindness, service and integrity. In addition to helping students find their purpose, the university endeavors to carry out its mission in ways that are marked by compassion, justice and concern for the common good.

The message of Jesus Christ offers wisdom for the present and hope for the future. It is good news for individuals and for the communities in which individuals live and work. Jesus himself taught that Christians should live as salt and light within the world, which suggests that the Christian worldview relates as much to the public arena as it does to the private lives of individuals. As a university, we are convinced this calling should shape the ways we think and act within academic disciplines and various career fields.

Our desire to integrate faith, learning and work flows out of an institutional commitment to cultivate and exemplify the biblical ideals of glorifying God and loving neighbors as ourselves. By God’s grace we seek to honor Him in all that we do and to serve others in ways that are consistent with the loving kindness of Jesus Christ. These ideals are lofty but they represent appropriate goals and should serve as standards for Christian educational institutions. For these reasons, GCU is devoted to the intentional and pervasive integration of the Christian worldview.

What is the Integration of Faith, Learning and Work? The integration of faith and learning may be understood as the scholarly process of joining together knowledge of God and knowledge of the universe for the sake of developing true, comprehensive and satisfactory understandings of humans and the world they inhabit. As a Christian university, we view the integration of faith and learning as a matter of institutional integrity and a matter of practical wisdom.

At GCU, integration of the Christian worldview also extends to the workplace as we strive to instill a sense of vocational calling and purpose in our students, faculty and staff. It is our conviction that

our work within the world matters to God and our neighbors and must be carried out with integrity and excellence. While few doubt that it is possible to serve God through ministry and mission work, we are convinced that God is also honored by faithful service within “secular” vocations. Integrating faith and work is a practical and logical extension of faith-learning integration.

The integration of faith and work may be understood as the application of the Christian worldview within the context of work in ways that honor God, serve neighbors and contribute to the advancement of the society. Work represents a vital opportunity to integrate Christian convictions, ethical principles and vocations in ways that glorify God and benefit others. Thus, we seek to honor God by educating students from the perspective of the Christian worldview and by equipping them to serve others through their respective vocations.

 

Why Does GCU Integrate Faith, Learning and Work? GCU has grown from a small, Christian college into a large and comprehensive university in Phoenix’s West Valley with a significant national presence. Yet, the university remains committed to the central convictions that have long characterized quality Christian education and faithful Christian institutions. Chief among these convictions are the principles that God is both Creator and Redeemer, that fallen humans need to be redeemed and that God is restoring the entire world through his Son, Jesus Christ. These convictions represent foundational beliefs that are central to the Christian worldview and derive from the consistent biblical emphasis on creation, fall, redemption and restoration. This four-fold framework undergirds the university’s approach to education and career preparation by providing a comprehensive and compelling view of the world.

The understanding that God created the universe and everything within it serves as a unifying principle and vital starting point for making sense of the world in which we live. Furthermore, by faith we recognize that God continues to work in our day to redeem the brokenness and inadequacies of humanity and society in ways that offer hope for the future. God is not only Creator but also Redeemer, and He has promised to make all things new through Jesus our Lord.

15COT0122

 

 

2

In some cases Christians have placed emphasis on sin and the need for personal redemption to the neglect of the doctrines of creation and restoration. While concern for individual salvation is entirely appropriate, we are convinced that the Bible actually sets forth a more holistic vision for life. This vision encompasses the restoration of the created order as well as the renewal of human creatures and communities. These understandings are rooted in the biblical narrative and reflected in GCU’s Doctrinal Statement. As such, they deeply shape the identity, mission and vision of the university.

In accord with Christian values and convictions, GCU affirms the universality and objectivity of truth and considers the pursuit of knowledge a worthy and attainable goal. Within secular academic contexts the search for knowledge tends to exclude areas of inquiry and sources that are not consistent with secularized views of the world. By contrast, GCU is committed to the pursuit of understanding and affirms that genuine knowledge may be derived from a wide variety of sources, including human reason and introspection, scientific investigation and divine revelation. The university strives to cultivate an academic environment in which students are empowered to seek truth wherever it may be found.

Students are encouraged to raise questions that cannot be answered adequately without exploring matters of ultimate concern. By broadening the conversation, we urge students to explore their personal worldviews as well as the Christian worldview to find their purpose within a world that displays the wisdom and glory of God. This provides unique opportunities to develop knowledge, skills, self-awareness, self-knowledge and depth of character. This educational strategy enables thoughtful people to understand Christian beliefs and Christian believers to become more thoughtful. As a result, graduates of GCU are prepared to engage the world with a sense of vocational calling and purpose.

How Does GCU Integrate Faith, Learning, and Work? The university strives to integrate faith at all academic levels, which includes its undergraduate, graduate and doctoral programs. GCU’s basic strategy of integration centers on the concept of a worldview, which refers to the complex network of assumptions that shape thought and practice. By exploring various worldview commitments, students are able to reflect on implications and practical value of major options available within the marketplace of ideas.

Students are introduced to the Christian worldview from the start of their programs of study. By thinking from a worldview perspective, students learn to reflect carefully on the underlying assumptions, motives and intentions that shape views of themselves and the world. They will be challenged to consider the practical implications of their personal perspectives and to refine understandings on the basis of investigation, reflection and dialogue. Students are encouraged to consider the needs and interests of others in addition to their own,

and embrace the Christian values of love and service as they prepare to enter the workforce.

This is not to suggest that all students are required to personally embrace the Christian worldview. They are free to do so, of course, but they are also free to embrace other views of the world. Christians believe that God grants common grace to Christians and non-Christians alike, a grace by which all truth and all that is excellent in our work may be considered good, regardless of an individual’s beliefs. Faith is a matter of conscience that cannot and should not be forced upon anyone who is unwilling or resistant to embrace it for any reason.

As a Christian university, we aim to be persuasive in our presentation and practice of the Christian worldview, but renounce all forms of coercion and compulsion. Faith, when genuine, is a voluntary response to the person and work of Jesus Christ. As a matter of loving others as we love ourselves, we are committed to respectful dialogue and charitable engagement in all matters, especially in matters of faith and conscience. GCU invites students from all walks of life to seek truth and to find their purpose within a context marked by Christian charity and compassion. We welcome all who genuinely seek truth to join the conversation.

Conclusion: Faith Seeking Understanding As intelligent and moral creatures, human beings bear significant responsibility for what they know and how they live in light of such knowledge. Thus the pursuit of truth should be a means to the end of promoting human flourishing and the good of the communities in which we live. Similarly, we must carry out our work with excellence and integrity and serve others as if our service is unto the Lord. Strong economies, healthy organizations and virtuous people are foundational to vibrant communities and thriving societies. Realizing these ideals depends substantially on arriving at true understandings of who we are and how we are meant to live in this world.

As a Christian university, GCU encourages students to find their purpose in Christ while emphasizing biblical values and ethics within the workplace. GCU embraces the notion that faith is the appropriate starting point for honest inquiry and exploration. Faith, understood in this way, should not stifle research, suppress dialogue or inhibit scientific investigation. Rather, we believe in order to understand more fully and by doing so we expect to see the power of God at work in the lives of individuals and in the restoration of our culture and society.

This expectation is rooted in the steadfast character of the God of the Bible who has graciously promised favor and blessing to all who call on His name. To Him alone we look for wisdom as we pray and wait for the day when His kingdom comes, and His will is finall

Eyewitness Identification Writing Assignment

Purpose:  Understand and apply behavioral terminology and concepts to a real-life situation.  Relate the importance of objectivity in scientific inquiry to the inherently subjective nature of human experience (LO 6)

TASK:

Watch the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drQ3i6EejPE

Scenario:  You are a defense attorney and one of the students in the video above has wrongfully identified your client as the thief of the laptop.Given what you know about:

  • effortful vs. automatic encoding
  • state-dependent and mood-congruent memory
  • interference, and
  • the constructive nature of memory (including misinformation, imagination, and source amnesia effects),

how would you challenge the validity and reliability of that eyewitness testimony?  What arguments would you use to confront the witness in your cross-examination and attack his/her credibility?

Write a defense of at least 300 words, answering the questions in red above.  Use the research articles below, as well as the material from the rest of this lesson, to support your conclusions.  Make sure to use the Key Terms correctly and format them in bold.

Research Article #1:  Misinformation Effect  https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/evidence-based-justice-acknowledges-our-corrupt-memories/

Research Article #2: Flashbulb memories https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-09/flashbulb-memories-of-dramatic-events-such-as-9-11-arent-as-accurate-as-believed

Research Article #3: How accurate are our memories of 9/11?  https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/911-memory-accuracy/

Research Article #4: Eyewitness identification https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-the-eyes-have-it/

Your defense/evaluation of the reliability of eyewitness testimony (integrating the above-mentioned issues) should be double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, and in 12-point font.  See the “More About the Eyewitness Identification Assignment” page and the “Eyewitness Identification APA Checklist” for more resources and information.

Leave time to submit a draft of your assignment to the Free Tutoring services for helpful feedback. Submit your write-up in the “Writing Assignment #1:  Eyewitness Identification” Assignment Tool.

Scatterplot

Raw Data from a Correlational Study

Participant——— Optimism Scale—————– Reported Health Behavior

1 —————————–6—————————————– 12

2—————————– 7 —————————————–20

3 —————————–1—————————————– 15

4—————————– 6—————————————— 9

5 —————————–2—————————————— 6

6—————————– 8—————————————— 14

7—————————– 3——————————————- 6

8 —————————–9——————————————- 21

9—————————– 9——————————————- 8

10 —————————7——————————————– 12

  1. With the raw data collected during a correlational study, create a scatterplot.
  2. Upload the scatterplot as part of this weeks quiz. 50pts
  3. On a separate page (2 pages min.) provide a summary of Chapter 10. 50 pts

    Analyzing and Composing

    About College Writing 1 The Top Twenty: A Quick

    Guide to Troubleshooting Your Writing

    2 Expectations for College Writing

    3 Oral and Multimedia Assignments

    student presentation 4 Design for College Writing

    The Writing Process 5 Writing Situations 6 Exploring Ideas 7 Planning and Drafting 8 Developing Paragraphs 9 Reviewing and Revising 10 Editing and Reflecting revised student draft student statement

    Critical Thinking and Argument 11 Critical Reading 12 Analyzing Arguments student analysis 13 Constructing Arguments student essay

    Research 14 Preparing for a Research

    Project 15 Doing Research 16 Evaluating Sources and

    Taking Notes 17 Integrating Sources and

    Avoiding Plagiarism

    18 Writing a Research Project

    p ag

    es 161–213 p

    ag es 43 –111

    p ag

    es 1– 42 p

    ag es 113 –160

    QUICK ACCESS MENU

     

     

    Resources

    MLA Documentation 48 MLA Style for In-Text

    Citations 49 Explanatory and Bibliographic

    Notes 50 List of Works Cited 51 student essay, mla style

    APA, Chicago, and CSE Documentation 52 APA Style student essay, apa style 53 Chicago Style student essay, chicago style 54 CSE Style student proposal, cse style

    For Multilingual Writers 55 Writing in U.S. Academic

    Genres 56 Clauses and Sentences 57 Nouns and Noun Phrases 58 Verbs and Verb Phrases 59 Prepositions and

    Prepositional Phrases

    Writing in the Disciplines 60 Academic Work in Any

    Discipline 61 Writing for the Humanities student essay 62 Writing for the Social Sciences student report 63 Writing for the Natural and

    Applied Sciences student lab report 64 Writing for Business student documents

    p ag

    es 577 – 623 p

    ag es 477 – 545

    p ag

    es 425 – 475 p

    ag es 547 – 576

    Usage and Style

    Language 19 Writing to the World 20 Language That Builds

    Common Ground 21 Language Variety 22 Word Choice and Spelling 23 Glossary of Usage

    Sentence Style 24 Coordination,

    Subordination, and Emphasis

    25 Consistency and Completeness

    26 Parallelism 27 Shifts 28 Conciseness 29 Sentence Variety

    Sentence Grammar 30 Basic Grammar 31 Verbs 32 Subject-Verb Agreement 33 Pronouns 34 Adjectives and Adverbs 35 Modifier Placement 36 Comma Splices and Fused

    Sentences 37 Sentence Fragments

    Punctuation and Mechanics 38 Commas 39 Semicolons 40 End Punctuation 41 Apostrophes 42 Quotation Marks 43 Other Punctuation 44 Capital Letters 45 Abbreviations and Numbers 46 Italics 47 Hyphens

    p ag

    es 367 – 424 p

    ag es 253 –281

    p ag

    es 215 –252 p

    ag es 283 – 365

    Luns.EverywiEx4.1st page.110508.indd 1 11/12/08 5:45:54 PM

     

     

    This page intentionally left blank

     

     

    The EVERYDAY

    Writer With Exercises

    00_LUN_66490_FM_(i-xx)_00_LUN_66490_FM_i-xx.qxd 11/30/11 1:54 PM Page i

     

     

    00_LUN_66490_FM_(i-xx)_00_LUN_66490_FM_i-xx.qxd 11/30/11 1:54 PM Page ii

    this page left intentionally blank

     

     

    The EVERYDAY

    Writer With Exercises

    Fourth Edition

    BEDFORD / ST. MARTIN’S Boston ◆ New York

    Andrea A. Lunsford STANFORD UNIVERSITY

    A section for multilingual writers with

    Paul Kei Matsuda ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY

    Christine M. Tardy DEPAUL UNIVERSITY

    00_LUN_66490_FM_(i-xx)_00_LUN_66490_FM_i-xx.qxd 11/30/11 1:54 PM Page iii

     

     

    For Bedford / St. Martin’s

    Senior Developmental Editor: Carolyn Lengel Senior Production Editor: Harold Chester Assistant Production Manager: Joe Ford Senior Marketing Manager: John Swanson Art Director: Lucy Krikorian Text Design: Anne Carter Copy Editor: Wendy Polhemus-Annibell Photo Research: Martha Friedman, Connie Gardner Cover Design: Donna Lee Dennison Cover Art and Illustrations: Eric Larsen Composition: Pre-Press PMG Printing and Binding: Quebecor World Taunton

    President: Joan E. Feinberg Editorial Director: Denise B. Wydra Editor in Chief: Karen S. Henry Director of Development: Erica T. Appel Director of Marketing: Karen R. Soeltz Director of Editing, Design, and Production: Marcia Cohen Assistant Director of Editing, Design, and Production: Elise S. Kaiser Managing Editor: Shuli Traub

    Library of Congress Control Number: 2009928112

    Copyright © 2010 (APA update), 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Bedford/St. Martin’s All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except as may be expressly permitted by the applicable copyright statutes or in writing by the Publisher.

    Manufactured in the United States of America.

    5 4 3 2 1 0 f e d c b a

    For information, write: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 75 Arlington Street, Boston, MA 02116 (617-399-4000)

    ISBN-10: 0-312-66490-7; ISBN-13: 978-0-312-66490-9

    Acknowledgments

    Acknowledgments and copyrights appear at the back of the book on pages 624 –625, which constitute an extension of the copyright page.

    00_LUN_66490_FM_(i-xx)_00_LUN_66490_FM_i-xx.qxd 11/30/11 1:54 PM Page iv

     

     

    How to Use This Book

    The Everyday Writer provides a “short and sweet” writing reference you can use easily on your own — at work, in class, even on the run. Small enough to tuck into a backpack or briefcase, this text has been designed to help you find information quickly, efficiently, and easily. I hope that this book will prove to be an everyday reference — and that the follow- ing tips will lead you to any information you need.

    Ways into the book

    QUICK ACCESS MENU. Inside the front cover you’ll find a list of the book’s contents. Once you locate a general topic on the quick access menu, flip to the tabbed section of the book that contains information on the topic, and check the menu on the tabbed divider for the exact page.

    USER-FRIENDLY INDEX. The index lists everything covered in the book. You can look up a topic either by its formal name (ellipses, for example) or, if you’re not sure what the formal name is, by a familiar word you use to describe it (such as dots).

    BRIEF CONTENTS. Inside the back cover, a brief but detailed table of con- tents lists chapter titles and major headings.

    GUIDE TO THE TOP TWENTY. The first tabbed section provides guidelines for recognizing, understanding, and editing the most common errors in student writing today. This section includes brief explanations, hand- edited examples, and cross-references to other places in the book where you’ll find more detail.

    CLEAR ADVICE ON RESEARCH AND DOCUMENTATION. Easy-to-follow source maps walk you step-by-step through the processes of selecting, evaluating, using, and citing sources. Documentation models appear in two tabbed sections — gold for MLA style and white for APA, Chicago, and CSE styles — with the different documentation styles color-coded in these sections.

    REVISION SYMBOLS. If your instructor uses revision symbols to mark your drafts, you can consult the list of symbols at the back of the book and its cross-references to places in the book where you’ll find more help.

    GLOSSARY OF USAGE. Chapter 19 gives quick advice on commonly con- fused and misused words.

    v

    00_LUN_66490_FM_(i-xx)_00_LUN_66490_FM_i-xx.qxd 11/30/11 1:54 PM Page v

     

     

    vi How to use this book

    Ways to navigate the pages

    GUIDES AT THE TOP OF EVERY PAGE. Headers tell you what chapter or subsection you’re in, the chapter number and section letter, the name of the tab, and the page number.

    “AT A GLANCE” BOXES. These boxes at the beginning of most chap- ters — and elsewhere in the book as well — help you check your drafts with a critical eye and revise or edit.

    BOXED TIPS THROUGHOUT THE BOOK.

    • Tips on academic language, concepts, and style. “Talking the Talk” and “Talking about Style” boxes help you make sense of how writing works in the academic world and help you make stylistic choices for various kinds of writing — in communities, jobs, and disciplines.

    • Tips for multilingual writers. Advice for multilingual writers appears in a separate tabbed section and in boxes throughout the book. You can also find a list of the topics covered, including language-specific tips, at the back of the book.

    • Tips for considering disabilities. These boxes, which also ap- pear throughout the book, help you make your work accessible to readers with disabilities. If you’re a writer with a disability, these boxes also point out resources and strategies you may want to use.

    • Tips on common assignments. Advice about dealing with the most common assignments in first-year writing — and in other disciplines — appears in boxed tips throughout the book.

    HAND-EDITED EXAMPLES. Many examples are hand-edited in blue, allowing you to see the error and its revision at a glance. Pointers and boldface type make examples easy to spot on the page.

    CROSS-REFERENCES TO THE WEB SITE. The Everyday Writer Web site expands the book’s coverage. The cross-references to the Web site point you to practical online resources — tutorials, interactive exer- cises, model papers, research and documentation help, and more.

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    00_LUN_66490_FM_(i-xx)_00_LUN_66490_FM_i-xx.qxd 11/30/11 1:54 PM Page vi

     

     

    308 Grammar Adjectives and adverbs34b

    AT A GLANCE

    • Scrutinize each adjective and adverb. Consider synonyms for each word to see whether you have chosen the best word possible.

    • See if a more specific noun would eliminate the need for an adjective (mansion rather than enormous house, for instance). Do the same with verbs and adverbs.

    • Look for places where you might make your writing more specific or vivid by adding an adjective or adverb.

    • Check that adjectives modify only nouns and pronouns and that adverbs modify only verbs, adjectives, and other adverbs. (34b) Check especially for proper use of good and well, bad and badly, real and really. (34b and c)

    • Make sure all comparisons are complete. (34c)

    Editing Adjectives and Adverbs

    Adverbs to modify verbs, adjectives, and adverbs

    In everyday conversation, you will often hear (and perhaps use) adjec- tives in place of adverbs. For example, people often say go quick instead of go quickly. When you write in standard academic English, however, use adverbs to modify verbs, adjectives, and other adverbs.

    carefully. � You can feel the song’s meter if you listen careful.

    ^really � The audience was real disappointed by the show.

    ^

    34b

    Using Adjectives with Plural Nouns

    In Spanish, Russian, and many other languages, adjectives agree in number with the nouns they modify. In English, adjectives do not change number this way: the kittens are cute (not cutes).

    FOR MULTILINGUAL WRITERS

    bedfordstmartins.com/everydaywriter For exercises, go to Exercise Central and click on Adjectives and Adverbs.D

    viiHow to use this book

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    00_LUN_66490_FM_(i-xx)_00_LUN_66490_FM_i-xx.qxd 11/30/11 1:54 PM Page vii

     

     

    Preface

    Today, perhaps more than ever before, everyone can be a writer — every day. From contributing entries to Wikipedia to blogging, texting, and posting to YouTube and Facebook, student writers are participating widely in what philosopher Kenneth Burke calls “the conversation of humankind.” As access to new writing spaces grows, so too do the po- tential audiences: many writers, for example, are in daily contact with people around the world, and their work goes out to millions. In such a time, writers need to think more carefully than ever about how to craft effective messages and how best to represent themselves to others.

    These ever-expanding opportunities for writers, as well as the chal- lenges that inevitably come with them, have inspired this edition of The Everyday Writer — from the focus on thinking carefully about audience and purposes for writing and on attending to the “look” of writing, to the emphasis on the ways writing works across disciplines, to the ques- tions that new genres and forms of writing raise about citing and docu- menting sources and about understanding and avoiding plagiarism. What remains constant is the focus on the “everydayness” of writing and on down-to-earth, practical advice for how to write well in a multi- tude of situations.

    What also remains constant is the focus on rhetorical concerns. In a time of such challenging possibilities, taking a rhetorical perspective is particularly important. Why? Because a rhetorical perspective rejects either/or, right/wrong, black/white approaches to writing in favor of asking what choices will be most appropriate, effective, and ethical in a given writing situation. A rhetorical perspective also means paying careful attention to the purposes we want to achieve and the audiences we want to address. Writers today need to maintain such a rhetorical perspective every single day, and The Everyday Writer, Fourth Edition, provides writers with the tools for doing so.

    A note about MLA style

    As you may know, the Modern Language Association publishes two different sets of guidelines: the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, Sixth Edition (2003), for student writers; and the MLA Style Manual, Third Edition (2008), for scholars and professional writers. MLA has recommended that undergraduate writers continue to fol- low the guidelines outlined in the sixth edition of the MLA Handbook until the seventh edition is published in 2009. The Everyday Writer fol- lows that recommendation.

    However, if you wish to follow the MLA Style Manual’s guidelines, you can request free copies of Documenting Sources: Supplement for Lunsford

    viii

    00_LUN_66490_FM_(i-xx)_00_LUN_66490_FM_i-xx.qxd 11/30/11 1:54 PM Page viii

     

     

    Handbooks (ISBN-10: 0-312-55455-9 or ISBN-13: 978-0-312-55455-2). Students and instructors can also download a free .pdf file of this booklet at bedfordstmartins.com/everydaywriter.

    Highlights

    ATTENTION TO GOOD WRITING, NOT JUST TO SURFACE CORRECTNESS. The Everyday Writer helps students understand that effective texts follow conventions that always depend on their audience, situation, and discipline.

    HELP FOR THE MOST COMMON WRITING PROBLEMS. A new nationwide study that I conducted with Karen Lunsford — revisiting the original 1986 research that Bob Connors and I conducted on student writing — shows the problems U.S. college students are most likely to have in their writing today. This book’s first chapter presents a quick guide to troubleshooting the Top Twenty — with examples, explanations, and information on where to turn in the handbook for more detailed infor- mation. Additional findings from the study inform advice throughout the book.

    UP-TO-DATE ADVICE ON RESEARCH AND DOCUMENTATION. As best prac- tices for research continue to evolve, so does The Everyday Writer. In this edition, you’ll find integrated coverage of library and online research to help students find authoritative and credible information in any medium, plus advice on integrating sources, avoiding plagiarism, us- ing social bookmarking tools for research, and citing sources in MLA, APA, Chicago, and CSE documentation styles. Visual source maps in all four documentation sections show students how to evaluate, use, and document print and online sources.

    COMPREHENSIVE COVERAGE OF CRITICAL THINKING AND ARGUMENT. My work on Everything’s an Argument has strengthened my belief that argu- ment is integral to many kinds of writing, and I have expanded the cov- erage of critical thinking and argument in this edition and placed them in a separate tab to make the information even easier to find and use. Chapters 11–13 offer extensive advice on critical reading and analysis of both visual and verbal arguments, instruction on composing argu- ments, and two complete student essays.

    EXPANDED HELP FOR WRITING IN THE DISCIPLINES. Along with strategies for understanding discipline-specific assignments, vocabulary, style, and use of evidence, this edition offers more student writing samples than ever before, including research projects in MLA, APA, Chicago, and CSE styles, business documents, and sample writing from introductory humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences courses.

    ixPreface

    00_LUN_66490_FM_(i-xx)_00_LUN_66490_FM_i-xx.qxd 11/30/11 1:54 PM Page ix

     

     

    New to this edition

    New advice based on Andrea Lunsford’s teaching and research

    UNIQUE COVERAGE OF LANGUAGE AND STYLE. Unique chapters on lan- guage help students think about language in context and about the con- sequences that language choices have on writers and readers. Boxed tips throughout the book help students communicate effectively across cultures — and use varieties of language both wisely and well.

    INTEGRATED EXERCISES. Exercises to help students practice writing, re- vising, thinking critically, and editing appear throughout the book. (An answer key appears in the Instructor’s Notes.)

    AN INVITING DESIGN. The Everyday Writer makes information easy to find and appealing to read.

    x Preface

    • New “Talking the Talk” boxes answer real questions students ask about academic concepts.

    • New “Common Assignments” boxes provide tips for succeeding with the kinds of writing projects and assignments that research shows students today are most likely to encounter in their classes.

    • A new chapter on expectations for college writing helps students grapple with academic work.

    Conventions TALKING THE TALK

    “Aren’t conventions really just rules with another name?” Not entirely. Conventions — agreed-on language practices of grammar, punctuation, and style — convey a kind of shorthand information from writer to read- er. In college writing, you will want to follow the conventions of standard academic English unless you have a good reason to do otherwise. But unlike hard-and-fast rules, conventions are flexible; a convention appro- priate for one time or situation may be inappropriate for another. You may even choose to ignore conventions to achieve a particular effect. (You might, for example, write a sentence fragment rather than a full sentence, such as the Not entirely at the beginning of this box.) As you become more experienced and confident in your writing, you will develop a sense of which conventions to apply in different writing situations.

    You are almost certain to get some form of analysis assignment during your first year of college. One common variety is the rhetorical analy- sis assignment, which essentially answers two big questions — What is the purpose of the text you are analyzing? How is that purpose achieved? — and focuses on how the text gets its meaning across.

    SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS OF A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT

    • Identify the purpose or purposes of the text. If the text has multiple purposes, point out any conflicts.

    • Identify the primary audience for the text and any secondary au- diences, and explore how the text meets audience expectations or needs.

    • Examine the author’s stance or attitude toward the topic: is it favor- able, critical, suspicious, neutral, or mocking? Identify parts of the text where such attitudes are evident, and show how they work to appeal to the audience.

    • Explain how the text uses deliberate strategies (such as tone, word choice, sentence structure, design, special effects, choice of medium, choice of evidence, and so on) to achieve its purposes.

    COMMON ASSIGNMENTS

    Rhetorical Analysis

    00_LUN_66490_FM_(i-xx)_00_LUN_66490_FM_i-xx.qxd 11/30/11 1:54 PM Page x

     

     

    xiPreface

    • New and expanded coverage of reviewing and revising clarifies the relationship between review and revision, with advice on how to offer useful comments on peers’ writing and how to benefit from com- ments from both peers and instructors.

    • A new section on reflecting on writing guides students in thinking back on their completed writing projects. A student reflective essay models the writing students are often asked to do for portfolio assessment.

    9 Reviewing and Revising 82 a Reread 82 b Get responses from peers 84 c Consult instructor comments 88 d Revise 91

    A student’s reflective statement

    Here is a shortened version of the cover letter that James Kung wrote to accompany his first-year writing portfolio.

    December 6, 2007

    Dear Professor Ashdown:

    “Writing is difficult and takes a long time.” This simple yet powerful

    statement has been uttered so many times in our class that it has

    essentially become our motto. During this class, my persuasive writing

    skills have improved dramatically, thanks to many hours spent writing,

    revising, polishing, and thinking about my topic. The various drafts,

    revisions, and other materials in my portfolio show this improvement.

    101Reflect Writ Process10b

    James Kung

    Student Writer

    Reflective Statements

    Research done for this book shows that one of the most common writ- ing assignments in college today is a reflective statement — in the form of a letter, a memo, or a home page — that explains and analyzes the contents of a portfolio.

    SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS OF A REFLECTIVE ASSIGNMENT

    • Think carefully about the overall impression you want the portfolio to create, and make sure that the tone and style of your reflective statement set the stage for the entire portfolio.

    • Unless otherwise instructed, include in your cover letter a descrip- tion of what the portfolio contains and explain the purpose of each piece of writing you have chosen.

    • Reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of your writing, using spe- cific passages from assignments in your portfolio to provide evi- dence for each point you make.

    • Reflect on the most important things you have learned about writ- ing and about yourself as a writer.

    • Conclude with plans for ongoing improvement in your writing.

    COMMON ASSIGNMENTS

    00_LUN_66490_FM_(i-xx)_00_LUN_66490_FM_i-xx.qxd 11/30/11 1:54 PM Page xi

     

     

    • Integrated coverage of writing and media helps students understand that smarter rhetorical choices produce better writing, no matter what the genre or format.

    xii Preface

    • New coverage for multilingual writers clarifies U.S. academic writing for every student with a multilingual background.

    493

    Xiaoming Li, now a college English teacher, says that before she came to the United States as a graduate student, she had been a “good writer” in China — in both English and Chinese. Once in the United States, however, she struggled to grasp what her teachers expected of her col- lege writing. While she could easily use grammar books and dictionar- ies, her instructors’ unstated expectations seemed to call for her to write in a way that was new to her.

    Of course, writing for college presents many challenges; such writ- ing differs in many ways from high school writing as well as from per- sonal writing like text messaging or postings to social networking sites. If you grew up speaking and writing in other languages, however, the transition to producing effective college writing can be even more com- plicated. Not only will you have to learn new information and new ways of thinking and arguing, but you also have to do it in a language that may not come naturally to you — especially in unfamiliar rhetori- cal situations.

    U.S. academic writing

    The expectations for college writing are often taken for granted by in- structors. To complicate the matter further, there is no single “correct” style of communication in any country, including the United States. Ef- fective oral styles differ from effective written styles, and what is con- sidered good writing in one field of study is not necessarily appropriate in another. Even the variety of English often referred to as “standard” covers a wide range of styles (see Chapter 21). In spite of this wide vari- ation, several features are often associated with U.S. academic English:

    • conventional grammar, spelling, punctuation, and mechanics • organization that links ideas explicitly

    55a

Antisocial Behavior

In a conversation with a family member, you are told: “Bad people do bad things. Some people are just bad eggs.” For this discussion, you will incorporate what you have learned about antisocial behavior and its implications for promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion.

First, title your post “Antisocial Behavior.”

For your initial post, review the videos What Is the Definition of Microaggression? and If Microaggressions Happened to White People. Then answer the following questions:

  • Are microaggressions real or imagined? Discuss the implications of statements such as “You shouldn’t take offense” and “Oh stop—you’re being too sensitive” on diversity, equity, and inclusion.
  • To what extent can we excuse a person’s motivation to participate in riots or tendency to bully others when it’s an aspect of group behavior? Discuss the implications of group mentality on diversity, equity, and inclusion.
  • Racial stereotyping and discrimination are antisocial behaviors. Given the impact of learning on human behavior, what is the first step that a person could take to unlearn discriminatory behavior and adopt a more accepting and inclusive attitude toward all people?
  • Our conception of bad eggs might inadvertently categorize people into specific social groups. How can we reframe the “bad” in people to view them through a less discriminatory and more inclusive, humanistic lens?
  • How does the concept of antisocial behavior apply to any of the following programmatic course themes:
    • Self-care
    • Social justice
    • Emotional intelligence
    • Career connections
    • Ethics