G-BioSport Dilemma Worksheet – 4 Of 5

G-BioSport Dilemma Worksheet – 4 of 5

The Problem: The Case of Helping the FBI

A friend of yours in the FBI has come to you with a problem. In response to the rising threat of terrorism in the US, the FBI is working at tracking those who might be illegally in the US or otherwise connected with unsavory practices. However, he is having trouble getting enough information to move the investigation ahead. Your friend has asked you to assist by releasing employee information as well as information about all of your sub-contractors and customers. While he does not have sufficient “probable cause” to justify a search warrant, you know that all things being equal at some point you could be compelled to release the information. You want to help prevent terrorism and assure that we are safe. You also feel strongly about non-documented workers.

Please complete each section of this worksheet. Some people find that writing the answers out on another page and then “cutting and pasting” them into the worksheet lets you think through the problem better.

If you only have time to do part of this worksheet, click the “save work” button at the bottom of this page. At any later time, you can then return to this worksheet and continue.

Be Responsible

  1. Choose an Option

    Select one option to implement within your Division:

    Release the information as requested.
    Do not release the information without a search warrant.
    Only release information about your employees that is otherwise available in other public records filed with different government agencies.
    Only release information about your sub-contractors and customers.
  2. Explain Your Decision

    Using the guidelines for how to write a memo, write a memo to be shared with the rest of the leadership team which explains your decision.

When you have completed all sections of this worksheet, please click the “continue” button below. This action will save your answers and advance you to the next worksheet in this assignment. If you wish to save your current work and then return to this worksheet at a later time, click the “save work” button below. Please note that this action will truncate any response that exceeds the 8,000 character limit.

PSYC 231 – Psychology Of Adolescence

Topic Paper Instructions

Choose a topic that is of personal interest and is relevant to adolescent development (suggested topics provided below). Write an informative paper that explores that topic and incorporates research to support your information. You must have at least 5 scholarly sources which include: books, a minimum of 3 journal articles, and a maximum of 2 internet sites. Your paper must have 3–5 pages of content not including the title page, abstract, and reference page.

 

Write in current APA format, double-spaced with 1-inch margins, and Times New Roman 12-point font. Include a page header with page numbers.

 

Your organization of this paper must be as follows:

Title Page 1 page

Abstract 120–150 words (1 page)

Introduction 1–2 paragraphs

Summary 3–4 pages

  • Origin of Issue
  • Statistics and Facts
  • Possible Solutions
  • Christian Worldview of Issue

Conclusion 2–4 paragraphs

Reference Page 1 page

 

This assignment is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 7.

 

Suggested Topics

Abortion

Peer pressure

Juvenile delinquency

Suicide

Underage drinking

ADHD

STDs

Bulimia

Blended families

Emotional development

Sexual abuse

Self-esteem

Gender differences

Personality traits

Violence in schools

Cliques

Test anxiety

Grief

Self mutilation

Learning disabilities

Obesity

Body image

Smoking

Parental styles

Emotional intelligence

Social development

School failure

Friendships

Substance abuse

Alcohol abuse

Aggression

Drunk Driving

Gangs

Anorexia Nervosa

Divorce

Physical development

Moral development

Ethnicity

Homosexuality

Dating

Violence in media

Shyness

 

PSYC 231

Comparison of Assessment Tool Constructs

Comparison of Assessment Tool Constructs

 

 

In this assignment, you will be comparing the constructs of two assessment tools. Use the Resources provided and the University Library to complete the following:

  • Select an assessment tool from those listed in the Resources area and one additional assessment tool from the literature using the Capella University Library. The assessment tools should measure the same construct. For example, if you select the Beck Anxiety Inventory from the Resources area, you would want to select another tool from the literature that also measures anxiety.
  • Examine the key test measurement constructs of reliability and validity for each tool, and compare these constructs for each tool. You will want to describe the methods used to acquire reliability and validity for each assessment and also discuss how the constructs relate to each other between the two assessment tools.
  • Describe how results on each assessment are interpreted. For example, how are scores interpreted in comparison to group means and norms (for a standardized or norm-referenced test) or to cutoff scores (for criterion-referenced test)? How are scores on this assessment correlated with other tests that measure the same construct?
  • Incorporate a minimum of six scholarly research studies analyzing the effectiveness of each selected assessment tool in professional settings.
  • Based on the review of literature, evaluate which assessment tool has clearer application of measurement concepts.

Please use the Assignment Template listed under Resources to compose your Comparison of Assessment Tool Constructs paper.

 

THESE ARE THE COMPARISONS, FIRST YOU WILL USE “BECK ANXIETY INVENTORY” AND THEN COMPARE IT WITH ” DETAILED ASSESSMENT of POSTRAUMATIC STRESS”

 

Beck Anxiety Inventory.

Detailed Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress (DAPS).

 

REFERENCE

Read Beier & Ackerman’s 2005 article, “Age, Ability, and the Role of Prior Knowledge on the Acquisition of New Domain Knowledge: Promising Results in a Real-World Learning Environment,” from Psychology and Aging, volume 20, issue 2, pages 341–355

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Unit and Assignment Title]

 

[Learner Name]

 

[COURSE NUMBER – NAME]

 

[Date]

 

[Professor Name]

Abstract

 

The abstract appears on a page by itself and is in single paragraph using block format and is double spaced. The abstract is a summary of your paper which allows the reader to quickly review what will be covered. Limit the abstract to 150–250 words.

 

 

#2 Opinion Maureen

Maureen Groome 

 

1 posts

Re:Module 7 DQ 1

It seems that every time I read a new article, I get a new perspective on my topic and want to change directions.  After having a call with my content expert and Dr. Rowell, I feel a lot more focused and believe I have found my niche.  After working on the review of the literature, I am seeing how themes and topics are appearing that will become subsections of that chapter. My chapter 2 submission for last week was pretty thin, but I realized that this is a work in progress. I am not supposed to have read, reviewed, and incorporated all of the literature on my topic as I have not read all the literature on my topic.  Neill (2017) states that writing a literature review can seem daunting and those that are new to the process are not sure where to begin.  However, in seeking to synthesis published research findings on my topic, gaps in the current knowledge with be exposed allowing for the investigation in forming a new question to be asked.  If I do not know what has been done before, I do not know what is left to do.

I feel that my progress is moving along, and the biggest change I have made is how I store the articles I have been reviewing.  Since my memory is definitely going, I had to come up with a way that worked for me.  By finding topics in what I am reading, I am able to create documents that are clearly labeled as that topic and I am putting my notes, and reference information directly into those documents.  It has allowed me to peruse smaller segments of information at one time as opposed to keeping everything in one document.

Maureen

Neill, C. (2017). Writing & Research. Writing a Literature Review. Radiation Therapist26(1), 89-91. Retrieved from https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=123551121&site=eds-live&scope=site