Activity: Listening Best Practices

Prompt

Watch the following video: Bringing Baths Into the 21st Century. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mh2-xA6AQfA

Then, identify the critical information missing from this persuasive presentation and describe some strategies or best practices you used when watching this video to arrive at your conclusions.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

  • Missing Information: Describe at least three critical pieces of information that are missing from the speech. Explain how they affected the speaker’s persuasive stance and the impact on the audience.
  • Listening Strategies: Describe at least three strategies or best practices you used when listening to the video. Explain how these strategies helped you identify the gaps in the speech.

Guidelines for Submission

Submit a 150- to 250-word Microsoft Word document that presents your evaluation of the video. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Resources for Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews

More than two billion people on the planet identify as Christians, a majority of whom associate with the Roman Catholic Church (some 1.3 billion). At the core of this belief system is the dual nature of the Jesus of Nazareth; the understanding that he was at once fully human and fully divine. Yet, has this always been the view? If not, how did it develop? Is this how he was understood during his lifetime? Put another way, how do historians study the life of someone billions consider to be divine? How do we study someone who left behind no writings? How do we study someone of whom we have few if any testimonials from people who knew him when he was alive?

Paula Freidriksen’s Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews is an example of what historians call an interpretive history. An interpretive history is based on the story told and the judgments made with the available evidence used in her / his study. It is the job of readers to assess whether or not the author met the goals of the study and proved her / his thesis?

Task:

Consult the materials located here: Resources for Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews

Read Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews by Paula Fredriksen

Answer the following questions:

1 What is the central thesis (argument) of the book? (10-40 words)

2 List at least 12 (twelve) sources the author uses to craft her study.

◦ Hint: Writing simply the “Bible” does not count as a source, but writing the “Letters of Paul” is acceptable. That said, be precise.

3 What are the opportunities and challenges of the available historical sources for this sort of study? (100-150)

4 Describe Jewish religious life in Roman antiquity, its features, its spaces, its beliefs. Why is this context important for the author? (200-250 words)

5 Why are apocalyptic beliefs and the Davidic Messiah critically important to this story? (200-250 words)

6 Describe the social and political environment within which John the Baptizer and Jesus of Nazareth were preaching, and why is this important? (100-150 words)

7 What role do the crowds in Jerusalem play in the lead up to the arrest and execution of Jesus of Nazareth? (100-150)

8 Whether or not you agree with the author’s central thesis, why is it important (or not) to understand the historical Jesus? (50-150 words)

Criteria:

1 Answers should meet the word limit requirements posted on each question. [Be advised: you may go over the word limit slightly, but you must not come in under]

2 Number and write your answers in paragraph form, except for Question 2.

3 Immediately after writing the question number, put the word count in parenthesis,

◦ e.g. – 3. (221 words) [BEGIN ANSWER]

4 Use Times New Roman font, size 12 point.

◦ You will likely have to manually adjust your font.

5 Adequate answers will include clear responses to all parts of the question.

6 Excellent answers will be complete, with careful analysis using and citing concrete examples from the book. You may simply cite the relevant page number(s) for the examples, be they summarized or quoted like so (147).

7 Consult the grading rubric so you know exactly how I will proceed.

Planning For Emergency Disaster Mangement

Question 1

Hazard identification and risk assessment

After completing this week’s readings, prepare a response that explains the role of hazard identification and risk assessment in emergency preparedness and planning. Include reference citations formatted using APA Style.

 

Question 2

Think about challenges to maintaining a realistic understanding of risk and implementing hazard mitigation and infrastructure protection in a community or organization. Prepare a short essay (approximately 250 words) describing one challenge and potential means to address the challenge.

 

Question 3

After completing this week’s readings, review at least one of the sample hazard mitigation plans provided. Review especially the risk assessment and mitigation strategies sections. Summarize the hazards addressed and the types of mitigation projects that are included in the plan. Also address the role of DMA2K in local and state hazard mitigation planning.

 

Question 4

prepare a post in your own words that explains why hazard mitigation plans are often considered the most technical types of plans in emergency management. Include at least one example of technical or scientific content. Include reference citations formatted using APA Style.

Mental Illness And Psychopathy

Mental Illness and Psychopathy
Consider mental illness and psychopathy on different spectrums each with their own specific set of characteristics. Is it possible to have mental disorders and not be mentally ill? Is it possible to have some of the characteristics of a psychopath without being a true psychopath? The terminology used to describe offenders has significant influence on their sentencing, treatment, and potential community reintegration. As professional practitioners you must learn to avoid stereotypes and focus on the facts of each case, the offenders, and their victim-offender relationships. What is critical for you in this week is to be able to differentiate between mental illness and psychopathy. It is very easy to focus solely on the behavior of an individual, especially in cases of extreme violent behavior, and deem them to be “crazy.” Indeed, the behavior is often “crazy,” but the individual does not meet the legal standard to be considered “insane.”

In this Discussion you will evaluate case studies to determine the Hare scale level of psychopathy of the offender.

To prepare

Review the factors on the Hare’s scale.
Review the Hare Psychopathy Checklist.
Review the Cleckley article “Behind the Mask of Sanity” located in the Learning Resources. Select two cases from the article to use in for this Discussion.
Compare two case studies from “The Mask of Sanity.”
Based on the Hare’s scale, which subject has the higher level of psychopathy?
What is your basis for rating the subjects?
Cite evidence for your opinion.