GCU Library Research Assignment

Course:

Date:

Instructor:

Topic 2 GCU Library Research Worksheet

Overview: The GCU Library will be a vital resource for you during your academic career. The Library contains a wealth of resources that will help you find, research, and broaden your understanding on any given topic. Learning to correctly locate, cite, and use resources to support your writing is an essential component of your academic success.

Directions: Type directly into this document. Be sure to address all questions within the document. When you have finished, save the document. While in the assignment dropbox: 1) click BROWSE FROM MY COMPUTER, 2) upload your saved document, and 3) SUBMIT to FINAL SUBMISSION. (This assignment will not be submitted to LopesWrite.)

Before starting this assignment, review the short walk-through tutorial on the GCU Library. http://tutorials.gcumedia.com/mediaElement/library-walk-through-tutorial/library-walk-through-tutorial-v1.1.php

After reviewing the library walk-through paying close attention to “Accessing Articles” and “Boolean Operators” sections, complete the following steps:

1. Go to www.library.gcu.edu.

2. From the library home page, choose “Find Journal Articles” (you may have to sign in with your GCU login information).

3. Click the “Peer Reviewed” box.

4. Type “higher education” in the search box (the Select Subject default reads “all subjects,” leave it).

5. Type “disability” in the second search box (below where you typed “higher education”)

6. Confirm the default selection in the dropdown for each is “And.” Click Search.

7. Locate on the results page the journal article “Higher education and disability: A systematic review of assessment instruments designed for students, faculty, and staff.”

8. Click on the article title.

9. Locate the “cite” icon on the right side of the screen.

10. Click on the cite icon, find the APA citation, and copy the APA citation. Paste it in the box below: Use the Merge Formatting option for paste.

(If the citation does not copy over with a hanging indent, use Control + T)

 

11. Always review the style guides in following link to make sure the reference in the library correctly follows the rules for GCU style.

Citations and Style guide resource: http://libguides.gcu.edu/CitingSources/APA

12. Go back to the Internet and your library search results. Keep “higher education” in the top search box.

13. Type “leadership” in the second search box (below where you typed “higher education”)

14. Type “glass-ceiling” in the third search box (below where you typed “leadership”)

15. Confirm the default selection in the dropdown for each is “And.” Click Search.

16. Click the article title “Climbing the stairs to leadership: Reflections on moving beyond the stained‐glass ceiling.”

17. As in #8, copy the APA citation and place it in the box below (Make sure you have a hanging ident and the citation is correct):

 

 

 

 

18. Copy and paste the “Abstract/Summary” in the box below:

 

 

 

 

19. Read the “Abstract/Summary” and write two to three sentences, briefly summarizing what the article is about in the box below:

 

 

OT Frame Of Reference Comparison Paper

South University, Richmond

Occupational Therapy Assistant Program

 

OT Frame of Reference Comparison Paper

 

OTA 1001 Introduction to OT

FOR Comparison Paper Assignment

 

Student Outcome(s) Addressed:

6.) Describe basic features of models of practice and frames of reference used in occupational therapy.

 

ACOTE Standards Addressed:

6.) Describe basic features of models of practice and frames of reference that are used in occupational therapy. (B.3.2)

 

5.) Describe basic features of the theories that underlie the practice of occupational therapy. (B.3.1)

 

 

1. Read Chapter 8, pages 35-36: Frank: Right Cerebrovascular Accident, Left Hemiplegia, Left Neglect. You will find this chapter in the Halloran, P, & Lowenstein, N. (2015). Case studies through the healthcare continuum: a workbook for the occupational therapy student. Thorofare: NJ.

 

Don’t worry about understanding the range of motion results or any other test results in the occupational therapy evaluation section; just focus on Frank’s overall abilities and deficits.

 

Here are some of the abbreviations used in the case and what they mean:

 

CVA – cerebrovascular accident, which is another term for a stroke

 

UE – upper extremity – from the shoulder down (distal) to the fingers

 

LE – lower extremity – from the hip down (distal) to the toes

 

AROM – active range of motion – motion that Frank has at any joint when he moves

 

PROM – passive range of motion – motion that Frank has at his joints when someone else, like the therapist, moves his arm. Frank has less motion that he can initiate on his own than when the therapist moves his arm due to muscle weakness on the right side.

 

WNL – within normal limits – if range of motion is limited by a few degrees from normal

then it is said to be within normal limits

 

ADL – activities of daily living

 

2. Read about the Rehabilitation (p.75-76) and the Cognitive Rehabilitation (p.84-85) frames of reference in Chapter 7 of your Ryan’s (2015) textbook.

 

In a paper that is no longer than five pages, following the prescribed format, you will provide the following information:

 

a. Define and describe the terms theory, frame of reference, and a model.

 

b. Why are assumptions made or defined when explaining frames of reference?

 

c. Identify and describe the Rehabilitation Frame of Reference.

 

d. Identify and describe the Cognitive Rehabilitation Frame of Reference.

 

e. What are the similarities between your two frames of reference?

 

f. How do your two frames of reference differ from each other?

 

g. Describe why the Rehabilitation and the Cognitive Rehabilitation Frames of

Reference are appropriate frameworks on which to base your treatment approach to working with Frank in occupational therapy.

 

h. Why is it important that OT practitioners base their approach to client treatment on a

frame of reference?

 

 

NOTE: Please copy the Evaluation Rubric and paste the entire Rubric into the very end of your paper — after any references or appendices. A missing rubric will incur a 10% reduction. Thank you!

 

Evaluation Rubric for Written Analysis of Research Article Assignment

This assignment is worth 25 points, which is 15% of your grade for this course. It will be evaluated according to the following rubric:

 

CRITERIA for Frame of Reference Paper

25 points

Above Average

Professional

Acceptable

Inconsistent Professionalism

Below Average

Deficient in professional skills

Unacceptable

Lacks professionalism

1. Definition of theory, frame of reference and model and assumptions Definitions and descriptions of terms are clear; complete information provided

(5 points)

Partial definition and description of terms; adequate information provided

(3-4 points)

Incomplete definition and description of terms; minimal and superficial information provided

(1-2 point)

Definitions and descriptions are unclear or incorrect; extraneous information provided ; reads like a first draft

(0.5 points)

2. Scope of Content: Description of each frame of reference; identification of similarities & differences Substantial, pertinent information and details provided about each frame of reference, including at least two similarities and two differences; point of view supported by evidence and examples; effective organization; good flow of information

(5 points)

Adequate information and some details provided about each frame of reference, including one similarity and one difference; point of view somewhat supported by an example; ineffective organization with awkward flow

(3-4 points)

Superficial information; minimal details provided; point of view supported by flawed reasoning and insufficient evidence; ineffective organization; difficult to follow

(1-2 points)

Description of frames of reference is unclear or incorrect; point of view is unsupported or supported incorrectly; reads like a first draft

(0.5 points)

3. Description of ways in which frames of reference guide practice and why that is important Substantial, pertinent information and details clearly stated about how frames of reference pertain to case and areas of practice; effective organization

(5 points)

Some details provided about how frames of reference pertain to case and areas of practice; ineffective organization with awkward flow

(3-4 point)

Superficial information about how frames of reference pertain to case and areas of practice; point of view supported by flawed reasoning and insufficient evidence; lack of flow leads to confusion;

(1-2points)

Description of frames of reference is unclear or incorrect; point of view is unsupported or supported incorrectly; reads like a first draft

(0.5 points)

4. Style Required formatting and APA style (if relevant) applied correctly and consistently throughout

(5 points)

Required formatting and APA style (if relevant) applied is correct but applied inconsistently throughout

(3-4 point)

Required formatting and APA style (if relevant) applied incorrectly and inconsistently throughout (

1-2points)

Required formatting and APA style (if relevant) not evident or reads like a first draft

(0.5 points)

5. Grammar

 

Effective command of grammar, spelling, usage, and punctuation; paper contains fewer than five errors

(5 points)

Fair command of grammar, usage, spelling and punctuation; paper contains fewer than five errors per page on all pages

(3-4 point)

Below average command of grammar, usage, spelling, punctuation; paper contains five errors per page on five or more pages

(1-2 points)

Poor command of grammar, spelling usage and punctuation; excessive errors interfere with understanding; reads like a first draft

(0.5 points)

 

 

 

OTA Program South University, Richmond adapted by C. Cox 4.20.16; modified 1/17/18MAS

Marketing Strategies

FM002: Marketing Strategies: Evaluate marketing strategies to ensure they enhance the organization’s competitive position and align with its mission and social responsibility.

Assessment Rubric

  0 Not Present 1 Needs Improvement 2 Meets Expectations 3 Exceeds Expectations
Part I. Kimball Hospital and Tanner Medical Center Merger Report
Sub-Competency 1: Analyze the long-term impact strategic actions have on the healthcare organization’s key stakeholders.
Learning Objective 1.1: Analyze the impact of issues (i.e., access, cost, and quality) related to mergers on various stakeholder groups. Analysis of the impact of issues (i.e., access, cost, and quality) related to mergers on various stakeholder groups is missing. Response vaguely analyzes the potential long-term impacts of issues related to the merger on one or more of the stakeholder groups, or analysis is inaccurate or illogical.

Explanation is not supported by academic/professional resources or the resources are not relevant.

Response clearly and accurately analyzes the potential long-term impacts of issues related to the merger on patients, the public, physicians, and payers.

Explanation is supported by relevant academic/professional resources.

Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response accurately explains one pro and one con of the issues related to the merger from the perspective of each of the four stakeholder groups.

Learning Objective 1.2: Analyze the impact of a merger on hospitals. Analysis of the impact of a merger on hospitals is missing. page1image360617200

Analysis of the impact of the merger is not properly targeted to Kimball’s community-based board members, or analysis is inaccurate or illogical.

Response clearly analyzes the impact of a merger on Kimball and Great Western Hospital Corporation in a way that is clear and understandable to Kimball’s community- based board members. Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response clearly and accurately describes one argument in support of Kimball Hospital assuming ownership of the community’s hospital and one argument in support

1

 

 

  0 Not Present 1 Needs Improvement 2 Meets Expectations 3 Exceeds Expectations
        of Tanner Medical Center doing the same.
Sub-Competency 2: Recommend strategies for analysis of healthcare industry issues and trends, including forces that shape a healthcare organization’s mission/vision/strategies, and balance organizational and community interests when making important decisions that affect the healthcare marketplace.
Learning Objective 2.1

Recommend strategies for balancing organizational and community interest during a merger.

Recommendation of strategies for balancing organizational and community interest during a merger is missing. Report recommends strategies that are illogical or irrelevant for balancing organizational and community interest during a merger.

Strategies are not supported by academic/professional resources or the resources are not relevant.

Report recommends logical and relevant strategies for effectively balancing organizational and community interest during a merger.

Strategies are supported by relevant academic/professional resources.

Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response accurately describes the respective interests of the organization and the community in relation to the hospital merger.

Learning Objective 2.2:

Justify decisions related to mergers using information about industry issues and trends.

Justification of the decisions related to mergers using information about industry issues and trends is missing. page2image358539296

Report provides an illogical justification of the decision related to the merger, and/or the justification does not use information about industry issues and trends to inform the justification.

Report provides a logical justification of the decision related to the merger.

Report uses relevant information about industry issues and trends to inform the justification.

Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Report addresses the alternative perspective in its justification of the decision.

page2image358590128

Learning Objective 2.3:

Explain how mission, vision, and strategic plan impacts important decisions that affect the healthcare

Explanation of how mission, vision, and strategic plan impacts important decisions that affect the healthcare marketplace is missing.  

Report provides an unclear or illogical explanation of how mission, vision, and strategic plan impacts important decisions that affect the healthcare

Report provides a clear and logical explanation of how mission, vision, and strategic plan impacts important decisions that affect the healthcare Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Report provides an example from an authentic

 

 

  0 Not Present 1 Needs Improvement 2 Meets Expectations 3 Exceeds Expectations
marketplace.   marketplace. marketplace. healthcare setting that illustrates how mission, vision, and strategic plan impacts important decisions that affect the healthcare marketplace.
Part II: Community Medical Center Presentation
Sub-Competency 3: Analyze information common to a dynamic and competitive healthcare marketplace as part of an organization’s strategic marketing process.
Learning Objective 3.1:

Apply a SWOT analysis to an organization.

page3image315100608

Application of a SWOT analysis to an organization is missing. Presentation incompletely or inaccurately applies a SWOT analysis of the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

 

Presentation effectively and comprehensively applies a SWOT analysis of the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Presentation notes accurately analyze the purpose and limitations of a SWOT analysis.

Learning Objective 3.2:

Apply a situational analysis for an organization.

Application of a situational analysis for an organization is missing. Presentation includes a situational analysis that is illogical or that omits an overview of the critical issues facing one of the stakeholder groups. Presentation includes a comprehensive situational analysis, including an overview of the most critical issues CMC faces regarding physicians, payers, patients, and public customers. Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response incorporates an analysis of key industry trends and corresponding impacts on CMC and its stakeholders.

Learning Objective 3.3:

Describe market strategy for an organization.

Description of the market strategy for an organization is missing. Market strategy does not accurately identify the target market and how to reach it. Presentation includes an effective market strategy that clearly identifies the target market and how to Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

 

 

  0 Not Present 1 Needs Improvement 2 Meets Expectations 3 Exceeds Expectations
    Market strategy does not effectively promote services to existing and new patients.

Market strategy recommends fewer than four effective marketing techniques.

reach it.

Market strategy effectively promotes services to existing and new patients.

Market strategy recommends four effective marketing techniques.

Market strategy includes growth strategies for each of the four marketing techniques.
Part III: Palomar Heart Hospital Report
Sub-Competency 4: Evaluate organizational and marketplace realities when pursing strategic initiatives, including the need for proactive pricing and contracting; sound business and financial modeling; and credible marketing strategies.

 

Learning Objective 4.1:

Describe marketing techniques used to raise the profile of an organization.

Description of marketing techniques used to raise the profile of an organization is missing. Description of marketing techniques is not logical for raising the profile of the organization in the community.

Response identifies fewer than two relevant mass- marketing techniques and fewer than two relevant target-marketing techniques.

Response is not supported by academic/professional resources or the resources are not relevant.

Response describes marketing techniques that could effectively raise the profile of the organization in the community.

Response identifies two relevant mass-marketing techniques and two relevant target-marketing techniques.

Response is supported by relevant academic/professional resources.

Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response identifies an additional relevant mass- marketing and target- marketing technique.

Learning Objective 4.2: Recommendation of Response recommends Response clearly Demonstrates the same

 

 

  0 Not Present 1 Needs Improvement 2 Meets Expectations 3 Exceeds Expectations
Recommend marketing strategies targeting payers, which will increase access to an organization. marketing strategies targeting payers, which will increase access to an organization is missing. fewer than two relevant marketing techniques targeting payers.

Marketing techniques recommended would not effectively increase the proportion of the population able to access an organization’s services.

recommends at least two relevant marketing techniques targeting payers that would effectively increase the proportion of the population able to access an organization’s services. level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response recommends at least one additional relevant marketing technique that targets payers and can potentially increase access to healthcare.

Learning Objective 4.3:

Recommend the use of social media to drive new business.

page5image357623584

Recommendation of how social media can be used to drive new business is missing.

page5image381689552

Response recommends fewer than two ways social media can be used to drive new business to PHH.

Recommendation of how social media can be used to drive new business is inaccurate or illogical.

Response clearly recommends at least two ways social media can be used to drive business to PHH. Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response includes an additional social media resource and the target audience for this medium.

Learning Objective 4.4:

Justify whether an organization should amend its mission, vision, and/or scope of services offered.

Justification of whether an organization should amend its mission, vision, and/or scope of services offered is missing. Justification is unclear, or it does not demonstrate a consideration of organizational and marketplace realities. Response clearly justifies whether PHH should amend its mission, vision, and/or scope of services offered.

Explanation demonstrates a consideration of organizational and market place realities.

Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response incorporates an accurate and thorough description of PHH’s operating and financial data (Exhibit 1) to support Explanation.

 

Part IV: Intermountain Healthcare Presentation

Sub-Competency 5: Defend the strategic marketing implications and opportunities of a healthcare organization’s relative position and

 

 

  0 Not Present 1 Needs Improvement 2 Meets Expectations 3 Exceeds Expectations
response to its marketplace.
Learning Objective 5.1:

Illustrate an organization’s engagement with customers in pursuit of its organizational mission and vision.

Illustration of an organization’s engagement with customers in pursuit of its organizational mission and vision is missing. Illustration of how Intermountain’s engagement with customers is in alignment with its mission and vision is incomplete or inaccurate. Presentation accurately illustrates how Intermountain’s engagement with patients, physicians, and payers is in alignment with the organization’s mission and vision. Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Response incorporates an accurate analysis of how Intermountain links its financial goals to its mission and vision.

page6image382015248

Learning Objective 5.2:

Illustrate an organization’s strategic advantages.

page6image382022720

Illustration of an organization’s strategic advantages is missing.  

Illustration of Intermountain’s strategic advantages is inaccurate, or it includes fewer than three strategic advantages.

 

Presentation clearly and accurately illustrates three of Intermountain’s most significant strategic advantages. Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Presentation identifies one of Intermountain’s weaknesses.

Learning Objective 5.3:

Explain how strategic advantages can be used in a marketing plan to advance the organization’s mission.

Explanation of how strategic advantages can be used in a marketing plan to advance an organization’s mission is missing. Explanation of how Intermountain’s strategic advantages can be used in a marketing plan to advance its mission is inaccurate, or it includes fewer than two examples. Presentation clearly explains at least two ways Intermountain’s strategic advantages can be used in a marketing plan to advance its mission. Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:

Presentation explains at least one additional way Intermountain’s strategic advantages can be used in a marketing plan to advance its mission.

 

PS001: Written Communication: Demonstrate graduate-level writing skills.

Learning Objective PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, Multiple major and minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics Multiple minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics are distracting Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English. Grammar, spelling, and mechanics reflect a high level of accuracy in

 

 

  0 Not Present 1 Needs Improvement 2 Meets Expectations 3 Exceeds Expectations
spelling, and mechanics.

page7image359428768

are highly distracting and seriously impact readability.

page7image359431600

and negatively impact readability. Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability. standard American English and enhance readability.
Learning Objective PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity.

page7image381226864

Writing is poorly organized and incoherent. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions are missing or inappropriate.

page7image381238624

Writing is loosely organized. Limited use of introductions, transitions, and conclusions provides partial continuity. Writing is generally well- organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions provide continuity and a logical progression of ideas. Writing is consistently well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions are used effectively to enhance clarity, cohesion, and flow.
Learning Objective PS 1.3: Apply APA style to written work. APA conventions are not applied. APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied inconsistently. APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are generally applied correctly in most instances. Sources are generally cited appropriately and accurately. APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied correctly and consistently throughout the paper. Sources are consistently cited appropriately and accurately.
page7image382736992

Learning Objective PS 1.4: Use appropriate vocabulary and tone for the audience and purpose.

page7image382769248

Vocabulary and tone are inappropriate and negatively impact clarity of concepts to be conveyed.

Vocabulary and tone have limited relevance to the audience. Vocabulary and tone are generally appropriate for the audience and support communication of key concepts. Vocabulary and tone are consistently tailored to the audience and effectively and directly support communication of key concepts.
 

PS003: Technology: Use technology tools effectively.

 

 

  0 Not Present 1 Needs Improvement 2 Meets Expectations 3 Exceeds Expectations
Learning Objective PS 3.1: Use images and layout of presentations to effectively communicate content to a specific audience.

page8image381547248

Images and layout are inappropriate, hard to read, and/or impede audience understanding of key concepts.

page8image381506016

Images or layout provide limited support for audience understanding of key concepts. Images and layout generally support audience understanding of key concepts. Images and design elements are used purposefully, and effectively support audience engagement and understanding of key concepts.
PS005: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: Use critical-thinking and problem-solving skills to analyze professional issues and inform best practice.
page8image381819040

Learning Objective PS 5.1: Analyze assumptions and fallacies.

Analysis of assumptions is missing.  

Response is weak in assessing the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument.

Response does not adequately identify and discuss the implications of fallacies or logical weaknesses in a given argument.

Response generally assesses the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument.

Response identifies and discusses the implications of fallacies and/or logical weaknesses in a given argument.

Response clearly and comprehensively assesses the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument.

Response provides a detailed and compelling analysis of implications of fallacies and logical weaknesses in a given argument.

page8image382212800

Learning Objective PS 5.2: Generate reasonable and appropriate assumptions.

Assumptions are missing.  

Response does not adequately present and discuss key assumptions in an original argument.

Response presents and discusses key assumptions in an original argument. Response justifies the reasonableness and need for assumptions in an original argument.
Learning Objective PS 5.3: Assess multiple Assessment of multiple perspectives is missing. Response does not identify nor adequately consider multiple perspectives or Response identifies and considers multiple perspectives and Response justifies selection of chosen alternative relative to

 

 

  0 Not Present 1 Needs Improvement 2 Meets Expectations 3 Exceeds Expectations
perspectives and alternatives.   alternatives. alternatives. others.
Learning Objective PS 5.4: Use problem-solving skills. Problems and solutions are not identified. Response presents solutions, but they are ineffective in addressing the specific problem. Response presents solutions that are practical and work in addressing the specific problem. Response presents compelling supporting arguments for proposed solutions.

Dietary Analysis Part 3

Part III: MyPlate (60 pts)

Your textbook, An Introduction to Nutrition, covers “Achieving a Healthy Diet” in chapter 2.  MyPlate (found at https://www.choosemyplate.gov ) is a tool that provides guidance in helping us achieve a healthy diet. As you may recall from chapter 2, the 5 key factors of a healthy diet include adequacy, balance, calorie control, moderation, and variety. In the Part 2 Diet Analysis (using Cronometer),we were able to assess our diets in terms of adequacy, balance, calorie control, and moderation. However, without looking at how well each food group is represented, we are unable to assess the variety in our diets. This portion of the diet analysis project will allow you to explore one of your documented days on your food diary and assess for variety. In addition to variety, this assignment will also provide more insight into moderation (are you getting too much or too little from a food group?).

Step 1: Finding Your MyPlate Daily Checklist

Locate your estimated calorie needs in Cronometer (and as discussed in the Energy Balance section of the Part 2 analysis questions). For purposes of this Part 3 Analysis, round this measurement to the nearest multiple of “200.” Once you have located your calorie needs from the Part 2 Analysis and rounded them to the nearest multiple of “200,” visit https://www.choosemyplate.gov/MyPlate-Daily-Checklist.

Choose the calorie level closest to your estimated Part 2 Analysis calorie needs value. For example, if you needed 2289 kcal/d, you would round down to 2200 instead of rounding up to 2400. On the other hand, if you needed 2340 kcal/d, you would round to up to 2400 instead of down to 2200.

As an adult, you will select a Calorie Level from the “Ages 14+” row and click on the appropriate calorie level.  See screenshot below for the Calorie Level table.

This will open up a PDF file in a new window. This is the worksheet you will be using to complete the next step of the project. Print out a copy of this and save to your computer.

Step 2: Transferring Your Diet Diary to the Worksheet

Review your 3-day food record. Select the day that most closely matches a typical day’s intake for you. Using those foods only, complete PAGE 2 of the MyPlate Daily Checklist Worksheet.

NOTE: You will be hand writing directly on this worksheet, however if you are comfortable with Adobe editing or other PDF editing tools you may type directly into this worksheet. Your handwriting must be legible and clear. You may need to write it down once as part of the process to identify where all foods fit and then copy it over to another blank form as a final version. You may also want to create your own table in Word that can clearly display the information if you find the worksheet does not give you enough space. In this case, you will still need to attach the worksheet that you took your notes on in order to verify you were using this as a guide.

Use the first column of the table “Food group targets” for guidance on determining portion sizes equivalent to a serving from that food group. For example, in the red box below, we can see we need 1 ½ cups of fruit for the day and that 1 cup of fruit is either 1 cup of raw or cooked fruit, ½ cup dried fruit, or 1 cup (8 fluid ounces) of 100% fruit juice. For the other food groups similar guidance is provided.

Some foods you have eaten may be “combination” foods, meaning they have components from more than 1 food group. You will want to split those up as ingredients or components and place each piece into the respective food group. For example, if you had 2 slices of a medium pizza with tomato sauce, vegetables, mozzarella cheese, and ground beef, we can identify 4 different food groups. You would count the crust as a starch (typically 1 ounce of grain per each slice), the tomato sauce and veggies on top count as vegetables, the mozzarella falls under dairy, and the ground beef is in the protein group. Include each ingredient in the correct group. DO NOT simply write pizza as a single food in a single category.

Write the foods or food components (ingredients) into the second column where it says to write in your foods. This is identified in the blue box on the graphic below. Fill this in for all foods in their respective food groups.

Next, determine if you reached your target using the information in column 1 (’Food group targets’) and the information you filled into column 2 (‘food choices’). In column 3, indicated by the green circle in the graphic below, check off Y or N as appropriate.

The last step in your data collection process for the MyPlate portion of this project is to assess your “limits”. Sodium, saturated fat, and added sugars are all areas that the Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend limiting. Using your Part 2 Diet Analysis Cronometer Nutrition Report screenshot check on your milligrams of sodium and grams of saturated fat intake If your sodium and saturated fat values from Part 2 Diet Analysis Cronometer are below the bolded values shown in the area called “Limit” below, check Y.  Otherwise, check N.  Your bolded values for the saturated fat “limit” will be different depending upon your calorie level, so do not worry if it’s not 20 grams like in the example below. . (Note: Since the tracking of added sugar in foods is new to food labeling, your Part 2 Analysis Cronometer results will not include this. They list total sugars, which does not differentiate between natural sugars (like those in fruit and milk) and added sugars.  Therefore we will not be including this in the project.)

Step 3: Assessing Your Intake for Variety and Moderation

It is possible that although your Part 2: Diet Analysis Cronometer Nutrition report showed your diet was adequate in nutrients, met calorie goals, and balanced in terms of nutrients, your diet is lacking variety and not showing moderation in terms of the food groups (one is too high or too low, resulting in too much or too little of another food group). This portion of the diet analysis project will focus on your critical analysis of your intake for one day as compared to recommendations from MyPlate for variety and moderation from the food groups.

This will be presented as a written paper. The paper should include an introduction paragraph, one paragraph for each of the 5 food groups, one paragraph on the “limits” (sodium and saturated fat), and a conclusion.

  • Introduction: This should tell the reader what they will expect to read about in your paper. The main focus here is that you are introducing a review of your diet in terms of how well it matches up to recommendations about food groups.
  • Body of the paper: Aim for 1 complete paragraph (3-5 sentences is a good goal to aim for) addressing each food group and the limits. This means you will have 6 paragraphs in total for the body of the paper.
    • For each food group support the determination you made (Y or N) in column 3 of your worksheet- Did you reach your target? Clearly state if you believe you did/did NOT meet the recommendation and how you came to this conclusion. Which foods did you classify in this food group and how did you come up with the total number of servings? Do this for each of the 5 food groups.
    • Once you have this for all food groups, do the same for the limits. If you exceeded sodium and/or saturated fat, identify which foods in your diet for the day resulted in being over the limit(s). If you were under for one or both, comment on how you made choices to keep those to a minimum. In the event no decisions were made specifically with awareness of sodium and saturated fat content, that is fine, however you will want to comment on this still and not skip over a critical analysis of your intake impacting those values.
  • Conclusion: This is the last paragraph of the paper. Here is where you present your final argument using the preceding evidence presented in the body of the paper to support whether or not your diet for that one-day was varied and exhibited moderation. The key aspects to address here are specifically variety and moderation as presented in An Introduction to Nutrition chapter 2 using MyPlate as your set of guidelines.

Step 4: Submission

You will need to submit 2 files to the correct assignment folder in LEO. The first is either a PDF version or a scanned version of your worksheet. Even if you feel your handwriting is not clear, you must be able to show that you worked through this activity. This must be included to be eligible for full credit. The second file to include is your paper (Step 3).  This must be submitted as a Word document. If you are a Mac user and have Pages, please “Save As” a Word file. If the file cannot be opened you risk getting a ‘0’ for the assignment. If you have completed the Worksheet as a Word doc to make reading it more clear, include this as an appendix with the paper.  Do not submit as a 3rdfile.

Rubric:

All required sections of the worksheet have been completed (includes foods with amounts, checked off of targets reached, and limits are addressed)

INTRODUCTION 

–Preview of review of diet with focus on comparing with recommendations by food group

BODY

–5 paragraphs on 5 food groups

*uses evidence to explain where recommendation met for each food group

*specific food groups and number of servings in each group

–1 paragraph on limits (saturated fat and sodium)

*identifies foods that take you over the limit

*uses evidence to explain plans to lower the intake of these foods

*If your limits meet recommendations, use evidence and explain how your diet meets the recommendation

CONCLUSION

–Discusses key factors of a healthy diet

*whether diet is varied

*whether diet demonstrates moderation

–Discusses key factors in the context of NUTR 100 textbook Chapter 2 and MyPlate guidelines

WRITING:

–Clear Introduction and Conclusion paragraphs

–Written in student’s own words

–Well-organized with cohesive logic flow

–Written in complete sentences

— Demonstrates critical thinking

–No spelling or grammatical errors

–Supported with external research cited in APA format in the text body and at the end of the paper