Case Study: Pfizer

CASE STUDY

 

Global biopharmaceutical company Pfizer believes that a diverse workforce leads to more innovative and creative thinking.[i] The company also feels that inclusion is the foundation to the ownership culture that it wants to build among its employees.[ii] Pfizer recognized that better attracting and retaining diverse employees would require it to pay more attention to its diversity and inclusion initiatives. In addition to relying more on its worldwide diversity and inclusion leadership council comprised of senior executives from around the company, <para></para>Pfizer also created employee  resource groups including people with disabilities, Latino/Hispanics, African American and LGBT employees to better apply their ideas to influence company results.[iii]

 

<problemset id=”ch03ps03″ role=”qonly”><supertitle id=”ch03ps03.supertitle”>Q

1.      Why is Pfizer interested in improving diversity and inclusion at the company?

 

<general-problem id=”ch03ps03gen002″ label=”2″ maxpoints=”1″><inst>2.   How does a proactive focus on diversity and inclusion improve Pfizer’s legal compliance?

 

<general-problem id=”ch03ps03gen003″ label=”3″ maxpoints=”1″><inst>        3.   If you were in charge of diversity and inclusion at Pfizer, what would you do to further improve diversity and inclusion at the company?

 

 

Questions

1.   Why is Pfizer interested in improving diversity and inclusion at the company?

2.   How does a proactive focus on diversity and inclusion improve Pfizer’s legal compliance?

3.   If you were in charge of diversity and inclusion at Pfizer, what would you do to further improve diversity and inclusion at the company?

 

Mark 4:26-34 New Living translation

Mark 4:26-34 New Living translation

Part 1: Introduction and Context of the Passage

You will write an introduction that serves as an overview of the content of the paper, providing background and cultural information about the setting of the book in which the selected passage occurs. You will write a thesis/purpose paragraph that alerts the reader as to what you plan to achieve in the writing of the paper. Identify the literary context of the selected passage and discuss its relevance for interpreting the passage. Each section will have its own heading following current Turabian style. Be sure the paper uses the School of Divinity Standardized Title Page and reflects a graduate level of vocabulary.

LIBERTY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DIVINITY

 

 

A Sample Paper for the Purpose of Correct Formatting

 

 

Submitted to Dr. <Insert Name>,

in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the completion of

 

 

<Insert Course Prefix and Number – Section Number>

<Insert Course Title>

 

 

by

 

<Insert Student Name>

<Month Date, Year Submitted>

 

 

Contents (not Table of Contents)

 

 

Introduction (First Level) 1

 

 

First Major Section (First Level) 3

 

First Subhead (Second Level) 3

 

Second Subhead (Second Level) 4

 

 

Second Major Section (First Level) 5

 

First Subhead (Second Level) 5

 

Second Subhead (Second Level) 5

 

 

Examples of Citing the Bible (First Level) 6

 

 

Conclusion (First Level) 8

 

Bibliography (First Level) 10

 

 

Updated 2/7/2018 8:59 AM

ii

 

Introduction (First-Level Subheading)

 

Since most beginning students will have difficulty learning how to write papers and also format papers correctly using the eighth edition of Kate L. Turabian’s, A Manual for Writers of Research Papers,[footnoteRef:1] this sample paper can be used as a template for inserting the correct parts. For the purpose of instruction, it will use second person, but third person must be used in student papers. You will notice that the first time Turabian’s name is written in the paper, her full name is given, but the second and subsequent uses of her name will be her last name only. [1: Kate L. Turabian, A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations, 8th ed., rev. Wayne C. Booth, et al. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013).]

Though some written assignments will not require a table of contents, Liberty University School of Divinity (hereafter referred to as SoD) requires all research papers to have a table of contents and abide by basic Turabian rules.

Number all pages of this element with roman numerals. Label the first page Contents at the top of the page. If the table of contents is more than one page, do not repeat the title. Leave two blank lines between the title and the first listed item. Single-space individual items listed, but add a blank line after each item. Between the lists for the front and back matter and the chapters, or between parts or volumes (if any), leave two blank lines.[footnoteRef:2] [2: Ibid., 380.]

 

It is important to note that a table of contents does not list the pages that precede it, only those pages that follow it. Be sure that the first letter of each word is capitalized (other than articles and prepositions within the phrase).

The footnote can be inserted in the middle of a sentence, but preferably following some punctuation (i.e. semicolon, comma, etc.). The SoD prefers that students use superscripted footnotes; however, we know that Microsoft Word 2013 defaults to standard font size followed by a period for the footnote. The footnote below is the proper form for books. If you are going to create a footnote for a journal article, you would use a different format as shown below.[footnoteRef:3] The footnote below is a full footnote from a journal article found in Liberty’s online library using an American Theological Library Association (ATLA) search. You can use an abbreviation in the body of your paper once it has been defined (as above). [3: Anthony C. Thornhill, “The Resurrection of Jesus and Spiritual (Trans) Formation,” Journal of Spiritual Formation & Soul Care 5, no. 2 (Fall 2012): 243. Notice that the footnote identifies the exact page number of the citation that is used in the text (the example given is from page 243) whereas the bibliographic entry (in the bibliography) must include the inclusive numbers for the entire article (i.e. 243-56). ]

You are asked in the course, “Research, Writing, and Ministry Preparation,”[footnoteRef:4] to learn the proper formatting of your papers as well as to learn how to conduct research, plan the details of a paper or report, and write your paper in a manner that your professor and classmates will be able to understand. Usually, you will finish your introduction with a full thesis statement. [4: Notice the comma was placed inside the quotation marks when the course title “Research, Writing, and Ministry Preparation” was written. Soft punctuation (such as a comma or a period) is always inserted inside the quotation mark whereas hard punctuation (such as a question mark, exclamation point, colon, or semicolon) is placed outside the quotation mark.]

Do not confuse a purpose statement with a thesis statement. A purpose statement states the reason why the paper is written. For all practical purposes, the purpose statement introduces the thesis statement. An example of a purpose statement is, “The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that when one recognizes God’s freedom he/she can find biblical inerrancy defensible.” An example of a thesis statement is, “Biblical inerrancy is defensible in the context of divine freedom.” Remember, it is the purpose and thesis statements that determine the form and content of an outline.

The distinction between a purpose statement and a thesis statement is important. The purpose of this sample paper is to provide a template for the correct formatting of a research paper. The thesis is, “Students who use this paper as a sample or template are more likely to format their papers correctly in the future.”

First Major Section (First-Level Subheading)

 

You will notice that the title of the first major section heading is centered and bold type. Within each heading and subheading, all words must be capitalized unless it is an article (a, an, the), preposition (on, to, by, from, in with, etc.), or coordinating conjunction (and, but, or, not, for). There are two blank lines above the heading and one below.[footnoteRef:5] [5: Turabian, Manual for Writers, 393.]

This was accomplished by highlighting the title and changing the formatting for just those lines to single space in the “Paragraph” menu above. The footnote below is the proper form for using a source that has been used previously (commonly referred to as a “second reference”). The first footnote has complete information, and later footnotes use an abbreviated form.

 

First Subhead (Second-Level Subheading)

 

This section will be the first sub section of the first major section. Note that the second level subheading is centered with each word capitalized (except for articles and prepositions) and not bold. Notice again the additional blank space above (again two blank lines before a subheading and one after). This is done by writing the subhead and then beginning the paragraph. Then return to the subhead and highlight the entire row in which it appears. Using “Paragraph” above, it is possible to remove the indentation and make that row single space. Then you can return and move the subhead down one additional space as well as add one space below.

This sample paper generally uses one paragraph per subhead. It is important to understand, however, that subheadings in a research paper must have at least two paragraphs. As a paragraph is a group of sentences that express one main idea, most sections (subheads) need more than a single paragraph to support their proposition.

 

 

Second Subhead (Second-Level Subheading)

 

Remember that you must always have at least two subheads per level.[footnoteRef:6] You cannot have just one subhead at any particular level. If this occurs, then divide the information into at least two sections at that level or simply remove the subhead altogether. When having to cite the same source in immediate sequence, use Ibid. (note the second footnote on page one). Avoid too many uses of ibidem (abbreviated Ibid.) by making use of multiple sources. It is also important to note that Ibid. cannot be used as the first footnote entry on a page (see footnote number six at the bottom of this page). As an abbreviation, the term Ibid. must be followed by a period even if used in the middle of a sentence. [6: Turabian, Manual for Writers, 329.]

Any number used in the text that is under one hundred and any whole number of hundreds should be spelled completely within the body of the paper (one hundred, two hundred, etc.).[footnoteRef:7] Generally, if the number can be written with two words, it should be spelled completely. For numbers written with more than two words (i.e. 108, 210, etc.), the numerals should be used. However, you should never mix the styles. If any number used has to be written with numerals, then all should be in the same style (i.e., 98, 108, 210, 300; not ninety-eight, 108, 210, three hundred). Of note here is an exception that when writing percentages in the text, you would write 98 percent or 100 percent, and so forth; always using the numeral, but writing out “percent.” [7: The exception is within a footnote where all numeric numerals can be used (e.g. 100, 200, etc.). ]

 

 

Second Major Section (First-Level Subheading)

 

First Subhead (Second-Level Subheading)

 

The title of a heading cannot be left alone at the bottom of a page. If there is not enough room on the previous page for both the heading title and at least the first two lines of the paragraph, you must begin a new page. You can have two headings in a row as above separated by one blank line (but again, not alone at the bottom of the page).

 

First Subsection Subhead (Third-Level Subheading)

 

Note that the third-level subheading subhead is flush-left in bold type, but the same spacing above and below is maintained. This is true of the second subhead that follows. Though the margins and the type (bold or regular) changes, the spacing remains constant.

 

Second Subsection Subhead (Third-Level Subheading)

 

This is the second subhead because it is always necessary to have at least two items at every level. This is an important clarification. There must be a second major section (level one) for every first major section (level one). There must be a second subhead (second level) for every first subhead (second level). There must be a second subsection subhead (third level) for every first subsection subhead (third level), and so forth.

 

Second Subhead (Second-Level Subheading)

 

This is the second subsection of the second major section. Once again it is centered but in regular type. When writing a paper, organize your outline first so that you are able to plan how you will make your argument and then give your reasoning and evidence to support your thesis statement. Your first paragraph of each section should explain how this will fit into your reasoning and then each section will end with a summary of how the evidence has shown your reasoning to be correct. Also, transitions are very helpful at the end of each major section so that the reader anticipates how the next section is connected to the logical progression of the reasoning you use to support your thesis.

Most graduate research papers will be no longer than twenty pages and generally do not have long and detailed outlines or subheadings beyond the third level. Details that would be appropriate for the fourth or fifth heading level tend to distract the reader’s attention from the overall thesis within a short essay. Even if a fourth level is unavoidable, a fifth level is discouraged.

 

Examples of Citing the Bible (First Level)

 

Many students struggle with the proper formatting in citing the Bible. When citing biblical passages, there are some general guidelines to follow that are important. It is not necessary to write out full citations of verses or paragraphs from the Bible since your readers can find the references that you cite. Citations are written in full when the author needs to make a specific observation, such as when he/she chooses to follow Luke’s example in his message to Theophilus; “so that you may know the exact truth about the things you have been taught” (Luke 1:4).[footnoteRef:8] You will notice in the footnote below that only a single footnote is needed when identifying the Bible version, providing the paper cites from only one translation. All the following biblical references are given in the text of the paper, not in the footnotes, unless content in the footnote requires biblical references. If you use multiple translations or versions of the Bible, then you would have to use one footnote for each new version and use a system of abbreviations in the text, but only within parentheses (NASB, KJV, NIV, etc.). The writing is simplified if you choose one version of the Bible and use it exclusively. Then you can provide a disclaimer footnote to that effect as stated in footnote number eight. [8: Unless otherwise noted, all biblical passages referenced are in the English Standard Version (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2008).]

In the actual text of a paper you need to follow proper grammatical and style requirements. Here are some correct examples of how to cite references or allusions from the Bible. Luke wrote to Theophilus in verse four of his first chapter so that his patron would have a more exact understanding of the details of the salvation offered also to the Gentiles. Luke claims that he wrote his Gospel, “in consecutive order,” after having “investigated everything carefully from the beginning” (Luke 1:3). In verse one of chapter one, Luke seems to be aware of previous Gospel accounts, but in Luke 1:2, he claims that he has information from eyewitnesses. You will note in the previous example that you are permitted to use standard biblical references like Luke 1:2 within a sentence as long as you introduce it as a biblical reference rather than as part of your text.

The abbreviations for the books of the Bible can be used only in parentheses within the text or in footnotes.[footnoteRef:9] For example, you may make a reference to Romans 1:16, but if you state that Christians should not be ashamed of the gospel (Rom 1:16), then you should use the abbreviation within parentheses. The following examples are all correct: Paul, in verse sixteen of chapter one of his Epistle to the Romans, states that he is not ashamed of the gospel; Paul states that he is not ashamed of the gospel (Rom 1:16); and in Romans 1:16, Paul states that he is not ashamed of the gospel.[footnoteRef:10] [9: When abbreviating books of the Bible, do not use the Turabian recommended list; consult the LBTS Writing Guide, Appendix A.] [10: Notice the word “gospel” is not capitalized when referring to the evangelical message (i.e. “good news”). It is capitalized when referring to one of the first four books of the New Testament.]

Finally, when citing multiple chapters or multiple verses, certain expectations exist. If you choose to cite several consecutive chapters, then use a dash (3-em dash) such as Romans 1–5, which is equivalent to Romans chapters one through five. If you choose to cite several consecutive verses, use a normal hyphen (-) such as Romans 3:21-26. If the verses are not in consecutive order, then use a comma, such as Romans 3:21, 23, and 26. Finally, when chapters are not in consecutive order, they are separated by semicolons (;), such as Romans 1; 3; 5; and 8. The following sentences are an example of how to use semicolons. Not only does Jesus possess supernatural knowledge, but his prophecy of the future destruction of Jerusalem also reflects his knowledge of Old Testament prophecies concerning past destructions of Jerusalem (Isa 9:3; Jer 6:6; 22:8-9; 23:38, 40; and Ezek 4:2). Additionally, since Matthew writes as if the temple is still standing (5:23-24; 12:5-7; 23:16-22; and 26:60-61), good evidence exists that he wrote before AD 70 and that Jesus actually historically predicted the fall of Jerusalem.[footnoteRef:11] [11: Years before Christ use the abbreviation BC (Before Christ) or BCE (Before the Common Era) after the year, as in 100 BC or 100 BCE. Years after the birth of Christ use AD (Anno Domini; lit., In the Year of our Lord) before the year as in AD 70. If CE (Common Era) is used in lieu of AD then the abbreviation follows the year as in 70 CE. Do not use periods after each letter (BC, not B.C. and AD, not A.D.). The SoD is more likely to use BC and AD rather than BCE and CE, but students will find both systems used in scholarly materials. Additionally, small caps (uppercase characters set at same height as surrounding lowercase letters) are often used for AD (ad) and BC (bc). The SoD allows the student to use regular large caps or small caps.]

 

Conclusion

 

The conclusion to your paper should reiterate the thesis (though not necessarily verbatim) and provide your readers with a concise summary of your major points. A well written conclusion defends your thesis and provides a clear perspective of the topic. Its importance cannot be overstated as the conclusion frames your closing thoughts and should provide a lasting impression.

The bibliography that follows starts on a new page even though a great deal of room may be left on a final page. If you hold down the “Ctrl” key and then “Enter,” you will go to an entirely new page in order to start the bibliography. You will note that the bibliography begins with the title centered in bold type followed by one blank line. The bibliography is single-spaced but with a blank line (or 12-pt line space after) inserted between each entry.

 

Bibliography

 

Thornhill, Anthony C. “The Resurrection of Jesus and Spiritual (Trans) Formation.” Journal of Spiritual Formation & Soul Care 5, no. 2 (Fall 2012): 243-56.[footnoteRef:12] [12: There are numerous rules about inclusive numbers. See Table 23.2 in Turabian, Manual for Writers, 325. ]

 

Turabian, Kate L. A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations: Chicago Style for Students and Researchers. 8th ed. Revised by Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.

 

 

 

 

 

1

10

Monsters In America Project CHAPTER 1

Monsters in America Project

As W. Scott Poole’s text will serve as the conceptual framework for the course, this assignment seeks to promote regular critical engagement with the text.

Part 1: Chapter by Chapter Engagement. For each chapter of the text, students will maintain comprehensive, written dossiers separated into three components as follows.

 Component 1: Annotated Reflections. (1.5-2 pages) Students will compose written reflections on the material covered, using annotation as a strategy to highlight their perspective and response to the readings. Keeping the principles outlined in Adler’s “How to Mark a Book” in mind while reading, students should seek to identify moments/passages in the text that were illuminating, confusing, instructive, dubious, biased, fascinating, problematic, and so forth.

The written reflection itself should be both specific and representative of the whole range of the required reading, and not simply be from the first few pages of the reading. This piece is a reflection of how the reader interacts with the text; there is no right or wrong, only different levels of academic curiosity and critical thought.

The reflection should include a series of insightful, well-developed entries of select annotations the student has made. Each entry should begin by citing the first few words of the relevant phrase or passage, followed by the page number. The remainder of the entry should examine the significance of the passage. Entries can clarify a reference and explain its significance, explore something that is unclear, or explain why something resonates with the reader, etc. (There is a reason that you made the annotation, and each individual will annotate something different.)

Reflections will be submitted according to the due dates outlined in the weekly schedule. Those students scheduled to present for a given chapter are not required to submit a reflection (see Monsters in America Presentations assignment). An individual grade is not assigned to each reflection; however, reflections will be graded collectively upon the completion of the project. Failure to submit a reflection will result in a 10 point reduction from the overall project grade.

Component 2: Summary. (1 page) Students will compose a summary of the chapter, highlighting the key elements of Poole’s text. These summaries should not exceed one page in length.

 Component 3: Vocabulary. Students will maintain a list of unfamiliar words they come across in the chapter. The list should also include the page on which the word was found. Once completing the chapter, students will define these words using a college dictionary and observing the definition appropriate for the word’s usage in context.

Part 2: Comprehensive ReflectionThe comprehensive reflection will be a culminating work composed at the end of the semester. Prior to the class, students will have their chapter reflections returned to them for review. The comprehensive reflection will call upon students, using their chapter reflections as their only reference, to treatMonsters in America in its entirety, focusing on their overall impressions of the work as well as anything learned from the text with long ranging applicability beyond the context of the course.

case in book of page74 case:

FORMAT FOR WRITTEN CASE ANALYSIS

 

Required Sections Guidelines

I. Executive Summary

 

 

 

 One to two paragraphs in length

 Summarize the critical events from the case that will be covered in the analysis

 Briefly identify the major problems facing the main player

 Summarize the recommended plan of action and include a brief justification of the recommended plan

II. Identification of Key

Stakeholders  Identify the key players in the case

 Include stakeholders who are impacted because of the critical events

 For each key player, identify events in the case that the stakeholder finds troublesome and would consider a problem; in doing so, quote the case

III. Statement of the Problem  State the problems facing the main player

 Identify and link the symptoms and root causes of the problems

 Differentiate short term from long term problems

 Conclude with the decision facing the main player

IV. Causes of the Problem  Provide a detailed analysis of the problems identified in the Statement of the Problem

 In the analysis, apply theories and models from the text and/or readings

 Support conclusions and /or assumptions with specific references to the case and/or the readings

V. Suggestions  Identify criteria against which you evaluate alternative solutions (i.e. time for implementation, tangible costs, acceptability to management)

 Include two or three possible alternative solutions

 Evaluate the pros and cons of each alternative against the criteria listed

 Suggest additional pros/cons if appropriate

 Using models and theories, identify why you chose these suggestions – how it would work and why

VI. Recommended Solution,

Implementation and

Justification

 Identify who, what, when, and how in your recommended plan of action

 Solution and implementation should address the problems and causes identified in the previous section

 The recommended plan should include a contingency plan(s) to back up the ‘ideal’ course of action

 Describe the difficulties you expect to encounter in actually implementing the course of action under consideration, including how implementing the course of action you propose may create

new problems.

 

Follow APA format.

Do not quote definitions from the text or outside sources. Synthesize sources to support points, provide proper in-text citations and references. Quote critical lines

from the case as evidence.