Child Interview Project

Directions:

  • Find a child between the ages of 6 and 12 to complete this interview assignment.
  • YOU MUST get written permission from the parent before you begin. 
  •  Read through the entire template so you understand all the components of this assignments and so you can gather all the materials (there are several things needed)  to bring to the interview.
  •  Download the attached four documents

 

  • Read and re-read the project instructions so you meet all of the criteria. Let me know if you have any questions.
  • Submit your project by uploading these three (3) documents.
    1.  Signed Parental Consent Form
    2.  Child’s Drawing of the Family
    3.  Child Interview Project Template

 

Some Rubric

Some Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

40.0 ptsChild Interview Template Complete

30.0 ptsTemplate nearly complete. Some elements missing

20.0 ptsTemplate incomplete. Several elements missin

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

10.0 ptsChild’s drawing and explanation complete

5.0 ptsDrawing or explanation missing.

0.0 ptsBoth drawing and explanation missing

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

15.0 ptsInformation from interview is quoted and supports conclusions

10.0 ptsInformation is not fully quoted and only moderately supports conclusions

0.0 ptsQuotes from interview are missing

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

15.0 ptsPiagetian stage is clearly stated and justified.

10.0 ptsPiagetian Stage is is stated but not justified

0.0 ptsPiagetian stage is not clearly stated or justified

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

10.0 ptsConclusions and Feedback are included

5.0 ptsConclusion or Feedback missing or incomplete.

0.0 ptsConclusion and Feedback Missing

0.0 ptsNo Marks

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

10.0 ptsFormat was followed (headings, font, spacing, citations, Work Cited page

5.0 ptsOnly some of the format was followed

0.0 ptsFormat was not followes

10.0 pts

Certificate of Appreciation awarded to

 

 

Thank you for participating in the

Child Interview Project for our Child Development 103 class.

 

. Dr. Janet L. Young . , . Dr. Janet L. Young, Professor of Childhood Education CDEV 103 Student, El Camino College

El Camino College

Childhood Education Department

 

 

  • Certificate of Appreciation awarded to

Fallacies In Advertising Project

Examine written and visual advertisements.

Select five advertisements that demonstrate the use of five different fallacies outlined in the University of Phoenix Material: Common List of Logical Fallacies.

Write a 350-word summary for each of your selected advertisements in which you address the following: in apa format

  • Summarize the content of the advertisement.
  • Identify the fallacy portrayed by the advertisement.
  • Describe how the fallacy is used as a persuasive argument.
  • Explain why you think that the creators of the advertisement used the fallacy to promote this product or concept.

Common Logical Fallacies

The following is a list of common fallacies. Some are covered in the textbook, and others are introduced by the faculty member. Use this document for your reference.

1. Ad hominem, or attacking the person: This fallacy involves attacking the arguer rather than his or her argument. Consider the following example: John’s objections to capital punishment carry no weight because he is a convicted felon.

Note. Saying something negative about someone is not automatically ad hominem. If you are discussing a person—such as a politician—criticizing him or her does not mean you have created an ad hominem fallacy.

2. Ad ignorantium, or appeal to ignorance: This fallacy, sometimes called the burden of proof fallacy, involves arguing on the basis of what is not known and cannot be proven; if you can’t prove that something is true, then it must be false, and vice versa. Consider the following example: You can’t prove the Loch Ness monster doesn’t exist, so there must be one.

3. Ad verecundiam, or appeal to authority: This fallacy involves trying to convince the listener by appealing to the reputation of a famous or respected person. This often involves an authority in one field speaking about a subject outside of his or her expertise. A sports star with little car expertise who endorses a car and the actor on a TV commercial who says “I’m not a doctor, but I play one on TV” are examples of this fallacy.

4. Affirming the consequent: This fallacy involves an invalid form of the conditional argument in which the second premise affirms the consequent of the first premise and the conclusion affirms the antecedent. Consider the following example: If he wants to get that job, he must know Spanish. He knows Spanish, so he will get the job.

5. Amphiboly: This is a fallacy of syntactical ambiguity in which the position of words in a sentence or the juxtaposition of two sentences conveys a mistaken idea. This fallacy is like equivocation except that the ambiguity does not result from a shift in meaning of a single word or phrase; it is created by word placement. Consider the following example: Jim said he saw Jenny walk her dog through the window. She should be reported for animal abuse.

6. Appeal to emotion: In this fallacy, the arguer uses emotional appeals rather than logic to persuade the listener. This fallacy may appeal to various emotions, including pride, pity, fear, hate, vanity, or sympathy. Generally, the issue is oversimplified to the advantage of the arguer. Consider the following example: An activist group which uses horrific or disturbing imagery unrelated to their cause.

7. Argument from analogy, or false analogy: This is an unsound form of the inductive argument in which an argument relies heavily on a weak analogy. Consider the following example: This must be a great car because, like the finest watches in the world, it was made in Switzerland.

8. Begging the question: This is an argument in which the conclusion is implied or already assumed in the premises. It is also referred to as a circular argument. Consider the following example: Of course the Bible is the word of God. Why? Because God says so in the Bible.

9. Slippery slope: This fallacy involves a line of reasoning that argues against a course of action because it assumes that if you take the first step, you will inevitably follow through to an assumed conclusion. This fallacy uses the valid form of hypothetical syllogism, but uses guesswork for the premise. Consider the following example: We cannot allow students any voice in decision making on campus; if we do, it won’t be long before they are in total control.

10. Common belief: This fallacy, which is sometimes called the bandwagon or appeal-to-popularity fallacy, is committed when we assert a statement to be true because many other people allegedly believe it. Being widely believed is not proof or evidence of the truth. Consider the following example: Of course Nixon was guilty in Watergate. Everybody knows that.

11. Past belief: This is a form of the common-belief fallacy. The same error in reasoning is committed except the claim is based on outdated beliefs or support. Consider the following example: We all know women should obey their husbands. After all, marriage vows have contained those words for centuries.

12. Contrary-to-fact hypothesis: This fallacy is committed when one states with an unreasonable degree of certainty that the hypothetical results of an event would have occurred. Consider the following example: If President George H. W. Bush had not gone into the Persian Gulf with military force when he did, Saddam Hussein would control the oil in Saudi Arabia today.

13. Denying the antecedent: An invalid form of the conditional argument in which the second premise denies the antecedent of the first premise, and the conclusion denies the consequent. This is often mistaken for modus tollens. Consider the following example: If she qualifies for a promotion, she must speak English. She doesn’t qualify for the promotion, so she must not know how to speak English.

14. Division: This fallacy is committed when we conclude that any part of a particular whole must have a characteristic because the whole has that characteristic. Consider the following example: I am sure that Karen plays the piano well because her family is so musical.

15. Composition: This fallacy is committed when we conclude that a whole must have a characteristic because some part of it has that characteristic. Consider the following example: The entire Dawson family must be rich because Fred Dawson makes a lot from his practice.

16. False dilemma: This fallacy, which is often called the either/or fallacy or a false dichotomy, assumes that we must choose one of two alternatives instead of allowing for other possibilities; it a false form of disjunctive syllogism. Consider the following example: Either you can love the United States of America, or you can move to another country.

17. Equivocation: This fallacy is a product of semantic ambiguity. The arguer uses the ambiguous nature of a word or phrase to shift the meaning to make his or her argument more convincing. Consider the following example: We realize that workers are idle during periods of lay-offs. However, the government should never subsidize idleness, which has often been condemned as a vice. Therefore, payments to laid-off workers are wrong.

18. Hasty generalization: This fallacy involves a generalization accepted on the support of a sample that is too small or too biased to warrant it. Consider the following example: All men are rats! Just look at the louse I married.

19. Post hoc and ergo propter hoc: This fallacy—which means after this, therefore caused by this—is a form of the false-cause fallacy in which it is inferred that because one event followed another, the first event caused the second event. Consider the following example: Mary joined our class and the next week we all did poorly on the quiz. It must be her fault.

20. Inconsistency: An argument is inconsistent or self-contradicting if it contains, explicitly or implicitly, two assertions that are logically incompatible with each other. Inconsistencies can also occur between words and actions. Consider the following example: That woman represents herself as a feminist, yet doesn’t believe women should run for Congress.

21. Non sequitur: In this fallacy, which means it does not follow, the premise of the arguement has no direct relationship to the conclusion. This fallacy often appears in political speeches and advertising. For example, a waterfall in the background of a commercial and a beautiful person in the foreground have nothing to do with an automobile’s performance.

22. Non causa pro causa, or questionable cause: This form of the false-cause fallacy occurs when the cause for an occurrence is identified on insufficient evidence. Consider the following example: I can’t find the checkbook; I am sure that my husband hid it so I couldn’t go shopping today.

23. Red herring: This fallacy introduces an irrelevant issue into a discussion as a diversionary tactic. It distracts people from the topic being discussed. Consider the following example: Many people say engineers need more writing practice, but I would like to remind these people of how difficult it is to master the math and drawing skills engineering requires.

24. Slanting: This is a form of misrepresentation in which a true statement is made, but is made to suggest that something is not true or to give a false description through the manipulation of connotation. Consider the following example: I can’t believe how much money is being poured into the space program The word poured in this case suggests heedless and unnecessary spending.

25. Straw man: This fallacy occurs when someone misrepresents an opponent’s position to make it easier to attack, usually by distorting the opponent’s views to ridiculous extremes. This can also take the form of attacking only the weak premises in an opposing argument while ignoring the strong ones. Consider the following example: Those who favor gun-control legislation just want to take all guns away from responsible citizens, and give them to criminals.

26. Two wrongs make a right: This fallacy is committed when someone tries to justify a bad or imprudent action with charges of a similar wrong. The underlying assumption is that if some people do it, then others are justified in doing the same thing. Supporters of apartheid, for example, are often guilty of this error in reasoning. They point to former U.S. slavery practices to justify their system.

27. Far-fetched hypothesis: This fallacy of inductive reasoning is committed when we accept a particular hypothesis when a more acceptable hypothesis, or one more strongly based on fact, is available. Consider the following example: The church with a large membership of African-American individuals was set on fire after the civil rights meeting last night. Therefore, the church leader and the minister must have done it to cast suspicion on the local segregationists.

What do you consider the advantages and disadvantages of standards-based reform for instructing students?

11/8/2019 Introduction: Teaching in Diverse, Standards-Based Classrooms

www.ascd.org/publications/books/109011/chapters/Introduction@_Teaching_in_Diverse,_Standards-Based_Classrooms.aspx 1/8

ASCD.orgASCD.org StoreStore BlogBlog Empower20Empower20 Navigate ApplicationsNavigate Applications HelpHelp Log InLog In

Books & PubsBooks & Pubs Browse BooksBrowse Books Meet the AuthorsMeet the Authors New BooksNew Books Member BooksMember Books BuyBuy

Connecting Teachers, Students, and StandardsConnecting Teachers, Students, and Standards by Deborah L. Voltz, Michele Jean Sims and Betty Nelsonby Deborah L. Voltz, Michele Jean Sims and Betty Nelson

Table of ContentsTable of Contents

Introduction: Teaching in Diverse, Standards-BasedIntroduction: Teaching in Diverse, Standards-Based ClassroomsClassrooms

Today’s schools are becoming increasingly diverse. Many teachers �nd that theirToday’s schools are becoming increasingly diverse. Many teachers �nd that their classrooms are populated by English language learners, gifted students, studentsclassrooms are populated by English language learners, gifted students, students with disabilities, and students who are culturally diverse. Nearly half of all studentswith disabilities, and students who are culturally diverse. Nearly half of all students in U.S. public schools (42 percent) are students of color, approximately 20 percentin U.S. public schools (42 percent) are students of color, approximately 20 percent of students speak a language other than English at home, and approximately 14of students speak a language other than English at home, and approximately 14 percent of students have an identi�ed disability (U.S. Department of Education,percent of students have an identi�ed disability (U.S. Department of Education, 2007a). Approximately half of the students who have an identi�ed disability spend2007a). Approximately half of the students who have an identi�ed disability spend 80 percent of their school day in general education classrooms (U.S. Department of80 percent of their school day in general education classrooms (U.S. Department of Education, 2007b). To add to this diversity, approximately 12 percent of students inEducation, 2007b). To add to this diversity, approximately 12 percent of students in public schools are labeled as gifted and talented (Friend, 2007). Like their peers with disabilities, gifted andpublic schools are labeled as gifted and talented (Friend, 2007). Like their peers with disabilities, gifted and talented students also are integrated into general education classrooms. All of these di�erences maketalented students also are integrated into general education classrooms. All of these di�erences make teaching more interesting and exciting as well as more complex.teaching more interesting and exciting as well as more complex.

Educational Trends That A�ect TeachingEducational Trends That A�ect Teaching

Standards-Based ReformStandards-Based Reform

Despite a wide range of student di�erences—or perhaps because of it— there is an increased emphasis toDespite a wide range of student di�erences—or perhaps because of it— there is an increased emphasis to have all students reach the same academic goals and standards. Some education experts have referred tohave all students reach the same academic goals and standards. Some education experts have referred to this movement as “standards-based reform.” Many advocates of standards-based reform have argued thatthis movement as “standards-based reform.” Many advocates of standards-based reform have argued that expectations for students have been too low, especially for students with disabilities and students fromexpectations for students have been too low, especially for students with disabilities and students from minority groups and lower socioeconomic classes. This perception has led to the idea that whateverminority groups and lower socioeconomic classes. This perception has led to the idea that whatever standards or educational goals are set should be uniformly applied to the vast majority of students andstandards or educational goals are set should be uniformly applied to the vast majority of students and particular attention should be given to historically underperforming groups. This shift in thinking has been aparticular attention should be given to historically underperforming groups. This shift in thinking has been a challenge for educators. Despite the challenges with standard-based reform, this movement holds manychallenge for educators. Despite the challenges with standard-based reform, this movement holds many promises, such aspromises, such as

Premium and SelectPremium and Select Member BookMember Book (( Jul 2010Jul 2010 ))

 

http://www.ascd.org/
http://shop.ascd.org/
http://inservice.ascd.org/
http://empower.ascd.org/Default.aspx
http://www.ascd.org/customer-service.aspx
http://auth.ascd.org/login.aspx
http://www.ascd.org/books-publications.aspx
http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/browse_by_author.aspx
http://www.ascd.org/publications/ascd_authors.aspx
http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/new_books.aspx
http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/Member_Books.aspx
http://shop.ascd.org/BOOKSEBOOKS.aspx
http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/109011.aspx
http://shop.ascd.org/?ProductCode=109011
http://shop.ascd.org/?ProductCode=109011

 

11/8/2019 Introduction: Teaching in Diverse, Standards-Based Classrooms

www.ascd.org/publications/books/109011/chapters/Introduction@_Teaching_in_Diverse,_Standards-Based_Classrooms.aspx 2/8

Helping educators focus on critical knowledge and skills.Helping educators focus on critical knowledge and skills.

Enhancing the coherence and continuity of instruction by eliminating what some educators have viewedEnhancing the coherence and continuity of instruction by eliminating what some educators have viewed as a chaotic patchwork of curricula that may vary from teacher to teacher or from school to school.as a chaotic patchwork of curricula that may vary from teacher to teacher or from school to school.

Addressing the soft bigotry associated with lower expectations for poor and minority students.Addressing the soft bigotry associated with lower expectations for poor and minority students.

Serving as a catalyst to promote collaboration between teachers in general education, special education,Serving as a catalyst to promote collaboration between teachers in general education, special education, ESL, and bilingual education. Standards-based reform also helps educators share responsibility andESL, and bilingual education. Standards-based reform also helps educators share responsibility and accountability for the progress of all students, including students with disabilities and students fromaccountability for the progress of all students, including students with disabilities and students from diverse backgrounds.diverse backgrounds.

InclusionInclusion

As attention increases to ensure that all learners reach common standards, there is also more attentionAs attention increases to ensure that all learners reach common standards, there is also more attention focused on integrating students with disabilities into general education classrooms. Some experts havefocused on integrating students with disabilities into general education classrooms. Some experts have referred to this movement as “inclusion.” It is important to note, however, that the physical placement ofreferred to this movement as “inclusion.” It is important to note, however, that the physical placement of students with disabilities in general education classes is not an end in and of itself, but rather a means to anstudents with disabilities in general education classes is not an end in and of itself, but rather a means to an end. The power of inclusion lies in how educators respond to individual di�erences. While standards-basedend. The power of inclusion lies in how educators respond to individual di�erences. While standards-based reform calls for convergence in terms of learning outcomes, inclusion calls for divergence in terms of thereform calls for convergence in terms of learning outcomes, inclusion calls for divergence in terms of the strategies used in teaching. When inclusion is considered alongside standards-based reform, it would appearstrategies used in teaching. When inclusion is considered alongside standards-based reform, it would appear that teachers are being called upon to produce greater similarity in learning outcomes despite greaterthat teachers are being called upon to produce greater similarity in learning outcomes despite greater diversity in student populations. For teachers who are attempting to manage the tension between standards-diversity in student populations. For teachers who are attempting to manage the tension between standards- based reform and inclusion, there are still many challenges. Inclusion provides many opportunities forbased reform and inclusion, there are still many challenges. Inclusion provides many opportunities for educators, such aseducators, such as

Enhancing access to general education curriculum for students with disabilities.Enhancing access to general education curriculum for students with disabilities. Greater academic Greater academic gains have been associated with general education placement for students with disabilities (Waldron &gains have been associated with general education placement for students with disabilities (Waldron & McLeskey, 1998). This enhanced access to a general education curriculum should include UniversalMcLeskey, 1998). This enhanced access to a general education curriculum should include Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles and materials for students with di�culties reading andDesign for Learning (UDL) principles and materials for students with di�culties reading and understanding print that meet the National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard (NIMAS). Thisunderstanding print that meet the National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard (NIMAS). This support is particularly important in a standards-based context because most students with disabilitiessupport is particularly important in a standards-based context because most students with disabilities will be held to the same educational standards as their peers without disabilities.will be held to the same educational standards as their peers without disabilities.

Providing greater opportunities for students with disabilities to learn socially appropriateProviding greater opportunities for students with disabilities to learn socially appropriate behaviors through interaction with their peers without disabilities.behaviors through interaction with their peers without disabilities. For example, when segregated For example, when segregated in separate settings, students who have emotional or behavioral disorders are exposed only to otherin separate settings, students who have emotional or behavioral disorders are exposed only to other students who have similar disorders. This practice limits their opportunities to see appropriatestudents who have similar disorders. This practice limits their opportunities to see appropriate behaviors and diminishes their inclination to conform to these behaviors through the dynamics of peerbehaviors and diminishes their inclination to conform to these behaviors through the dynamics of peer pressure.pressure.

Preparing students with and without disabilities for the real world.Preparing students with and without disabilities for the real world. As adults, students will be As adults, students will be exposed to a wide range of human variance, including individuals with disabilities. By providingexposed to a wide range of human variance, including individuals with disabilities. By providing opportunities for all students to have interactions with students with disabilities during their educationalopportunities for all students to have interactions with students with disabilities during their educational experience, the groundwork will be laid for these students to embrace all individuals with disabilitiesexperience, the groundwork will be laid for these students to embrace all individuals with disabilities throughout their lives.throughout their lives.

Cultural and Linguistic DiversityCultural and Linguistic Diversity

Of course, disability status re�ects only one aspect of human diversity. Factors such as race, ethnicity, class,Of course, disability status re�ects only one aspect of human diversity. Factors such as race, ethnicity, class, gender, and language also contribute to the classroom mosaic and may in�uence the cultural characteristicsgender, and language also contribute to the classroom mosaic and may in�uence the cultural characteristics that students bring. Given the pervasive manner in which culture in�uences thought and behavior, it is notthat students bring. Given the pervasive manner in which culture in�uences thought and behavior, it is not hard to imagine that it plays a signi�cant role in the learning process. In fact, almost every aspect of thehard to imagine that it plays a signi�cant role in the learning process. In fact, almost every aspect of the teaching and learning process is culturally in�uenced, such as attitudes about what is important to learn andteaching and learning process is culturally in�uenced, such as attitudes about what is important to learn and

 

 

11/8/2019 Introduction: Teaching in Diverse, Standards-Based Classrooms

www.ascd.org/publications/books/109011/chapters/Introduction@_Teaching_in_Diverse,_Standards-Based_Classrooms.aspx 3/8

decisions about how learning is best accomplished and assessed. While student diversity provides a richdecisions about how learning is best accomplished and assessed. While student diversity provides a rich educational resource, it also adds to the complexity of teaching in a standards-based context. Nevertheless,educational resource, it also adds to the complexity of teaching in a standards-based context. Nevertheless, there are many opportunities that cultural diversity provides, such asthere are many opportunities that cultural diversity provides, such as

Providing opportunities for all students to learn from other students who are di�erent.Providing opportunities for all students to learn from other students who are di�erent. Cultural Cultural diversity gives students a chance to learn about di�erent languages, customs, and worldviews.diversity gives students a chance to learn about di�erent languages, customs, and worldviews.

Reducing ignorance that comes from lack of exposure.Reducing ignorance that comes from lack of exposure. Oftentimes, when students only interact with Oftentimes, when students only interact with persons who share the same background, they become blind to other ways of seeing and doing things.persons who share the same background, they become blind to other ways of seeing and doing things. This cultural isolation frequently works to their disadvantage.This cultural isolation frequently works to their disadvantage.

Providing opportunities for all students to develop cross-cultural competence.Providing opportunities for all students to develop cross-cultural competence. Through everyday Through everyday activities in diverse school settings, students are challenged to �nd ways of interacting e�ectively withactivities in diverse school settings, students are challenged to �nd ways of interacting e�ectively with students who are culturally di�erent. In so doing, they develop important skills in cross-culturalstudents who are culturally di�erent. In so doing, they develop important skills in cross-cultural competence.competence.

Preparing students for the real world.Preparing students for the real world. Similar to inclusion, giving students opportunities to interact Similar to inclusion, giving students opportunities to interact with diverse individuals in their school experiences better prepares them to do so as adults in thewith diverse individuals in their school experiences better prepares them to do so as adults in the workplace.workplace.

Integrating standards-based reform, including students with disabilities, and teaching more students fromIntegrating standards-based reform, including students with disabilities, and teaching more students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds combine to create the perfect educational storm. How do allculturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds combine to create the perfect educational storm. How do all of these trends �t together? In some regards, these trends may seem to re�ect incompatible ideas. On oneof these trends �t together? In some regards, these trends may seem to re�ect incompatible ideas. On one hand, these movements were created to provide the same standards for all learners; but each reformhand, these movements were created to provide the same standards for all learners; but each reform mandates respect for each student’s individual di�erences. The next section addresses these tensions.mandates respect for each student’s individual di�erences. The next section addresses these tensions.

Can Inclusion Really Work in Diverse, Standards-Based Classrooms?Can Inclusion Really Work in Diverse, Standards-Based Classrooms?

Despite the fact that it is not always possible to get all students to exactly the same point in the curriculum atDespite the fact that it is not always possible to get all students to exactly the same point in the curriculum at exactly the same time, it is feasible to move most students through the curriculum toward establishedexactly the same time, it is feasible to move most students through the curriculum toward established standards. Although the concepts of inclusion and teaching for cultural and linguistic diversity often seem tostandards. Although the concepts of inclusion and teaching for cultural and linguistic diversity often seem to con�ict with standards-based reform, these ideas actually work together.con�ict with standards-based reform, these ideas actually work together.

As is shown in Figure I.1, the overarching goals of standards-based reform, inclusion, and teaching for culturalAs is shown in Figure I.1, the overarching goals of standards-based reform, inclusion, and teaching for cultural and linguistic diversity are the same—to enhance the educational outcomes for all students. For example,and linguistic diversity are the same—to enhance the educational outcomes for all students. For example, standards-based reform emphasizes the need to support all students in reaching rigorous standards.standards-based reform emphasizes the need to support all students in reaching rigorous standards. Students with disabilities and students with culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds have historicallyStudents with disabilities and students with culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds have historically been among the most vulnerable to diminished educational outcomes as a result of low expectations. Thebeen among the most vulnerable to diminished educational outcomes as a result of low expectations. The reality is that the vast majority of students with disabilities and students from culturally and linguisticallyreality is that the vast majority of students with disabilities and students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds do not have severe cognitive de�cits. These students have the ability to succeeddiverse backgrounds do not have severe cognitive de�cits. These students have the ability to succeed academically in the inclusive classroom. While raising standards is not the same thing as raising expectations,academically in the inclusive classroom. While raising standards is not the same thing as raising expectations, some educators feel that the accountability assessments associated with standards-based reform will forcesome educators feel that the accountability assessments associated with standards-based reform will force the issue of higher expectations. It is possible that we will have to change our behaviors and adjust ourthe issue of higher expectations. It is possible that we will have to change our behaviors and adjust our attitudes and expectations. For example, a teacher may not initially believe in a student’s ability to meet aattitudes and expectations. For example, a teacher may not initially believe in a student’s ability to meet a certain standard; however, that teacher will still earnestly work with that student because he or she willcertain standard; however, that teacher will still earnestly work with that student because he or she will encounter that same standard on an accountability assessment in the future. Despite the teacher’s initialencounter that same standard on an accountability assessment in the future. Despite the teacher’s initial doubts, the student may master the standard in question. This student’s achievement will make it possible fordoubts, the student may master the standard in question. This student’s achievement will make it possible for that teacher to see potential in other students with similar characteristics. Without the standards andthat teacher to see potential in other students with similar characteristics. Without the standards and accountability assessment processes, this teacher may never have given this student the opportunity toaccountability assessment processes, this teacher may never have given this student the opportunity to master the standard in question. The core idea of not underestimating students’ abilities is implicit inmaster the standard in question. The core idea of not underestimating students’ abilities is implicit in standards-based reform and holds particular importance in the education of diverse students.standards-based reform and holds particular importance in the education of diverse students.

Figure I.1. Current Movements in EducationFigure I.1. Current Movements in Education

 

 

11/8/2019 Introduction: Teaching in Diverse, Standards-Based Classrooms

www.ascd.org/publications/books/109011/chapters/Introduction@_Teaching_in_Diverse,_Standards-Based_Classrooms.aspx 4/8

g

Standards-Based ReformStandards-Based Reform InclusionInclusion Education forEducation for DiversityDiversity

OverarchingOverarching GoalGoal

Enhance educationalEnhance educational outcomes for all studentsoutcomes for all students

Enhance educationalEnhance educational outcomes for alloutcomes for all studentsstudents

EnhanceEnhance educationaleducational outcomesoutcomes for allfor all studentsstudents

Basic TenetBasic Tenet Educational outcomes can beEducational outcomes can be enhanced by setting rigorousenhanced by setting rigorous standards, teaching to thosestandards, teaching to those standards, and assessingstandards, and assessing progress towardprogress toward accomplishing thoseaccomplishing those standardsstandards

Educational outcomesEducational outcomes can be enhanced bycan be enhanced by maximizingmaximizing opportunities foropportunities for students with andstudents with and without disabilities towithout disabilities to be educated togetherbe educated together

EducationalEducational outcomesoutcomes can becan be enhancedenhanced byby embracingembracing studentstudent diversitydiversity

AssociatedAssociated InstructionalInstructional PracticesPractices

Curriculum is aligned withCurriculum is aligned with standardsstandards

Uses large-scale assessmentsUses large-scale assessments

Di�erentiatedDi�erentiated instructioninstruction

Universal designUniversal design

MulticulturalMulticultural educationeducation

ShelteredSheltered instructioninstruction

The metaphor of all boats rising or sinking together is often used when describing approaches to standards-The metaphor of all boats rising or sinking together is often used when describing approaches to standards- based reform, such as the No Child Left Behind Act. For example, in order for a school to achieve adequatebased reform, such as the No Child Left Behind Act. For example, in order for a school to achieve adequate yearly progress (AYP), all student subgroups, including English language learners, students with disabilities,yearly progress (AYP), all student subgroups, including English language learners, students with disabilities, and students from minority groups, must make adequate yearly progress. The progress of the group as aand students from minority groups, must make adequate yearly progress. The progress of the group as a whole cannot mask the lack of development of designated subgroups. To extend the nautical metaphor, wewhole cannot mask the lack of development of designated subgroups. To extend the nautical metaphor, we can’t ignore a hole in our neighbor’s end of the boat and still expect to have our end remain dry. Specialcan’t ignore a hole in our neighbor’s end of the boat and still expect to have our end remain dry. Special education students and other historically marginalized groups cannot be sent to the trailer and be forgotten.education students and other historically marginalized groups cannot be sent to the trailer and be forgotten.

The goal of helping all students meet rigorous standards can only be attained by attending to the needs ofThe goal of helping all students meet rigorous standards can only be attained by attending to the needs of the most vulnerable students—students with disabilities and students from culturally and linguisticallythe most vulnerable students—students with disabilities and students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. The ideas embodied in movements such as inclusion and teaching for cultural anddiverse backgrounds. The ideas embodied in movements such as inclusion and teaching for cultural and linguistic diversity provide this needed attention. Additionally, while standards-based reform is largely silentlinguistic diversity provide this needed attention. Additionally, while standards-based reform is largely silent on the issue of instructional methodology, the inclusion and teaching for cultural and linguistic diversityon the issue of instructional methodology, the inclusion and teaching for cultural and linguistic diversity movements infuse instructional approaches that maximize opportunities for all students to learn from theirmovements infuse instructional approaches that maximize opportunities for all students to learn from their diverse peers. These approaches include di�erentiated instruction, universal design, sheltered instruction,diverse peers. These approaches include di�erentiated instruction, universal design, sheltered instruction, and multicultural education.and multicultural education.

Instructional Approaches That Support Inclusion in Diverse, Standards-Instructional Approaches That Support Inclusion in Diverse, Standards- Based ClassroomsBased Classrooms

Di�erentiated InstructionDi�erentiated Instruction

 

 

11/8/2019 Introduction: Teaching in Diverse, Standards-Based Classrooms

www.ascd.org/publications/books/109011/chapters/Introduction@_Teaching_in_Diverse,_Standards-Based_Classrooms.aspx 5/8

Without the supporting pedagogy, inclusion in diverse, standards-based classrooms could not be successful.Without the supporting pedagogy, inclusion in diverse, standards-based classrooms could not be successful. Di�erentiated instruction is an example of a supporting instructional approach that embraces the needs ofDi�erentiated instruction is an example of a supporting instructional approach that embraces the needs of academically diverse populations of students, in particular students who are gifted or who have disabilities.academically diverse populations of students, in particular students who are gifted or who have disabilities. Di�erentiated instruction involves creating multiple paths to learning for diverse students (Tomlinson, 1999).Di�erentiated instruction involves creating multiple paths to learning for diverse students (Tomlinson, 1999). Instruction can be di�erentiated in a variety of ways, such as tailoring content to an individual student’sInstruction can be di�erentiated in a variety of ways, such as tailoring content to an individual student’s needs, modifying instructional methods to address student learning characteristics more appropriately, orneeds, modifying instructional methods to address student learning characteristics more appropriately, or adjusting learning products or assignments based on a student’s skill and ability levels.adjusting learning products or assignments based on a student’s skill and ability levels.

Universal Design for LearningUniversal Design for Learning

Universal design is an instructional approach that gives particular attention to students who have physical,Universal design is an instructional approach that gives particular attention to students who have physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities. Like di�erentiated instruction, universal design embraces the idea thatsensory, and cognitive disabilities. Like di�erentiated instruction, universal design embraces the idea that instruction should be designed from the beginning with students’ diverse needs in mind. Universal designinstruction should be designed from the beginning with students’ diverse needs in mind. Universal design supports the thought that educators should not have to retro�t lessons for students with exceptional needssupports the thought that educators should not have to retro�t lessons for students with exceptional needs after those lessons have already been created. According to Orkwis (1999), “Universal design implies a designafter those lessons have already been created. According to Orkwis (1999), “Universal design implies a design of instructional materials and activities that allows learning goals to be attainable by individuals with wideof instructional materials and activities that allows learning goals to be attainable by individuals with wide di�erences in their abilities to see, hear, speak, move, read, write, understand English, attend, organize,di�erences in their abilities to see, hear, speak, move, read, write, understand English, attend, organize, engage, and remember” (p. 1). With universal design, it is important that learning activities provide multipleengage, and remember” (p. 1). With universal design, it is important that learning activities provide multiple means of representation or modes of presentation (i.e., auditory, visual, and varying levels of complexity).means of representation or modes of presentation (i.e., auditory, visual, and varying levels of complexity). Learning activities also must allow students to respond in various modes and should be designed to engageLearning activities also must allow students to respond in various modes and should be designed to engage learners with varying interests and aptitudes. Often, educators use assistive technology to implementlearners with varying interests and aptitudes. Often, educators use assistive technology to implement universal design to make instruction accessible for a broader array of students. Assistive technology refers touniversal design to make instruction accessible for a broader array of students. Assistive technology refers to “any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquired commercially o� the shelf, modi�ed, or”any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquired commercially o� the shelf, modi�ed, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve functional capabilities of a child with a disability”customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve functional capabilities of a child with a disability” (U.S. Department of Education, 2004, 20 U.S.C. 1401 (a) (25)). Hence, low-tech devices such as pencil grips may(U.S. Department of Education, 2004, 20 U.S.C. 1401 (a) (25)). Hence, low-tech devices such as pencil grips may be considered assistive technology as well as high-tech devices such as screen readers or electronic books.be considered assistive technology as well as high-tech devices such as screen readers or electronic books. The principles of universal design are important to engineering classrooms that support diverse learners,The principles of universal design are important to engineering classrooms that support diverse learners, including those students with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities (see Chapter 2 for an in-depthincluding those students with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities (see Chapter 2 for an in-depth discussion on UDL).discussion on UDL).

Sheltered InstructionSheltered Instruction

Like di�erentiated instruction and universal design, sheltered instruction also embraces the needs of diverseLike di�erentiated instruction and universal design, sheltered instruction also embraces the needs of diverse learners, speci�cally English language learners. Echevarria, Vogt, and Short (2004) de�ne sheltered instructionlearners, speci�cally English language learners. Echevarria, Vogt, and Short (2004) de�ne sheltered instruction by using the following eight broad elements: (1) preparation, (2) building background, (3) comprehensibleby using the following eight broad elements: (1) preparation, (2) building background, (3) comprehensible input, (4) strategies, (5) interaction, (6) practice and application, (7) lesson delivery, and (8) review andinput, (4) strategies, (5) interaction, (6) practice and application, (7) lesson delivery, and (8) review and assessment. The preparation element suggests that teachers �rst identify lesson objectives aligned with stateassessment. The preparation element suggests that teachers �rst identify lesson objectives aligned with state and local standards. The building background element requires that teachers link new content to students’and local standards. The building background element requires that teachers link new content to students’ background experiences and helps students focus on unfamiliar vocabulary. With the comprehensible inputbackground experiences and helps students focus on unfamiliar vocabulary. With the comprehensible input element, as the name implies, teachers use controlled vocabulary, sentence structure, and visuals andelement, as the name implies, teachers use controlled vocabulary, sentence structure, and visuals and gestures to facilitate students’ comprehension. The strategies element refers to teaching students di�erentgestures to facilitate students’ comprehension. The strategies element refers to teaching students di�erent approaches for organizing and retaining information associated with e�ective learning. The interactionapproaches for organizing and retaining information associated with e�ective learning. The interaction element shows teachers how to structure opportunities for students to interact with their peers in theelement shows teachers how to structure opportunities for students to interact with their peers in the learning process. The interaction phase leads to the practice and application element, which requireslearning process. The interaction phase leads to the practice and application element, which requires teachers to provide frequent opportunities for students to practice new language skills in context. The lessonteachers to provide frequent opportunities for students to practice new language skills in context. The lesson delivery element illustrates how teachers can appropriately pace the lesson and provide for activedelivery element illustrates how teachers can appropriately pace the lesson and provide for active engagement. The review and assessment element focuses on establishing standards and including language-engagement. The review and assessment element focuses on establishing standards and including language- based and content-based evaluations. All of these elements are important in designing classroom instructionbased and content-based evaluations. All of these elements are important in designing classroom instruction that embraces the needs of English language learners.that embraces the needs of English language learners.

Multicultural EducationMulticultural Education

 

 

11/8/2019 Introduction: Teaching in Diverse, Standards-Based Classrooms

www.ascd.org/publications/books/109011/chapters/Introduction@_Teaching_in_Diverse,_Standards-Based_Classrooms.aspx 6/8

Multicultural education is another approach that is important in today’s diverse, standards-based classrooms.Multicultural education is another approach that is important in today’s diverse, standards-based classrooms. As the name implies, multicultural education addresses the needs of culturally diverse populations ofAs the name implies, multicultural education addresses the needs of culturally diverse populations of students. Banks (2001) de�ned this approach with the following �ve major dimensions: (1) contentstudents. Banks (2001) de�ned this approach with the following �ve major dimensions: (1) content integration, (2) the knowledge construction process, (3) bias reduction, (4) empowering school culture, and (5)integration, (2) the knowledge construction process, (3) bias reduction, (4) empowering school culture, and (5) equity pedagogy. Content integration implies that curricula should include content about diverse populationsequity pedagogy. Content integration implies that curricula should include content about diverse populations and present information from diverse points of view. The knowledge construction process focuses on theand present information from diverse points of view. The knowledge construction process focuses on the extent to which teachers explore the in�uences of culture with students. This process includes exploring howextent to which teachers explore the in�uences of culture with students. This process includes exploring how knowledge is constructed and how attitudes are formed in regards to what constitutes valuable or importantknowledge is constructed and how attitudes are formed in regards to what constitutes valuable or important knowledge. Bias reduction refers to activities that are designed to examine and reduce bias in attitudes.knowledge. Bias reduction refers to activities that are designed to examine and reduce bias in attitudes. Building an empowering school culture eradicates systemic factors such as the negative e�ects of trackingBuilding an empowering school culture eradicates systemic factors such as the negative e�ects of tracking practices on diverse groups of students. Equity pedagogy helps teachers use instructional strategies thatpractices on diverse groups of students. Equity pedagogy helps teachers use instructional strategies that embrace the learning characteristics and cognitive styles of diverse populations. Multicultural educationembrace the learning characteristics and cognitive styles of diverse populations. Multicultural education supports educators in enhancing the educational experiences of all learners, including students fromsupports educators in enhancing the educational experiences of all learners, including students from culturally diverse backgrounds.culturally diverse backgrounds.

Together, di�erentiated instruction, sheltered instruction, universal design, and multicultural educationTogether, di�erentiated instruction, sheltered instruction, universal design, and multicultural education address the broad array of students in today’s classrooms. By using these approaches, teachers have theaddress the broad array of students in today’s classrooms. By using these approaches, teachers have the pedagogical tools they need to teach standards in diverse, inclusive classrooms.pedagogical tools they need to teach standards in diverse, inclusive classrooms.

MMECCA: A Framework for SuccessMMECCA: A Framework for Success

As you read the descriptions of the instructional approaches, you probably noticed that there was someAs you read the descriptions of the instructional approaches, you probably noticed that there was some similarity in the strategies used for each. For example, encouraging teachers to vary how they present contentsimilarity in the strategies used for each. For example, encouraging teachers to vary how they present content to students is a common theme for all of the instructional approaches. This overlap suggests that teachersto students is a common theme for all of the instructional approaches. This overlap suggests that teachers need not have a separate repertoire of strategies for each aspect of student diversity. Rather, it may be moreneed not have a separate repertoire of strategies for each aspect of student diversity. Rather, it may be more helpful to consider implications of student diversity on the critical elements of instruction. Combininghelpful to consider implications of student diversity on the critical elements of instruction. Combining instruction with an awareness of student diversity is the theme of this book. The following chapters will focusinstruction with an awareness of student diversity is the theme of this book. The following chapters will focus on the MMECCA framework which is composed of six critical elements of instruction that must be addressedon the MMECCA framework which is composed of six critical elements of instruction that must be addressed to appropriately respond to student diversity in standards-based classrooms. As shown in Figure I.2, theto appropriately respond to student diversity in standards-based classrooms. As shown in Figure I.2, the MMECCA framework helps to integrate the four instructional approaches associated with teaching diverseMMECCA framework helps to integrate the four instructional approaches associated with teaching diverse populations that were discussed in the previous section. This MMECCA framework is composed of thepopulations that were discussed in the previous section. This MMECCA framework is composed of the following elements:following elements:

Methods of Instruction.Methods of Instruction. This element shows the strategies and techniques that are employed during This element shows the strategies and techniques that are employed during instruction. This is the “how” through which instruction is accomplished.instruction. This is the “how” through which instruction is accomplished.

Materials of Instruction.Materials of Instruction. This element pertains to the tangible items that are used to support This element pertains to the tangible items that are used to support instruction. This is the “with what” through which instruction is accomplished.instruction. This is the “with what” through which instruction is accomplished.

Environment of Instruction.Environment of Instruction. This element focuses on the physical environment of the classroom, This element focuses on the physical environment of the classroom, behavior management, and general classroom ethos. This is the “where” of instruction or thebehavior management, and general classroom ethos. This is the “where” of instruction or the instructional context in which learning will occur.instructional context in which learning will occur.

Content of Instruction.Content of Instruction. This element details what is being taught to students. It addresses curricular This element details what is being taught to students. It addresses curricular issues related to what students should know and be able to do. This is the “what” of the learningissues related to what students should know and be able to do. This is the “what” of the learning process or the knowledge, facts, and understandings that are the essence of teaching and learning.process or the knowledge, facts, and understandings that are the essence of teaching and learning.

Collaboration for Instruction.Collaboration for Instruction. This element pertains to how educators should work together in This element pertains to how educators should work together in delivering instruction to diverse populations. It includes educational practices such as collaborativedelivering instruction to diverse populations. It includes educational practices such as collaborative problem solving and co-teaching. This element also addresses how educators and parents should workproblem solving and co-teaching. This element also addresses how educators and parents should work together. This is the “it takes a village” element of instruction.together. This is the “it takes a village” element of instruction.

Assessment in Instruction.Assessment in Instruction. Finally, this element focuses on the assessment process that begins and Finally, this element focuses on the assessment process that begins and ends the instructional cycle. It includes informal, teacher-made assessments, as well as large-scaleends the instructional cycle. It includes informal, teacher-made assessments, as well as large-scale

 

 

11/8/2019 Introduction: Teaching in Diverse, Standards-Based Classrooms

www.ascd.org/publications/books/109011/chapters/Introduction@_Teaching_in_Diverse,_Standards-Based_Classrooms.aspx 7/8

standardized tests. This is the “how do we know what students need and what they know?” element ofstandardized tests. This is the “how do we know what students need and what they know?” element of the instructional process.the instructional process.

Figure I.2. Elements of Instruction in Inclusive, Standards-Based ClassroomsFigure I.2. Elements of Instruction in Inclusive, Standards-Based Classrooms

This framework has been �eld tested in 50 diverse, standards-based classrooms. Participating teachers wereThis framework has been �eld tested in 50 diverse, standards-based classrooms. Participating teachers were trained to use the MMECCA framework during a three-month period. They developed lessons using thistrained to use the MMECCA framework during a three-month period. They developed lessons using this framework, taught the lessons, and then evaluated the outcomes. Participating teachers reported that usingframework, taught the lessons, and then evaluated the outcomes. Participating teachers reported that using the MMECCA framework enhanced their ability to design lessons that met the educational needs of theirthe MMECCA framework enhanced their ability to design lessons that met the educational needs of their diverse students. For example, one teacher said, “Learning about the MMECCA framework in-depth has reallydiverse students. For example, one teacher said, “Learning about the MMECCA framework in-depth has really helped me in working with special needs students.” Student work samples taken from the lessons werehelped me in working with special needs students.” Student work samples taken from the lessons were evaluated based on how they mastered the standards targeted in the lesson. These student work samplesevaluated based on how they mastered the standards targeted in the lesson. These student work samples and the teachers’ re�ections supported the teachers’ reported growth in the area of teaching in inclusive,and the teachers’ re�ections supported the teachers’ reported growth in the area of teaching in inclusive, standards-based classrooms (Voltz, 2006).standards-based classrooms (Voltz, 2006).

The remaining chapters of this book will address each element of the MMECCA framework in-depth.The remaining chapters of this book will address each element of the MMECCA framework in-depth. Suggestions on integrating these ideas into your instruction will be provided in each chapter. We will followSuggestions on integrating these ideas into your instruction will be provided in each chapter. We will follow elementary, middle, and high school teachers as they examine these six elements of their instruction.elementary, middle, and high school teachers as they examine these six elements of their instruction. Through the lens of the instructional models associated with inclusion and teaching for cultural and linguisticThrough the lens of the instructional models associated with inclusion and teaching for cultural and linguistic diversity, each of the elements from the MMECCA framework will be explored and concrete strategies anddiversity, each of the elements from the MMECCA framework will be explored and concrete strategies and illustrative examples will be provided to show how inclusion in diverse, standard-based classrooms can workillustrative examples will be provided to show how inclusion in diverse, standard-based classrooms can work for YOU!for YOU!

 

 

11/8/2019 Introduction: Teaching in Diverse, Standards-Based Classrooms

www.ascd.org/publications/books/109011/chapters/Introduction@_Teaching_in_Diverse,_Standards-Based_Classrooms.aspx 8/8

Resources for MMECCA FrameworkResources for MMECCA Framework

BooksBooks

Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. M. (2009). Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. M. (2009). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectivesMulticultural education: Issues and perspectives. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.

Conklin, W., & Frei, S. (2007). Conklin, W., & Frei, S. (2007). Di�erentiating the curriculum for gifted learnersDi�erentiating the curriculum for gifted learners. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education.Education.

Council for Exceptional Children. (2005). Council for Exceptional Children. (2005). Universal design for learningUniversal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Author.. Alexandria, VA: Author.

Echevarria, J., & Graves, A. (2010). Echevarria, J., & Graves, A. (2010). Sheltered content instruction: Teaching English language learners with diverseSheltered content instruction: Teaching English language learners with diverse abilitiesabilities. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Gregory, G. H., & Chapman, C. M. (2006). Gregory, G. H., & Chapman, C. M. (2006). Di�erentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn’t �t allDi�erentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn’t �t all. Thousand. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Rose, D. H., & Mayer, R. (2002). Rose, D. H., & Mayer, R. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learningTeaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria,. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.VA: ASCD.

Tomlinson, C. (2004). Tomlinson, C. (2004). How to di�erentiate instruction in mixed ability classroomsHow to di�erentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Copyright © 2010 by ASCD. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2010 by ASCD. All rights reserved. No part of this publication—including the drawings, graphs, illustrations, orNo part of this publication—including the drawings, graphs, illustrations, or chapters, except for brief quotations in chapters, except for brief quotations in critical reviews or articles—may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by anycritical reviews or articles—may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, withoutincluding photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from ASCD.permission from ASCD.

Requesting PermissionRequesting Permission

For For photocopyphotocopy, , electronic and online accesselectronic and online access, and , and republication requestsrepublication requests, go to the , go to the CopyrightCopyright Clearance CenterClearance Center. Enter the book title within the “. Enter the book title within the “Get PermissionGet Permission” search �eld.” search �eld.

To To translatetranslate this book, contact this book, contact translations@ascd.orgtranslations@ascd.org

 

http://www.copyright.com/

Educaion Law: Religious Expression Case Analysis And Rationale

Running Head: PRINCIPAL LEADERSHIP AND DISTRICT POLICY 1

 

PRINCIPAL LEADERSHIP AND DISTRICT POLICY 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal Leadership and District Policy

Jolene Williams

GCU EAD-505

01/08/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal Leadership and District Policy

Summary

One of the factors that determine how well a school performs is its organization and the depth to which the stakeholders understand and play their roles. This paper is a summary of two interviews conducted, one at Northridge Elementary School on the subject of day-to-day Principal Leadership, and one at the Alpine School District on the subject of District Policy. The first interview was held on January 6, 2020, the interviewee being Craig Jensen, the Director of Human Resources of Alpine School District. This interviewee stated that his role, generally, is to supervise and advise the district on strategic issues like staffing, compensation, training and development, and benefits (Jensen, 2020). As a leader, he must also ensure the development of a culture in which employees perform in line with the objectives of the school. Mr. Jensen stated that district policies are made and updated if and when the need arises. The School Board meets in each April of every year to officially review, formulate, and update any school policy (Policies by Category, 2020).

The second interview, conducted on January 7, 2020, with John LaBare as the interviewee, was to find out the duties and functions of an Elementary School principal. Each day at the school is as unique as a snowflake according to Mr. LaBare (2020). The primary function of the principal is to cultivate and execute a collective vision of quality education for the academic achievement and welfare of all students. Being the pillar of the school, the principal is expected to show adeptness and honor in every aspect: relationships, decision-making, cultural awareness, and professionalism. He is supposed to show support for curriculum and instruction and empower all stakeholders, including teachers, staff, students, parents, PTA, and the overall community to work towards improving each student (Northridge Elementary Parent & Student Handbook, 2019). In short, he is supposed to hold the school together and ensure improvement in every domain.

In light of the outcomes of these interviews, and in adherence to the Professional Standards for Educational Leaders Standard 9 (Reston, 2015), I have a conviction that the knowledge so far gained will help nurture my skills as a future educational leader. It will help me in the efficient management of school functions and resources to ensure the academic achievement and welfare of each student. This knowledge will assist me, in future practice, to manage the school’s resources strategically, professionally, responsibly, and ethically. In summary, this knowledge will help guide me in the future duties that will promote the achievement of my personal career goals within the scope of my field of expertise.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

LaBare, J. (2020, January 7). Personal interview.

Jensen, C. (2020, January 6). Personal interview.

Northridge Elementary Parent & Student Handbook. (2019). Retrieved from https://northridge.alpineschools.org/parentsstudents/.

Policies by Category. (2020). Retrieved from https://alpineschools.org/policy/policies-by-category/.

Reston, V.A. (2015). National Policy Board for Educational Administration. Professional Standards for Educational Leaders.