Careers In Early Childhood Education

ASSIGNMENT 04

E01 Careers in Early Childhood Education

Directions: Be sure to save an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling, and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) double‐spaced pages; refer to the “Format Requirementsʺ page for specific format requirements.

 

The scenarios presented below are similar to those that you will likely encounter as an early childhood educator. Put yourself in the shoes of the early childhood educator and apply your knowledge and skills to navigate through each scenario.

 

Scenario 1

 

Both Friedrich Froebel and Maria Montessori developed unique materials to support their methods of teaching children. These materials are still used in classrooms today. Imagine that you are an early childhood educator at a preschool where you teach a class of 3- to 5-year-olds.

 

Part A: Develop an original age-appropriate activity for your preschool class using one of the following.

· Froebel’s cube gift

· Froebel’s parquetry gift

· Lincoln Logs

 

1. Describe the activity that you have developed.

 

2. Identify at least two (2) skills that the activity would help develop.

 

Part B: Develop an original age-appropriate activity for your preschool class promoting the same skill(s) as the activity above, but develop the activity based on the Montessori method.

 

1. Describe the activity that you have developed.

 

2. What are at least two key differences between the two activities you developed?

 

 

Scenario 2

 

Characteristics of developmentally appropriate practices can be observed in classrooms. Intentional teachers can utilize this knowledge in planning experiences specifically designed for children of various ages to enhance their development and learning.

Below is a list of some of the characteristics that children display naturally. Imagine that you are teaching a kindergarten class of 5- to 6-year-olds. Develop two learning activities that you could use to further nurture the development of these capabilities. Each experience should integrate at least three of the characteristics listed below. Make sure to describe how each characteristic is incorporated into the activities.

 

Lead Draw

Create Raise questions

Move Solve problems

Create art Try again

Make a plan Read and make books

Initiate Choose wisely

Speak Decide

 

Scenario 3

 

Imagine that you are an early childhood educator who teaches a first-grade class of 6- to 7-year-olds. Develop an activity designed to promote reading and/or writing skills. Provide a description of the activity.

 

Explain how you would adapt this learning experience to be more appropriate for children with four of the following special needs.

· Gifted

· Intellectual disability

· Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

· Speech delayed

· Hearing impairment

· Visual impairment

· Physical disability

· Epilepsy

· Asthma

 

 

Scenario 4

 

As an early childhood educator, imagine that you observe each of the situations below. Fill out the chart below, identifying the most likely cause, the most appropriate preventative guidance technique you, as the teacher, could use, the most appropriate solution that promotes positive self-concept and prosocial behaviors, and the reason why you selected each technique and solution.

 

1. Mealtime Fight. At age 18 months, highly active Jake climbs out of his high chair long before his meal is finished. Exasperated, his teacher makes him sit at the table until he has eaten all of his food. Soon Jake’s behavior escalates into throwing his food on the floor.

 

2. Temper Tantrum. Three-year-old Connor falls on the floor and kicks and hits his fists on the floor while he yells. The teacher and three other children are sitting at a table nearby working on puzzles. Connor continues this behavior and looks up every minute or so to see the teacher’s reaction.

 

3. “Mommy, don’t go!” Four-year-old Angela screams “Mommy, don’t go!” when her mother brings her to the center each morning.

 

4. Bully. Jenny, a first-grader, is large for her age. When she enters the after-school program each day, she goes around the room pushing the other children and taking toys away from them. No one wants to play with her because of the way she acts.

 

  Cause Guidance Technique Appropriate Solution Reason
Mealtime Fight        
Temper Tantrum        
“Mommy, don’t go!”        
Bully        

 

 

Grading Rubric

 

Please refer to the rubric on the next page for the grading criteria for this assignment.

 

CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable

10 points8 points5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear, logical

description of an age-

appropriate activity using

Froebel’s cube gift, Froebel’s

parquetry gift, or Lincoln Logs.

Student provides a mostly clear,

logical description of an age-

appropriate activity using

Froebel’s cube gift, Froebel’s

parquetry gift, or Lincoln Logs.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of an

age-appropriate activity using

Froebel’s cube gift, Froebel’s

parquetry gift, or Lincoln Logs.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of an age-

appropriate activity using

Froebel’s cube gift, Froebel’s

parquetry gift, or Lincoln Logs.

10 points8 points5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear, logical

description of at least 2 skills

that the above activity would

help develop.

Student provides a mostly clear,

logical description of at least 2

skills that the above activity

would help develop.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of 1-2

skills that the above activity

would help develop.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of 1-2 skills

that the above activity would

help develop.

10 points8 points5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear, logical

description of an age-

appropriate activity using the

Montessori method to promote

the skills described above.

Student provides a mostly clear,

logical description of an age-

appropriate activity using the

Montessori method to promote

the skills described above.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of an

age-appropriate activity using

the Montessori method to

promote the skills described

above.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of an age-

appropriate activity using the

Montessori method to promote

the skills described above.

10 points8 points5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear, logical

description of at least 2

differences in the activities

described above.

Student provides a mostly clear,

logical description of at least 2

differences in the activities

described above.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of 1-2

differences in the activities

described above.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of 1-2

differences in the activities

described above.

10 points8 points5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear, logical

description of at least 2 age-

appropriate learning activities

that integrate at least 3 of the

given characteristics.

Student provides a mostly clear,

logical description of at least 2

age-appropriate learning

activities that integrate 2-3 of

the given characteristics.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of at

least 2 age-appropriate learning

activities that integrate 1-3 of

the given characteristics.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of 1-2 age-

appropriate learning activities

that integrate 1-3 of the given

characteristics.

15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points

Student provides a clear, logical

description the activity and how

the activity would be adapted

to fit the needs of at least 4 of

the special needs categories

listed.

Student provides a mostly clear,

logical description of the

activity and how the activity

would be adapted to fit the

needs of 3-4 of the special

needs categories listed.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of the

activity and how the activity

would be adapted to fit the

needs of 2-4 of the special

needs categories listed.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of the

activity and how the activity

would be adapted to fit the

needs of 1-4 of the special

needs categories listed.

15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points

Student successfully fills out the

chart for all 4 scenarios using

clear, logical information.

Student successfully fills out the

chart for 3-4 scenarios using

mostly clear, logical

information.

Student successfully fills out the

chart for 2-4 scenarios using

partially clear, logical

information.

Student successfully fills out the

chart for 1-4 scenarios using

weak or unclear information.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student does not make any

errors in grammar or spelling,

especially those that distract

the reader from the content.

Student makes 1-2 errors in

grammar or spelling that

distract the reader from the

content.

Student makes 3-4 errors in

grammar or spelling that

distract the reader from the

content.

Student makes more than 4

errors in grammar or spelling

that distract the reader from

the content.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

The paper is written in proper

APA and organizational format.

All sources used for quotes and

facts are credible and cited

correctly. Excellent

organization, including a variety

of thoughtful transitions.

The paper is written in proper

format with only 1-2 errors. All

sources used for quotes and

facts are credible, and most are

cited correctly. Adequate

organization includes a variety

of appropriate transitions.

The paper is written in proper

format with only 3-5 errors.

Most sources used for quotes

and facts are credible and cited

correctly. Essay is poorly

organized, but may include a

few effective transitions.

The paper is not written in

proper format. Many sources

used for quotes and facts are

less than credible (suspect)

and/or are not cited correctly.

Essay is disorganized and does

not include effective

transitions.

Format – APA Format,

Citations, Organization,

Transitions (10 Points)

Scenario 1 Part A:

Description of Activity

(10 Points)

Mechanics (10 Points)

Scenario 1 Part A: Skills

(10 Points)

Scenario 4: Guidance

Scenarios (15 Points)

Scenario 1 Part B:

Differences (10 Points)

Scenario 1 Part B:

Description of Activity

(10 Points)

Scenario 2: Learning

Activities (10 Points)

Scenario 3: Special

Needs (15 Points)

Focused SOAP Note For Anxiety, PTSD, And OCD

The Assignment

Develop a Focused SOAP Note, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:

  • Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
  • Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
  • Assessment: Discuss the https://www.keenessays.xyz/uncategorized/focused-soap-note-for-anxiety-ptsd-and-ocd/   patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
  • Plan: What is your plan for psychotherapy? What is your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters, as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. Also incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.
  • Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session again? Discuss what your next intervention would be if you could follow up with this patient. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion, and disease prevention, taking into consideration https://www.keenessays.xyz/uncategorized/focused-soap-note-for-anxiety-ptsd-and-ocd/ patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
  • Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old).

Analyzing Arizona’s Language Development Approach

Arizona’s instructional program for English language learners is based on four principles called Arizona’s Language Development Approach. According to the Arizona Department of Education, these principles are based on the core idea that “all educators share the responsibility for promoting the success of English learners.”

Choose one of the following deliverables to complete this assignment:

  • 10-12 slide digital      presentation, including presenter’s notes with documentation of resources      and a title slide

Utilizing the deliverable of your choice, present the following information about Arizona’s Language Development Approach to general classroom teachers:

Part 1: Terminology

  • Explain Arizona’s definition      of an English learner (EL).
  • Briefly discuss the      distinctions between the following instructional program models: ESL,      bilingual, sheltered English instruction, and structured English immersion      (SEI).

Part 2: Four Principles of Arizona’s Language Development Approach

  • Briefly describe Arizona’s      Language Development Approach and the synthesis of the research around      ELLs.
  • Explain student agency and      its importance in the instruction of ELLs.
  • Explain each of the four      principles of Arizona’s Language Development Approach.
  • Discuss components of      Arizona’s approved research-based SEI models: newcomer, pull-out, two      hour, 50-50 dual language immersion.

If applicable, the deliverable should include graphics that are relevant to the content, visually appealing, and uses space appropriately.

Please ass notes

Education Matrix

EDUC 305

Philosophy Matrix Template

Using the text and online resources (do not copy and paste from your resources), complete the empty white cells in the chart below. Your responses in each column should reflect the beliefs about that category according to the specific philosophy for that section. This will assist you in comparing the various philosophies. Ensure that the major principles of each philosophy are clarified. Remember that aspects of these philosophies should be integrated into your final philosophy paper at the end of the course.

· Metaphysics = What is reality/truth?

· Epistemology = Is it possible to know reality/truth? If so, how?

· Axiology = What values should be developed in education?

· Learner’s Nature = What is the human condition? Good? Bad? Neutral? What learner factors should be considered in education?

· Teacher’s Role = What is the most effective approach the teacher should take?

· Curricular Focus = What content is most important?

· Methodology = What pedagogical strategies are most effective?

· Criticisms = What do opponents of this philosophy/theory say?

Traditional Philosophies
Idealism (Plato)
Metaphysics Epistemology Axiology Learner’s Nature Teacher’s Role Curricular Focus Methodology Criticisms
               
Neo-Scholasticism (Aquinas)
Metaphysics Epistemology Axiology Learner’s Nature Teacher’s Role Curricular Focus Methodology Criticisms
               
Modern Philosophies
Pragmatism (Dewey)
Metaphysics Epistemology Axiology Learner’s Nature Teacher’s Role Curricular Focus Methodology Criticisms
               
Existentialism/Humanism (Kierkegaard, Sartre, etc.)
Metaphysics Epistemology Axiology Learner’s Nature Teacher’s Role Curricular Focus Methodology Criticisms
               
Contemporary Educational Theories for Transmission
Perennialism (Adler, Hutchins, etc)
Metaphysics Epistemology Axiology Learner’s Nature Teacher’s Role Curricular Focus Methodology Criticisms
               
Essentialism (E.D. Hirsch)
Metaphysics Epistemology Axiology Learner’s Nature Teacher’s Role Curricular Focus Methodology Criticisms
               
Behaviorism (Skinner)
Metaphysics Epistemology Axiology Learner’s Nature Teacher’s Role Curricular Focus Methodology Criticisms
               
Contemporary Educational Theories for Transformation
Reconstructionism (Counts)
Metaphysics Epistemology Axiology Learner’s Nature Teacher’s Role Curricular Focus Methodology Criticisms
               
Critical Pedagogy (Friere, Giroux, Noddings, etc)
Metaphysics Epistemology Axiology Learner’s Nature Teacher’s Role Curricular Focus Methodology Criticisms
               

Page 3 of 3