ETHICAL BEHAVIOR, DIVERSITY, AND CIVIL DISCOURSE

My degree is an EDD in Performance Improvement Leadership 

 

  • Assignment Overview
    In the assignment this week, you will write a paper (7–10 pages), including a literature review, that examines ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse in the context of your particular focus and specialization.
  • What You Need to Know
    Ethical Reasoning
    Morris (2016) tells us:
    In fall 2016, more than twenty million students enrolled across more than four million colleges and universities in the U.S. One in four students were members of a minority group, and approximately one million were international students. These students interacted with approximately four million administrators and faculty and staff members in a diversity of settings. Most of these students will easily transition into a life of academics and social interactions. For others, insults, aggressions, and lack of inclusion are a reality; and these experiences will shape their interactions and perceptions . . . on the challenges facing the nation and world and considering the role that post-secondary education plays in improving civil discourse nationally and creating safe spaces for dialogue and personal growth. (p. 361)
    Morris (2016) goes on to argue:
    First, [we must] identify resources to support conversations around civil discourse, social justice, and inclusion. Could we individually and collectively in every department, college, and administrative unit resolve to make a difference—to role-model and ask our students to be kind, show compassion, be inclusive and fair, and extend a hand of friendship? Maybe our academic words, like social justice, just do not resonate. Perhaps people forget that words have power and can cause long-lasting pain or can provide encouragement. While we may study and advocate for equity, perhaps we should say that this campus and my class will discuss challenging topics; but we will be characterized by the following values: to listen, to reflect, to show compassion, to think critically, and to care about this community of learners. I know: it sounds like Robert Fulghum’s All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten (1988). However, sometimes simple guidelines work best. (p. 361)
    Use your Critical Thinking text to quickly review the following:

    • Chapter 14, “Develop As an Ethical Reasoner,” pages 345–365.
    • If you did not complete the Blooming Park: Ethics, Diversity, and Personnel Selection simulation last week, complete it now to begin work on the interviews relevant to your organization: P–12 education, higher education, business or corporate, or military. This activity will give you the opportunity to grapple with the ethical questions that frequently arise in professional contexts, which will be the focus of your assignment this week.
      Diversity and Multiculturalism
      Diversity in all organization settings can take many forms. We may consider differences across many criteria, including the following:
    • Ethnicity.
    • Ethnic identity.
    • Gender.
    • Gender identity.
    • Culture.
    • Ability and disability.
    • Developmental criteria.
    • Age and generation.
    • Other exceptionalities.
    • When taking account of this diversity, the principles of multicultural education encourage us to acknowledge differences, addressing the reality of each person’s experience and seeking the best possible outcomes for all.
      This week, you are asked how the diversity of the constituencies you serve within your organization need to be considered when planning and implementing education programming. Theories in the fields of diversity and multicultural education indicate that an important role of educators is to plan for and implement education practices that recognize the diverse needs of the people they serve.
      Use the Capella library to read the following:
    • Banks, J. A. (Ed.). (2012). Encyclopedia of diversity in education. Sage.
      • Read “Introduction” (Volume 1, starting on page xlvii).
      • Scan “Index” (Volume 4, beginning on page 2383) for a comprehensive listing of terms and topics related to diversity.
    • Doubet, K. J., & Hockett, J. A. (2017). Classroom discourse as civil discourse. Educational Leadership, 75(3), 56–60.
    • Morris, L. V. (2016). Collective action for civil discourse [PDF]. Innovative Higher Education, 41(5), 361–363.
    • Use the Internet to read the following:
    • Gay, G. (1994). A synthesis of scholarship in multicultural education [PDF]. Eric. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED378287.pdf
    • Teaching Tolerance. (n.d.). Civil discourse in the classroom. https://www.tolerance.org/magazine/publications/civil-discourse-in-the-classroom
    • Explore the following websites to learn about standards, definitions, and issues related to ethics and diversity:
    • American Council on Education. (n.d.). http://www.acenet.edu
    • Council for Exceptional Children. (n.d.). http://www.cec.sped.org/
    • The National Association for Multicultural Education. (n.d.). http://nameorg.org/index.php
    • Reference
      Morris, L. (2016). Collective action for civil discourse. Innovative Higher Education, 41(5), 361–363.
  • Assignment Instructions
    ETHICAL BEHAVIOR, DIVERSITY, AND CIVIL DISCOURSE
    Overview
    Ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse are subjects not easily defined for study. We can point to perceived differences between people and cultures; however, that is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg, ignoring the effects of those differences in a given context. Additionally, focus on ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse usually requires value comparisons and judgments, rather than a one-side-versus-the-other approach. For additional information on these concepts and how they tie into the assignment, see the Week 7 Assignment Background Information [PDF] document.
    In the context of the field of education, the effects of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse on individuals and organizations are impossible to ignore. The challenges of adopting a broad view of difference and creating an equitable learning experience for all whom we lead are many, and they are not easily met. However, the professional literature of the field is a rich resource of tools, research, and practical experience and application.
    For this assignment, you will review the literature related to ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse in the context of your particular focus and specialization and choose one main concern for each of these domains to analyze in the literature review section of your paper. You will apply the skills you started building in the Literature Review assignment in Week 4. Similar to what you did previously, but focused now on the challenges relevant to these domains and inherent to your specialization, you will research and review scholarly, peer-reviewed literature. Going one step further, you will then choose and explain the main challenges in your specialization, as suggested by your review. Note that you are writing a condensed literature review for this assignment.
    Reminders
    Note that:

    • The literature that you will select and discuss in this assignment is totally distinct from those sources that you searched and discussed in your Week 4 Literature Review assignment, but the skills you employed in that assignment will apply here.
    • Writing a literature review is a key part of academic work. A literature review is a piece of writing that describes what has been learned about a topic through previous research efforts. A literature review is essentially a report on work previously done in a field, to show an understanding of the context for your own writing. A literature review is not a summary of individual sources in a list, such as in the form of an annotated bibliography. Rather, the literature review paraphrases the findings from the scholarly readings you selected. You will seek the key themes from the different sources, and you will use in-text citations to support the information you learned from the scholarly readings.
    • Use Academic Writer for guidance in citing sources and formatting your paper in proper APA style. See the Evidence and APA section of the Writing Center for instructions on accessing and using Academic Writer.
      Instructions
      Before you begin your paper, examine the grading criteria in the scoring guide.
    • Use the Sample Course Paper Template [DOCX] as a guide for formatting and organizing your course papers.
    • Use the Week 7 Writing Revision Matrix [DOCX] template to address feedback you receive on this assignment from your instructor. Refer to the Writing Revision Matrix instructions below for further information.
    • Paper Organization
      Start with a title page and organize your paper with the following guidelines:
    • Title page: Include a title page with the following title: Ethical Behavior, Diversity, Civil Discourse, and [Name of Your Specialization]: A Literature Review.
    • Introduction: The opening content should directly follow the title of the paper (repeated from the title page). In this section, list or summarize the issues you selected from the literature related to ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse, and provide a summary or road map for the content included in your paper.
    • Overview of issues: Begin the body of your paper with an overview of the issues related to ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse you chose for this review. Describe connections among these issues and their significance to education. Write in third person and include literature support.
    • Diversity issue related to specialization: Provide detailed descriptions and examples of how the issues you chose to review specifically relate to your specialization. Write in third person and include literature support.
    • Ethical behavior issue related to specialization: Provide detailed descriptions and examples of how the issue you chose to review specifically relates to your specialization. Write in third person and include literature support.
    • Civil discourse issue related to specialization: Provide detailed descriptions and examples of how the issue you chose to review specifically relates to your specialization. Write in third person and include literature support.
    • Review of the literature: The literature review should include a minimum of five references from peer-reviewed journal articles related to your education specialization. Analyze this scholarly literature, focusing on the connections between your educational specialization and the issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse you chose to research. Continue writing in third person and cite the literature for support.
    • Conclusion: Your conclusion should emphasize the main themes in your paper and provide a synthesis of the literature reviewed, with special attention to the connections and relationships among the issues you chose to research and your educational specialization.
    • References: Include a minimum of five different scholarly, peer-reviewed journals (related to your field of specialization) that are also cited in the paper. Your citations must have references and your references should be included within your paper as in-text citations.
    • Research Guides
      Refer to the EdD Program Library Research Guide and the EdS Program Library Research Guide for guidance on gathering scholarly resources. The topical tabs offer more advice for each specialization. If you have questions about gathering articles or other materials, see the Library Help page for personal assistance through chat, e-mail, and phone.
      Additional Requirements
      In addition to the requirements outlined above, your assignment should meet the following:
    • Assignment template: Use the Sample Course Paper Template [DOCX] for the assignment.
    • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • Sources: A minimum five scholarly, peer-reviewed sources from at least three different scholarly journals for your field or specialization.
    • APA formatting: Follow current APA style and formatting for in-text citations. For more information on the APA guidelines for in-text citations, go to Academic Writer and use the Learn tab to find the Quick Guides on Citing Sources and Paper Format and Organization.
      • Include a title page with the following title: Ethical Behavior, Diversity, Civil Discourse, and [Name of Your Specialization]: A Literature Review.
    • Length: The paper should be 7–10 pages, in addition to the title page and references page.
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
    • Portfolio Prompt: Consider saving this assignment to your ePortfolio. The work you submit for this course will only be retrievable for a limited time, and you may want or need to access these assignments in the future.
      Submit your paper as a Word document in the Week 7 assignment area.

1

Week 7 Assignment Background Information

Ethical Behavior

Of all the courses I have taken, at all levels, this course has no boundaries. What I mean is all the materials we have read, the discussions we have had and the lessons I have learned, directly impact all I will study and all I will do. . . . Ethics courses should not be only for students who are interested in going on to law school or medical school. [They] should be for students who are interested in becoming citizens. . . . If anyone ever challenges the relevance of a course such as this in an educational leadership curriculum, [he or she is] not an educated individual. (Graduate student in educational leadership). (Shapiro & Stefkovich, 2011, p. 3)

Shapiro and Stefkovich offer insightful perspectives via this student quote included in the preface of their work, as true today as when they wrote this several years ago.

For further insights into ethical leadership, you may review and consider Peter Northouse’s ideas as you prepare to complete this assignment:

• Dunaetz, D. (2018, July 23). Leadership Ethics (chap 13) leadership by Northouse, 8th ed. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2- pHatE7Pk&feature=youtu.be

In addition, you may check out the following from the National Education Association:

• National Education Association. (n.d.). Diversity toolkit. http:// www.nea.org/tools/diversity-toolkit.html

Diversity

As you develop this element of the assignment, consider the following from the National Education Association (n.d., para. 1–3):

Diversity can be defined as the sum of the ways that people are both alike and different. The dimensions of diversity include race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, language, culture, religion, mental and physical ability, class, and immigration status. The field of education includes diverse professional job categories ranging from classroom teachers to education support professionals to higher education faculty to retired professionals. While diversity itself is not a value-laden term, the way that people react to diversity is driven by values, attitudes, beliefs, and so on. Full acceptance of diversity is a major principle of social justice.

The concept of diversity presents both extraordinary promise and daunting challenges for education employees. On the one hand, educators and students have more opportunities than ever to learn about different experiences, languages, and cultures, whether through classroom curriculum, the Internet, or a conversation with a peer or a neighbor. This learning enriches us and prepares us for life in our 21st century, global society.

On the other hand, the education community faces growing challenges related to diversity, such as the academic achievement gaps between students of diverse backgrounds; racial segregation and resegregation in our schools; gender inequalities and sex discrimination; bullying and harassment of students who identify as gay, lesbian,

 

 

2

bisexual or transgender; educating students with disabilities; staggering disparities in educational resources based on class or income; access to education for immigrants; respecting students of all religious backgrounds; and so forth. Institutional hurdles such as high-stakes testing and the lack of resources for “nonessential” subjects make addressing the issue of diversity even more challenging. (National Education Association, 2019)

Civil Discourse

As you develop this element of the assignment, consider the following:

In fall 2016, more than 20 million students will enroll across more than 4 million colleges and universities in the U.S. One in four students will be members of a minority group, and approximately one million will be international students. These students will interact with approximately four million administrators and faculty and staff members in a diversity of settings. Most of these students will easily transition into a life of academics and social interactions. For others, insults, aggressions, and lack of inclusion are a reality; and these experiences will shape their interactions and perceptions [emphasis added] . . . on the challenges facing the nation and world and considering the role that post-secondary education plays in improving civil discourse nationally and creating safe spaces for dialogue and personal growth. (Moris, 2016, p. 361)

[C]could we individually and collectively in every department, college, and administrative unit resolve to make a difference—to role-model and ask our students to be kind, show compassion, be inclusive and fair, and extend a hand of friendship? Maybe our academic words, like social justice, just do not resonate. Perhaps people forget that words have power and can cause long-lasting pain or can provide encouragement. While we may study and advocate for equity, perhaps we should say that this campus and my class will discuss challenging topics; but we will be characterized by the following values: to listen, to reflect, to show compassion, to think critically, and to care about this community of learners. I know: it sounds like Robert Fulghum’s (1988), All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten. However, sometimes simple guidelines work best. (Morris, 2016, p. 362)

Civil Discourse in the Classroom—based on lessons tested in diverse classrooms across the United States and proven effective with a wide range of students and topics— will introduce educators to basic tools for teaching civil discourse. It is not subject- specific; on the contrary, the tools of argumentation and discussion lend themselves to any subject in any classroom. Although it is primarily designed for young adolescents, the curriculum can be adapted for students of any age. (Teaching Tolerance, n.d.)

References

Morris, L. (2016). Collective action for civil discourse. Innovative Higher Education, 41(5), 361–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9376-5 National Education Association. (n.d.). Diversity toolkit introduction.

http://www.nea.org/tools/diversity-toolkit-introduction.html

Shapiro, P. J., & Stfkovich, J. A. (2011). Ethical leadership and decision making in education:

Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas. Routledge.

 

 

3

Teaching Tolerance. (n.d.). Civil discourse in the classroom. https://www.tolerance.org/magazine/publications/civil-discourse-in-the-classroom

Late 19th And 20th Century “Isms” In Western Art

ions Think about which art movements are you familiar with? Perhaps you have heard in the past about Impressionism or Cubism, but really what is the meaning of those terms? What did artists truly want to express by creating artworks in said styles? Were the artists working within the framework of a specific movement restricting their ways of expressing ideas, or were advancing the ideas of their predecessors? These are some of the questions we will address in this discussion board.

There are dozen art movements mentioned in the textbook that emerged in roughly one hundred fifty years in Europe and later in the United States – from the Modernist aesthetic that begins explaining starting Realism all the way to Installation and Socially Engaged art of today. Many political and social events were happening at the time, and artists reacted to these through their artworks (after all, one of the things artists do is reflect the times we live in). Other artists would then react against previous artistic expressions or to particular political uprisings. In this discussion board, you will study two distinct art movements and delve into their context and manifestations providing specific examples to illustrate your research. I suggest looking into the artworks found in the assigned reading and find those paintings or sculptures that speak to you, that you find compelling. Then focus on those to help formulate a complete and thorough discussion board post.

In a five-hundred-word essay, compare and contrast two art movements from the late nineteenth century or the twentieth century. Often students need to use slightly more words to respond to these questions. As always, make sure to proofread and spell-check all work for clarity and create a concise written response for this assignment.

Select two art movements discussed in chapters 3.8 and 3.9 in our textbook containing the suffix “ism” (such as Realism, Impressionism, Post-Impressionism, Fauvism, Expressionism, Cubism, Bauhaus, De Stijl, Dada, Surrealism, Abstract Expressionism, Pop Art, Minimalism, etc.) addressing the following questions:

1. Briefly define the selected art movements and provide at least two unique characteristics of the style.

2. Discuss factors that contributed to the evolution and emergence of the selected art movement. Mention the context in which the art movement emerged, the antecedents (perhaps the political situation in Europe or North America at the time), and how artists reacted to those conditions.

2. Select two artworks by two different artists from each of the movements you choose to write about and provide the chapter and image number – for a total of four artworks. Providing the chapter and image numbers will count as the source citation for this board. Mention the name of the artist, title, and date for each artwork.

3. Discuss how each artwork is a good representation of each selected art movement. Include the vocabulary of art, mentioning two visual elements and two design principles for each artwork.

4. Reflect on the material studied during this discussion board, using the sentence stems:

I used to think…

But now I think…

This board might result in a more extended discussion board than previous ones requiring five-hundred words. I would say try not to exceed 1000 words.

Have fun exploring art movements!

Augmentative And Alternative Communication Devices

There are various methods and tools that can be used to improve the accessibility of curriculum for students with disabilities. Augmentative and alternative communication devices as well as other assistive technologies are often used for this purpose. It is important for teachers to understand the options that are available, and that they advocate for students to be provided with the best possible tools to assist them.

Part 1: Measurement Data Lesson Plan

Select a 1-5 grade level, a corresponding Arizona or other state standard based on the Measurement and Data domain, and a group of 3-4 students from the “Class Profile” who would benefit from the use of augmentative and/or alternative communication devices or other forms of assistive technology.

With your identified learning target and small group in mind, complete a lesson plan, using the “COE Lesson Plan Template,” that specifies applicable assistive technology and includes differentiated activities to facilitate students making measurement comparisons, and

· Using models of measuring units; or

· Using measuring instruments; or

· Representing and interpreting the data.

Part 2: Communication Device Rationale

In addition to your completed lesson plan, justify your augmentative and/or alternative communication devices or other forms of assistive technology choices in a 250-500 word rationale.

Support your choices with 2-3 scholarly resources.

Class Profile

 

Student Name English Language Learner Socioeconomic

Status

Ethnicity Gender IEP/504 Other Age Reading

Performance Level

Math Performance

Level

Parental

Involvement

Internet Available

at Home

Arturo Yes Low SES Hispanic Male No Tier 2 RTI for Reading Grade level One year below grade level At grade level Med No
Bertie No Low SES Asian Female No None Grade level One year above grade level At grade level Low Yes
Beryl No Mid SES White Female No NOTE: School does not have gifted program Grade level Two years above grade level At grade level Med Yes
Brandie No Low SES White Female No Tier 2 RTI for Math Grade level At grade level One year below grade level Low No
Dessie No Mid SES White Female No Tier 2 RTI for Math Grade level Grade level One year below grade level Med Yes
Diana Yes Low SES White Female No Tier 2 RTI for Reading Grade level One year below grade level At grade level Low No
Donnie No Mid SES African American Female No Hearing Aids Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Eduardo Yes Low SES Hispanic Male No Tier 2 RTI for Reading Grade level One year below grade level At grade level Low No
Emma No Mid SES White Female No None Grade level At grade level At grade level Low Yes
Enrique No Low SES Hispanic Male No Tier 2 RTI for Reading One year above grade level One year below grade level At grade level Low No
Fatma Yes Low SES White Female No Tier 2 RTI for Reading Grade level One year below grade level One year above grade level Low Yes
Frances No Mid SES White Female No Diabetic Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Francesca No Low SES White Female No None Grade level At grade level At grade level High No
Fredrick No Low SES White Male Traumatic Brain Injury Tier 3 RTI for Reading and Math One year above grade level Two years below grade level Two years below grade level Very High No
Ines No Low SES Hispanic Female ASD Tier 2 RTI for Math Grade level One year below grade level One year below grade level Low No
Jade No Mid SES African American Female No None Grade level At grade level One year above grade level High Yes
Kent No High SES White Male Emotion-ally Disabled None Grade level At grade level One year above grade level Med Yes
Lolita No Mid SES Native American/

Pacific Islander

Female No None Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Maria No Mid SES Hispanic Female No NOTE: School does not have gifted program Grade level At grade level Two years above grade level Low Yes
Mason No Low SES White Male No None Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Nick No Low SES White Male No None Grade level One year above grade level At grade level Med No
Noah No Low SES White Male No None Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Sharlene No Mid SES White Female No None Grade level One year above grade level At grade level Med Med
Sophia No Mid SES White Female No None Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Stuart No Mid SES White Male No Allergic to peanuts Grade level One year above grade level At grade level Med Yes
Terrence No Mid SES White Male No None Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Wade No Mid SES White Male No None Grade level At grade level One year above grade level Med Yes
Wayne No High SES White Male Intellectually Disabled Tier 3 RTI for Math Grade level One year below grade level Two years below grade level High Yes
Wendell No Mid SES African American Male Learning Disabled Tier 3 RTI for Math Grade level One year below grade level Two years below grade level Med Yes
Yung No Mid SES Asian Male No NOTE: School does not have gifted program One year below grade level Two years above grade level Two years above grade level Low Yes

 

 

 

 

© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.