Understanding Human Behavior in Managing Workforce.

Hello, I am looking for someone to write an article on Understanding Human Behavior in Managing Workforce. It needs to be at least 1500 words. Organizational leaders should be able to put in place the application of leadership principles through knowing oneself and seeking self-improvement by continually strengthening favorable leadership attributes. A leader needs to be proficient technically concerning the tasks and responsibilities of each employee under his/her leadership. Leadership must entail taking responsibility for the organization in general by guiding the organization to new heights alongside making an in-depth analysis of challenges and taking corrective actions rather than placing the blame on employees. More so, making timely and sound decisions, effective communication to employees, and application of the team spirit is also essential for organizational leadership.

Good leaders seek to achieve self-improvement of leadership attributes that would be useful in understanding human behavior and leading the organizations to greater heights. Leadership attributes for understanding human behavior may include professionalism, selflessness, honesty, proficiency, and competence. Over and above the leadership attributes with regards to employee behavior, the environment in which responsibilities are discharged is paramount. All organizations exist and carry out their day-to-day operations in a specific work environment that is a significant influencing factor on the way leaders manage organizational behavior and respond to opportunities and challenges facing them (Gamage, 2006, p.76).

In discharging their duties, leaders can influence the work environment by establishing relevant and high-performance standards and goals, values, employee, and activity concepts. Organization’s success and exemplary performance are dependent on the capability of leaders to set high employee performance standards and&nbsp.organizational goals with regards to strategies, plans, work environment relations, and productivity. Values set reflect the value that organizations place for their employees, clients, and the community in general through is corporate social responsibility.

Katherine Mansfield’s “The Garden Party” Vol 2, pp. 1357-1366Refer to the gradin

Katherine Mansfield’s “The Garden Party” Vol 2, pp. 1357-1366Refer to the grading rubric for this assignment using the link in the Gradebook.Step 2: Reflect
“The Garden Party” is told as a third-person narrative, not as a first-person narrative. The difference is that a third-person narrative presents the characters to us in the words of a narrator rather than from the words of the characters themselves. The story contains descriptions such as “Laura did this” or “Laura said that,” but it’s not as if the character Laura herself is telling everything from her perspective. Of course, sometimes Laura speaks in the story, but she does not get to tell the story or what she’s thinking or feeling. It is up to the reader to determine what Laura might be thinking or feeling.
Step 3: Respond
For this assignment, try to get into the mind of Laura. Be imaginative and creative. Pretend you are Laura writing in a private journal about her feelings about her mother both before and after she finds out about the accident. In this journal entry you can put down whatever thoughts Laura might have using absolute frankness and honesty. Remember, you are Laura for this writing assignment.
Criteria:
Write a minimum of 400 words in paragraph form, using Times new roman 12-point font (or similar) with double spacing. A title page is not required.Submit as a Microsoft Word or PDF attachment on the submission page (click title above). Assignments not submitted in this way may be returned to you ungraded.

Discuss eyewitness to a genocide: the united nations and rwanda.

Create a 5 pages page paper that discusses eyewitness to a genocide: the united nations and rwanda.

Hutu leaders come to believe that Hutu rescue required Tutsi annihilation. The Hutus ratified their plots with shocking efficiency. In just one hundred days they killed approximately eight hundred thousand persons. The Rwandan mass murder, therefore, has the ghoulish oddity of more than the rate of massacre attained during this genocide. And the persons behind the Rwandan genocide employed mainly low-tech and physically demanding instruments of death that necessitated an understanding of their fatalities.

The genocide was implemented with viciousness and hostility that defy the mind’s eye.Almost as incomprehensible is the response of the global community. What sets the Rwandan crisis aside from other crisis is that the global community could have mediated at a fairly low cost prior to the results were entirely realized. A crisis conference commanded states to react. There were twenty-five hundred U.N. peacekeeping troops on the land, and certainly, later on, the slaughter started, the U.N.’s commandant, Canadian Gen.

Romeo Dallaire1, satisfied with all mod cons troop to prevent the slaughter. Yet the U.N. at once arranged its army not to save nationals from harm. And on April 21, it ordered that but 270 troops are withdrawn (Dallaire 2004, pg. 231).In the background of it, the U.N. basically overlooked both the smaller carnages held in the period of 1990-1993 and the arrangements for this unforgivable genocide. It cracked down instead on creating an end to the war between the Rwandan government and the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), an objective indeed achieved in August 1993 with the signing of the Arusha Accords2.

An asset in the accord, the U.N. provided a conscientious objector force3 (UNAMIR) to ease the transition to a designated government and to supervise the integration of the Rwandan Militia with the RPF military. But the U.N. sought a shameful victory and remained unsuccessful to provide either the command required or the military services needed to make sure a timely and systematic transition.

Discussion on Aboriginal Drinking Problems to the Cultural Construction.

Hello, I am looking for someone to write an article on Aboriginal Drinking Problems to the Cultural Construction. It needs to be at least 1500 words. By using this group of people as an example, culture and its construction can be explored to see how it is socially and politically structured, especially by using articles written by both indigenous and non-indigenous Australians.

The most obvious things about human social interactions are that people like to socialize with people they have things in common with. For example, international students may enjoy talking to other international students because they have a culture in common or the same visa issues. People who like some music will talk to people who like the same kind of music. This has led to some groups using fashion and other things to advertise their hobbies and interest as this may be a way to signal to others that they are open for conversation with people who enjoy the same. This social grouping can lead to cultural identity because it can be a reflection of a culture or sub-culture that others may find difficult to enter (Haviland, 1999). The same applies to people like the aboriginal Australians who share a similar ancestry and may share similar social structures and therefore may group themselves or be grouped.

It could be thought that because aboriginal Australians are a race and that they are often part of the same cultural group that race is the most important part of cultural construction. This is not true because racial construction is based on social construction more than biology. In the United Kingdom or the United States, for example, the aboriginal Australians would be treated differently than they are in Australia and placed into a different cultural construction (Anon, 2010). This would lead to them being expected to act, dress, and eat differently than the Australians believe that they should act. The indigenous Australians may even begin to take up some of these expectations as they are forced into another cultural construction and may begin to identify more with this new group as these become the norm.

One of the main things that are important in cultural construction is whether the people themselves think that they are part of this group.