whether the current rules, for admitting expert evidence in criminal proceedings, are too laissez-faire.

Create a 17 pages page paper that discusses whether the current rules, for admitting expert evidence in criminal proceedings, are too laissez-faire. There are three criteria in which the judge is allowed to admit evidence from an expert. The first criteria state that “When the court needs any assistance from an expert. the expert’s evidence must deal with something” (McKie, 2012). This is so because, without instructions or advice from an expert, the court may be unable to reach a sound conclusion as to the subject matter” (McKie, 2012). The second criteria concern the fact that “the expert witness must have sufficient understanding of the theory and practice of the subject question” (McKie, 2012). Moreover, the last criteria check the possibility of substantial evidence proposed in the expert’s reports being reliable. This issues a directive that all forensic experts must be part of a registered body of science. The expert should have extended experience in the field. They should also have a good reputation and acknowledgment in the field to guarantee justice in an opinion offered (Procedures for the Evidence Act, 1999).

The entire discussion in this paper revolves around the fact that across the world justice systems are failing. This is due to the fact that error created by forensic expert’s evidence tabled cannot be validated by the courts (Bohan, 2004).To make the matter worse, the judiciary systems are not even talking about the weakness in evidence validation. This has increases vast doubt about the authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility of forensic evidence by judges (McKie, 2012). Although not all cases are faced with miscarriage of justice as a result of sham evidence, people who are innocent do end up behind the bar. Flawed experts evidence can result in criminal conviction and even execution by law courts. The truth of the matter is that how most judged verify the mentioned criteria is a bit of a misery.

Jim’s Burgers’recent technological innovations have allowed them to reduce the marginal cost of their burgers

while the market price remained unchanged. Assume the market for burgers is perfectly competitive.

Which of the following statements are true:

Stores should produce more burgers, compared to before the technological innovations, to maximise their profit at the current market price.

A store should produce the same quantity of burgers as before the technological innovations.

A store should produce fewer burgers to avoid an increase in average variable costs.

A store should now produce more burgers and then sell them at a price lower than the market price.

Reflection

All of your answers should be written in your own words, using full sentences, correct terminology, and proper spelling and grammar.Explain the anatomical concepts associated with nutrition structural foundations. Summarize this module’s key points in 5-6 sentences.Explain the physiological concepts associated with nutrition and metabolic functional foundations. Summarize this module’s key points in 5-6 sentences.How will you apply the concepts you have learned about basic nutrition and metabolism in real life and in your future career?Which topic within this module has been the most valuable to your learning experience and why?Which topic(s) within this module did you struggle to understand and why?

Human Services Organizations as Systems

This is a 2 page double spaced paper.Explain how systems theory can help administrators understand the relationships between human services organizations and their environments. Provide specific examples of ways administrators might apply systems theory to their work. Finally, explain how leadership and management roles within human services organizations contribute to their overall functioning.Lauffer, A. (2011). Understanding your social agency (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Sage.•Chapter 1, “Where Your Agency Came From and Where It’s Going” (pp. 2–31)•Prequel to Chapter 2, “Meet the Staff Members” (pp. 35–37)•Chapter 2, “Concepts, Theories, and Classifications” (pp. 38–65)•Chapter 7, “Organizational Culture” (pp. 210–240)•Chapter 8, “Leadership, Management, and Governance” (pp. 243–280)Mulroy, E. A. (2004). Theoretical perspectives on the social environment to guide management and community perspectives: An organization-in-environment approach. Administration in Social Work, 28(1), 77–96.