paper on the topic The Issues of Major Life Choice: Frost and Adrienne.

Hi, need to submit a 1500 words paper on the topic The Issues of Major Life Choice: Frost and Adrienne. Faulkner and Frost have spoken of choice as a chance to shape their future and to decide how they want to be responsible for their actions.

Frost necessarily puts stresses on the fact that once a choice is made, it turns into one’s destiny. But it is necessary to make one’s choice rather than suffering in hesitation that Sarty suffers from in “Barn Burning”. Eventually, it appears that both Faulkner’s and Frost’s concepts of choice are complementary to each. This complementary role of both of Faulkner’s and Frost’s “choice” is evident in the fact that the indecision in taking any decision or making any choice that Faulkner’s protagonist, Sarty, suffers has been outlawed by the speaker’s calculative approach to making choice in Frost’s “The Road not Taken”. As Grimes says in an article,

Frost claims that he wrote this poem about his friend Edward Thomas, with whom he had walked many times in the woods near London. Frost has said that while walking, they would come to different paths and choosing one….might have missed by not taking the other path. (Grimes)

Frost’s approach to the determination of choice in life is individualistic. It is the individual that will decide whether the path of life he or she chooses is right for her. As the speaker (the poet) in the poem “The Road not Taken” says, “TWO roads diverged in a yellow wood, / And sorry I could not travel both” (Frost, “The Road Not Taken”), life, may offer an individual multiple options out of which he or she has to choose one. It is totally up to the individual whether the option is good for him or her, or not. In the long run, what consequences one’s choice may bring is vividly evident in Abner Snopes’ character.&nbsp.

When compared to the web world where some popular apps could get away with mediocre design, why do mobile apps face a higher design bar?

  • When compared to the web world where some popular apps could get away with mediocre design, why do mobile apps face a higher design bar?
  • Compare and contrast native mobile app design versus standard desktop app design.  Discuss considerations for choosing one over the other.  Elaborate on main advantages vs disadvantages.

Word Count: 300additional Scholarly source
Strict APA 7 format

Read the ppt slides first the class activities are based largely on lecture materials 2-1 Read the following scenario (originally presented by

 Read the ppt slides first

the class activities are based largely on lecture materials

2-1

Read the following scenario (originally presented by Bernard Williams) and answer the following questions.

“Jim, the traveler, finds himself in a central square of a small quaint town. Tied up against the wall are a row of twenty innocent people. The “captain” of the town comes out with a gun with the clear intention of killing them all. But he starts talking with Jim and grows fond of him. To honor Jim, the captain suggests, Jim can shoot one of the twenty people there. If Jim accepts to do so, then the captain will let the rest go; if Jim rejects his offer, however, then the captain will stick to the original plan and kill all twenty people. Should Jim take the offer or not?”

1. What would Hedonic Utilitarianists tell Jim to do? Briefly explain your answer. 150 WORDS

2. Do you think that Jim should to what Hedonic Utilitarianists tell him to do? Why or why not? 200 WORDS

2-2

 

Read the scenario below and answer the following questions:

<Frank constantly cheats on his wife. She recently grew suspicious of him, but he figured that telling his wife the truth won’t do him any good. His wife might want to leave him even though he doesn’t want to; and he hates confrontation of any kind. So Frank decides to lie to his wife that he is not cheating on her in order to keep his peace of mind.>

(a) Formulate the maxim behind the agent’s act. 

(b) Can the maxim pass the Universalizability Test? Why or why not? 150 WORDS

(c) Is the act in question morally permissible, according to the Humanity as Ends version of the Categorial Imperative? Why or why not? 200 WORDS