communist manifesto on religion, law and morality

/in /by

Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on communist manifesto on religion, law and morality Paper must be at least 1250 words. Please, no plagiarized work! Marx’s theory of dialectical materialism asserts that conflicts between the social classes are triggered by material needs. The bourgeoisie class desires to maintain the status quo through controlling production whereas the proletariat class seeks to overthrow them and in turn control production. This paper is going to argue in favour of Marx’s claim that law, morality and religion are tools used by the rich to keep the poor in line.

The bourgeoisie class is the class or the rich because it controls production in the economy hence the ruling class. According to the Marxist philosophy, the law is a means by which the ruling class disadvantages the other classes (Engels & Marx, 2014). It is a fact that some legislations are meant to submerge the minds of the poor so that they can feel relevant within the economy. For instance, the laws on free trade work to the advantage of the rich within the economy since they can produce goods in large numbers and release them to the market at cheaper prices. This is evident when we consider the case of developed and third world economies having equal access to markets. Since the competition in the market will be unfavorable, weaker economies will be overpowered by stronger economies that will in turn control the markets. According to Marx, the bourgeois education policy perpetuates the subordination of the proletariats, ensuring that they do not own property (Engels & Marx, 2014). As such, the rich ensure that they continue to control the economy whereas the poor continues to be poor.

According to Marx, bourgeois moralities allow private property ownership and personal freedom and independence. It is therefore moral for one to own property just as it is moral for the property owner to employ the poor to work for them. He argues that wage labor creates no property for the employee, but only creates capital, which is a property that works to escalate abuse of workers. Freedom allows the capitalists to&nbsp.constantly revolutionize production in order to expand and exploit their markets. This leads to globalization which in turn leads to economic imperialism which dictates that other countries acculturate to the bourgeois practice or be sent to the economic outback.

Discussion on Practicing Curiosity.

/in /by

I will pay for the following article Practicing Curiosity. The work is to be 2 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. Lecturer Practicing Curiosity Charlie Rose Interviews Daniel Barenboim On 15th, January, Charlie Rose interviewed the piano maestro Daniel Barenboim. The interview was centered on the artist’s s long spanning career in music. Indeed, this was one of the most insightful and inspiring interviews I have ever watched in my life. The most interesting lesson I learnt from it is about the dedications and commitments put by Daniel in his music career. Having begun at the age of five years, he eventually emerged from playing piano to working as a conductor with some of the most reputable bands before bagging several international awards and prizes such as Granny Awards. Prince of Asturias Concord Award. Willy Brandt Award. and Order of the British Empire Award. In fact, he says that he successfully made his first public performance when he was only seven. This shows that he was always having the passion and desire to be a great musician (Eisen and Stanley 43).

The other important thing which arouses my curiosity is Daniel’s musical style. As a pianist, he acknowledges his disapproval for the band wagon and instead, adopting and subscribing to his own school of thought. Instead of borrowing from his mentors, he opted to adopt his own peculiar style for playing his piano. He became so conventional and used to find his tempo from within his music particularly harmonic rhythm and harmony. by opting to act in such a manner, he was trying to prove to his colleagues of fans that music is a very dynamic field which does not necessarily need to be done in a similar manner. since each musician is free, they can choose their own style to adopt as they refine and make it better to appeal to their respective audience.

Because of this, I would like to point out that I have really learnt a lot from this artist. Through his interview with Rose, I have known that music is a good and rewarding career if taken seriously. The interview has changed my attitude towards music. Unlike before, I now regard music as a very interesting and fulfilling career. However, for anyone to excel to the level of Daniel, they must have the required passion for it (Eisen and Stanley 27). Besides, they should be dedicated and committed to be novel and perfect in the playing of their various instruments. Lastly, it needs a high level of flexibility. Just like Daniel himself who participated in the orchestra, symphony and jazz, any artist should not be restricted to only one area. This is the only way through which they can build a reputation for themselves.

Questions

1. What is the difference between orchestra and symphony music? Are they related in any way? Explain.

2. During the interviews, Rose introduced Daniel as a conductor. Explain how a person can qualify to be a music conductor. A part from experience, what other factors are considered before employment?

3. Daniel is a pianist. Who invented piano?

Works Cited

Eisen, Cliff, and Stanley Sadie. The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, second edition. London: Macmillan.

Learning Goal: I’m working on a history writing question and need support to hel

/in /by

Learning Goal: I’m working on a history writing question and need support to help me learn.In terms of the content of each report, I am looking for two main points of discussion. First, you should devote the first half of the report to a summary of the main points in the article that you selected. To help you to address this issue, consider some of these questions: What is the main issue being discussed? (i.e. immigration, elections, education, environment, women’s issues, crime, etc.) Who are the main personalities mentioned in the article? (i.e. El Salvador president Nayib Bukele, President Biden, Secretary of State Blinken, former President Trump, etc.) How does the issue affect the people of the country mentioned in the article? Does the issue have any connection with United States interests? What do you think could be the best solution to resolve this problem?And for the second point of discussion, please analyze the article that you selected and present your point of view on the story. For example, how do you feel about the story? How did this article contribute to your understanding about modern Latin America? And what do you think about the author’s perspective on the article? How does this topic relate to contemporary political, economic or cultural themes in the United States today? The information should be about https://nacla.org/news/2020/08/14/caribbean-food-s…f

ethical principles

/in /by

In 2005, news reports disclosed that psychologists were involved in the torture of prisoners at military/CIA sites such as Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay. Sadly, this was not the first time that psychologists were involved in such practices—hired by the government for their psychological knowledge. Evaluate the role of psychologists in torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment? Be sure to include information concerning human rights, social justice, multicultural guidelines, and other relevant ethical principles.