Hi, need to submit a 8000 words paper on the topic Lifelong Learning. In practical terms, if practicing nurses stopped learning they would not be able to keep up with changes: they would not be able to adapt to new demands from the public they serve and the world in which to live and work would become an alien, disturbing environment.

Not all the reasons for an interest in lifelong learning and continuing education are, however, work related. Martin (2000) suggests more idealistic reasons in relation to social inclusion and active citizenship, condemning the concept that human beings are primarily economic animals, obsessed with producing and consuming, ignoring the being in preference for the having.

Burnard and Chapman (2000) see the lifelong learner as one who appreciates the changing nature of knowledge, not one who hoards “dead” knowledge. Maslin-Prothero (2000) recommends that the developing lifelong learner will benefit from information-seeking skills and the ability to process and critically analyse that information. DeMarco et al. (2002) agree with Maslin-Prothero and stress the importance of educators developing strategies that will move students from passive to active learners for the duration of their lives at a professional and a personal level. Hughes (2005, p. 48) advocates that nurses must be self-directed learners, able to identify their own educational needs and pursue “lifelong learning as a method of continuing professional development (CPD)” if they are to develop into critical thinkers, able to apply knowledge and skills to improve client care.

Each person is an individual with characteristics that are related to their life past experiences, work, hopes, fears, strengths and weaknesses (Daines et al., 2002). The purpose of attempting to understand some of the characteristics of the adult learner is not to provide educators with generalisations, but to help them enhance the effectiveness of their teaching and learning interactions. Wlodkowski (2001) identified the most important characteristic of the adult learner, as highly pragmatic and that many have a strong need to acquire knowledge and become competent in its practical application, but Knox (2003) highlighted that adult development goes far beyond the acquisition of competences and that certain phases of the adult learner’s life can have an effect on the individuals’ learning style, motivation and participation. Educators with a fundamental understanding of adults as learners could provide a supportive and challenging learning environment, reducing barriers to the learner’s participation and achievement and being instrumental in enhancing their self-esteem, which based on the andragogical theory of learning and social research, Knowles (2000) identified as the deepest need in human development.

Hi, need to submit a 1750 words paper on the topic Design of the New Nose for Open-Wheel Climb Race Car. The optimization test parameters length setting from 500mm to 700mm and height from 102.8mm to 142.8mm.

The MATLAB codes (Kriging Surrogate Model) were used to help in the optimization of the nose. First, running 10 simulations in different length and height as the database and the maximum downforce predicted with the corresponding length and height noted. Figure 2 shows the optimization of the data as distributed in different positions. The parameters included the maximum down force and the position of the maximum down force.

The nosecone is not the primary producer of down force component. From table 1, the total car absolute largest CL change was about 0.57%, while the least change was of CL was 0.006%. It was found that simulation no.20 has the largest CL which increased the optimization result to about 0.458%. But from the result is hard to find the regulation by simply changing nose length and height may be more simulations needed to show the regulation. Using nose length of 700m and 525m, it was observed that the change in CL is greater when a nose length of 700m is used than for 500m this resulted in an efficiency of 1.149%. The more the simulations, the better the optimization results are realized. Table 2 below, shows each component (nose, front wing, and undertray) CL change in different optimization tests.

From table 2, the results of down force change regulation between the front wing and undertray are shown. From the analysis of the lower nose, the front wing CL increases which has the potential of decreasing the undertray CL. At the higher nose of the nosecone, undertray CL increase but front wings CL decrease. This operation of the machine makes it possible for any change in ride height, the body of full car CL will change. At the same time, when the front wing CL increases, the undertray CL decreases. Quantitatively, from the optimization results, the difference between maximum front wing CL and minimum CL reached was about 4.5% and the difference between&nbsp.under tray CL and minimum CL reached 6.7%.