September 2022 – Page 674 – Homework Handlers

Why College Students Should Support Ban on Alcohol in Colleges.

September 5, 2022/in Uncategorized /by admin

Provide a 5 pages analysis while answering the following question: Why College Students Should Support Ban on Alcohol in Colleges. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required.

Political science observes that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Similarly, a little drinking distracts a student, and too much drinking distracts completely. Therefore, students should support the alcohol ban in colleges as it is for their ultimate good.I feel that students should join hands with those pushing for an alcohol ban in colleges. One thing that I recognize is that finishing high school comes with too much excitement. For those joining colleges, the prospect of joining college is even more thrilling.

It is a normal thing for many people to group in peers and plan how they intend to utilize their first month in college. It should be not a surprise that the outcomes of such discussions are usually centered on the coming freedom. Let us face it. Many students would plan parties, dances, fun and doing something crazy amongst others. Get it right that there is nothing wrong with being happy in the company of friends, but as Correia et al. (39) observes, some social behaviors are detrimental to an individual.

Even so, the socializing process should not be used to assert freedom in the wrong way. It has been found that many young people do not make a decision to take their first bottle of alcohol. They find themselves doing so because they are in the company of their friends. In many cases, they do so to show that they are now independent. The question one should ask himself/herself is whether taking alcohol is the only way of demonstrating independence. Suppose you come across twelve-year-old taking alcohol, what picture would you paint of such a person?

He is independent, right? By no means.Therefore, if taking alcohol is not a measure of independence, do you not observe that such claims are fallacious? Consequently, it follows that taking alcohol to assert independence is completely misguided. In fact, not taking alcohol would constitute a perfect measure of managing one’s independence. That is because despite having the freedom to do as one pleases, a&nbsp.student who refrains from taking alcohol so that he/she may give his/her academics a fair chance is very responsible.

esus in the eyes of the American Jewish population in the 21st century.

September 5, 2022/in Uncategorized /by admin

Need help with my writing homework on Jesus in the eyes of the American Jewish population in the 21st century. Write a 3500 word paper answering; A discussion of American Jewish attitudes towards Jesus can sensibly start with the small (but growing) sect of Judaism called Messianic Judaism which believes that Jesus was indeed the Messiah. Messianic Jews claim 47,000 followers and 280 congregations worldwide by the turn of the Twenty-First century (Kaplan, 2005). The idea that Jesus was the Messiah is seen as antithetical to the vast majority of American Jews. Kaplan succinctly states the problem that they have with the Messianic adherents:

Christianity, which is perceived to be incompatible with any form of Jewishness . . . .Messianic Jewish groups are thus seen as antithetical to Judaism and are completely rejected by the majority of Jews.

Thus Messianic “Jews” regard themselves as a culmination of Judaism rather than a branch of Christianity. Even their very claim to being Jewish has been rejected by nearly all Jewish denominations, organizations and the State of Israel itself. This is remarkable as Jews have been consistent throughout their history in being, as a whole, a tolerant religion used to adapting to various kinds of creed within their religion. The line that cannot be crossed, as far as most Jews are concerned, is regarding Jesus as the Messiah.

It would thus seem that a majority of American Jews will not regard Jesus as the Messiah in the Twentieth Century, even though their Messianic brethren would claim this as a fact. The Central Conference of American Rabbis puts the situation in context:

For us in the Jewish community, anyone who claims that Jesus is their savior is no longer a Jew and is an apostate. Through that belief she has placed herself outside the Jewish community. Whether she cares to define herself as a Christian or as a ‘fulfilled Jew,’ ‘Messianic Jew,’ or any other designation is irrelevant. to us, she is clearly a Christian.

(Harris-Shapiro, 1999)

Some have even related Messianic Judaism with an attempt to convert Jews, which is in reality an attempt to destroy Judaism through being a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Or, to mix the metaphor, Messianic Judaism is seen as a Trojan Horse within this argument, designed to topple Judaism from within. Again, it is American Jews who seem to take this argument to its most extreme conclusions:

… Except in relations with Christians, the Christ of Christianity is not a Jewish issue. There simply can be no dialogue worthy of the name unless Christians accept – nay, treasure – the fact that Jews through the two millennia of Christianity have had an agenda of their own. There can be no Jewish-Christian dialogue worthy of the name unless one Christian activity is abandoned, missions to the Jews. It must be abandoned, moreover, not as a temporary strategy but in principle, as a bi-millennial theological mistake. The cost of that mistake in Christian love and Jewish blood one hesitates to contemplate.

Discussion on modern business in comparative perspective (exam preparation).

September 5, 2022/in Uncategorized /by admin

Compose a 500 words assignment on modern business in comparative perspective (exam preparation). Needs to be plagiarism free! The national business systems are influenced and affected by early and late industrialization, especially analyzing the past and present growth in the business systems. This paper will discuss the differences in the nature (institutional and organizational) and the performance of the national business systems from early and late industrialization by using relevant examples.

DIFFERENCES OF NATURE AND PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS

EARLY INDUSTRIALIZATION

In early industrialization, the industrial revolution is the changes in social and economic changes that resulted from the use of hand tools to machines and the development of large-scale industrial production. This was happened between the 17th and 18th century

In the late 17th century, the United Kingdom (UK) began the industrial revolution. Before industrialization, the people used to live in the rural area practicing farming. However, the countries had distinctive advantage in the manufacturing industry, especially in textile industry. Moreover, The development of the steam engine played important roles in ensuring an improvement in the banking industry. However, the UK banking industrywas lack of intermediation.

In the early 18th century, the United States (US) began the industrial revolution. After the civil war, the US industry was changed drastically. The railroads distributed goods and products everywhere. therefore, the production level was increased. Before industrialization, the organizational structure was under hierarchy structure. However, when the population in the cities increased after revolution, the country was decreased between rich and poor. Moreover, increasing in US industries improved in the banking industry. The US banking industry supported many industries along with introducing the stock markets.

Both early-industrialized countries focused on invention and innovation. The UK and US were creatively used in the textile and automotive industry with adequate support of the financial institutions where started growth of economies. Moreover, the manufacturing industries were set in these countries that marked the growth in the market share.

LATE INDUSTRIALIZATION

In late industrialization, Germany, Japan, and China implemented industrial revolution to enhance their economies.

Late or newly, industrialization refers to those countries whose level of economic development is between the developing and the first world classifications (Wyatt, 2009).&nbsp.This means that these countries have moved from the agriculture based economy to the industrialized urban economy. Some of the countries that are industrialized include Germany, China, and Japan.

Germany (1st Paragraph)

The development of the railway network fastened the transportation of goods from one place to another. In addition, through education, these countries produced more scientists thus becoming better in the technical field. Industrialization led to the rise of the middle class and social labor movements. Moreover, Germany which was and still rich in natural resources like coal and iron, and a rich soil makes Germany to have an advantage. Additionally, the introduction of industrial protection in 1879 encouraged trade and growth of businesses.

Japan (2nd Paragraph)

In Japan, the threat by the west to economic backwardness and national sovereignty was the initial stage for the formation of a modern state. The banking industry emerged to provide investment capital and fund for local trade. In 1870, the ministry of industry was created to operate certain industries as well as check the economic policy of the organization. The private sector was also involved in the development of Japans economy.

China (3rd Paragraph)

In China, there were the labor-intensive sectors that saw an increase in export-oriented rural industries. After the introduction of the open door policy, there was massive direct foreign investment. This led to an efficient allocation of labor resources thus boosted the economy of China.

** EXPLAIN THE INSTITUTIONAL, ORGANIZATIONAL, AND PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL BUSINESS IN LATE INDUSTRIALIZATION **

** THREE PARAGRAPH **

In the early 1880’s oligopolistic firms became part of industrialization. This led to big businesses to diversify into more than a single industry thus leading to market concentration.

problem stateline shipping and transport company.

September 5, 2022/in Uncategorized /by admin

Need an research paper on 4: case problem stateline shipping and transport company. Needs to be 2 pages. Please no plagiarism. Case Study John Doe Case Study The scope is to study to create two models. one will show how to minimize the shipping cost of transportation of waste from six plants to three disposal sites, the other one will illustrate how to organize the same work using transshipment concept. The objects for transshipments are the six plants and three disposal sites.

Transportation Model

From the viewpoint of demand and supply, the six plants are considered as supply sources and three waste sites are demands sites. both of them have limitation, which is expressed as a quantity that can be supplied and stored. The objective is to achieve cost minimization under the given limitations (Reeb & Leavengood, 2002)

The solution is approached by creating a 6 x3 matrix illustrated in Table 1. Each cell of transportation expressed through Xij depicts quantity from the supply source to waste disposal site. The matrix also shows that total supply quantity is 223 bbls per week and the total demand quantity is 250 bbls per week. Supply and demand are not balanced. the solution requires to implement a dummy supply source of 27 bbls. Decision variable, in this case, is the quantity for a site, and objective function is cost minimization. The model is represented through the following linear equations (“Linear programing”, n.d).

Minimization is solved using the following equation, subject to: Z=12X11+15X12+17X13+14X21+9X22+10X23+13X31+20X32+11X33+17X41+16X42+19X43+7X51+14X52+12X53+22X61+16X62+18X63.

X11 + X12 + X13 = 35X11 + X21 + X31 + X41 + X51 + X61 = 65

X21 + X22 + X 23 = 26X12 + X22 + X32 + X42 + X52 + X62 = 80

X31 + X32 + X33 = 42X13 + X23 + X33 + X43 + X53 + X63= 105

X41 + X42 + X43 = 53

X51 + X52 + X53 = 29

X61 + X62 + X63 = 38

The solution was obtained using the “Transportation” module of POM – OM software (“The Transportation model”, n.d.) The shipment from the supply source to waste the side is illustrated in Table 3. The POM – OM solution includes a dummy supply source for 27 bbls. The minimum cost is $2,832. it does not include dummy supply source quantity.

Table 3. Shipment from supply sources to the disposal sites

Transportation Solution

Optimal solution value = $2832

Whitewater

Los Canos

Duras

Kingsport

35

&nbsp.

Danville

&nbsp.

26

Macon

&nbsp.

42

Selma

1

42

10

Columbus

29

&nbsp.

Allentown

&nbsp.

38

&nbsp.

Dummy

&nbsp.

27

Note: Quantity in barrels

Table 4. Cost of transportation from the plants to the disposal sites

Transportation Solution

&nbsp.

Whitewater

Los Canos

Duras

Kingsport

35/$420

&nbsp.

Danville

&nbsp.

26/$260

Macon

&nbsp.

42/$462

Selma

1/$17

42/$672

10/$190

Columbus

29/$203

&nbsp.

Allentown

&nbsp.

38/$608

&nbsp.

Dummy

&nbsp.

27/$0

Transshipment Model

The idea is based on the concept that shipping line will use an intermediary supply center, which could be either a plant or waste disposal site. This concept gives a 9 x 9 matrix where supply plus disposal sources together act as supply sources and disposal sources (Rajendran & Pandian, 2012). Table 5 displays the feed matrix to achieve a solution. The values for supply and demand quantities of the matrix are based on the following assumptions:

Table 5. Transshipment solution matrix

Demand Sites

&nbsp.

Supply Q-ty

Supply Sites

1

2

3

4

5

6

A

B

C

Kingsport

Danville

Macon

Selma

Columbus

Allentown

Whitewater

Los Canos

Duras

1

285

Kingsport

X11

X12

X13

X14

X15

X16

X1A

X1B

X1C

2

276

Danville

X21

X22

X23

X24

X25

X26

X2A

X2B

X2C

3

292

Macon

X31

X32

X33

X34

X35

X36

X3A

X3B

X3C

4

403

Selma

X41

X42

X43

X44

X45

X46

X4A

X4B

X4C

5

279

Columbus

X51

X52

X53

X54

X55

X56

X5A

X5B

X5C

6

288

Allentown

X61

X62

X63

X64

X65

X66

X6A

X6B

X6C

A

250

Whitewater

XA1

XA2

XA3

XA4

XA5

XA6

XAA

XAB

XAC

B

250

Los Canos

XB1

XB2

XB3

XB4

XB5

XB6

XBA

XBB

XBC

C

250

Duras

XC1

XC2

XC3

XC4

XC5

XC6

XCA

XCB

XCC

250

315

330

355

1. Each plant may absorb total demand quantity 250 bbls. in addition to its own supply quantity,

2. Each waste site may absorb total demand quantity 250 bbls in addition to its own demand quantity.

Table 6. Transshipment cost matrix

Demand Sites

1

2

3

4

5

6

A

B

C

Supply sites

From Sites

To Sites

Kingsport

Danville

Macon

Selma

Columbus

Allentown

Whitewater

Los Canos

Duras

1

Kingsport

0

6

4

9

7

8

12

15

17

2

Danville

6

0

11

10

12

7

14

9

10

3

Macon

5

11

0

3

7

15

13

20

11

4

Selma

9

10

3

0

3

16

17

16

19

5

Columbus

7

12

7

3

0

14

7

14

12

6

Allentown

8

7

15

16

14

0

22

16

18

A

Whitewater

12

14

13

17

7

22

0

12

10

B

Los Canos

15

9

20

16

14

16

12

0

15

C

Duras

17

10

11

19

12

18

10

15

0

The solution is achieved by solving the 9×9 matrix for cost minimization. Each Xij of the matrix depicts the quantity it may contain in determining the minimum transportation cost. The supply and demand constraints are obtained, in the same way as shown in the previous example. The summation of each row of the matrix presents a supply constraint equation. The summation of each column of the matrix presents a demand constraint. The minimization solution is achieved using the “Transportation” module of POM – OM software. The results are presented in Tables 7 and 8. The results illustrate the required shipment directions and associated cost.

Table 7. Transshipment cost from one place to another

&nbsp.

Kingsport

Danville

Macon

Selma

Columbus

Allentown

Whitewater

Los Canos

Duras

Kingsport

16/$96

19/$76

&nbsp.

Danville

&nbsp.

80/$720

&nbsp.

Macon

&nbsp.

78/$858

Selma

&nbsp.

17/$51

36/$108

&nbsp.

Columbus

&nbsp.

65/$455

&nbsp.

Allentown

&nbsp.

38/$266

&nbsp.

Whitewater

&nbsp.

Table 8. Transshipment solution

Transshipment Solution

Optimal solution value = $2630

Kingsport

Danville

Macon

Selma

Columbus

Allentown

Whitewater

Los Canos

Duras

Kingsport

250

16

19

&nbsp.

Danville

&nbsp.

196

&nbsp.

80

&nbsp.

Macon

&nbsp.

214

&nbsp.

78

Selma

&nbsp.

17

250

36

&nbsp.

Columbus

&nbsp.

214

&nbsp.

65

&nbsp.

Allentown

&nbsp.

38

&nbsp.

250

&nbsp.

Whitewater

&nbsp.

250

&nbsp.

Los Canos

&nbsp.

250

&nbsp.

Duras

&nbsp.

250

Dummy

&nbsp.

27

POM-QM for Windows

Conclusion

In this assignment, the demand quantity is 250 bbls whereas the supply quantity is 223 bbls. In approaching cost minimization, software POM –QM used a dummy supply source in the quantity of 27 bbls. The unbalanced demand and supply quantity is considered to be a limitation of the study. The study shows that using transshipment the company management can reduce the shipment cost. The shipment cost of shipment of 223 bbls without the transshipment option is $2832 whereas with the option is $2630. Hence, transshipment, in this case is a better solution.

References

Linear Programming: Introduction. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.purplemath.com/modules/linprog.htm

Rajendran, P., & Pandian, P. (2012). Solving Fully Interval Transshipment Problems. Retrieved from http://www.m-hikari.com/imf/imf-2012/41-44-2012/pandianIMF41-44-2012.pdf

Reeb, J., & Leavengood, S. (2002). Transportation Problem: A Special Case for Linear Programming Problems. Retrieved from http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/20201/em8779-e.pdf

http://www.prenhall.com/weiss_dswin/html/trans.htm

The Transportation Model. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.prenhall.com/weiss_dswin/html/trans.

Why College Students Should Support Ban on Alcohol in Colleges.

esus in the eyes of the American Jewish population in the 21st century.

Discussion on modern business in comparative perspective (exam preparation).

problem stateline shipping and transport company.

Experience

Our mission

Latest Posts

Talk to us...