Compose a 1250 words assignment on the culture of india. Needs to be plagiarism free! The culture in India is among the World’s oldest described as the Sa Prathama Sanskrati Vishvarara, which means the world’s first and supreme culture (Zimmerman).

India has experienced an incredibly rich heritage and culture. The Indians express unity in diversity as nothing can compare to the pedestal that India holds because of its colorful and unique culture that has been in existence for thousands of years now (Maps). The cultural euphoria and the warmth in the relations backed by the country’s liveliness attract tourists to its vibrant culture. Culture plays a significant role in the progress of any country. The canvas of India’s culture is enormous with hues and vibrancy of all sorts. India exhibition and presentation as a tolerant, cooperative, and peaceful over so many centuries to modern times arise due to its ideologies. India is a multilingual country as different states have different official languages. These languages have developed over the years all forming significance in the people’s cultural setting.

India has developed a strong hierarchical relationship that got influenced by Hinduism and the caste system of governance. The caste system developed in the Vedic period between 1700 and 150 BCE (Mark). The Indian society became divided into the Varnas that comprised of Brahmana, Kshatriya, Vaishya, and Shudra (Mark). The caste system developed into a rigidly interpreted approach that was characterized by the belief in an eternal order to a life dictated by a supreme deity (Mark). Indians have always been conscious of the social order and status compared to other people (Kwintesential). Most relationships get based on a hierarchy system where the father is the Patriarch meaning the elder of the family. Relationships in the historical-cultural setting had a clear-cut hierarchy that got observed keenly to ensure social order gets maintained.

Write 8 pages thesis on the topic on the control people have over their behavior, emotions, and thoughts.

It is interesting how the different authors portray the man. In a way, their portrayal also defines what it means for man to be free, and just how free he is in reality. Armstrong, for one, notes that man is not totally free to be anything, because he is hardwired to look for God. He is a religious being as much as he is descended from apes and has that particular anatomy. There in that vision of man, there seems to be already a defining and limiting of what man can be. He is not free to be anything he wants to be.

He must by his very nature act, think, and feel in accordance with his wiring. That wiring includes looking for God. Thurman also seems to think the same way, in a sense. He says that in essence the ego or the individual is not in control of himself, because the ego is always in flux. He is a bundle of passing thoughts, feelings, and actions. Stout seems to say the same thing, in the language of trauma and the human brain. She is saying that trauma, for instance, can affect the way people perceive the world.

Trauma changes the way the brain is wired. It is so that people are not in control of the way they react to things that remind them of traumatic events (Armstrong 22-38. Thurman 460-473. Stout 381-398).Reading Stout, for instance, we come face to face with just how vulnerable man is to trauma. Trauma can reshape the brain itself. With the brain reshaped, a person’s thoughts and feelings are affected. Of course with the thoughts affected and changed in profound ways, actions are likewise reshaped and affected.

We see that man can be so affected by trauma as to be unaware that he is acting out of reason, for instance. It can be also that man can be unaware that he is acting out of a reaction to a past traumatic event. How much control does man have in this instance? Obviously, man is not much in control. To be aware means to&nbsp.know that one’s actions are coming from a deep-rooted fear. People who experienced trauma sometimes do not know that. They are unconscious of the effect that fear and memory have on their feelings, thoughts, and actions: “ … nor do we comprehend how swampy and vitality-sucking some of our memories really are…in the course of a lifetime such “protective” mental reactions acquire tremendous habit strength” (Stout 384).