I will pay for the following article Inadmissibility of Character Evidence. The work is to be 1 page with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. Inadmissibility of Character Evidence

The main aim of the Federal Rules of Evidence (404), the set of rules that govern the admission of facts in theU.S. federal court system, is to regulate the evidence that jurors may rely on to decide cases presented before them (Rothstein, Raeder & Crump, 2003). The Rules of Evidence are also aimed at eliminating the distrust that may exist amongst jurors while also encouraging the admission of evidence in close cases (Rice & Delker, 2000). The Rules also ensure that the juries have a wide spectrum of evidence to rely on without being bogged down with too much evidence that is practically unnecessary, time-wasting, confusing, repetitive or inflammatory. In other words, the Rules are purposeful in eliminating evidence that may lead to unfair prejudice against a party.

One case that illustrates the inadmissibility of character evidence in a criminal proceeding is the Greenberg v. Aetna Ins. Co., 427 Pa. 494, 235 A.2d 582 (1967) in which it was established that the plaintiff was erroneously permitted to testify that he had a heroic record having served in the U.S. Army during WWII (Paco de, N.d.).

Inadmissibility of Character Evidence in Rape Cases

The admissibility of character evidence in respect of a rape victim as presented by a defendant is limited if the court case is for assault, intent to commit rape or rape. If the defendant seeks to use opinion or reputation evidence to show the sexual conduct of the rape victim, the character evidence remains inadmissible (Scott, 2000) as it may be inflammatory. The defendant, however, may only enjoy admissibility of character evidence if they intend to show specific instances of behavior by a sex victim in proof of the claim that a party different from the defendant was the source of injury, semen or other physical evidence. Alternatively, the defendant may enjoy admissibility of character evidence to show that their sexual behavior with the victim was consented to by both parties. In the two cases, the evidence is used solely to prove the defendant’s innocence.

I need some assistance with these assignment. analysis of the bottom billion by paul collier and the united states of europe by t.r. reid Thank you in advance for the help! The poor are poor as they are subjugated by the rich. That is what Collier once consideration, along with lots of others for whom the answer was a rebellion of one kind or another against entrepreneur domination. “For rebellion, the image is frequently that of Che Guevara, everywhere in my cohort as a poster on scholar walls.

The goal is not to pay for our sins but to give confidence in financial enlargement. As Collier notes, the word expansion is now regularly encumbered by means of other Western agendas, as in the environmental actions persistence on “sustainable enlargement.” The phrase sustainable increase has for decades been endorsed by groups such as the World Council of Churches and lots of NGOs. Too frequently it has meant that the world’s really poor ought to be given partial access to the circle of efficiency and exchange lest they add to the ecological burden that humankind has placed on our delicate planet. Devoid of that, the “bottom billion” will carry on to sink. Collier writes: “The difficulty of the bottom billion has not been that they have had the wrong type of enlargement. it is that they have not had any increase. The suspicion of growth has unintentionally undermined authentically strategic thinking.” (Richard John Neuhaus, 2007)

This research asked the question addressed with cautious argument and massive supporting confirmation by Paul Collier in The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest nation Are Failing and What Can Be Done concerning It. Facing up to the realities of global poverty as well as what can be done regarding it requires concern, cleverness, and long-term pledge. Just how long-term our thinking has to be is underscored by Michael Clemens, who appraisal The Bottom Billion in Foreign Affairs:

“Change in the societies at the very bottom must come predominantly from within. we cannot impose it on them. In all these societies there do struggle between brave people who want change and entrenched interests opposing it. To date, we have largely been bystanders in this struggle.