Examine the psychological phases of disaster response and how these are uniquely experienced by affected individuals and communities. Through the course materials, we have learned that psychologically processing disaster events generally follows a predictable set of phases. Although this is not always the case, these phases are the norm versus the exception in disaster behavioral responses.Explain the five commonly accepted psychological phases of disaster responses. As a reminder, these include (1) the pre-disaster phase, (2) the hero phase, (3) the honeymoon phase, (4) the disillusionment phase, and (5) the reconstruction phase.Examine individual and community responses to a disaster event of your choice, provide a summary of the psychological phases of disaster response displayed in the example.Explain how the selected phase(s) is appropriate to describe the observed behavior(s) from the example.Discuss the role of cultural competence during any of the phases of psychological disaster response and how such awareness might affect the actions of behavioral health professionals as psychological first aid (PFA) is implemented.5 to 6 pages in length, excluding the title and reference pageA minimum of five academic, scholarly sources are required to be cited in the work, 3 of which must be peer-reviewed journal articles.APA Format with headers.

I need help creating a thesis and an outline on Bruce Tuckman’s Theory of Group Development. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. Another states that the similarity between group members aids in task efficiency, mainly because, the more similar people are, the more they think alike and the less likely there will be the conflict that will slow down the task (Civettini, 2007, p. 264).

Since then, the theory has been tested by others. One question that could be asked is why there is intragroup conflict. The other elements seem self-explanatory, but the element of storming is one that needs some sort of explanation. One such explanation is offered by Rothwell (2008). According to Bions theory of group emotions, there is a predictability to the emotions of groups, and these emotions form the basis for group cohesiveness and functioning (Rothwell et al., 2008, p. 114). The group cultures are divided into two distinct categories – work, which refers to the overt behaviours of the group that is associated with the groups official purpose. and emotional group culture, or basic assumption, which is based upon the individuals anxiety, fears and fantasies (Rothwell et al., 2008, p. 114). The basic assumption group is always a part of the work group so that groups, in general, are viewed as emotional groups that subsumed within work groups (Rothwell et al., 2008, p. 114).

Related to this theory is the theory put forth by Wright (2010), which states that there are phases that each group goes through, which marks how the members interact with one another through time. In the beginning, the group is marked by the individual’s fears and anxiety about the group, which is related to Rothwell’s emotional group culture. These fears and anxieties are based upon the fear of rejection from other group members, and it is up to the leaders to facilitate each individual members entrance into the group.&nbsp.