Challenges and Difficulties of Gene and Stem Cell Therapy in the Treatment of Parkinson’s disease.

Topic :

Challenges and Difficulties of Gene and Stem Cell Therapy in the Treatment of Parkinson’s disease.

Topic: Challenges and Difficulties of Gene and Stem Cell Therapy in the Treatment of Parkinson’s disease.

Guidelines:

Term paper should be typed and double spaced. It should be 10 pages including illustrations but the abstract and references are not included in the 10 page limit. It should be organized with a

Summary or abstract (one page maximum),

Introduction, (one page)

Main content or the body of the paper (6 pages)

References (in addition to the 10 pages).

In the introduction you should describe the technology and how it works in detail. You should also describe the disease or situation when it is appropriate to use the technology and explain why it is appropriate to use the technology.

In the body of the paper you should explain the biological basis of why the technology might be effective and you should explain the biological basis of potential problems or limitations of the technology (including but not limited to health risks, and environmental risks). You should also discuss the feasibility and efficacy of the technology. In the body of the paper you should discuss the legal and ethical issues of using the technology. You should also explain if this would be a technology that you would support or not and provide justification for your answer

You should use Times roman 12 font and 1-inch margins on all sides.

References should be presented in the American Medical Association (AMA) style ( HYPERLINK “http://www.medlib.bu.edu/facts/faq2.cfm/content/citationsama.cfm” http://www.medlib.bu.edu/facts/faq2.cfm/content/citationsama.cfm).

There should be at least two references of original papers published in peer-reviewed research journals.

Copy of one such research article must be attached with the paper.

It is important that you make note of sample term paper on the black board.

This is due December 19th 2020

Discuss John Quincy Adams was consider the best Secretary of State in U.S. History.

I need help creating a thesis and an outline on (research on why)DPrepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. John Quincy Adams: The Greatest Secretary of in United s Outline Paragraph John Quincy Adams as the Greatest Secretary of in U.S.

Paragraph 2: The Treaty of 1818

Paragraph 3: Florida Treaty

Paragraph 4: Monroe Doctrine

Paragraph 5: Conclusion

Throughout the history of United States, John Quincy Adams’s service as a Secretary of State in the Cabinet of President James Monroe (1817-1825) was believed to be the greatest (Herring, 2008: 129). In fact, Adams was regarded as the best Secretary of State of all times. His service was the most outstanding among the others for many reasons. Though what really made his performance as a secretary the most remarkable were the Treaty of 1818, Florida Treaty and Monroe Doctrine.

First was the Treaty of 1818 with Britain. According to LaFeber (1994: 78), Adams had effectively settled the issues, including the problems of boundary between western United States and Canada, left by the Treaty of Ghent. Among the many provisions of this treaty, the highlight of the agreement was setting the boundary between British North America and the United States. Britain was told to abandon the Northern access to the Mississippi River.

Another among Adams’s stunning successes as a Secretary of State was his triumphant acquisition of Florida. Ever since the purchase of Lousiana, border issues particularly concerning Florida had been a problem (Peil, 1997). Different administrations struggled to include Florida, which was back then was a Spanish territory without any presence of the Spaniards but with runaway slaves and Indian raiders. Despite all the efforts, it was only Adams who had victoriously negotiated the territory of Florida through making the Spanish minister sign the Florida Treaty, also known as the Adams Onis Treaty. Thus, the Spaniards had given up to United States all the entitlement to Florida. This former secretary was able to successfully won Florida to United States through justifying that events that involved General Andrew Jackson such as forcing the Indians to go south, exterminated the British suppliers of weapons, and others, were just evidences that Spain could not govern her territory (Chace and Carr, 1988).

Moreover, another striking achievement of Adams was the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. Indeed, this doctrine had the name of the president on it but Adams was primarily the author of the said policy. According to LaFeber (1994) and Tremblay (2004: 133-134) , the Monroe Doctrine stated that the United States of America would consider all efforts of the European powers to colonize or interfere with the states inside the boundaries of America as forms of offense. Thus, the United States should intervene in all the kinds of invasion by the European countries. This policy was a mechanism serving as prevention from any attempts of the European worlds of taking over the Spanish colonies. For Adams (1821), this doctrine only showed that America was never for armed interference but for a principled support for independent movements. In this regard, Adams designed a doctrine which had been a very significant strategy in the foreign policy of the United States. His strategic planning on addressing the issues of boundaries did not only benefit Monroe’s supremacy but also his administration when he had become the president, and as well as those of the several presidents of United States that came after him.

Indeed, John Quincy Adams, during his service as a Secretary of State in the Monroe Administration, had achieved the most notable accomplishments which were not even exceeded by the other Secretaries of States throughout the history of United States. He, being a great thinker as well as a great leader, had definitely contributed advantageous approaches that greatly assisted the welfare of America. He was just a Secretary of State that time but his major achievements had gone beyond the other secretaries’ and even those of the presidents.

References:

Adams, John Quincy (1821) Speech to the U.S. House of Representatives on foreign policy, Miller Center of Public Affairs, University of Virginia. Available: http://millercenter.org/scripps/archive/speeches/detail/3484 [7 Jan 2011]

Chace, James and Carr, Caleb (1988) The odd couple who won Florida and half the West. (Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams) Smithsonian. Available: http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-5452955_ITM [7 Jan 2011]

Herring, George C. (2008). From colony to superpower: U.S. foreign relations since 1776, 1st edition, Oxford University Press.

LaFeber, Walter (1994) The American age: U.S. foreign policy at home and abroad 1750 to the present, 2nd edition, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Peil, Michael (1997) Biography of John Quincy Adams. Available: http://www.law.cornell.edu/background/amistad/adamsbio.html [7 Jan 2011]

Tremblay, Rodrigue (2004) The new American empire, Infinity Publishing.

Reflect on an instance when you or someone else were unfairly excluded, discrimi

Reflect on an instance when you or someone else were unfairly excluded, discriminated against, or otherwise neglected or treated inappropriately due to race, ethnicity, age, gender, social class, sexuality, disability, or other category related to diversity. Depending on the setting in which the incident occurred, consider whether any laws or policies were violated, either those established by an organization, such as a business or school, or state or federal antidiscrimination policies.
Write an essay in which you complete each of the following:
Part 1 – Describe your experience:
Describe the event and the underlying diversity issues at play.
Describe your opinions, feelings, actions, and what you learned from the event.
Part 2 – Examine your experience:
Discuss experiences from your personal background that might account for your feelings or reactions. Consider areas such as your ethnicity, history, upbringing, local mores, recent events, et cetera.
Connect your experience to at least three sociological concepts and/or issues. For example, if you are writing about what if feels like to be an outsider, you could connect your discussion to the concept of power or social structure, or the broader issue of relationships between dominant and minority groups.
Examples of other concepts you could include are prejudice, discrimination, stereotypes, cultural pluralism, assimilation, structural mobility, social distance, and modern racism.
Examples of theories include functional or conflict theory, Marx’s and Weber’s theories of inequality, Park’s race relations cycle, Gordon’s theory of assimilation, human capital theory, scapegoat hypothesis, and the theory of authoritarian personality.
Incorporate research on the broader issue that your experience illustrates. For example, if the incident you describe involves discrimination in the workplace, research workplace discrimination and find data on the prevalence or nature of this problem. If the incident involves bullying at school, locate data on how extensive this issue is. Questions to consider include:
Is the type of incident you describe commonplace?
Where might this be most prevalent?
Among what groups is it most likely to occur?
What trends did you notice in your research? For example, does the kind of incident you experienced or observed seem to be an increasing problem, or is it declining over time?
Analyze how relevant laws or policies might be applied to this situation. These may be civil or criminal laws or, perhaps, policies established in the workplace or schools.
Consider whether any laws or policies were violated and how those laws or policies might be changed or better enforced to address the situation you describe.
Part 3 – Reflect on your experience:
Based on your reflections of the event and the research you have now done, share personal strategies that are useful for informing the interactions or relationships between the involved parties, as well as your own understanding or perspectives.

Assume you are in charge of one of the major professional sports organization (i.e., National Football League, Major League Baseball, National Basket

Assume you are in charge of one of the major professional sports organization (i.e., National Football League, Major League Baseball, National Basketball Association, FIFA, US Gymnastics).  The issues of domestic violence & sexual assault have existed for some time but meaningful change has not yet occurred (e.g., NFL has taken some actions but baseball is far behind in addressing the issue; US Gymnastics recently settled some cases but there are questions about whether they’ve done enough). What would you do to transform the culture in one of these organizations?  In answering this, you should consider 2 different stakeholders, how you would address them, & what risks/consequences would result from your changes.  NOTE:  if you choose FIFA, you can discuss the issue of corruption that has plagued that group over the years (e.g., awarding the World Cup to Qatar).