Community Intervention

III. Community InterventionBased on your group’s discussions, you have arranged for a community meeting to discuss the violence in the community.The following people come to the first meeting:• A teacher from the high school whose concern is that her students aren’t performing as well in school as they had been. When she has addressed this with them, they verbalize that increased violence makes it more difficult for them to get their work done.• A minister who is very involved with his community. Several of his congregants have lost family members and/or friends to recent violence.• A social worker from a community-based organization 10 miles away. He provides clinical outpatient services and has recently heard an increased concern about violence from his clients.• A teen who works in the local after school program who has become aware of the children attending the program feeling frightened to leave the program at the end of the day.• An ER doctor from the local hospital who has treated an increased number of patients who are victims of violence crimes.• The manager from a large department store who has seen an increase in thefts in his store.• A police officer who is very concerned about the increased violence in the community that he is witnessing firsthand.• A senior who resides in the assisted living community who is concerned for his safety.Choose one of the meeting attendees and create an intervention plan to address his or her concerns. This plan can be very specific to address the potential solution that will help this meeting attendee and the community as well.(Referring to your macro practice book for thisassignment will be helpful.)1. Set a goal for the intervention.2. Write objectives for the intervention.3. Establish a time frame for the intervention.4. Specify a result or outcome.

write an article on how do the views of machiavelli, hobbes and grotius differ and what aspect of society influenced these theories

Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on how do the views of machiavelli, hobbes and grotius differ and what aspect of society influenced these theories Paper must be at least 3000 words. Please, no plagiarized work! To his mind the law was a necessary and rational perversion of nature, part of the civil contract that governed all societies – a compromise in order for men to live peacefully. Grotius, on the other hand, would not accept the separation of nature and the law – the true law arose out of human nature and, more pertinently to him, the nature of God. As such, the law is not merely a series of arbitrary rules with which those in a social group (say, the state) are forced to comply. It is a base for all interaction, including interaction between states. As such Grotius points to a law than can be transnational, one that binds all cultures and societies.

Machiavelli portrayed a system of government that, unlike the systems of government that had been propounded before, was based entirely on pragmatic concerns. In his writings there is a large gap between the concept of things that are morally correct, and those things which are politic and advisable. As he says when regarding the way a leader chooses to rule his people, “it is a sound maxim that reprehensible actions may be justified by their effects” (Brown et al. 266). This, then, completely changes the landscape of how one is to understand the law, which before Machiavelli had been considered the inscription of rules barring those practices which are immoral or against the common good. In other words, people had seen the law as something which was used to protect society from those members of it who wished to harm the rest. The only way the law is a consideration in Machiavelli’s philosophy is if the prince needs to pacify the populace and, by doing so, retain control of a kingdom. The rule of law, then, is merely used by the leader as an appeasement to the collective might of the masses. However – Machiavelli is quite clear – the law can be suspended at any time the prince sees fit, and it should offer no protection from the violence he might wish to inflict – “It should be observed here that men should either be caressed or crushed” (Brown et al. 260).

An example that Machiavelli uses is the annexation of Milan by Louis XII and its subsequent loss to Ludovico. When Louis had taken the principality, the people expected certain favours from him but, in actuality, he ruled as a tyrant. This made it nearly impossible for him to hold the Milan when a new attack came from without. “For when the people who had opened the gate to Louis found that they did not receive the benefits they expected, they could not endure the oppressive rule of the new master” (Brown et al. 258). Notice that Machiavelli does not treat the law (and other benefits, such as governmental structures, a wealthy privileged class, etc.) as a result of the organic growth of society. Rather, it is a tactical means of a prince retaining power. Machiavelli does not identify the rule of just law as a prerequisite of the state, quite the opposite, it is one weapon in the arsenal that a ruler might use in order to perpetuate his rule.

As we will soon find, Hobbes sees the law as a treaty between a group of people – a little like a social contract – which grows of necessity when enough people congregate. For Machiavelli, however, the rule of law is applied from above, by the prince or emperor.

Andy: A Story of Screening and Referral DISCUSSION

Andy: A Story of Screening and ReferralResourcesAttributes and Evaluation of Discussion Contributions.Professional Communications and Writing Guide.List of Tests by Type.In this unit, you are introduced to the clinical psychology, counseling psychology, and neuropsychology branches of psychology. While these three specialty areas share overlap with goals for clients and the tools they employ in the process of assessment, they each have unique content knowledge and skill they acquired through training and provide differentiated roles and services. Subsequently, the referring concern and the needs of an individual will likely indicate which professional may be best suited to complete the assessment.In Units 6 through 9, you have studied different applications of tests and measurements in a variety of settings and specialty areas. Regardless of the specialization, it is likely that at some time, a psychologist will have a client with one of the referral concerns including possible neurological problems. In this unit, you read about psychologists using a standard battery to gather information on an individual from a variety of tests and instruments as a means of screening for a neurological deficit. A minimum amount of testing for an adequate neuropsychological screening includes an intelligence test, a personality test, and a perceptual, motor, or memory test.In this discussion, you will refer to the following case study to answer the questions in Part 1 and Part 2 of this activity.Andy was referred to you, a psychologist.Name: Andrew “Andy” Davis.Age: 6 years, 0 months.Mother: Emily Davis, single parent.Sibling: Molly.Recent changes: Relocation to a smaller house, father abandoned family.Referral concerns (reported by mother): Frequent intense imaginative play, significantly reduced social interactions, talks to self in his room, destroys toys (for example, rips arms of dolls), falls frequently, and concerns that he fell down stairs (with no open head injury) at the new house (that is, Andy reported falling down and off staircase railing).Part 1Based on this referral information, what would be the three tests you would include in a standard battery for screening purposes that include neurological concerns? You may use, as a guide, the same test list that was provided to you in Unit 2. You are allowed to choose tests outside of those on the list. This task will allow you to review tests covered in earlier units of this course, as well as some that are introduced in this unit. However, remember to address a minimum of three recommended areas of assessment for a screening of this type. Be sure to take into consideration age range appropriate for the tests and instruments you select. Then, provide an explanation for using each instrument and how it connects to your working hypothesis on Andy and his mother’s concerns.Part 2You complete your evaluation using the three (or more) tests in your standard battery and obtain signs signaling that a more thorough neuropsychological evaluation is recommended. Subsequently, Andy is referred to Dr. Woody Pride, a neuropsychologist. Dr. Pride decides to administer Andy the Brief Neuropsychological Cognitive Examination (BNCE) published by WPS since it can be administered in one sitting and reports that it minimizes reading skills to complete it.Based on this information from Dr. Pride, and after conducting your own research on this test selection, determine if this is an appropriate test to obtain additional data on Andy regarding neuropsychological concerns. If it is appropriate, then state that and provide your rationale for supporting this as a test selection. If it is not appropriate, then state that and provide your rationale for rejecting this as a test selection. Finally, regardless if you find the BNCE appropriate or not for Andy and the referring concerns, identify a second neuropsychological test that would be highly recommended for its use with Andy (you may select one from the list provided you in Unit 2, or another neuropsychological test battery).As a test user, identify any AERA standards regarding The Rights and Responsibilities of Test Users, which are implicated in this case study of Andy Davis.

Using the topic you chose earlier in the semester (This paper will prove the sim

Using the topic you chose earlier in the semester (This paper will prove the similarities; differences between the Spanish Flu of 1918 and Covid-19 and the effects each had on society and the change seen from them) write an expository paper. The argumentative paper is a genre of writing that requires the student to investigate a topic; collect, generate, and evaluate evidence; and establish a position on the topic in a concise manner.
Final Paper Format
Must include a cover page and footnotes with bibliography which are not included in the total page count. Your bibliography and notes must be formatted using the Chicago Manual of Style for the Humanities.
Must have at least 10 sources of evidence relying heavily on primary sources.
Must cite the sources of all of your evidence and all quotations and well as all paraphrased or summarized information (limit extended quotes) using the Chicago Manual of Style footnotes.
Paper length 5-7 pages *(Page length does not include the notes and bibliography or cover page, so be sure your submission is no less than five complete pages and no more than seven pages in length.)
Times New Roman or Calibri font
12 point
Double spaced
Standard one inch margins
Page numbers centered on the bottom of the page (excluding cover page)
Structure
A clear, concise, and defined thesis statement that occurs in the first paragraph of the paper.
Clear and logical transitions between the introduction, body, and conclusion paragraphs.
Body paragraphs that include evidential support cited by footnotes.
Evidential support (whether factual, logical, statistical, or anecdotal) supporting every point cited by footnotes.
A conclusion that does not simply restate the thesis, but readdresses it in light of the evidence provided.
Final Project Rubric
OUTSTANDING
PROFICIENT
LIMITED
UNSASTIFACTORY
THESIS
Easily identifiable, plausible, sophisticated, insightful, and crystal clear.
23-25 points
Promising, but may be slightly unclear.
20-22 points
Unclear (contains vague terms), appears unoriginal, or offers relatively little that is new; provides little around which to structure the paper.
15-19 points
Difficult to identify and may blend restatement of obvious point. Has no identifiable thesis. Shows minimal lack of effort or comprehension of the assignment.
Below 15
STRUCTURE & SPELLING
Evident, understandable, appropriate for thesis. Excellent transition from point to point. Paragraphs support solid topic sentences. Language is clearly organized. Correct word usage, punctuation, sentence structure, and grammar; correct citation of sources; minimal to no spelling errors; absolutely no run-on sentences. 5 full pages in length.
23-25 points
Generally clear and appropriate, though may wander occasionally. May have a few unclear transitions, or a few paragraphs without strong topic sentences. Sentence structure and grammar strong despite occasional lapses punctuation and citation style often used correctly. Some spelling errors and at least one run-on sentence.
20-22 points
Generally unclear, often wanders or jumps around. Few or weak transitions, and there are many paragraphs without topic sentences. Minor problems in sentence structure and grammar. Multiple errors in punctuation and citation style, and spelling. May have several (two to five) run-on sentences.
15-19 points
Unclear, often because thesis is weak or non-existent. Transitions are confusing and unclear. Few topic sentences. No evidence structure or organization. Huge problems in sentence structure and grammar. Frequent major errors in citation style, punctuation, and spelling. May have many (more than five) run-on sentences.
Below 15
USE OF EVIDENCE
Primary and secondary source information incorporated to strengthen every point. Examples support thesis and fit within paragraph. Excellent integration of quoted material into sentences. Factual information is incorporated.
23-25 points
Examples used to support most points. Some evidence does not support point or may appear where inappropriate. Quotations are integrated well into sentences. Some factual information is incorporated.
20-22 points
Examples support some points. Quotations may be poorly integrated into sentences. There may not be a clear point. Moderate amount of factual information is incorporated.
15-19 points
Very few or weak examples of factual information. General failure to support statements, or evidence seems to support no particular point.
Below 15
LOGIC & ARGUMENTATION
All ideas flow logically; the argument is identifiable, reasonable, and sound.
23-25 points
Argument is clear and usually flows logically and makes sense.
20-22 points
Logic may often fail, or the argument may often be unclear.
15-19 points