The factors that affect forestry and the significance of forests will be discussed in this paper.

/in /by

Write 4 pages thesis on the topic research paper. The factors that affect forestry and the significance of forests will be discussed in this paper. This paper will also tackle the different types of forests.

Forests are mostly dominated by trees amongst other plants. Some of the plants are tall and others are short. Most of the plants have features that help them adapt to the several conditions that are presented in the different types of forests (Green). Forests have sufficient amount of water. A majority of the forests receive sufficient amounts of rain that help in the growth of the plants and support the animals that live in the forests (Green). The rain water forms ponds and streams.

Forests offer great biodiversity due to the fact that it acts as a habitat to many habitants. The forest has several foods and shelters that support the habitants that reside in the various forests (Green).Forest canopy is a characteristic that is found in different forests (Green). The canopy differs in the different types of forests due to the fact that the nutrients found in forests differ.

Tropical forests are densely populated and are found near the equator. In this type of forests winter is not present and the temperatures are normally between 68 and 77 degrees. These forests receive mostly receive 100 inches of rain in a year. The soils found in the tropical forests are very poor due to the high levels of rain and warm temperature. The plants that grow in these types of forests are normally broad-leafed and the trees are normally very tall. Due to the huge density of the trees the sun doesn’t reach the lower levels of the forest. This forces the animals that live in these forests to adapt to living in the trees (Green).

These forests are normally found in eastern North America, northeastern Asia, parts of Russia, China, Japan, Western Europe and Eastern Europe. The trees that are found in these forests are normally deciduous and coniferous evergreen trees.

Final Paper (Organization) Intellectual Foundations (Final Paper) The final proj

/in /by

Final
Paper (Organization)
Intellectual Foundations (Final Paper)
The final project is centered on a
Critical Autoethnographic methodological investigativ approach.
Paper Completion
A research paper is required for the
successful completion of this course. In this paper, you are to use at
least seven sources to examine a major topic related to the course
materials, Ethnic & Racial Diversity in Society. All
required materials can be used as sources for this paper. Topics may come from
sections discussed in class, or they may derive from issues that you find of
interest. This paper requires you to reflect on the normality of
racism. Using the society, you are to identify a specific
unit of analysis and identify the meaningful ways microaggressions operate to
victimize the oppressed. You will be allowed to stretch definitions
microaggression to include all of the forms of interactions informed by unequal
power relationships. While one individual may wish to look at the normality
of racism in the classroom (teacher interactions, curriculum choice,
aesthetics, etc.), another individual may choose to look at the normality
of racism through the lens of food packaging or labels in grocery
stores. Once you have identified a unit of analysis, you must develop an
argument that identifies the normality of racism in the “space” you have
selected. Your argument must be based on scholarship, not just your opinion.
You are not making up stories to support your ideas. There are plenty of real examples
to draw from. If I were to look at the normality of racism in
the classroom, for example, I would find articles that highlight scholarship on
this topic (the required text for the course is full of great examples,
however). Once I have identified materials to “build” on
(scholarship), I would then be able to insert my personal life story (if I
chose) into the discourse. Afterward, I would identify and explain the
meaningful ways my own racial identity informs my thinking about the
case(s).
Example (classroom):
Normality of racism in the
classroom
Literature review (teacher interactions,
social foundations of education, culturally competent pedagogy, detention
rate, etc.)
Speak to my personal story (this
is not a requirement at this point, but might help to enhance your
critical reflection and writing skills)
Identify microaggressions and
types (microinvalidation, microassault), and provide clear examples
(literature, your story)
Address how your “findings”
connect to the larger discourse on racial and ethnic diversity in society
(again, you must explore the literature)
(Critical autoethnography) discuss
your feelings about your topic.
Have your ideologies
concerning the normality of racism changed, explain?
What was the most interesting finding,
explain?
What was the most troubling finding,
explain?
How has the course influenced your
understanding of the normality of racism, explain?
You must connect your ideas to
current events (perhaps even address a current event in the news)
Reflection: Conclusion, tell me
what you wish about the writing process, review of literature, final
product……..here, you problematize the emotional work of addressing
the normality of racism in the topic you chose.
Paper Development/Requirements
Introduce your topic to the reader. Present the
materials in a clear, concise voice. Act as if the reader does not have
any prior knowledge of the materials. The introduction should provide a
clear overview of the topic and give the reader a preview of what to
expect in the formal presentation. Here you must define your terms for the
reader. ( 1-3 pgs. 75 pts.)
Thoroughly research & present your topic (what have
other people written about your topic)? Summary of relevant information
(Literature Review). Identify relevant themes Provide the reader with
scholarly insights into your subject matter. At this stage, you are
focused on what others have already written about your topic. Scholarship,
not your opinion, drives this stage of the paper. It is important
that you conduct a thorough investigation and explain, in concrete
language, the “social history” of your chosen topic. Identify 2 major
themes that surfaced as you reviewed the literature? What seems to be the
general focus of the person, group, era, etc. you have chosen to
investigate (Approx. 2-4 pgs. 150 pts.)
Identify microaggressions and types (microinvalidation,
microassault), and provide clear examples (literature, your story) (Approx.
2-4 pgs. 75 pts.)
Address how your “findings” connect to the larger
discourse on racial and ethnic diversity in society (Approx. ½ – 1
½ pg. 25 pts.)
(Critical autoethnography) discuss your own feelings
about your topic.
Have your ideologies concerning the normality
of racism changed, explain?
What was the most interesting finding,
explain?
What was the most troubling finding,
explain?
How has the course influenced your understanding of
the normality of racism, explain?
Reflection: Conclusion, tell me what you wish about the
writing process, review of literature, final product……..here, you
problematize the emotional work of addressing the normality of
racism. (Approx. 2-5 pgs. 200 pts.
Identify the contemporary/historic connection (How
historic events frame your current work)? For example, (racial) social
foundations of education (institution) influence pedagogical decisions of
educators. ( 1-3 pgs. 25 pts.)
The
paper must include an abstract and reference page (not counted as full pages)
1. Identify your research problem & objectives (What were you trying to resolve/explore)? My research resulted in finding many articles regarding my topic about Treyvon Martin and how his death could possibly be a result of a racism case The key objectives throughout most of the articles depended on a Black Lives Matter protest Treyvon Martin was killed cold blooded by Zimmerman who was already stereotypical I am trying to speak about the stereotypical people in the world and how being prejudice about a certain group could cause a tragedy like this
2. Your method (Critical Autoethnography)? I am not sure if you are asking my method of research? However my method of research was the web, and some video documentaries off of youtube. The reason I chose this topic was because I feel strongly about the Black Lives Matter movement.
3. What did you discover about yourself, the culture, and the society? I discovered that before this class I always had the wrong idea of was being prejudice was, Professor Harvell taught me that being prejudice is kind of like being stereotypical in a way. While doing this research I have realized that most of society including myself tend to have a pre judgment on a certain person whether it is there skin color or there ethnic / religion group
4. Main conclusion of the paper? The main conclusion of my paper would definitely have to be about how Americans are shaped to believe that certain people of color may be “bad” because of a person who may or
may not be the reason

Discuss failure of business journalism in reporting during the great market crash of 1929.

/in /by

Need an research paper on failure of business journalism in reporting during the great market crash of 1929. Needs to be 6 pages. Please no plagiarism. The spring of 1929 also gave more signs of a serious setback to the economy due to the slowing down of steel production, car sales, and house construction. During this time, some few individuals warned of an impending serious crash in the stock markets, but they were cautioned, ignored, and labeled as pessimists. Most economists believe in the cycling of the overall economic activities between the expansion and contraction of the economic periods. The economic growth alternates with depressions and recessions. Analysis of the great depression indicates efforts by economists and journalists and their determination of the causes of depression (Burgan 2002, p.78).

Business journalism requires that the journalists know exactly what is required, and the content should be critically analyzed before distribution to the audience. Some business journalists do not know the appropriate sources for their information to back up a story or an event. Others do not understand the principles of economics and the importance of stock markets. Some business reporting lack contextualization, which helps readers understand the meaning of the economic situation. The major goal of business reporting is to enhance more customer cover-up and retention. This is especially notable since many people have shifted to the media for them to know the prevailing economic conditions. People simply want better business coverage (King 2000, p. 67).

The business journalists knew about the great depression, but their ignorance of economic history was massive. Ignorance in expressing their opinions rendered everything wrong during their reporting on the great depression. For instance, in 1920, the forecasting reported on flourished economy and failure to recognize the coming depression, a factor that totally put them out of business. J. K. Galbraith’s reporting on The Great Crash 1929 relates to the forecasts of the Harvard Economic Service who failed in warning the business of impending depression. Galbraith wrote in November 1929 that the U.S. was not facing a protracted liquidation and that severe depression like that which was in 1929-1931 was less likely to be experienced.

submit a paper on should a charge of plagiarism ruin your life.

/in /by

Your assignment is to prepare and submit a paper on should a charge of plagiarism ruin your life. When people go to university for a bachelor’s in Literature, they get a broad taste of writing from various eras and areas. Then for a master’s, the scope is narrowed to something like Medieval French literature, modern American novels, or Japanese literature. A dissertation for one’s Ph. D concentrates typically on one specific area of research in the person’s field of study. What exactly is the point of all this? No matter how much people study, there is no way to actually know everything. Chances are that there will be familiar echoes of another artist in any work, no matter how self-consciously the author might be attempting to eliminate those echoes. What can be done to find one’s own voice than in the midst of all of these echoes?

One option, the only option it seems, is to embrace one’s influence and recognize it. As Jonathan Lethem says, “most artists are converted to art by art itself. Finding one’s voice isn’t just an emptying and purifying oneself of the words of others but an adopting and embracing of filiations, communities, and discourses.” The process of emptying oneself of influence in an attempt to create something completely new is futile. Anyways, what better way to create something compelling than to use a recognized and respected piece of art as a template and inspiration? Looking throughout most of the history of art and literature, appropriation has played was is seemingly a central role in the creation process.

A large part of Shakespeare scholarship has been in the identification of the source stories.