Discuss applying people cmm to your organization-part 1

/in /by

Compose a 500 words assignment on applying people cmm to your organization-part 1. Needs to be plagiarism free! Applying People CMM to Your Organization-Part Toyota Toyota is a car manufacturing company known for its management philosophy and innovation. It has achieved success using its lean manufacturing process while other companies have tried the same process, but still fails. It is also known for its mass-market hybrids. Just like any other company, Toyota has its own practices, principles and problem solving techniques. In its quest for success and sustainability, the company has implemented a continuous improvement culture, which as described below, can benefit from the people CMM (Toyota, 2014).

The Organization’s need for people CMM

Toyota developed a lean manufacturing process, and has been using this process to achieve its competitive advantage. The company also recognized the need for a continuous improvement culture in order to sustain the process. Because of that, Toyota selects the brightest and best workers within the organization, from all levels, and challenges them to use their proposals and creativity to experiment and learn. This is a challenge that puts the workers through a constant problem solving state, and encourages them to grow in their jobs. Every specialty, for example. engineering, accounting, sales, service, and human resources, are equipped with skills which the company refines to achieve customer satisfaction. This continuous improvement culture could use people CMM for the company to achieve its targets (Toyota, 2014). Continuous improvement means the company will always have changing aims to meet. There should be a system of ensuring these aims are met, and this is where the people CMM come in. It provides staged improvements through which the organization’s culture can be changed. People CMM is a model of change that focuses on improving workforce practices. It has five levels of maturity, and these act as guidance through change. If Toyota, for example, wants to change the culture of the organization to a continuous improvement focused, it will make use of the maturity levels to meet its targets. The model describes an evolutionary process through which companies go through to achieve quality and effectiveness. Maturity levels determine the characteristics of the organization. Toyota, for example, already established a continuous improvement culture which it has to maintain. It means that the company has passed the initial level, the managed level, and the defined level. The initial level is all about the inconsistency of the practices. Toyota has a consistent practice of identifying the best skills, and guiding them through problem solving activities to develop new ideas and improve the company’s processes. At level two, critical skills are identified for each unit. Toyota already has a consistent practice of identifying the best, which the company uses to develop new ideas. This is well managed. Then there is level three of maturity where the organization implements the right infrastructure that will support the newly adopted practices, to ensure an alignment of the organization’s strategic objectives and the workforce capability. There is also the predictable level where the company can manage its performance and capability quantitatively, and the optimizing level where the company focuses on continual improvement (Curtis, Hefley & Miller, 2003).

Benefits that Toyota gets from People CMM

The People CMM will provide more than a human resource management framework. It will provide a framework for process management if based on competency processes. strategic planning. and measurement and analysis of performance at all levels ensuring an alignment of performance across the organization. The people CMM also ensures cultural changes that lead to long lasting improvements (Curtis, Hefley & Miller, 2003).

References

Curtis, B., Hefley, W. E. and Miller, S. A. (2003). Experiences applying the people capability

maturity model. The Journal of Defense Software Engineering. Retrieved from:

http://www.crosstalkonline.org/storage/issue-archives/2003/200304/200304-Curtis.pdf

Toyota. (2014). Toyota Traditions. Retrieved from:

http://www.toyota-global.

reading included ,Your essay must be submitted in Blackboard. Please compose you

/in /by

reading included ,Your essay must be submitted in Blackboard. Please compose your essay outside of Blackboard in a word processing program so you can spellcheck and proofread your sentence structure and grammar. Using no fewer than 200 words, summarize what you learned in the reading distributed in class on Wednesday 27 April. Demonstrate in your essay that you read the document from the beginning through the end; don’t just summarize the first few pages! What was interesting? What was noteworthy? I am not looking for your impression or feelings; I am looking for factual information that you read.
This can’t be submitted after the final exam, only before.
Grammar and spelling count! You must proofread to make sure your work will be understandable to others.

The post reading included ,Your essay must be submitted in Blackboard. Please compose you appeared first on essaysclick.

Critiques should be written in an appropriate scientific style such as APA forma

/in /by

Critiques should be written in an appropriate scientific style such as APA format (1.5-spaced and 11-point Times New Roman or Arial font), and each should correctly cite at least three primary scientific references. Citations may be formatted in the style of any major scientific journal, and should indicate to the reader the source of data and observations and conclusions that are cited in the critique. The text of these critiques will be no longer than three pages excluding references. The idea of a critique is to go through the paper, figure by figure, and describe what was done, how it was done, suggest alternate explanations for the results as appropriate, and come up with ideas for additional tests that could have helped to confirm or refute the authors’ conclusions.
There are a total of five articles, but you only must choose one article to critique. Due date 05/07/2022.

M3A2 NS

/in /by

Answer the questions on the attachement based off the assignment below.For the last two modules, you have been using a template called the Science Tool Kit to guide your work in analyzing news articles that bring the public information from scientific research. In this module, we are expanding our definition of science to include technology and engineering, since they are crucial in considering our energy resources, needs, and plans for the future of our planet.For this assignment, we will drill down (pun intended) on the controversies that surround hydraulic fracturing, typically shortened to “hydro-fracking”, for natural gas. This process is not new, but technological innovations in recent years have made it a much more practical and widespread technique to obtain natural gas. Fracking has supporters and detractors, but many states are now allowing fracking, and the practice is so widespread and effective that the prices for natural gas have fallen precipitously in recent years. However, there have been a host of environmental concerns with the rapid increase in the use of fracking. These include health issues created by water and air pollutants, damage to once wild and pristine environments that cannot be undone, and also earthquakes.This assignment asks you to analyze an article from a Houston newspaper by A. Kuchment that reviews recent research on the increase in the number of earthquakes in Texas. This increase has apparently been linked to the increased use of fracking techniques. The US Geologic Survey has also published information on this issue. Learn more from the following reading and viewing opportunities before you begin the assignment.Participating in this activity will enable you to demonstrate mastery of Module Level Outcome 2.First:Carefully read the news article:Kuchment, A. (2016, May 21).  Fracking activities caused majority of recent Texas quakes.  Standard Times.Take notes and pay special attention to the language used in the news article.Next, for your comparison to the news article, your information from the “scientific community”:View: Oklahoma Earthquakes and the Rise in Fracking [Video, 10:12 mins]Read: US Geologic Survey Myths and Misconceptions about Fracking and EarthquakesReview the Abstract (on page 1) and Discussion and Conclusions (on pp. 13-15) from: Frohlich, C., DeShon, H., Stump, B., Hayward, C., Hornbach, M., & Walter, J. I. (2016).  A historical review of induced earthquakes in Texas.  Seismological Research Letters, 87(4).