Developmental Psycology 10 questions to answer

/in /by

I need these 10 easy questions of Psychology to be answered by Sunday 01/31/2021 Afternoon (USA Eastern Time). Please apply only if you can complete it

Dissertation Annotated Bibliography for….. (Due date – Monday 5th February, 2018 DUE IN 10 HOURS FROM NOW)

/in /by

Annotated BibliographyAs  part of your Doctoral Seminar for this set of weeks, you are      participating in a seminar-style discussion about the weekly topics.  You must address 5  of the attached Dissertations in the prescribed format. As a related exercise, submit an annotated  bibliography of the 5 resources you referred to this week. For each dissertation entry, be sure to include the full APA citation and address the following :1. Scope2. Purpose3. Philosophical Approach4. Underlying Assumptions5. Research6. Limitations7. Opportunities for further inquiry8. Validity of useGeneral Topic: Sustainability and Community participationDissertation Resources:Thompson, J. D. (2015). Engineering community engagement partnerships: Investigating motivation, nature, and structure (Order No. 3720049). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1718546773). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1718546773?accountid=14872Dooley, J. E. (2016). Effecting transformation through community partnerships: A case study in building networks of hope (Order No. 10118959). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1804419112). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1804419112?accountid=14872Anderson, T. D. (2017). The role of rural community colleges in promoting sustainable economic rural community development: A multiple case study (Order No. 10284673). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1914908221). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1914908221?accountid=14872Tatar, J. A. (2017). Civic engagement: Generational differences in engagement of citizens in their communities (Order No. 10640336). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1972689844). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1972689844?accountid=14872Regan, R. M. (2015). Community engagement and adaptive reuse: The intersection of sustaining multi-use art space in Washington, DC (Order No. 1588764). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1688807369). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1688807369?accountid=14872

Week 3 8185

/in /by

3/15https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=udfldYXvUxw&feature=youtu.be

Reply 1-1 BG

/in /by

REply to:Scholarly sources are written by professionals in the field with the focus to continue to find advancements (Dunn & Halonen, 2020). They main audience is intended for other colleagues in the field to read. A peer reviewed source is one that is being evaluated and critiqued by another professional in the field. The feedback given in a peer review is with the intention to continue to find advancements in the area of being researched. The similarities among both a scholarly source and a peer review source are that both are written by professionals specialized in the field, and both have the intention to communicate findings of a study, The differences between the two consist of the scholarly source documented in detail with an inclusion of the complete break down of the study while the peer review reviews the important details and builds up on that content. Also, a scholarly source uses various sources while a peer review compares it with recent studies.