researchers think that theory of mind is exclusively a human phenomenon. – theory of mind

TOPIC: Some researchers think that theory of mind is exclusively a human phenomenon.  Other think that some animals (chimpanzees, dolphins) also possess a theory of mind.  Who is right and why?  (please note there is a lot of bad science on this topic – if you rely on the bad science, your paper will be poor as well.  So make sure your draw your research from peer-reviewed journals and Nowhere else).Please write like you are a student taking this course not so many external links certified journalsgenerate hypotheses, and, in general, apply psychological science. The task will be to take a position in a current debate in cognitive science. You will then have to support your position by drawing on the data that are available on the topic. The goal is to convince readers that the position you take is correct by presenting the relevant data on the topic.  Writing that both positions are correct will automatically result in a deduction of points.  Think of this as a “debate” in which your job is to argue one of the positions. This paper will require you to go beyond Matlin’s textbook. You will need to refer to journal articles, book chapters, and, if you must, websites. Each student must read journal articles for the paper. At least three journal articles must be referenced. If you use websites, you are responsible for any misinformation you get from the website (the best websites to use are those of the researchers themselves). Your view in the reaction paper must be supported by psychological science (including neuroscience, social psychology, neurobiology). Your feelings and impressions are not relevant in this paper (NO PRONOUNS) NO ( I ); rather it is scientific data that you must draw upon.Choose arguments that support your position, and refute arguments that may support the other position. Y do both.approximately 1,000 words (about 3 pages)BOOK LINK FREE just scroll down to pg 17 table of contents  https://kupdf.net/download/margaret-w-matlin-cognition-bookzz-org_58c8b2d7dc0d606630339028_pdf

Integrative Literature Review

The headings listed below must be used to delineate the sections of content. These sections include the following: a clear introduction that provides a general review and organizes the research in a meaningful way; a discussion in which the evidence is presented through analysis, critique, and synthesis; and a conclusion in which the discussion is drawn together in a meaningful way, the claims of the introduction are brought to a logical closure, and new research is proposed(1)Introduction:Provide a conceptual framework for the review.Describe how the review will be organized. The questions below may be used to guide this section.What are the guiding theories within the domains?How are the domains connected?Are there competing points of view across the domains?Why is the integration of these domains important?What is the history of these domains?What are the related theories or findings?Describe how the literature was identified, analyzed, and synthesized.How and why was the literature chosen?What is your claim or thesis statement?(2)Discussion:Provide the analysis, critique, and synthesis for the review?(3)Analysis:Examine the main ideas and relationships presented in the literature across the four domains?Integrate concepts from the four different content domains within the larger field of psychology?What claim(s) can be made in the introduction?What evidence supports the claim(s) made in the introduction?(4)Critique:Evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the chosen research findings.How well does the literature represent the issues across the four domains?Identify the strengths and the key contributions of the literature.What, if any, deficiencies exist within the literature?Have the authors omitted any key points and/or arguments?What, if any, inaccuracies have been identified in the literature?What evidence runs contrary to the claims proposed in the introduction, and how might these be reconciled with the claims presented?Explain how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct might influence the reliability and/or generalizability of the chosen findings.Did the ethical issues influence the outcomes of the research?Were ethical considerations different across the domains?(5)Synthesis:Integrate existing ideas with new ideas to create new knowledge and new perspectives?Describe the research that has previously been done across these domains, as well as any controversies or alternate opinions that currently exist?Relate the evidence presented to the major conclusions being made?Construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to posit new relationships and perspectives on the topics within the domains?(6)Conclusion:Provide a conclusion and present potential future considerations?State your final conclusion(s)?Synthesize the findings described in the discussion into a succinct summary?What questions remain?What are the possible implications of your argument for existing theories and for everyday life?Are there novel theories and/or testable hypothesizes for future research?What do the overarching implications of the studies show?Where should the research go from this point to further the understanding of these domains and the greater study of psychology?

Case Study 4 Impressing Others

In your files there is a case study entitled “Impressing Others.” Utilizing your reading assignment to support your responses, select three questions found at the end to answer.