Species Interactions and You

Species Interactions and YouHumans interact with various species every day without actually realizing it. In the field of ecology, these interactions can either be interspecific (between species) or intraspecific (within species). Interactions between humans are known as intraspecific (within species) interactions. For example, interactions between a human and a pet would be interspecific, whereas interactions between a human and another human would be intraspecific.Research interspecific and intraspecific interactions using the module readings, the Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet.This assignment has two parts. Complete both parts.Part AComplete the following:Track your interactions with other organisms—between and within species—for one day.Summarize your interactions throughout the day, using the terms from this module’s readings. If required, review the module’s readings again.At a minimum, identify ten interactions that you witnessed or participated in today. Among those interactions, you should be able to identify a predatory-prey relationship, a competitive relationship, and a mutualism. You could also identify parasitic relationships or commensalisms, if you choose. Although you can repeat interaction types—for instance, you can have multiple mutualisms—the examples must differ. These are some examples:Did you have a predatory-prey relationship with a chicken today? That is, did you eat chicken for lunch?Did you have a competitive relationship with a coworker today? That is, were you competing for a raise?Click here to download this template to track interactions with organisms.Part BRespond to the following:For every interaction you identified above, describe an interaction in nature that is similar to what you experienced or witnessed. For example, if you had a predatory-prey interaction with your meal, identify and describe an example of a predatory-prey interaction in nature. Or, if you had a competitive interaction with your coworker, identify and describe a competitive interaction in nature.Using the information you reviewed, explain why it is important to recognize these interactions.Support your statements with appropriate examples and scholarly references.Using the information that you compiled above, summarize your interactions for the day. Be sure to classify your interactions (parasitic, mutualism, etc.) and that you also determine if the interactions are considered intraspecific or interspecific.Write your initial response in a minimum of 300–350 words. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.By Wednesday, July 17, 2013, post your response to the appropriate Discussion Area. Through Sunday, July 21, 2013, review and comment on at least two peers’ responses. In your response posting, address the following by employing the concepts covered in module readings and your research:Evaluate your fellow students’ examples of interactions in nature. Are the categories accurately identified? Are the examples valid?What did you learn from the other students’ entries and comparisons?Did you agree or disagree with students’ explanation of the importance of recognizing these interactions?Be sure to give reasons for your responses.

Week 4 Journal: Rough Draft Review Process Evaluation

Rough Draft Review Process Evaluation[WLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]Purpose: The primary goal of this weekly assignment is to enable you to understand the revision process and revise your paper with the help of a writing specialist.Prepare:Step 1: Prepare a shortened version of your Final Paper (at least four pages) by including the following:Introduction paragraph and thesis statement you developed for your Week 3 Assignment.Background information of the global societal issue you have chosen. (International Drug Trafficking)Brief argument supporting at least two solutions to the global societal issue.(International Drug Trafficking)Conclusion paragraph.Must document any information used from at least five scholarly sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.) Note that you will need at least eight scholarly sources for your Final Paper in Week 5.I HAVE INCLUDED ASSIGNMENT #3 DOCUM|ENT FOR SEVERAL RESOURCES TO USE. YOU MUST USE AND SITE ALL RESOURCES THAT ARE IN WEEK 3 BIBLIOGRAPHY.There is also thesis help in the assignment provided.Step 2: After you have completed a rough draft of your paper, submit that draft to the Ashford Writing Center by using the instructions found in the Paper Review (Links to an external site.) page. Your paper will be returned within 24 hours, so give yourself enough time to complete and submit it prior to the due date.Reflect: Carefully review the summary feedback found in the email from the tutor and the margin comments that you see on your returned paper. Consider each of the suggestions provided to help you to revise your paper.

Need it to be done by 9pm tonight

Using the information in the background readings as well as some research in peer-reviewed sources of your own, which clearly summarizes each of the items below. Include thorough speaker’s notes to further expand upon and explain your points. Use in-text citations on your slides, as well as a reference slide at the end of the presentation.1.  Summarize the three types of assessment to be completed during utilization review. What is involved in each process and who completes this work? What is the health care manager’s specific role in the review?2.  Provide an example of how each of the three types of assessment are performed in the current health care settings. In your three examples, specifically explain how quality was/was not preserved, and how cost was/was not controlled.3.  Describe the role of communication between all stakeholders involved in utilization review. Who are each of the stakeholders, and how should this communication take place? How are decisions best made and communicated, when the review involves competing interests among stakeholders (e.g., for off-label drug uses for terminal patients, handling bed shortages, etc.).View:Baker, J. (2018). Improving quality of care through utilization management [Video file]. Retrieved fromhttps://youtu.be/g-T-YeP53nYCarasso, S. (2017). Is that test necessary? The key to laboratory utilization management.The Journal of Medical Practice Management: MPM, 33(3), 160-164. Retrieved from theTrident Online Library.Desai, S., Gruber, P. F., Eiting, E., Seabury, S. A., Mack, W. J., Voyageur, C., . . . Terp, S. (2017). The effect of utilization review on emergency department operations. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 70(5), 623-631.e1. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.El-Othmani, M. M., Sayeed, Z., Ramsey, J. A., Abaab, L., Little, B. E., & Saleh, K. J. (2019).The joint utilization management program: Implementation of a bundle payment model andcomparison between year 1 and 2 results. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 34(11), 2532-2537.Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.Parast, M. M., & Golmohammadi, D. (2019). Quality management in healthcareorganizations: Empirical evidence from the Baldrige data. International Journal of ProductionEconomics, 216, 133-144. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.Suklar, S. (2018). Quality assurance system at primary level of healthcare. Izzivi Prihodnosti, 3(1), 21-53. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.Wakefield, E., Keller, H., Mianzo, H., Nagaraj, C. B., Tawde, S., & Ulm, E. (2018). Reductionof health care costs and improved appropriateness of incoming test orders: The impact ofgenetic counselor review in an academic genetic testing laboratory. Journal of GeneticCounseling, 27(5), 1067-1073. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.