Module Seven Video Reflection Guidelines and Rubric

/in /by

OverviewIn Modules One through Seven of this course, you will watch a series of videos from leaders within the SNHU community. The objective of these videos is to share with you some reflections and insights as they pertain to the participants’ identity, advocacy, leadership, and motivation. Watching the videos and reflecting on the content will contribute to the creation of your own social change identity.Note: As you progress through the video series and the subsequent module reflections, you will synthesize information provided from various concepts discussed within the context of the videos. Pay particular attention to specific conceptual themes that emerge from the videos. You will use the knowledge acquired in all the videos that you’ve viewed so far to complete each module reflection assignment.PromptFor this assignment, you will watch the Module Seven Video|SNHU Leadership and answer the following in 2 to 4 sentences per question.Describe the ways in which the participants’ knowledge of psychology has shaped their orientation toward advocacy and allyship.Describe how you can apply aspects of your learning experience to advocate for positive social change.All sources and ideas requiring attribution must be cited according to APA style.Guidelines for SubmissionSubmit your completed Module Seven video reflection as a Word document, with sources cited according to APA style.

Blog

/in /by

Pick one Disease or Disorder from this week’s reading assignments. Write a blog as if you were a patient suffering from this condition. Be creative. Answer the following questions in paragraph form?What are the worst symptoms or hardest to deal with symptoms of the disease?What treatments are you currently on?Are you experiencing any side effects from the treatments or medications?What questions do you have for your doctor?What advice would you offer a patient that is newly diagnosed with this condition?Finally, add how this condition makes you feel from an emotional standpoint.  How are you coping with it?Your blog should be at least 250 words.

Enhancing Performance: Preparation/Motivation- A4

/in /by

Critical Thinking Essay IYour writing should illustrate knowledge of the concepts through an original personal and/or professional integration of the assigned text material. All assignments MUST be typed, double-spaced, 1” margins and in APA format. It must be written and proof read at the graduate level. Each answer should be numbered and be 1-2 pages long. This tells you about how much content to include and is not meant as a word count. You must integrate the material presented in the text and cite your work according to APA format. 1. The term Motivation is constantly used in Sports. “Let’s get Motivated.”, “Motivation wins.” And even “Motivational climate.” What is meant by the term “motivation”? Discuss self motivation, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, maximizing motivation, and motivational strategies. 2. There are many different coaching styles. Some coaches use authoritative and try to control everything about the athlete. Sometimes this causes the athlete to lose all self-determination. Discuss this coaching style, current research about it, and if you agree or disagree with it. Use personal examples to support your answer. 3. As a coach, how might you employ five different types of imagery (control emotional responses, acquire and practice sport skills, acquire and practice strategy, cope with pain and injury, solve problems) for different situations to enhance the performance, affect, and thoughts of your athlete? 4. Explain the self-determination theory (SDT).  Do you agree with this theory? Give recent research and personal examples to support your answer.References:Roberts, G. & Treasure, D.   (2012).   Advances in motivation in sport and exercise.   (3rd).   Champaign, IL   Human Kinetics.     978-0736090810

250 word discussion respond Reply to two students 50 word each

/in /by

**Due By Saturday April 23, 2022 no later then 5pm Pacific USA time**No plagiarizingOver the past several years, some important fields of scientific study (e.g., climate change, evolution) have become entangled with ideological agendas. Unfortunately, when scientific findings have political or religious implications, stakeholders tend to react emotionally, displaying either unquestioning acceptance or extreme skepticism, depending on their own ideological perspective. This creates a wedge between elements of the scientific community and certain societal groups. On the one hand, scientists are accused of allowing their political viewpoints to affect the way they analyze, interpret, and report their findings. And consistent reports of data tampering and academic dishonesty only add fuel to this fire. On the other hand, skeptical members of the public are dismissed as being irrational, unintelligent, or foolish. In such a culture of suspicion and defensiveness, it is difficult to make progress.For this week’s discussion board, think about the societal groups to which you belong (e.g., political, religious, ethnic).How would you describe your group’s relationship with the scientific community?Is there any “bad blood” between your group and some part of the scientific community?Explain. What areas of division or distrust can you identify? What is the impact of these divisions?This post should be no less than 250 words.****Next, respond to the posts of TWO other students BELOW in no less than 50 words each**—>>>>Respond to Kristin 50 words minimumThe relationship that my group has with the scientific community can be a mixture of emotions. Christians tend to be seen from scientists as having untrustworthy ideas of the beliefs from the Bible and not being statistically proven. Both aspects of religion and science have a compelling number of differences because of personal belief that can come between the two.I would have to say that there is plenty of “bad blood” between Christians and some part of the scientific community. When it comes to the “bad blood” between the two groups, I find it more to be on personal influences that contribute to the division and not so much as proof from one aspect or the other. There is great deal of debate of who is right when it comes to the beliefs but there is not a saying that one supersedes the over the other.The biggest one that comes to mind within this division is how the world was created. Christians follow the teaching in the Bible that all things were created by God. On the other hand, scientists would say that the world was created by evolution over time. The back and forth of this belief creates many disagreements between the two because typically science proves things from a biological standpoint. The bible does not have the “data” that science typically likes to see to prove something factual from a scientific perspective therefore there is questioning that science always has on Christian beliefs. The beliefs of Christians and information derived from the Bible of God’s creation should not be taken away from those who have religious beliefs. There is adequate amount of coexistence between the two that can go hand in hand to avoid the division and in turn embrace the knowledge from both aspects to make informal conclusions.—->>>> Respond to Raylene 50 word minimumI would describe my group’s relationship with the scientific community as not a close relationship because my societal group is religious. My societal group believes that God is the reason for our creation and the theory of evolution is not something that brings them skepticism because they trust God and his word. However, I can’t necessarily say the same about myself. I do consider myself religious, but I am skeptical about human creation. It is difficult for me to choose one side, but I also don’t feel as though I need to choose one side.There isn’t necessarily bad blood between my group and the scientific community, but one thing that I do see in my church community is that they have no regard for science. They don’t even question science, which I disagree with because I believe science is very important in understanding the world around us. I don’t think religion is the reason for all life, but I do believe that both faith and science worked together to create humankind.The areas of division and distrust I can identify is my religious community not trusting medicine as much as they trust their faith. They believe that medicine might help heal those who are sick, but they also believe that their prayers and God will be the sole person in creating a miracle. I think it is great that they have trust in God, but I also believe that they should have faith in medicine as well. Because science and faith can work together to create a miracle.