Ethics in Industrial Organization Psychology

I/O Psychologists follow the American Psychological Association’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Yet this Code is written in general terms. It is therefore quite important for you to explore and comprehend how this code is understood specifically by I/O Psychologists and applied to their work within organizations. You will do this through your participation in this unit’s Discussion.Read Chapter 30 in your textbook, “Issues in the Ethical Practice of Consulting Psychology.” This chapter addresses the following 10 ethical issues in terms specific to their application to the work of I/O Psychologists.Who is the Client?Informed ConsentConfidentialityDual RelationshipsConsultant CompetenceManagement versus Helping PerspectivesLevel of InterventionEthical Issues in Organizational AssessmentEthics of InterventionAspiring to Moral and Ethical InfluenceFrom this list of 10 ethics concerns of special attention for I/O Psychologists, select one.Summarize the range of issues and factors that comprise this ethical concern, as outlined in the Reading.Explain your personal position on these issues and factors — how would you likely handle each issue/factor as an I/O Professional?Do you feel that the issues and factors which you have discussed will force you out of your comfort zone or present any particular professional, personal, or other challenges to you in your I/O Psychology career? If so, how and why? Will this influence the kind of work you choose to do as an I/O Psychologist?A

4MAT Review paper

4MAT Review InstructionsThe 4MAT Review is a way of responding to readings that requires the learner to interact with new ideas on several levels. Please use the following format in preparing your 4MAT Review:1.      Summary: Summarize what you have read as if you were the author boiling down the book into 250 tight words. Prove that you comprehend the readings by writing a no-nonsense summary (picture a summary similar to reading the back cover of a book to decide if you want to read it).  **You may not use the course text book for this assignment. Any reviews submitted on the Dunbar text will receive an immediate grade of 0. The book must be written specifically regarding the subject of life coaching.2.      Concrete responses: Get vulnerable! In 250 words, relate a personal life experience that this book connected with in your own life. Relate your story in first person, describing action, quoting sentences you remember hearing or saying. In the teaching style of Jesus, this is a do-it-yourself parable, case study, confession. You will remember almost nothing you have read unless you make this critical, personal connection. What video memory began to roll? This is your chance to tell your story and make new ideas found in the book your own.3.      Reflection: What new questions pop up for you in response to what you have read? Keep a rough note sheet at hand as you read. Begin with questions like, “What would I like further information on?”, “Where do I not agree/strongly agree with the author?”, or “What bothers me/excites me about this content?” This section should be at least 250 words.4.      Application: How does information book influence how you are going to continue your own personal growth process? What actions or changes are you going to make in your life as a result of your learning? Your response here is a matter of obedience first, questions later. Be precise in summarizing your action steps (limit these comments to about 250 words).Please note: Your grade for the 4MAT Reviews depends on the quality and thoroughness of your response to each of these four headings. Please include each heading in the body of your paper.

Reply 8-1 JS

Reply to:Validity is defined in an experiment on how correct the results are of an experiment. Internal validity measures this from within the experiment; ensuring that the variables intended to be manipulated in the experiment are the only ones that were manipulated (Myers, & Hansen, 2012). External validity measures the extent to which the results of an experiment can be generalized to other populations outside the experiment. Ways to increase external validity include aggregation, multivariate designs, non-reactive measurements, field experiments, and natural observation. Aggregation is gathering data and averaging it in many ways (Myers, & Hansen, 2012). There are four types of aggregation: over subjects, over stimuli or situations, over trials or occasions, and over measures. The second way is to use multivariate designs; multivariate designs allow researchers to analyze multiple dependent variables at a time. This allows researchers to look at a combination of variables that will generalize better with populations outside the experiment.