Research studies should include a presentation of limitations or flaws or shortcoming of the study. This transparency allows the data to be interpreted correctly by the reader. However, this transparency also is valuable when proposing future studies. How can research limitations noted in published studies help researcher who are proposing new research studies?
In no less than 300 words,Imagine your 17-year old sister is about to start her first semester of college. She’s always been one to do it all, but can become easily stressed. What advice would you give her about ways to manage her stress, prevent stress, and cope with stress? Use specific theories and examples from your reading.Do you know people who are happy in one way but not in others? People who are high in life satisfaction, for example, but low in enjoying life or high in negative feelings? What should they do to increase their happiness across all three types of subjective well-being?Professor’s Lecture:https://open.spotify.com/episode/68AN2EE8iWf6LiiVHzlFZm?si=ITAWNNx9R_SMg9_Z9nomcQAdditional Resources:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcUAIpZrwog
Reply to:When it comes to scholarly journals, the terms peer-reviewed and refereed are interchangeable (Svoboda., 2022). The process of peer-review involves evaluating the ideas and agreements in a manuscript or other work by professionals working in the same field (Dunn & Halonen, 2020). Prior to publication, peer-reviewed/referred journals undergo an extremely critical and rigorous review process by other authors or specialty scholars. This review process ensures that the published content is first evaluated by the author’s peers and reflects a solid scholarship in their fields of study. Although peer-reviewed journals are always scholarly in nature, scholarly journals are not always peer-reviewed. Scholarly journals are research-focused, reporting results of original research and experimentation. They are heavily cited in the form of either footnotes or bibliographies, and written by, and addressed to, experts in a discipline. However, while peer-reviewed journals require strict “peer approval” for publishing, a scholarly journal that is not peer-reviewed only requires the approval of an editorial board (Svoboda., 2022).
Discussion 6.1: Abnormal BehaviorsDiscuss the following:How can we distinguish normal from abnormal behavior?Provide an example of abnormal behaviorProvide an example of normal behaviorDetermine what helped you to draw your conclusions regarding normal and abnormal behaviorsDo you think society and culture influence what is considered “Normal”?Explain your answers.Discussion Expectations:The minimum requirements for class discussions are to respond directly to the discussion prompt and to respond to at least two other posts, by other students or the instructor, by the end of the week. The discussion will close on the due date and will NOT be reopened for a late submission.Submit one main post responding directly to each part of the discussion prompt(s) by Thursday at 11:59 PM ET.This should be a substantive response (between 75 -150 words minimum) to the topic(s) in your own words, referencing (using APA format) what you have discovered in your required reading and other learning activities.You may use resources in addition to your textbook that support your post(s); however, you must mention the source(s) that you used in your post(s) using APA format in-text citations and reference lists. You can review APA formatting here:https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html
We are experienced and have access to ample research materials to guarantee quality A+ papers. Our Professional Writers can handle all subjects and deliver your papers on time.
For any questions, feedback, or comments, we have an ethical customer support team that is always waiting on the line for your inquiries.
Send us an E-mail: support@homeworkhandlers.com or Call us: +1 (518)-934-6741
