Comparing And Contrasting Followership And Servant Leadership In The Army EssayRegular English. All reading material attached. You need read and use. 250-500 words.5 paragraphs:1. Introduction2. About followership3. About servant leadership4. What similar5. Conclusion
Correctional psychology is a specialty area within the field of forensic psychology. Work in this setting can present specific challenges for evaluators and treatment providers. For example, a psychology professional working in a corrections facility might serve in dual roles with clients since he or she will likely provide them treatment and evaluate them for early release, risk for dangerousness, and to make recommendations for postrelease conditions. This assignment will introduce you to the specific challenges faced while writing a risk assessment report on a client you have treated during his or her incarceration and presenting the data to the parole board for the purpose of early release. The client has served two years of his four-year sentence for aggravated assault; during this period, he or she has made significant progress, while under your care, with impulse control, anger management, and the ability to challenge his or her criminal thought patterns. You have conducted your risk assessment and are now ready to write your report. Before you write your report, you will have to think about these important factors. Discuss them in your initial post.Tasks:Using online resources, respond to the following in a minimum of 200 words:The APA stance on dual relationships for psychology professionals in a correctional settingThe inherent conflict a psychology professional in a corrections setting might experience by being in the dual role of a treatment provider and an evaluatorThe individual client factors that might influence prerelease decisions made by psychology professionals in a corrections settingYour response should rely upon at least 2 sources from additional professional literature; the sources must be cited in APA format. Professional literature may include relevant textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, and websites created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions (.edu, .org, or .gov).
Take a practice IQ test (although not a valid or reliable measure of your intelligence) and read the sample report generated. Notice the adjusted score and where your score falls on the bell curve, the range and percentile score as well as the descriptor. Be sure to convert your scores to the Catell and Stanford Binet scales and notice if there are any differences. Use the link to the IQ Testing Lab provided: www.intelligencetest.com/index.htmPlease note that should the practice IQ test be not available simply use the sample IQ results for this assignment. Click on the “Check out the sample report” hyperlink!Prepare a brief overview (1 page in length; you may put this in a table or paragraph form) of your results, the conversions, and any differences that occur. Then respond in a 3-5 page, APA formatted paper to the following:In your opinion, was this a fair measurement of your intelligence? Why or why not? Support your answer with what you have learned about IQ tests.Discuss possible limitations with interpretation of your results within the context of what you have learned about psychometric test properties. How would you explain the reliability and validity of this test to someone who has not taken this course?Explain whether you felt this test minimized cultural bias, based on what you have learned so far.What ethical limitations might prevent the use of this type of test in major decision-making (e.g., entrance to college, identifying disabilities, etc.)?Analyze the possible influence of the format of the test (e.g., computer versus manipulatives or paper, timed versus untimed, standardization, multiple choice, etc.) on your results, based on what you have learned about various testing instruments so far.Submit your response to the Assignment by Wednesday, July 29, 2015.Assignment 2 Grading CriteriaMaximum PointsReported results of experiment, including statistical data and comparison with the other scales.28Examined whether the measurement of intelligence was a fair assessment and supported position with theory.28Explained whether the test minimized cultural bias.24Discussed possible limitations within the context of psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability).24Discussed ethical limitations.24Analyzed the influence of the format of the test on interpretation of results.28Style (4 points): Tone, audience, and word choiceOrganization (12 points): Introduction, transitions, and conclusionUsage and Mechanics (12 points): Grammar, spelling, and sentence structureAPA Elements (16 points): In text citations and references, paraphrasing, and appropriate use of quotations and other elements of style44Total:200
For this assignment, you will use the approved subject selection from Topic 1.Review Topic 3 outline feedback and consider the feedback from the Topic 5 rough draft in the development of your final draft.In 1,500-2,000 words, address the following:Provide a comprehensive explanation of the selected topic.Address the societal and/or cultural implications of the chosen topic.Discuss how the topic is related to one or more models of abnormality as discussed in Chapter 3 of the textbook.Use the school Library databases and include four to six scholarly sources from the school Library to support your claims. In addition to the scholarly resources from the library, you can include classroom materials, such as your textbook.
We are experienced and have access to ample research materials to guarantee quality A+ papers. Our Professional Writers can handle all subjects and deliver your papers on time.
For any questions, feedback, or comments, we have an ethical customer support team that is always waiting on the line for your inquiries.
Send us an E-mail: support@homeworkhandlers.com or Call us: +1 (518)-934-6741
