Behavioral and Social-Cognitive Approaches to Forming Habits

Create a 12- to 15-slide presentation analyzing the formation of habits using behavioral and social-cognitive approaches. Your presentation should cover the following areas:Analyze one of your habits. How did you develop this habit? Were there role models for this habit? Which people influenced the adoption of this habit?Why do you continue it? Has there been a time when you have attempted to break this habit?Use the behavioral personality theory to explain why you have this habit.Describe components of social-cognitive theory that explain why the habit formed.Develop a plan that applies operant conditioning to change this habit.Between the behavioral and social-cognitive theories, which one do you find best explains your personality?Include detailed speaker notes on each slide, along with title and reference slides.Provide 3 to 4 references.Format any citations in your presentation according to APA guidelines.

The Science of Psychology and Biological Perspectives.

IntroductionIf you were creating Frankenstein’s monster and you found that there were no “whole” brains that could be used, only parts of various brains, what 5 “parts” of the brain would you include? Be sure to give your explanation of “why” you chose these parts rather than others.Important guidelines to follow:Write at least a 300-word, well-developed and well-written response.  Use APA Formatting Guide to create accurate citations and documentation to give credit for any resource material used in your response.

prison privatization

Please use the APA 7th edition template attached above to format your article critique template.  Review additional support content in the announcements.  This will help you understand “how to critique” and the type of information that should be found in each section of your critique.For each article critique, you will select 2 peer-reviewed articles no older than 5-10 years. Using concepts presented in the weekly reading and study, you will write a paper critique that is at least 4 pages but no more than 7 pages of these articles in current APA format.Article Critique 3Locate 2 peer-reviewed articles no older than 5-10 years that discuss prison privatization. One article must present arguments advocating for American prison privatization and the second article must present arguments against American prison privatization. Provide a critique of each author’s position on the privatization of prisons. from a Christian worldview, critique the current state of private prisons and present a clear argument on how to fix the system.**follow the template thats attachand use the peer reviewed articles that is attached

Short Essay 1000 words

The goal of this assignment is to demonstrate that you can use aesthetic principles in your own reasoning, and to look at an object in a new, perhaps more open-minded, way. Ideally you should learn something about what you value, and gain some insight into how others might perceive the world a bit differently.You must submit your responses to the assignment below in an essay format.Your essay should be a minimum of 1000 words, not including your “Works Cited” section at the end of your essay.Submit your responses in the text box provided when you click on “submit assignment.”Do not attach any files to your submission. To include a picture of your object of analysis, use the “Image” tool available in the text submission box (signified by a “tree” in a box), or upload your picture to a website and include the URL in your essay.Your essay will be automatically checked through the “Turn It In” system, so make sure that you are responsibly citing your sources, including quotation marks around quoted material, and using your own words for any summarizing or paraphrasing.ASSIGNMENT:First, find an object THAT YOU HAVE PHYSICALLY ENCOUNTERED (do not use things from online) that you do not normally consider art, or even aesthetically valuable. You may have encountered this item in a normal daily setting, or in a museum, art store, or other venue.Examine the object for a while, and then write out a brief description of the object (if necessary, take a picture of the object and include that with your assignment, pasting the picture into the submission text box.).Second, indicate (in approximately one or two paragraphs) why you normally would not consider the object art or aesthetically valuable. You should include what your original definition of art is (what do you normally consider art, and why), and you should clearly explain why this object does not meet your preconceived notions about art.Next, try to examine the object in a new way, using the principles of aesthetic reasoning (either functionalist or formalist, but not both). Give an argument, which integrates facts about the object and the aesthetic principles, for why someone could consider the object art or aesthetically valuable. The aesthetic principles you use must be true of the object. You must choose to use either functionalist principles or formalism, but NOT BOTH since functionalism and formalism are incompatible.  YOU CANNOT USE, OR EVEN MENTION, THE LAST PRINCIPLE ABOUT “NO ARGUMENT CAN BE GIVEN TO ESTABLISH AESTHETIC VALUE” (since the assignment REQUIRES YOU TO PROVIDE AN ARGUMENT, this last principle is not compatible with the assignment).The more reasoning and depth to your analysis, the better.  You should submit an essay of 1000 to 2000 words in order to ensure you have developed your ideas adequately. Don’t forget to include your in-text citations and a Works cited section at the end of your essay.