Using the information in the background readings as well as some research in peer-reviewed sources of your own, which clearly summarizes each of the items below. Include thorough speaker’s notes to further expand upon and explain your points. Use in-text citations on your slides, as well as a reference slide at the end of the presentation.1.  Summarize the three types of assessment to be completed during utilization review. What is involved in each process and who completes this work? What is the health care manager’s specific role in the review?2.  Provide an example of how each of the three types of assessment are performed in the current health care settings. In your three examples, specifically explain how quality was/was not preserved, and how cost was/was not controlled.3.  Describe the role of communication between all stakeholders involved in utilization review. Who are each of the stakeholders, and how should this communication take place? How are decisions best made and communicated, when the review involves competing interests among stakeholders (e.g., for off-label drug uses for terminal patients, handling bed shortages, etc.).View:Baker, J. (2018). Improving quality of care through utilization management [Video file]. Retrieved fromhttps://youtu.be/g-T-YeP53nYCarasso, S. (2017). Is that test necessary? The key to laboratory utilization management.The Journal of Medical Practice Management: MPM, 33(3), 160-164. Retrieved from theTrident Online Library.Desai, S., Gruber, P. F., Eiting, E., Seabury, S. A., Mack, W. J., Voyageur, C., . . . Terp, S. (2017). The effect of utilization review on emergency department operations. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 70(5), 623-631.e1. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.El-Othmani, M. M., Sayeed, Z., Ramsey, J. A., Abaab, L., Little, B. E., & Saleh, K. J. (2019).The joint utilization management program: Implementation of a bundle payment model andcomparison between year 1 and 2 results. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 34(11), 2532-2537.Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.Parast, M. M., & Golmohammadi, D. (2019). Quality management in healthcareorganizations: Empirical evidence from the Baldrige data. International Journal of ProductionEconomics, 216, 133-144. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.Suklar, S. (2018). Quality assurance system at primary level of healthcare. Izzivi Prihodnosti, 3(1), 21-53. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.Wakefield, E., Keller, H., Mianzo, H., Nagaraj, C. B., Tawde, S., & Ulm, E. (2018). Reductionof health care costs and improved appropriateness of incoming test orders: The impact ofgenetic counselor review in an academic genetic testing laboratory. Journal of GeneticCounseling, 27(5), 1067-1073. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.

Philosophical Differences Between Qualitative and Quantitative Paradigms and ApproachesPrior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapter 1 in the Frost e-book, Qualitative Research Methods in Psychology, and the required journal articles for this week. Also review last week’sPSY635 Week Two Discussion Scenario (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. In that scenario, the three instructors realized there are limits to the insights they can gain through anonymous counting of discussion posts. The instructors would like to answer two additional research questions: (a) How do their students actually feel about the intervention? and (b) How do students view the influence of the intervention on their learning inside and outside of the classroom (if applicable)?In your initial post, compare the characteristics of appropriate research designs and recommend a qualitative research design that would facilitate answering the instructors’ additional questions. Explain the philosophical paradigm underlying the recommended approach. Evaluate the required articles for this week and describe the  assumptions the instructors might have to set aside as they enter into a qualitative research study. Be sure to identify any ethical issues that may apply to the research. Review the characteristics of the quantitative approach you described in the Week Two discussion. Explain the ways in which the quantitative approach and paradigm differs from the qualitative approach and paradigm you have recommended here.