Assignment: Journal: Supervising Others

For this Assignment, review the Petrakis case study in this week’s video and note how supervisory and leadership skills are portrayed.Assignment (4–5 paragraphs)Complete the following Journal entry:Identify attributes of leadership styles and approaches that facilitate quality supervision.Evaluate the supervisory and leadership skills demonstrated in the Petrakis case study by identifying which supervisory and leadership skills the supervisor demonstrated.Explain whether the supervisor in the video demonstrated quality supervision, and why. Provide specific examples to support your evaluation.Notes:Please make sure the posted assignment is Zero Percent Plagiarism.Running heads are not to be on the paper.Make sure paper is in APA 7 formatting.Make sure paragraphs are indented and aligned to the left.Please provide a reference page and references throughout the paper.Please use the following reference for this assignment:ReferenceWalden University, LLC. (Producer). (2014d). Sessions: Petrakis (Episode 4 of 42) [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu

DISCUSSION POST 2

“Correlation does not equal causation” and yet much of what you read in the popular media suggest that people have conveniently forgotten this fact.  For this weeks discussion post, please think about things your have read or heard.  Find one item you located where someone has reported a correlation and either outright declared a causation or implied causation in their discussion of the research findings. If you have trouble thinking of ideas, consider either the alt right or alt left media.  In fact, just about anything reported as news on Facebook will probably misuse some type of correlation.  For that final point in the scoring make sur eyou include the weblink to the source.  You don’t need a source in your responses to peers.Then, state what you found (with a reference for it so others can locate it) and then how a correlation was twisted into a causation.  What other explanation would you give for it?In your response to peers, see if you can find another alternate explanation than the one the original author (not your peer) came up with.  In other words, your peer will come up with an explanation and can you come up with another?  You don’t need to include a source for your responses.

Building a case: Using empirical findings to reconceptualize patient-centeredness for primary care

In other words, rather than developing your position regarding others’ arguments and claims in the literature (as with ex 1 and 2), you are being asked to specifically draw on the empirical findings or results of research studies as the evidence to support your position.

WK 8 DQ 2

Compare causes and treatments of various eating disorders. Identify the treatment you believe to be most effective and defend your position with current research.