Initial Assessment

/in /by

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, please read Chapters 2, 6, and 7 in DSM-5 Made Easy: The Clinician’s Guide to Diagnosis. Additionally, please watch the video Beer Is Cheaper than Therapy: Fort Hood’s PTSD Problem . (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.For this discussion, the patient for whom you wrote your transcript in the Week One Initial Call discussion has come to your office for a 15-minute initial assessment. As part of the intake process, you have asked the patient to fill out a biographical form that contains the same information included in the case study. Based on this information, propose three questions you would ask the patient to determine a diagnosis and treatment plan.Provide a transcript of this brief initial session including your three questions and the answers you would expect the prospective patient to give. Beneath the transcript, provide a rationale for each of the three questions you proposed. Include the case study title you chose for your Week One Initial Call discussionpost.PLEASE CHECK OUT LINK THIS DIS SHOULD BE BASED ON THE FRED CASE.https://platform.virdocs.com/r/s/0/doc/230891/sp/9662822/mi/31292016/search?cfi=%2F4%2F2%2C%2F4%2F1%3A0%2C%2F80%2F1%3A470&q=fred%20&sidebar=true

Reply 2-1 RK

/in /by

Reply to:The peer review process is one in which members and experts of the same field get together to review the findings, procedures, arguments, and data within a particular experiment (Dunn & Halonen, 2020). Being part of the same field and familiar with the proper techniques, theories, and ethical considerations, these experts are able to comb through the article in order to determine if the research utilized proper techniques, avoided potential confounds, treated subjects ethically, and came to proper and unbiased conclusions. This process is very important as it can stop a false or inadequate article from being published in a scholarly journal. By doing so, the peer review process can ensure that other articles, or studies, are not founded on the basis of unsupported findings (Myers & Hansen, 2012).