MGT 441 Training and Development

Extending Learning with the 6D’sHow can the 6Ds you have learned about in the book help evaluate a learning organization?Read Case in Point 1.2: Extending Learning at Emerson in your text on page 21-22. Based on Emerson’s account please find an example of an organization that is not a learning organization. Compare and contrast the key characteristics of learning organizations at Emerson with your example.  How does your example fail to meet the characteristics of a learning organization?The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:· Write between 1,250 – 1,750 words (approximately 3 – 5 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style, see the example below.· Use font size 12 and 1” margins.· Include cover page and reference page.· At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.· No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.· Use at least three references from outside the course material, one reference must be from EBSCOhost. Textbook, lectures, and other materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the three reference requirement.· Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA style.References must come from sources such as, scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, CNN, online newspapers such as, The Wall Street Journal, government websites, etc. Sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. are not acceptable for academic writing.A detailed explanation of how to cite a source using APA can be found here (link).Download an example here.Grading Criteria AssignmentsMaximum PointsMeets or exceeds established   assignment criteria40Demonstrates an understanding   of lesson concepts20Clearly presents   well-reasoned ideas and concepts30Uses proper mechanics,   punctuation, sentence structure, and spelling10Total100–Below is the case in Point 1.2 Extending Learning at EmersonWhen Terrence Donahue accepted the leadership of the Charles F. Knight Learning Center at Emerson, he knew he had big shoes to fill. The former director had been highly respected and greatly admired. The learning organization he hadbuilt—which is responsible for leadership training for Emerson worldwide—enjoyed strong support from management and an excellent reputation throughout the company. They embraced the importance of learning transfer. How could Terrence and his team build on those strengths and take learning to an even higher level of excellence?They decided to use the 6Ds to strengthen their ties to the business, drive learning transfer, and ensure that training delivered business impact. They started spreading the idea of a new finish line; that a leadership development experience isn’t finished until leaders have transferred and applied their new skills and knowledge. The learning Center staff kept repeating the message about business outcomes and began including transfer and achievement phases in program plans and descriptions.And themessagebegan to stick. “The concept of the new finish line for learning has struck a resonant chord here and across our enterprise,” Terrence told us, “A global manufacturing company like Emerson really understands the concept of manufacturing scrap, so the concept of learning scrap has hit some people like a thunderbolt.”For example, one of the business unit presidents recorded a video for all supervisors in his company, outlining his expectations of them to drive learning transfer and provide performance support and how he intended to hold them accountable for outcomes. In India, front-line supervisors attending Leading at Emerson 2.0 are so excited about the implementation phase that they are calling their facilitators to share their successes.In the company’s 2015 Professional Development Learning Guide, the senior vice president for human resources, Michael Rohret, wrote. “We are making a significant investment in your future… don’t become a victim of learning scrap. Attending a workshop and not applying what you learned is a wasted investment. To make sure your learning investments bring a return, we introduced a new finish line for learning.”The chief financial officer, Frank Dellaquila, embraced the concept immediately, so much so that he agreed to record a video “call to action,” for the company’s flagship program, Leading at Emerson. The video is shown about 90 minutes before the end of the workshop phase of the program. In it, the CFO congratulates participants and explains how the workshop is an investment Emerson has made in a foundation for their careers. He goes on the emphasize that “there is more work to do,” if that investment is to pay dividends. “The value of the training will be measured by what you do with that foundation; that is, what you put to work when you are back to work. The next twelve weeks are actually the most important part of the process.” Coming fro the CFO of a $25 billion global corporation, it’s a clear and unambiguous message that learning needs to be converted into action.“The new finish line and all the components around it continue to receive very strongpositive support from senior executives and front-line managers alike,” Terrence said. “It is a delightful situation for us to be in.”

Informative Speech Evaluation

Submit a one-page evaluation of your informative speech in a Word (.docx) document. Consider the following areas.Balance positive comments with areas of opportunity.Use examples to support your comments.Provide both honest and encouraging feedback aimed at your own awareness and improvement.

Tuition Assistance at Garden Gate – Case Study

Case StudyTuition Assistance at Garden GateDuring the past 14 years, Garden Gate Inc. has grown from a small local garden supply company into a diversified corporation with stores in 36 states and net sales of almost $1.4 billion. The company currently employs 26,500 people and has been expanding at a 12 percent annual rate. Garden Gate expects to continue this pace of growth for at least five more years. The company has a talent philosophy of treating its employees as investors and spends heavily on their training and development. The firm also has a generous tuition-aid program that allows qualified employees to pursue bachelors and master’s degrees part time if the degree they are pursuing is consistent with their career plans established in conjunction with their supervisors.Last year the company spent $350,000 on tuition aid and recently decided to more closely evaluate the program’s effectiveness. The evaluation was prompted by the recent departure of Jill Ises, who stated that her reason for leaving was that she had not been promoted in the year since she had received her MBA degree. Her career plan had been to become a senior accountant in one of the company’s regional offices, and she received high performance appraisal evaluations while earning good grades in the accounting program. Five regional accounting manager positions (the job in between Jill’s current job and her desired senior accountant position) had been filled in the past year, and Jill had not been contacted about any of them. Further investigation identified 17 other tuition-aid beneficiaries who had left in the past year. Like Ises, these people said that their lack of being promoted after earning their degrees was the primary reason for their leaving. The following table describes the 18 employees who received tuition aid but left the company because they had not been promoted.*****SEE ATTAHED FILE FOR TABLE****The company’s review of its internal hiring policy identified the following three primary sources for identifying internal talent, and some problems with them:1.      Supervisors are asked to nominate employees they feel are qualified for openings in the company, but there are often dozens of open positions, and many supervisors do not regularly review the internal job postings.2.      The firm’s HR professionals try to match open positions with employees who fit the criteria for them by looking at the company’s skills inventory database. Unfortunately, the information in the database is often outdated or incomplete.3.      The departments that have openings recommend employees they feel are promotable.4.      Garden Gate’s management is concerned that it is not realizing a sufficient return on its considerable investment in its tuition-aid program, and is considering discontinuing the program.Questions1.      Describe the key problems with the tuition-aid program.2.      Does the information in the table indicate any special problems or issues? What do you suggest Garden Gate do about them? (**SEE ATTACHED FILE FOR TABLE**)3.      Should Garden Gate discontinue its tuition-aid program?4.      Create a plan to improve the retention of tuition-aid recipients.***All case studies MUST be in paper form typed in Times New Roman, double spaced, 1 inch margin all around and be at least 1 page in length*****