submit a 2000 words paper on the topic Casestudy.

/in /by

Hi, need to submit a 2000 words paper on the topic Casestudy. The English Law of contract is clear on the fact that any agreement that is enforceable in a court of law is considered a contract. Offer and acceptance are some of the most important features of a contract (Collins, 2003). In this particular case, one party makes an offer for a certain arrangement, and the other party accepts the terms of the arrangement. Neither offer nor acceptance has to be made through writing or through making oral statements. This type of contract is referred to as an implied contract in which certain terms are not expressed or explained in words (National Archives, 2010). This seems to be the kind of agreement that Eddie had with Adele. Once he ordered for his piglets, Adele expected him to accept and pay for the services rendered. Adele has every right to demand for compensation from Eddie, who had made it clear in his communication that he would get the piglets for Eddie. In the Smith v. Hughes 1871 LR 6 QB 597 case, one cannot go against a contract at will (Young, 2010). Before Eddie met his second supplier, he had intended to honour his agreement with Adele because it was a business agreement. However, just because he found a cheap alternative, he disregarded his earlier agreement with Adele.

1.    Describe the fundamental tenets of social disorganization theory, starting from its origins with Shaw and McKay and continuing through the more recent extensions such as the concept of collective efficacy by Sampson’s and others. Include a discussion of the empirical research that has tested the theory and its extensions.

/in /by

You must answer two of the following questions.  The content of the questions may overlap somewhat, but your answers should not have much overlap with each other. Your completed exam must be submitted on Canvas by 11:59 PM ET on Sunday, February 28th.  Though length will vary depending on your style of writing, you must write at least 4 double-spaced pages for each question.  Be sure to address every aspect of the question.

Your answers must be submitted as a single document in Microsoft Word or pdf format.  The answers must adhere to the following guidelines:

1.    Describe the fundamental tenets of social disorganization theory, starting from its origins with Shaw and McKay and continuing through the more recent extensions such as the concept of collective efficacy by Sampson’s and others. Include a discussion of the empirical research that has tested the theory and its extensions.

2.    Compare and contrast the social disorganization perspective (e.g. Shaw & McKay and Sampson) with the differential organization perspective (e.g. Anderson’s “code of the street”).  How are the two perspectives compatible, and how are they incompatible?  Be sure to include a discussion of empirical research for each perspective. Given that they are considerably different in many ways, how do you think it is possible that empirical evidence has found support for both?

3.    Robert Sampson’s book, Great American City, makes the case that life is decisively shaped by where you live. Each chapter in the book supports this argument in a different way, including (but not limited to) thorough discussions of the theory of collective efficacy, the influence of disorder, and mobility experiments. Based on the arguments and research evidence in this book, describe two specific programs or policies that could be implemented by cities or neighborhoods to reduce levels of crime in neighborhoods.  For each of the two programs you propose, you must describe the program and explain why you would expect it to be successful in reducing crime based on the arguments made in the book. You cannot simply give your own opinion about what would reduce neighborhood crime levels. Each program must be supported by specific arguments made in the book.

  • Provide in-text citations for any information you draw from the readings (e.g. Recent research has found that…. (Kubrin and Wo 2016)).
  • Use a 12pt font such as Arial or Times New Roman, double-spaced
  • Use margins no larger than 1”.
  • At the beginning of each answer, clearly indicate which question number you are answering, but do not type the actual question in your document.
  • Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and formatting will be part of your grade.
  • A title sheet is not required.
  • Provide in-text citations for any information you draw from the readings (e.g. Recent research has found that…. (Kubrin and Wo 2016)).
  • You do not need a references/works cited page if all of your citations come from the course readings. If you draw on anything outside the course–which is absolutely not necessary–you should provide a separate references page at the very end of your submission. Any recognized format is fine (e.g. APA, MLA, Chicago style, etc). This reference page does not count toward your page count.
  • Avoid including direct quotes from the readings. Instead, put things into your own words and then provide a citation at the end of the sentence. You only need to include page numbers in your citation if you are citing a direct quote. The best submissions will have no direct quotes.

we also used Sampson, Robert J. 2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226055688. I can give the Chegg login if needed.

writing homework on Corporate Social Responsibility Conflict With the Interests of Shareholders.

/in /by

Need help with my writing homework on Corporate Social Responsibility Conflict With the Interests of Shareholders. Write a 1750 word paper answering; The shareholders invest within the reigns of a business so that they could reap rich dividends from it as well as bolster the manner under which the organization tries to achieve its short term objectives and long term goals. This is indeed a symbiotic relationship because the shareholders feel that their linkage with the organization would benefit both of them and hence the development would instil a sense of confidence amongst the other shareholders to invest as well. (Dobson, 1991) The shareholders feel that it is also in their interest to go with the tide and invest heavily within the domains of the business so that their investments could extract the best possible returns and thus the exponential increases are there for the taking. However, these investments are more reliant on the market conditions and might just fluctuate in the event of a natural calamity or catastrophe to hit the region, country or even the industry. The shareholders need to be ready for the losses that might be incurred on their part and consequently, their constant vigilance in this regard pay huge dividends. The shareholders are always on the lookout for better returns and thus they do not stick within the reigns of a singular organization. They will either shift back and forth or keep switching until they get the best returns on their investments.

Considering a scenario where an organization undergoes CSR in order to boost its falling market reputation, the shareholders might just raise concerns since they do not like to be a part of the organization’s social awareness tenets and hence they believe that their money should not be wasted. However, this is the negative philosophy put forward by the conventional mindset of the shareholders. The modern-day philosophy has changed for the better.

creating a thesis and an outline on Classical music concert review. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.

/in /by

I need help creating a thesis and an outline on Classical music concert review. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. Review of a ical Music Concert: For quite some time, there has been news about the Philadelphia Orchestra due to the bankruptcy filing resolution of the board of the very band. Among the primary American orchestra, the Philadelphians have been the first to proclaim bankruptcy. By making this decision, the band has generated an impulse of doom that echoes in the whole industry of classical music in America. The long cultivated controversy was silenced as the Philadelphia Orchestra staged a show on the Tuesday night in Carnegie Hall with Charles Dutoit, being the chief conductor. Igor Stravinsky displayed a unique and diverse work program that included the opera-operated Oedipus Rex, and the sunny ballet score Apollo. As a consequence, the dark and light contrasted with each other meaningfully which revealed two entirely different aspects of the neo-classical era of Stravinsky. Since the very early days of this band in which, Leopold Stokowski used to stand over the podium, the dark and luscious string melody has been the fundamental identity of the Philadelphia Orchestra. The very spellbinding effects of sound were quite noticeable in the Apollo performance, which is a work essentially and solely meant for strings. In every section of the Apollo, the main players sing solos. From the neo-classical elegance work, the Rite of Spring’s tribal thunder, Apollo tends to identify a unique Stravinsky. On the other hand, the heavy chords which jarred and marked the Oedipus Rex’s initial bars were entirely opposite in the effect they cast. In the Oedipus, the all-male Lain chorus had been beautifully combined with the massive rough percussion and brass blocks. This reminded the audience of the masks and marble of the Greek tragedy. An omniscient narrative put forth an explanation for every event that made part of the Oedipus’ downfall even before the event actually happened. No actions of the Sophocles’ Latin setting whatsoever were featured onstage. One could call it the best opera to be done in the setting of a concert without any doubt. Confidence was poured into the very first act of the work of Tenor Paul Groves. The same confidence magically transformed into panic as time went by. The roles of Messenger and Creon were doubled by Baritone Robert Gierlach. Although his voice was very sweet and fine, he could not manage to make it heard at the full blast of orchestra. The entry of Petra Lang on the stage in the form of Jocasta was quite interesting and memorable for the audience, though her tone sounded quite rough and annoying in the final scenes of hers with Oedipus. However, one got to think that the panic she expressed might have raised from her curiosity to know her husband. The sound blocks were manipulated with an Athenian crew’s ease by Mr. Dutroit despite the fact that the orchestra often went too heavy and made the soloists overwhelmed. The band played orchestra with extreme accuracy and precision. The trombone tones were quite rich and audible. The Philadelphia Singers Chorale comprised men who acted so beautifully as to cast a very strong image of the citizens of Thebes, which was caught in the plague. They all looked too terrified upon their king’s destiny. David Honey’s narration was full of sympathy and strength. It was, undoubtedly, one of the best concerts I have ever attended so far. The Philadelphia Orchestra band’s performance was spell-binding. The performers had cast a magic on the audience with their excellent showmanship. Among the audience were people of all ages ranging from infants to sexagenarians. I could not see any difference in the emotional excitement and involvement of a seventy year old man on my left and a five year old girl on my right. In the midst of the flashing lights, the musicians commenced a special jive. Their gestures were made more prominent by the spotlight in which the musicians stood. I was amazed to see Charles Dutoit wearing a very sophisticated look. I had never seen him this involved and immersed in his work ever before this concert. His boots were quite visible in the Tweet. They would often interact with one another off the mike. Nonetheless, this never had any indecent impact on their companionship and performance, both individualistic and collective. Because of the controversy surrounding the Philadelphia Orchestra in these days, I did not expect the band to be in good shape! I was very skeptical about whether or not I should be attending the concert. However, I finally made it to the concert and enjoyed it too much to repent having gone there.