Your assignment is to prepare and submit a paper on planning and visualization (civil engineering ). developing a project using As Late as Possible (ALAP) method will make all the tasks critical tasks and hence include all tasks in the project’s critical path. In essence, this method implies that all tasks will be sent to start at a date that will not affect the dependent task but will also not leave any room for delays.

For every task, the late start date is the last date the project is expected to be ready, less the duration the task is expected to complete in order to be ready. Resource leveling often involves consideration of predecessors and successors as well as a number of other constraints. Consequently, when unskilled resources are insufficient to allow start of task at its LST, a delay beyond LST may be warranted. This ensures that the existing resources are used within the task without the need for either over-allocation, or extra expenditure on unskilled labor. In essence, these delays will lead to outright extension of the project’s duration. However, where the last start date is calculated as the latest possible date for the task’s start where all its successors and predecessors are also started and ended of their last start and end dates, the project end date may remain unaltered. However, for fixed task duration, where a successor task experiences delay, the delay is factored into a date in LST.

Task scheduling involves resource leveling process which is helpful in resolution of the problem of resource over-allocation by delaying tasks until the assigned resources becomes available to work on it. In the absence of resource leveling, plan schedule is accomplished using information such as task plan dates, as well as constraints and dependencies of individual task items. Resource leveling introduces the question of resource availability in calculation of time. Organization benefits from avoidance of conflicts and untimely delivery. Consequently, resource leveling is a very important process.

I will pay for the following article Kennaway and Thompson. The work is to be 36 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. Traditional theories of private property ownership involve the recognition of absolute possession to the exclusion of all others. However, other theories of private property ownership recognize that there are limits to the exclusivity of private property ownership. Both the exclusivity and limits to that exclusivity are captured by Protocol 1 and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 which is now a part of law in England and Wales pursuant to the Human Rights Act 1998. The limits to exclusivity in private property ownership are necessitated by a number of competing rights: the public interest in encouraging productive activities, the rights of others and the right to the reasonable use and enjoyment of one’s property. Thus from an economic perspective private property ownership necessarily involves trade-offs and a balancing of rights.

The tort of nuisance is demonstrative of the economic approach to balancing the competing interest in private property ownership. Much of the law relative to the limits of exclusivity in private property ownership under the tort of nuisance was established under the common law and typically refers to a number of activities. The rule in Rylands v Fletcher in was established to deal with a single act of nuisance giving rise to interference in the use and enjoyment of one’s land. The rule of law in Rylands establishes liability where activities conducted by one owner/occupier causes damages to the use or enjoyment of property owned or occupied by another.