Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on analytical paper :the legal perspective Paper must be at least 500 words. Please, no plagiarized work! Word count – 547 words In the film “Inside Job” written, directed and produced by Charles Ferguson, he tries to expose how financial services in the United States became unrecognisably corrupted in the space of 30 years. The unregulated acts of conglomerate investment banks caused the credit crunch crises of 2008 and most certainly your local community bank was not to blame. The film focuses on quite intentional frauds perpetrated by government employees, politicians or even academics.

There are various unlawful, financial practices adopted and described in the film and the crucial question Ferguson poses is why no one is prosecuted or send to jail.

One such unlawful practice executed is by predatory mortgage lenders. During the housing boom, they went after middle class workers, who given the circumstances will not qualify for a mortgage. However, they we approved and received a 100% mortgage with considerably low interest rates.

When the crises hit the home-owners and they couldnt keep up with the impossibly high repayments, they now seek the protection of the law and filing lawsuits against the borrowers. Those who can afford a lawyer can either delay the proceeding of getting their home foreclosed or try and negotiate with the bank whether the loan can be modified to a more appropriate terms. Those who are not able to afford an individual lawyer can join a group lawsuit. Some of the borrowers who might have lost their homes already are seeking damage compensation. A common predatory lending practice describes also in the film is that of so called Balloon Loans. This type of loan provides the borrower with unrealistically small monthly repayments, which cover the interest on the mortgage. The principal of the loan is not factored into the repayments. So in order for the borrower to finish the loan he needs to pay a lump sum of several thousands . In most of the cases this is not possible and foreclose of the property will take place.

In the rule of law it is the lenders duty to establish and determine that the borrower can re-pay the mortgage based on his credit history, current income and other assets. It was a common practice for the lenders to ignore or disregard some of these factors in order to get the deal finalized. What are your rights before the court of law if you had fallen victim to a predatory lender? According to the Truth in Lending Act, you need to be provided with notice of rescission. This documents allows the borrower to turn the loan down within three days. If you did not receive the notice of Rescission, the contract is not legally binding. Hence, if you wish you can walk away from the predatory loan and not oblige to the lenders repayments. Also you will be able to collect damages in court about that.

If the mortgage documents clearly stipulate that your lender violated the Truth in Lending Act you are also able to file a lawsuit on the legal grounds of a borrower. You might be able to claim monetary damages and in some instances get twice the amount of the agreed mortgage that the lender levied against you. Although the Truth in Lending Act is a federal law, the states law may also apply when preparing a civil suit.

Write 6 pages thesis on the topic the issues of privacy and surveillance about the internet. &nbsp.&nbsp. &nbsp.&nbsp.Although the N.S.A. claims its online surveillance as simple intelligence work against terrorism and other crimes, the very nature of digital technology today proves otherwise. On the Internet, profiling has become comfortable not only because of the technology but also because the required information to profile people is free and readily accessible on online social networking sites. “The digital technologies that have revolutionized our daily lives have also created minutely detailed records of those lives” (Richards 1934). These profiles can be used for whatever purpose most useful and most profitable to those who have them (Buchholz and Rosenthal 34). In the end, profiling makes us vulnerable to anything, whether good or bad. &nbsp.

Breaching people’s privacy is not a new thing. Today’s difference is the sophistication and subtleness of violating one’s privacy than even the law meant to protect an individual’s privacy is rendered ineffective. Hence, it is more chilling. The resurgence of our assertion for privacy, specifically Internet privacy, does not mean we condone terrorism. Instead, we wanted to draw a clear line between privacy and security interest, as we see how easily online surveillance can be abused not only for cybercrimes but much more frightening for witch-hunting. Internet privacy is not a trivial matter but has become more necessary and urgent today as global insecurity reigns. it has become more compelling as the intrusive nature of the Internet (Garfinkel 260) has blurred the line between privacy and security and in defining what is public information and what is private information.

Internet Privacy

&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp.&nbsp. Since its inception, the Internet has become the center of all human communications, whether personal, business-related, social, or political. Every time we communicate via the Internet, we store bits and pieces of information about ourselves and other people that can be easily retrieved and accessed, not by us, because we rarely retrieve information about us.