Compose a 250 words assignment on origin of the word strategy.

Compose a 250 words assignment on origin of the word strategy. Needs to be plagiarism free! The word strategy has been used differently in different contexts to bring out different meaning. Strategy can be defined as a plan put in place to achieve its goals and objectives (Thoughtful posterous). however, other people use the word strategy to mean mitigation, prediction and preferred ways of attaining goals and objectives. In the business context, it can be used to describe the aims of a business and its ways of succeeding in a market against its competitors. A business should, therefore, have separate and attractive competitive strategies that cope with the challenging environment and they should meet the needs of customers.

What it should do to be better than its competitors, what resources should it use, what are the main challenges that the business will face in the market and what are the expectations of those around them (Riley)? In conclusion, a strategy is the exact implementation of the plan and not the preventive measures or judgments of the plan and should be followed strictly in every business.

Complete 6 pages APA formatted article: The Rise of Imperial Rome.

Complete 6 pages APA formatted article: The Rise of Imperial Rome. Afterwards, more provinces became romanized and integrated they themselves played an increasing role in the empire governing. The people in the new provinces gradually started getting roman citizenship and later the provinces came to form significant minorities in the Rome senate (Jill, 286). However, the citizenships extended always tend to exclude women and slaves. The same time the provinces were be included in the senate, the economic centre of the empire began to move towards the provinces within the Roman Empire from Italy. Trade started expanding and extending to other markets such as Italy and beyond. The trading that went on within the provinces of trading everyday items between those in the empire created a sense of communion. However, a clear defined line between the east and west was still laid down. In the east Greek was spoken as an official language while in the west Latin was the official language at this time. However, through the years Latin remained to be a marker of Romanness. The trading opportunities for Rome Empire were diverse and plentiful. Roman glassware and pottery were traded east. Gold and silver coins were the main form of payment, draining 100 million sesterces every year from the empire. Among the trade that took place in Rome was also slave trade (history.com/topics/ancient-rome). During Augustus reign as many as 35 percent of Italian people were slaves. Therefore Rome was marked as one of the five slave societies in history. Slaves in Rome Empire constituted at least a fifth of the people in the population and played a major role in the economy. History of the rise of imperial Rome Initially, Rome was governed as a republic before it becoming an empire. It had three major elements. the central government, military and provincial government. In the 3rd century BC, Rome had begun taking over provinces. During this time, Sulla and Caesar governed Rome and they had both achieved the rank of absolute ruler, however, their reign was short lived, owing to the crisis that the empire underwent in the 3rd century, which threatened its existence. Fortunately, the situation was stabilized and reunited. This was four centuries before it became the greatest empire. Furthermore, the provinces were administered by former praetors and consuls. The consuls and praetors were elected to one year term and held right of command. Consequently, Rome transitioned from republic to imperial autocracy due to the amassing of misappropriates military power and wealth by some men through their provincial commands and this was a lead factor for the transition. After the transition from a republic to an empire the first empire was Augustus. The first empire Augustus obtained his role as a supreme ruler after defeating Antony and Cleopatra in 31 BC, at the battle of Actium. The emperor was the overall authority in decision and policy making and his practical source of power and authority was the military. Augustus rejected titles associated with monarchy and otherwise referred to him as princeps which meant the leading citizen. Moreover, in his era, Augustus order to the chaos that almost took 20 years of civil war was finally brought to an end (Duncan, 24). Areas that had been added to the Roman republic needed to be reconstructed as provinces to the empire, therefore Augustus reorganised the provinces such as Asia Minor and Syria, and then held the Parthian empire in check using cunning diplomacy.

 

prepare and submit a term paper on Ethics in the media. Your paper should be a minimum of 1250 words in length.

You will prepare and submit a term paper on Ethics in the media. Your paper should be a minimum of 1250 words in length. They are required to make sure the independence of the information and fairness are not tainted in the process of journalism. They are required to make sure no commercial or any other considerations never undermine the accuracy of the information’s independence and fairness. The journalists are required to use fair, accountable and straightforward means to acquire information. They are never to exploit a person’s susceptibility or unawareness of mass media practice. Rapid environmental change in the media scene has altered the traditional aspect of journalism into the trending dimensions of the new environment specification. The social media and the internet are some of the new dimensions of news outlets as they are easily accessed and the rate at which the society is viewing the traditional media as incompetent makes the sudden change in the media. Today’s viewers anticipate to be able to select what they read, and most trust they had better be able to add content and sentiments, too. This shift occasionally called the social media revolution, is not the demise of journalism, as a society always knew it. It is the birth of autonomous society that accentuates some of the Broadcasting’s key factors like limpidity, morality while giving expression to the individual with none. Technology is one of the change initiators that have been on the forefront where it has produced several platforms for the masses to express their view. The information is filtered and comes with many different ethical breaches.

the united kingdom supreme court: a physical transparency of independence

I need some assistance with these assignment. the united kingdom supreme court: a physical transparency of independence Thank you in advance for the help! The Supreme Court is the highest court in the whole United Kingdom. It is the final arbiters of all types of cases and is the final court of appeal for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. It is also the final arbiter for civil cases in Scotland. Through Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (CRA 2005) the role of Lord Chancellor was modified to give more strength and independence to the Judiciary. The separation of the senior judges from the House of Lords was made to introduce a clear-cut separation of the judiciary from the parliament. The purpose was to maintain impartiality, as the Law Lords were somehow, less understood by the public to be a separate entity from the House of Lords. The attempt to create a separate judiciary is to give more credibility to the judgments and decisions made without political influence. But the separation of judicial functions of the House of Lords with a new Court is rather a change in form than in substance, as the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom lacks the power of judicial review to annul acts of the legislature that are incompatible with the Constitution. The Controversy The issue of judicial independence was discussed in the case of McGonnel v. United Kingdom.1 The case in summary involves a judge of the island of Guernsey who took part over a decision on appeal in the Royal Court over a case that involved an issue that he has previously dealt upon in his prior legislative capacity as Deputy Bailiff. The European Court of Human Rights held that this was a violation of article 6 (1) that requires having his rights determined by an impartial and independent court. The Court held that “with particular respect to his presiding, as Deputy Bailiff, over the States of Deliberation in 1990, the Court considers that any direct involvement in the passage of legislation, or of executive rules, is likely to be sufficient to cast doubt on the judicial impartiality of a person subsequently called on to determine a dispute over whether reasons exist to permit a variation from the wording of the legislation or rules at issue.2″ The European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) incorporates the freedom and rights of every individual citizen through the passing of the Human Rights Act of 1998 (HRA 1998) in the United Kingdom. The ECHR provides a requirement for an “independent and impartial tribunal established by law” that will secure the rights and freedom of each individual “without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status”.3 Due to the brewing conflict of the lack of physical independence of the judiciary from the House of Lords, the CRA 2005 was created to replace the appellate committee of the House of Lords with a new Supreme Court. It is to provide a sufficient transparency of the independence of the judiciary from the executive and legislative branch and avoid future controversies involving the ECHR on questioning decisions by the Law Lords on the basis of the lack of impartiality and independence to give a fair trial. The Concept of Separation of Power The concept of judicial independence although not historically linked to Montesquieu doctrine of separation of power is intimately connected. The doctrine introduces the separation from each other of the three branches of government: the executive, legislative and judiciary to avoid abuse of power. “There is no liberty, if the judiciary power be not separated from the legislative and executive..”4 It provides for a system of checks and balances in which the three branches can prevent the abuse of power of one and the other.