I will pay for the following article Arguing to Persuade. The work is to be 4 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. Argument to persuasion invites more use of language resources than argument to persuade (Caine 54). A persuasive paper intends to use logic and reasoning to convince others abandon their stands and beliefs and be conformed to the writers views). In this regard, this writing prior to preparation is necessary. There are stipulated steps that, if followed would result to a high performing persuasive paper. To begin with, an author should choose a certain stand (Wachob 34). Before one embarks on convincing others about his point of view, he or she must be sure of what he or she believes. Understanding and analyzing the audience follows. after this, the writer must delve into serious research on the topic. This enables one form concrete decisions, explanations to every statement and also boosts personal confidence and esteem. It is also in this level that one understands the failures of former works in the topic and develops mechanisms to counter them. The research on the topic also helps indentify reliable and legitimate sources of information and experts on the same. From the research plane, one is to develop a hypothesis, a proposition, a claim on the topic. The hypothesis should be debatable, carry with it two opposing ends. One can resort to having a thesis that stands against his or her stand, doing this ensures that the claim is debatable. The next move is to try and extrapolate possible refutations against your stand. This stage can be meant to do two things, prepare one psychologically to defend his or her stand and prepare answers to the refutations citing legitimate and available evidences (Forsyth 23). The next point is to provide concrete reasons for a particulate stand. This can be done by providing evidences by the use of facts, statistics from dependable sources and by the use of illustrations and examples. There are elements of a good persuasive writing. There should be order of how things get presented. This allows a clear flow of information without conflicting of ideas, facts and truths. To start with is the introduction of the paper. This part gives an oversight of the paper and should not to be too lengthy. Terminologies in the topic of the paper should be defined and be explained at this point. Explanation of the background of the paper can also be given in the introduction (Caine 64). In the end of introduction, the claim should be introduced in a clear and precise way. The thesis can tell the reader the actual topic of the paper and the organization of the paper After introduction and having stated the thesis, the next thing in line is defending the thesis by providing evidences. This happens in the body of the paper and should take a minimum of three paragraphs. The thesis carries the whole paper. At this point, it is healthy to have the extrapolated refutations in the fingertips so as to start countering them from the very first defense. The paragraphs should also be arranged in accordance with the weight of the evidences, starting from the beast to the least. The last statement of the paragraph should also be able to link with the next paragraph in a manner that embraces a perfect flow of information. (Wachob 39) After a perfect statement of the writers evidences, the paper should proceed to a new paragraph or segment that purely focuses on refutations.

Create a 5 pages page paper that discusses au policy on boko haram. This is necessary prior to the AU getting authorization and funding from the UNSC to deploy the force. The AU’s rationale for this strategy was that the Nigerian Army had failed to curb Boko Haram’s activities, even as its neighbours grew increasingly apprehensive about the group’s increasing prosperity and expansionist agenda (Akinleye, 2015: p1). This agreement at the 24th AU Summit is a marked shift in Nigerian policy about the AU’s role in fighting Boko Haram. However, questions remain about Nigeria’s continued willingness to allow foreign troops on its territory, as well as whether this will be enough to contain the group.

Overall, the decision by Nigeria to accept AU help through regional countries in the Lake Chad Basin, especially in stepping up military assaults on villages and towns on Nigeria’s borders, may mark the turning point in how the threat from Boko Haram is handled. The UNSC has also agreed to support advance plans by countries from the Chad Basin to form a multinational joint task force against Boko Haram, of which Chad contributes the bulk of the troops (telegraph.co.uk, 2015: p1). The acceptance by Nigeria of the AU’s recommendation to form the multinational force and deploy it in the North East of the country was the result of pressure by its neighbours leading to the 24th AU Summit, especially as Boko Haram had begun to expand its activities across the border. The AU has seemingly convinced the involved countries to put aside historical border tensions, as well as previous failures by individual governments to tackle the group (bbc.com, 2015: p1). Through the AU resolution, it seems that Nigeria and its neighbours are more determined to confront Boko Haram and its destabilizing mission in the Chad Basin region.

However, there are still major obstacles to achieving the results desired by the EU in its resolution during the 24th AU Summit, even if the regional countries do manage to address the issues that have&nbsp.prevented previous efforts from succeeding. Indeed, there is increasing evidence that intensified military action may not be sufficient to solve the problem that is deeply rooted (Dory, 2015: p42).