Relationship of D Vinci and Michelangelo. The work is to be 5 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

/in /by

I will pay for the following article Relationship of D Vinci and Michelangelo. The work is to be 5 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. This might explain why many people considered their artistic works exceptional. This discourse seeks to explore the relationship between the two artists of the Renaissance period. In so doing, the paper will analyze some of their greatest works that have earned them the fame. Michelangelo Buonarroti and Leonardo Da Vinci remains the most famous and celebrated artists of the Renaissance period. Their art, poetry, music, architecture, and scientific explorations and achievements show what it means to be a Renaissance man. Since the two knew of the fame and the huge influence they had with regards to their artistic works, they became very bitter rivals. In fact, stories are being told of how the two great masters of the Renaissance disliked each other. Experts attribute the rivalry between Michelangelo and Da Vinci to the stiff competition they had in the profession as artists (Jones 2). However, the most striking relationship between the two great artists of the Renaissance period is the fact that both of them were Italians. Da Vinci for instance, was born in 1452 in a remote village called Vinci in Italy. Soon afterwards, he relocated to Florence, where he took up an apprenticeship to Verrocchio. He began working as a painter at a very tender age. However, because of his creativity, he was able to surpass his teachers with the way he painted very first. This earned him the tag of being a universal genus. He did not only prove himself as one of the best painters in the world at the time, but also an inventor, scientist, engineer and architect because of his ideas, which were far beyond their time. In addition, many of those who knew him described him as a physically strong man, who was not only handsome, but also had a good singing voice. Some of his most celebrated and famous works include the Mona Lisa and the fresco the Last Supper (Verspohl 7). Surprisingly, Michelangelo, who was born in 1475, which is about 23 years after Da Vinci was also an Italian. However, unlike Da Vinci, Michelangelo was born near Florence in Italy. Like Da Vinci, Michelangelo also began working as an apprenticeship when he was barely 13 years in Ghirlandaio. In fact, just as Da Vinci began his works as a painter, Michelangelo also did the same beginning his works as a painter. However, he gained fame as a sculptor. He was able to produce many artistic works which enabled him become a very famous and celebrated Renaissance man in the entire world. Some of his greatest and most famous masterpieces include the statue of David, The Pieta, the Sistine Chapel, and his architectural work, the ST. Peter’s Basilica (Barton par. 2). Another striking relationship that existed between Michelangelo and Da Vinci is the fact that both of them trained at Florence college. In fact, many people believe that the kind of training the got at Florence college might have contributed immensely to their great work and skills. Research indicates that there choice to train at Florence was informed by the fact that Florence was regarded as a vibrant arts center during the renaissance period. In fact, Michelangelo confirmed this claim by arguing that he opted to join Florence arts center since he viewed it as a place where he could innate his talent to advance and flourish. The same applies to Da Vinci who joined Florence arts center in order to be able develop his innate talent in arts (Verspohl 9). Both Michelangelo and Da Vinci also share their areas of expertise.

Complete 4 pages APA formatted article: For one more day by Mitch Albom.

/in /by

Complete 4 pages APA formatted article: For one more day by Mitch Albom. Charley’s mother Posey had died some years ago though he wished to spend additional time with his mother. According to the book, the love between a child and his mother is strong because it can save a child. The major theme of the story is family because it reflects occurrences in many families today as evident in themes, viewpoints, and characters. Character The main characters of the book are Charley’s family members. Charley is the storyteller and the major character of the story. The story reveals pertinent concerns focusing on the relationships between children and their parents in the current society (Albon 2). Most male children like to be associated with their fathers though they have difficult relationships with them. Charley always sided with his father. He always wanted his father’s approval though he was always hard on him. He made Charley believe that he was never good enough. This made him try hard with the intent of affirming his worth. This happened in his childhood and adulthood when he was at the Old Timers baseball team. Charley’s father in the novel represents the fathers who live their dreams through their children. It is true that parents like to achieve their targets through their children by forcing them to do what they do not like. Charlie’s father wanted him to realize his vision of playing baseball. He bullied his son though he was growing up. This is shown when the father ordered him to leave his mother’s birthday party for a baseball game. He told Charley that he should choose either his mother or him. The father told him that he could not choose both. Charley discovered later that his father was a hypocrite who led a double life. This is because his father has a second alcohol store, a second wife, and another child (Albom 17). Charley’s relationship with his mother in the novel shows that mothers support their children though they tend to make serious mistakes. His mother always made him realize that he should return to his life. Charlie discovered that his mother was considerate compared to his father. This was evident when Charlie told his mother that he made a wrong mistake when they visited the Italian wife. He told his mother that he loved and admired her. Charlie thought that he should have chosen his mother over his father. However, his mother opposed by indicating that it was not his culpable because he never had a chance to choose. She knew that his son was confused throughout his life because he failed to acknowledge whether to support his mother or to please his father. She also knew that his son was pressured by his father to choose him as his role model (Albom 43). Charlie’s relationship with his daughter was also poor because he felt guilty for neglecting his mother making him an alcoholic. His wife left him because of this habit. This shows that a child’s life is immensely affected by his parents’ behaviors. Charlie had problems with his wife and daughter because of the effects of his relationship with his parents. He never saw his daughter after his wife left him. His daughter got married but he was not invited to the wedding. This made Charlie to feel so lonely that he wanted to kill himself. During their meeting, Charlie’s mother helped him realize that he should reclaim his relationship with his daughter (O’Hara 1).

Create a 7 pages page paper that discusses the nature of king lear.

/in /by

Create a 7 pages page paper that discusses the nature of king lear. Throughout the play, Shakespeare’s characters continue to emphasize the concept of nature as a means of trying to understand the forces at work around them. This concept is generally thought of in terms of the physical forces of the outer world but has also been used to refer to familial relationships, the metaphysical harmony of the universe and the inner composition of man. Within this single play, Shakespeare explores many of these various meanings of nature. His message seems to be that nature, left unchecked, will most often lead to disaster. Shakespeare conveys this message within King Lear through his portrayal of physical nature, the nature of man, and the nature of human relationships.

Perhaps the most visible element of nature apparent in the play is the element of physical nature. Lear invokes it in the opening scene as he gifts his daughters with their estates by pointing out the natural splendors that each territory has to offer and then calls upon nature in his curse of Cordelia’s lack of suitable response to his request: “by the sacred radiance of the sun, / The mysteries of Hecate and the night, / By all the operations of the orbs” as he disowns her. It is only after this pronouncement that Gloucester makes it clear that the kingdom has recently witnessed a number of strange eclipses of the sun and moon, suggesting that the upsetting situations then occurring in the human realm are just reflections of the upsets occurring in the heavens or vice versa. “Though the wisdom of nature can reason it thus and thus, yet nature finds itself scourged by the sequent effects” (I, ii, 102-103). Although Edmund seems to feel placing such blame for men’s actions on the physical natural environment is foolish, Shakespeare allows nature to continue reflecting the emotions and upsets of the human realm. As the relationships break down between families and within the individual characters involved, each of them going a bit insane as the play continues, the physical world of nature becomes more and more disordered as well. The play continues forward through the darkness of the night before it finally leads to Lear’s banishment from both his daughter’s homes, leaving him to wander through the moors unsheltered during a fierce natural storm. This storm first breaks when Lear is confronted by both Goneril and Regan on the issue of his retinue. As they whittle him down from 100 to 50 knights and then down to 25 and finally into questioning whether he should have even one, the storm breaks on the lines of Lear’s refusal to weep with outrage at the daughters’ ungratefulness. In this, Shakespeare seems to suggest that since the king cannot weep for himself, the skies will do it for him. This storm continues to rage through the night, which takes place through the remainder of this scene as well as the following scenes until Lear begins to regain his own sanity.

According to Geoffrey Robertson and Andrew Nicol: free speech, in fact, means no more than speech from which illegal utterances are subtracted .

/in /by

I will pay for the following article According to Geoffrey Robertson and Andrew Nicol: free speech, in fact, means no more than speech from which illegal utterances are subtracted … In practice, the free press is not a free press: it is what is left of the copy by laws and lawyers. W. The work is to be 14 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. Moreover, the de-regulation of the media ownership structures implemented by the Communications Act 2003 has led some to argue that whilst ostensibly aiming to take media control out of the public sector, the financial ownership structures within the private sector, further impedes media freedom due to the control of powerful minorities (Frost, 2007).

The focus of this analysis is to critically evaluate the legal constraints upon media freedom within the UK. To this end it is necessary to consider the current UK position on legal protection of privacy, evaluating the efficacy of incidental protection through the law of defamation, with a particular focus on whether implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) through the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) has made any significant impact in clarifying the right to privacy under UK law particularly. I shall further consider issues raised by the Internet and the impact of the current legal regulatory framework on media freedom.

The issue of a legal right to privacy has come to the fore through discussions of media accountability in reporting, raising questions as to morality in journalism versus the constitutional right to freedom of speech (Reuss, 1999). The role of the media as an arm of the state of sorts, acting as an accountability safeguard against individuals in power is vital to sustaining the constitutional objective of the UK as a democracy in substance (Feldman, 1994). However, some argue that the public “right to know defence” goes beyond the purpose of accountability and effectively grants a licence to the press to invade and dissect the details of an individual’s private life with impunity (Clayton & Tomlinson, 2001. Tomlinson 2002. Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127).