Provide a 6 pages analysis while answering the following question: From the book. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. In our present political system, the Democrats can be considered as liberals due to the parallelism of their party ideology to liberalism.

/in /by

Provide a 6 pages analysis while answering the following question: From the book. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. In our present political system, the Democrats can be considered as liberals due to the parallelism of their party ideology to liberalism. a. Conservatism Conservatism is often considered to be a right wing political ideology that seeks to uphold the traditional institutions in society. As an ideology, conservatism seeks to emphasize stability of how things were done and values continuity. Famous thinkers who advocated conservatism were Aristotle and Edmund Burke who presupposed that to change societies, it has to be understood at its present form, accept them as they are and help them evolve rather make a radical change. Conservatives, as what the proponents of conservatism are called, believed in the evolution of society as an agent of change rather than the radical or revolutionary change. In principle, conservatives were opposed to the kind of revolution such as the French Revolution and its kindred revolution. Conservatives believes and favors more the gradual change that does not shake society to maintain its stability rather a radical transformation. It grounds its ideology based on the reality of society and not on certain ideas of what an ideal society should be such as the society that Marx’s Communism envisioned. Such, conservatives are known to be realist than idealist. b. Socialism Socialism differentiates from capitalism in a way that its mode of production are owned or controlled by its workers and business does not exist. Industries exist only to satisfy a certain need or demand and its production and distribution is done through a centralized planning or planned by the state. Socialism is said to be the stage before achieving the final stage of communism. As a political ideology, socialism is characterized with the common ownership of the modes of production that it is not intended for profit but rather to satisfy a demand and to fulfill human needs. Since ownership of the modes of production is communal, it meant that no individual has the right to control the modes of production or resources. Production also is not intended for business but for use and to satisfy the needs of society rather than the accumulation of wealth through profit. Proceeds of the output of production is distributed according to individual contribution instead of salary as we know it. c. Fascism Fascism is a political ideology that aims to consolidate a country in terms of their national identity based on their heredity or race under a state that mobilizes its citizen through stringent discipline and mass political indoctrination. Its government is dictatorial and considers conflict as a necessity to achieve national goal. Fascism shares a trait with socialism that the modes of production are not controlled by an individual but by the state. But unlike socialism that does not entertain private enterprise, fascism promotes the regulation of private enterprise when it is beneficial to the state. Its economic goal is self-sufficiency. Governments that once were fascists were Italy under Benito Mussolin and Germany under Adolf Hitler. d. Anarchism.&nbsp.

 

Compose a 250 words assignment on creative destruction & learning/innovation perspective.

/in /by

Compose a 250 words assignment on creative destruction & learning/innovation perspective. Needs to be plagiarism free! Creative Destruction & Learning/Innovation Perspective Today, continuous learning and innovation has emerged as very much important for the development of any company on a consistent basis. While various mechanisms and processes are considered in the implementation of continuous learning and innovation, balance scorecard is often regarded as one such tool having phenomenon effects in accelerating the process within an organizational periphery. Balance scorecard is often used to measure the performance level of the management as well as of its individuals to have a critical understanding of the company’s performances, and further use those attributes in controlling business simulation in favor of the business. In comparison to other tools used for market simulation through competitive advantages when competing inter-team (between two or more companies), balance scorecard is credited to be very useful for the company as it is observed to be based on the notion of creative destruction that triggers change within the organization, as per the developmental needs of the managerial functions. The mechanism also helps to accumulate the various components in a single report and provides support to the company to function as a more customer-oriented system that in turn rewards better advantages on other teams. It also helps the company to improve its production quality and decrease the fresh product launch times, highlighting upon the teamwork of the company. Hence, it is often critically assessed to act as the protector of the company against sub-optimization, based on the thought of creative destruction. By the process of learning and innovation, balance scorecard influences the senior level managers to gather all operational trials and evaluate the improvements in one particular area with relation to another. With the help of balance scorecards teams can therefore spend lesser time in the market as it rewards greater flexibility in implementing change and likewise, increasing potentials of teams to attract higher competitive advantages (Kaplan & Norton, 1992).

research paper on value of rubbish in a consumer society. Needs to be 5 pages. Please no plagiarism.

/in /by

Need an research paper on value of rubbish in a consumer society. Needs to be 5 pages. Please no plagiarism. Many factors have contributed to this phenomenon, such as industrialisation, economic growth and affluence (Brown 2009: 108), easy availability of education and better opportunities, and a growing array of options and exposure to improved and varied choices (Hetherington 2009: 29). Social scientists and sociologists have extensively studied the impact of these changes on different sociological levels, trying to explain the reasons behind these shifts in attitude, their targets, implications in both the negative and positive sets, and predictions based on these changes regarding the trends that might be observed in the future (Hetherington 2009: 30). Such studies are important in the fields of economics, politics, sociology, business and marketing, and many other disciplines which are directly or indirectly linked to the way in which people behave and operate (Hetherington 2009: 30). This paper purports to trace the evolution of the present day society in terms of changes in trends of consumption, and the implications of those shifting trends regarding the perception of rubbish in the society produced as a result of consumption. The present day society can be safely labeled as a consumer society (Hinchliffe 2009: 12), based on observations of the trends in the spending habits of the people and the acquisition of commodities (Hinchliffe 2009: 12). Spending money to fulfill needs through shopping is a basic requirement of a sustainable lifestyle (Hinchliffe 2009: 11), and this phenomenon alone does not merit a society as a consumer society. Rather, it is the underlying reasons for spending that money on commodities, the kind of commodities that people acquire, and the mindset with which they perceive the act of shopping and consumption that determines whether a society can be deemed as consumption oriented or non-consumption oriented (Hinchliffe 2009). This is not to state that the present day society in the U.K. is not capitalist in nature anymore (Hetherington 2009: 35). it continues to be capitalist, however, the lifestyle that was previously available to only a select few who formed the elite of the society is now more widely available to the masses, who can now enjoy the same luxuries and opportunities with an easy and more readily accessible approach (Hetherington 2009: 35). The difference between the trends of the 1880s (Hetherington 2009: 45) and the present day attitude towards shopping has greatly changed from the aim of getting what is needed to that of what the consumer wants and desires (Hinchliffe 2009: 14). that is, consumption is no more merely need-based. it is now a statement of an individual’s personality (Hetherington 2009: 50), and an attempt at socialization and maintenance of higher social standing (Hetherington 2009: 50). Shopping has become a pastime and leisure, and consumption is driven by excess and affluence (Brown 2009: 108). This has important implications as regards to the waste and rubbish that such an attitude generates, and its effects on the environment and economy (Brown 2009: 123). These issues will be considered shortly. The shifting trends have much to do with the shifts in the ontology of values in the society. The term value can be interpreted in many ways, depending on the context in which it is used.

Compose a 2500 words assignment on eu law.

/in /by

Compose a 2500 words assignment on eu law. Needs to be plagiarism free! It was held in Marshall v Southampton and South West Hampshire Health Authority that an anti-discrimination Directive that had not been implemented by the UK despite the expiration of time for doing so, could not be used against private parties. The ECJ’s decision was based on the rationale that Article 249 of the EC Treaty specifically stated that Directives were binding on the states to which they were addressed.3 The only real possibility for pursuing claims against private parties in cases where damages are sustained and claim would have arisen under an unimplemented directive is in cases where the private individual is under the control of the state, subject to some form of statutory control or provides a public service.4 Fattenem appears to be a private corporate body offering private services and thus cannot be characterized as an agent of the state. There are other possibilities for the residents and the gardener to pursue claims against Fattenem with respect to the unimplemented Directive. The doctrine of indirect effect as enunciated in Francovitch v Italian Republic [1992] IRLR 84. In the Francovitch case, the Italian government’s failure to implement a Directive seeking to ensure that employees receive fair compensation when their employers became insolvent resulted in employees losing out on compensation. The court ruled that Italy’s failure to implement the Directive was a breach of its obligation to ensure that the result intended to be achieved was ensured. Thus Italy was liable to compensate the employees.5 Based on the doctrine of indirect effect as enunciated in Francovitch, the residents and gardeners can thus pursue Fattenem for damages relative to the unimplemented Directive. Based on the ruling in Francovitch, the right to take action indirectly is substantiated if it can be established that the damages complained of is exactly the result that the Directive intended to prevent. The Direction was clearly intended to prevent water pollution and the government’s failure to implement the Directive resulted in significant water pollution and damages. Essentially, the Francovitch decision established that individuals may pursue claims against the state in respect of damages sustained as a result of the government’s failure to implement a Directive if three conditions were satisfied.6 First, it must be established that the Directive must transfer some right to the individual complainants. Arguably, the Directive conferred upon the individuals a right to clean and unpolluted water. Secondly, the rights must be discernible from the wording of the Directive. The Directive clearly intended to prevent contamination of water in the areas of waste disposal by those who manufactured fertilisers. Thirdly, there must be a link between the government’s failure to implement the Directive and the corresponding damages complained of. The evidence suggest that the government’s failure to implement the Directive resulted in Fattenem’s progressive and unrestrained use of chemicals. The residents had not complained of pollution and contamination before. Thus had the Directive been implemented Fattenem would not have continued to increase its use of the chemical to dangerous levels.