Area of family gerontology. The work is to be 11 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

/in /by

I will pay for the following article Area of family gerontology. The work is to be 11 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. They are also not in a position to communicate the abuse and thus suffer in silence (IQ Nursing Homes.com, 2008). According to the reports from the U.S. General Accounting Office, 43% of elderly population will live in a nursing home during a lifetime and of these atleast 3 million will be subjected to abuse and atleast 300,000 will die following abuse and neglect at nursing homes (cited in Roberts, 2004). Abuse and negligence leads to violation of human rights of the elderly people who deserve to be respected and have the right to live with dignity and comfort. Infact, the very purpose of admitting then to nursing homes is to make them feel comfortable and get assistance round the clock. Exploitation of their physical and mental vulnerability by means of abuse and neglect needs to be condemned and prevented. Many organizations, groups, laws and reports have devised methods of prevention of abuse and neglect in nursing homes. This article explores some of the measures which help prevent abuse and neglect. Focus and research statement Is abuse and neglect of elderly common in the nursing homes of United States? Background information Types of abuse in nursing homes Abuse in the elderly can be physical, sexual, emotional or even wrongful death. Financial exploitation and abuse can also occur. Most of the times, abuse occurs by the staff of the nursing home. However, abuse can occur from other residents of the nursing home too. This article mainly concentrates on abuse from the staff. Abuse of the residents can lead to many consequences which vary in intensity ranging from mild discomfort to serious consequences like dehydration, starvation, serious injuries, bedsores and even death. The most common forms of abuse are neglect and caretaking mistreatment (Griffore et al, 2009). Indicators of abuse and negligence in nursing homes In majority of cases, abuse is not obvious and may be missed easily if a family member or a loved person is not watching intentionally. Since most of the times, the elderly person is not in a position to address and communicate abuse and neglect which he or she is subjected to, the family member or the loved person must make effort to identify abuse and neglect through various signs and symptoms of abuse (IQ Nursing Homes.com, 2008). When the elderly person becomes withdrawn or non-communicative, emotional abuse must be suspected. Other signs and symptoms of emotional abuse are anxiety, agitation, involuntary seclusion, mood swings, feeling of low self esteem, depression and strange behaviour like sucking, rocking and biting. Since many elderly people develop these features as part of their disease and old age, presence of symptoms and signs of emotional abuse can be attributed to old age mental conditions (IQ Nursing Homes.com, 2008). One clue to the fact that these symptoms actually are due to abuse and neglect is the fact that the onset of symptoms has occurred after admission to the nursing home.

freedom of information act on the cayman islands

/in /by

I need some assistance with these assignment. freedom of information act on the cayman islands Thank you in advance for the help! The provisions may not necessarily guarantee higher levels of access to the people of Caymen islands.

The passage of the FOI 2007 arises against the trend of civil servants to keep Government business secret due to the fear of losing their jobs or a promotion due to putting out wrong information in public. (Fuller, 2008). The Freedom of Information Act of 2007 seeks to achieve a balance between the citizen’s right to know and the obligation of the Government to preserve the confidentiality of certain kinds of information. The major objectives of the Law are set out under Part I, Section 4 are to give effect to the “fundamental principles underlying the system of constitutional democracy, namely (a)governmental accountability (b) transparency. and (c) public participation in national decision making” by allowing the public to participate in national decisions through granting them a “general right of access to records held by public authorities”, subject to certain exemptions.1

In essence, the Law seeks to grant citizens the legal right to inspect or copy official documents in the possession of Government authorities. Members of the public can also ask for their personal information to be changed and the Act allows citizens legal grounds to appeal if access to a record is either not granted or not granted in time. This Law specifically applies to Public authorities, which as defined under the Act, also includes government ministries, portfolios, statutory bodies and government companies2. The scope of information as contained in government records includes “information held in any form”3 and it applies to all government records, irrespective of the date when they may have been created4.

One of the drawbacks in the law, however, is the failure to adequately define what exactly constitutes “public interest” or “access”.&nbsp.

Compose a 750 words assignment on crito a good friend of socrates.

/in /by

Compose a 750 words assignment on crito a good friend of socrates. Needs to be plagiarism free! Crito Socrates was imprisoned and was sentenced to death at Athens’ prison. Apparently, a galley sailed off for an annual religious service toDelos. Being so sacred for the Athenians, no executions were permitted while the galley was away. While waiting for the ship to arrive at Athens and for his death, Socrates’ old friend came to try to save him by convincing him to break out of prison. Crito, being so faithful and a good friend of Socrates, made everything that was needed for Socrates to break out of prison. He tried everything that was necessary in order to save his friend’s life. He persuaded Socrates to escape out of prison and proposed a future plan of moving away from Athens and to live to an adjacent city, Thessaly. However Socrates, being persuaded by Crito, did not responded to his friend’ plea. He neglected his friends’ proposal for reasons he had given. He had based his reasons for clear and precise arguments. Socrates believes that: 1. One ought to live rightly. 2. One ought never to do wrong. 3. One must never do wrong in return for a wrong. 4. One ought to keep agreements. 5. It would be wrong to break the laws. 6. Laws are just. Socrates believed that all laws authorized by a certain state should be obeyed, not by majority, by all individuals within the state. Being a citizen of Athens, Socrates already knew Athens’ laws and still continued to live there. When one is already familiar with the laws of a state, and still he chooses to continue to live there, he enters into an implied contract to obey the laws of the state and. having entered into the contract, one should either obey the laws or convince the state that they are unjust. Then Socrates, being a citizen of Athens, entered into an implied contract agreement to obey Athens’ laws. So, having entered into the contract Socrates must either obey the laws or convince Athens’ that he is unjust. It is because other than the two, anything else would be an unjust violation of the contract agreement between the citizen and the state. Therefore, in order that Socrates would not make any violation of the contract agreement between him and Athens, he must obey the law and convince the Athens that he is unjust by not to escape from prison and the coming death. Socrates’ decision of not coming along Crito and his plan was the best and the right thing to be done. Some may think that Socrates was acting like a fool for what he had done. However examining Socrates’ reasons, to be based by arguments, it is clear that what he has done was the right thing. The vital part of his reasons was the first one. One ought to live rightly. Living rightly is the same as living well or living justly. Socrates believes that one is ought to live a just life, and in order to live a just life, one must do right and must not do what is not right and that it is not right to do wrong, and that laws are just. Socrates was wronged by the citizens. To escape in prison is to disobey the law and to disobey the law is to break an agreement between Athens and him. breaking an agreement is doing wrong, and doing wrong will eventually harm others therefore it is wrong. to inflict a wrong doing in return for a wrong is wrong. If I were in Socrates’ shoes, I would have done the same. What he thought and believed was simple and just. Like him, I also believe that laws are just and that one must live right. In order to live right and just, one must do what is right and must not do what is not right. Even thinking that my life would be over pretty soon, I would still be considering my thoughts and arguments by which I am living for and by. This act is right for two lines of reasons. First, if I would escape the prison and escape death, neither I am obeying the law anymore, nor I am successful on convincing my state that I am unjust, rather I am doing a thing that is a just violation of the implied contract agreement between me and the state that rose when I started to choose the state as a place for me to live. Moreover, as I am violating the contract agreement between me and the state, I am no longer obeying the law, and that I am breaking an agreement. Further, failure to keep an agreement is disobeying the laws which, by nature, are just. To disobey laws is to do wrong, and by doing wrong, I am not living a just life. Second, if I would escape from prison and disobey the law, I am to do wrong. Considering that I was imprisoned because the citizens, not the law, wronged me for what I am or what I have done, it shows that I am doing wrong in return for what the citizens have done, which was wrong. Since it is wrong to inflict wrong in return for a wrong, I am doing wrong anymore. and to do what is wrong is to do what is not right, and to do what is not right will now technically disallows me upon living rightly.

submit a 1000 words paper on the topic United States National Security. Policy developers will have to address these energy encounters – but none of them are an interrogation of yes or no, either, do or don’t.

/in /by

Hi, need to submit a 1000 words paper on the topic United States National Security. Policy developers will have to address these energy encounters – but none of them are an interrogation of yes or no, either, do or don’t. As an alternative, how the United States encounter those challenges will need choices-strategy judgments about infrastructure investment, government policy, investigation funding, and even external policy.

The American security plan has a strong program scrutinizing how America-and the world-uses and yields energy. It is thought that the way Americans consume energy is unfavorable to their national security, their monetary well-being, and their environs. Without prejudice, we seek solutions. We focus on long-term, strategic sets that will control the well-being of their country until the next century.

At this time, the fears for their security areas composite and varied as complex and diverse as extremism, the spread of weapons of mass devastation, climate change, deteriorating states and economic downfall. Many of these national trials will require answers that go beyond military capacity and utilize all the tools at their clearance. The American security mission is prominent in the development of new state security hallucination and strategy that generate a new American store for the twenty-first century that is open to the challenges and changes we face as a nation.

The United States encounters many defies around the world that are composite because they are irregular in nature. Uneven challenges are those where the unlike performers and components have not the same welfares and proficiencies, but nonetheless, intermingle compound ways to make policy tremendously difficult.&nbsp.