Write 9 pages with APA style on How White Lies Can Be Good For Your Marriage.

/in /by

Write 9 pages with APA style on How White Lies Can Be Good For Your Marriage. In translating this idea into a more academic realm, this literature review is going to analyze research on the importance of trust and communication in an interpersonal relationship. What happens when white lies are told? Is it better to always tell the truth or to safeguard the feelings of your significant other by telling them a simple, unassuming lie? The aim of this literature analysis is to determine if the practice of telling white lies can lead to more serious transgressions of trust within a relationship. The following ten journal articles will divulge this argument of white lies in a relationship to determine whether or not they help or harm a relationship. In order to discuss the literature surrounding this argument, this analysis will review articles about trust and deception within relationships. Analyzing the positive and negative components of white lies against these relationship ideas will help to determine the effect that minor lies can have a romantic connection. Beginning with trust in relationships, Fletcher and Simpson’s 2000 journal article on the Ideal Standards Model discusses what components are necessary for the makings of a good relationship. In placing the ideas of truth and honesty into the loyalty category, it is evident that truth plays a vital role in a relationship. While one can argue that people show their devotion and commitment to one another by demonstrating continuous truth and honesty in a relationship, the question also arises of protecting feelings.

Write 3 pages with APA style on Adult and Juvenile Justice System.

/in /by

Write 3 pages with APA style on Adult and Juvenile Justice System. The criminal justice system, in U.S, occurs as a system of activities and institutions that ensure social control. Criminal justice systems function to deter or mitigate the activities of criminals besides sanctioning law violators. These systems achieve these objectives through various strategies such as punishment, rehabilitation and criminal penalties. These criminal justice systems play essential roles in safeguarding the life and rights of the violators. These systems ensure that criminals do not face abuse from investigative and prosecuting officers. The American Judicial System has two divisions that serve criminals according to their judicial requirements. The Juvenile Justice System developed from the criminal courts systems 100 years ago (Harr, Hess & Orthmann, 2012). This separation was motivated by the goal of diverting juvenile offenders from the excessive and sometimes disparaging punishment of the adult criminal court system. The Juvenile Justice System encourages rehabilitation instead of punishment. The juvenile and adult criminal justice systems disagree in several ways. Comparison and contrast The Juvenile Justice System focuses on the juvenile in need of assistance instead of the act that brought the juvenile before the court. Juvenile criminal courts occur in an informal setting with the judge having discretion. In the juvenile system, the judge should act in the interests of the juvenile. As a result, the system does not have provisions for trial by jury, rights to know charges and right to an attorney. Additionally, the juvenile court proceedings are usually inaccessible to the public. Furthermore, the records of the proceedings are kept confident to reduce interference to the child’s rehabilitation and reintegration in the society. The language used in these courts underscore the differences between the court systems (Harr, Hess & Orthmann, 2012). It is essential to note that juveniles are not arraigned with crimes but with delinquencies. Additionally, juveniles are adjudicated as delinquents though they are not blameworthy. The juveniles are also not sent to correctional or prison facilities, but to reformatory and training schools. The Juvenile Criminal Justice System has led to tensions between social control and welfare. This arises because of the system’s focus on the interests of the juvenile and incapacitation, punishment and the protection of society from criminal offences. There also exist court divergences connecting the two systems. For instance, criminal offenders above 18 years are tried in circuit or district courts, but juvenile offenders undergo trial in juvenile courts. During proceedings, juveniles are not criminals while offender is usually represented by an appointee of the courts to advocate for the necessary rehabilitation actions based on the interests of the child. During trials, adult criminal proceedings follow fact based trails while juvenile offenders face hearings based on the legal and psychological issues. Adult criminals have constitutional provisions for jury trials, but juvenile offenders lack these provisions. During verdict and sentencing, adult criminal offenders are either guilty or innocent, while juvenile offenders are delinquent or not delinquent (Harr, Hess & Orthmann, 2012). A criminal offender will be sentenced to jail while a juvenile will be sent to a rehabilitation facility. The sentencing of a juvenile offender depends on the offense history and severity of the offense. In case the offender exhibits a severe or extensive offense history, the juvenile offender may face detainment for their safety and social stability.

research paper on language development in early childhood. Needs to be 7 pages. Please no plagiarism.

/in /by

Need an research paper on language development in early childhood. Needs to be 7 pages. Please no plagiarism. I was so conscious of this when I was talking to L and was worried that my inability to understand him might result in negative consequences. I am aware that patience and sensitivity are important professional responsibilities for a qualified teacher to have to support the development of children’s language and communication skills.

A teacher will interact with learners (students), and should at all times maintain high standards of sensitivity and compassion, to recognise and respect others as individuals and to care for the learning of those who are disadvantaged and those with learning difficulties (The Teachers Council “Fit to be a teacher” criteria&nbsp.)

Children use language for many purposes (Otto, 2010) such as telling stories that may be real from their own experiences, or contrived from their imaginations. directing stories. expressing pride. obtaining help when needed. sharing experiences in varied social settings, and developing conversational skills. However, teachers should be more patient with toddlers who are still developing their language skills and may have difficulty in doing so. Dismissing them from their attempts at communication will discourage them from trying again, but showing encouragement by giving one’s full attention will motivate them to find more ways to communicate their ideas.

It is essential that toddlers get to be engaged in conversations no matter how little they may say. Piaget and Vygotsky, key people in the study of language and thought, believe that development will not take place unless children engage in rich, meaningful conversations with others. In doing so, they internalize language to more complex thinking (Neuman & Roskos, 1993).

I have to always keep in mind that every child has the right to be heard. With toddlers who are in the process of developing their language skills and identities, they need more patience in being understood.&nbsp.

unit 3 proposal designs discussion

/in /by

I need some assistance with these assignment. unit 3 proposal designs discussion Thank you in advance for the help! Before selecting the funding source of an organization, one should examine if the organization under consideration has enough funds to fund the various programs of a non-governmental organization. Where examining this aspect, it is important for the grant seeker to analyze what are the sources of these organizations funds, i.e. does the organization gets its funds in a legal manner, or does it get its funds in an illegal manner. If it gets the funds in a legal manner, how much can the organization give the grant seeker, if his or her applications are successful?

This is important for the grant seeker, because he or she will be able to quote a reasonable amount of money, in which the organization can afford to give (Karsh and Fox, 2009). The grant seeker can quote a large amount of money that the organization might be unable to provide. For example, an institution such as the Melinda and Bill Gates foundation gives from a few hundred to millions of dollars in terms of grants. On this basis, a grant seeker might not be limited on the amount of money that he or she will ask (Gregory, 2013).

Another issue that the grant seeker needs to analyze is the mission and vision of the organization. In seeking sources of funds, the grant seeker has to look if the funding organization under consideration provides funds for the activities or services that it engages in. For example, a grant seeker whose mission is to serve people in the agricultural field cannot seek for funds in an institution that provides funds for religious activities such as the Mustard Seed Foundation. It is a guarantee that the Mustard Seed Foundation won’t approve of their requests (Moore, 2010). However, if he or she applies for funds from institutions such as the Melinda and the Bill Gates foundation, chances are high that he or she may get the funds.

Another issue to look at is the application process, and the period upon which the applications are made. For example, the Monsanto fund requires that all funds must supported by a realistic goal, and it must have the descriptions of the project. This is in case the grant seeker needs to achieve success in his or her application. The Monsanto Fund is so serious about the quality of an applicant’s proposal, to an extent that it has given some tips on how to write a good application/proposal (Zunz, 2012).

Response to Roberts Discussion:

Roberts identifies the mission and vision of an organization as an issue that he will consider when choosing a source of fund. This is an issue that I will also consider, and this is because an organization will only fund an issue that is in line with its mission and vision. Another issue that Roberts agrees with me is the amount of money that the institution offers. This will make the grant seeker not to apply for a large amount of money, that the institution cannot afford, or too little money. Roberts further denotes that he would seek for the guidelines and the time frame of applying for the grant. The issues that Robert identifies are similar to mine, but the only difference is the priority he gives them and he does not factor in the manner in which these organizations raise their money. In importance, Roberts first identifies the mission of the organization, the amount of money the organization can offer, and the guidelines of applying for the fund.

Response to Joenella Discussion:

Joenella denotes that before looking for funds, she will analyze if her organization can raise the money through other channels apart from looking for grants. If it is unable to raise money from these other sources, then she will have to look at the mission of the company. This will help her to identify whether the organization can fund her activities. This clearly agrees with my approach and that of Roberts. Organizations will only fund a project that is in line with their mission and vision. However, Joenella discussion does not include the application process of requesting for the grants. This should be included in her approach.

References:

Gregory, J. (2013). Bill and Melinda Gates. New York: Childrens Press.

Karsh, E., & Fox, A.S. (2009). The only grant-writing book you’ll ever need. New York, NY:

Basic Books.

Moore, J. R. (2010). A practical guide to international philanthropy. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Zunz, O. (2012). Philanthropy in America: a history. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.