prepare and submit a term paper on Summary of. Your paper should be a minimum of 500 words in length. &nbsp

/in /by

You will prepare and submit a term paper on Summary of. Your paper should be a minimum of 500 words in length. &nbsp.The article ‘The Antitrust Battle Ahead’ by Ben Protess and Michael J. De la Merced brings to focus on important economic aspects that may arise from mergers and acquisitions. The article also highlights the various forms in which regulators may intervene to block mergers that are potentially harmful to the customer.

Companies may resort to mergers and acquisitions because they provide an inorganic route to expansion. Any such transaction makes good strategic sense for at least one of the companies involved in the deal. However, there is nothing to say that whatever is good for the organization is also good for its consumers. It may so happen that the merged organizations gains at the expense of the consumer. This is where the government chips in, through its antitrust regulations.

The government reserves the right, and rightly so, to intervene and block any merger deal which it feels would reduce competition in the industry and thereby adversely affect the consumers, either by way of high prices or by way of low quality. In some cases, these mergers may lead to less innovation thus indirectly putting consumers at a loss.

Simply put, the purpose of antitrust legislation is to enforce laws that promote competitive markets.

These laws thus ensure efficient allocation of resources in a free market and prevent market failures. The focal point of antitrust economics is competition (Scheffman 2002). It is the competition that is at the heart of many important business decisions and to a large extent determines the firms pricing strategies and tactics.

The rest, which does have antitrust issues, may broadly be classified into two categories.

The first category consists of merger proposals wherein the competitive concerns can be resolved by mutual consent of the parties concerned. The revised merger proposal so arrived after negotiations, retains the beneficial aspects of the deal and discards the threat. The federal regulators negotiated a settlement in the proposed merger deal of Comcast and NBC Universal. As a part of the revised deal, Comcast agreed to give up NBC’s management role in Hulu, the Internet video site and managed to secure the government’s permission to go ahead with the merger. Likewise, the negotiations in case of the Nasdaq’s proposed $11 billion bid for rival NYSE Euronext may not have been amicable, however, the bid was revoked at the intervention and threat of the Department of Justice to sue the merging companies.

The second category of proposals consists of cases where consensus cannot be reached between the regulators and merging parties. In such instances, the regulators move to the federal court to prevent the merger. The Justice Department recently moved to court in a bid to block AT&T’s takeover of T-Mobile USA. Had this merger seen the light of the day, it would have created the nation’s largest mobile carrier. Apprehensions were rife that this would be against consumer welfare given the sheer size of the market share of the combined entity (Priest 2011). Thus the regulators played a vital role in ensuring that the consumer’s interests are not harmed. The blockage of this merger also establishes that the law is forward-looking and bars mergers that may turn out to be detrimental.

Provide a 5 pages analysis while answering the following question: Gun Control in the US. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.

/in /by

Provide a 5 pages analysis while answering the following question: Gun Control in the US. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. According to Congressional Digest, there «has been ongoing tension between the right of an individual to own and use firearms and the responsibility of government to prevent crime». While the initial intention of mass gun possession was the prevention of crimes and lowering the level of risk both for gun owners and non-owners (Cook& Ludwig), in reality, it has increased risks of gun misuse. The advantages and disadvantages of gun ownership/control were laid on the basis of mass nationwide debate.

As far as gun ownership was entrenched in the constitution as one of the fundamental rights, motivated by the need for equal opportunities of self-defense for all U.S. citizens, this remains the main advantage of legalized gun ownership and – at the same time – the main argument against stricter gun control laws. Permission to own a firearm gives law-abiding citizens an opportunity to protect themselves against crime and predation, while a ban on gun ownership would deprive them of protection leaving them at the mercy of criminals, who will still be able to find illegal guns. Moreover, the right for self-defense becomes crucial as police forces prove to fail in preventing all the crimes. therefore, there is a great chance that police will be unable to prevent assault or murder if the potential victim him/herself has no means of protection, i.e. firearm.

Another positive aspect of gun ownership in the U.S. implies that, with legal permission to carry guns, crime rates are likely to decrease. With the new legislation of the early 1990s, crime rates went down, whereas a considerable increase in privately owned guns was observed. Particularly, there was a decrease in the nationwide murder rate and overall crime rate.

Finally, as practice shows, the level of violence doesn’t directly depend on gun control policy and the number of guns owned privately, as the human factor weighs much in this respect. Finally, people kill other people, not firearms. therefore, banning gun ownership or restricting it to a minimum wouldn’t act as a deterrent for crime. instead, a ban would spark a boom in illegal firearms trade and spreading, which would result in even higher criminal activity. On the other hand, guns owned by people who have passed a thorough background check is believed to provide safety for households.

research paper on nietzsche and sartre are each concerned about the definition of self. Needs to be 1 page.

/in /by

Need an research paper on nietzsche and sartre are each concerned about the definition of self. Needs to be 1 page. Please no plagiarism. Task: Definition of Self Philosophers invoke different understanding of the vast occurrences in the environment. Such is the basis of arguments presented by Friedrich Nietzsche and Jean- Paul Sartre on the definition of self. These two philosophers may disagree on many fronts, but one thing is common to both. their definition of self.

Sartre describes man as the centre of his own transcendence. He elaborates that man is all time out of himself. that man only exists by projecting and losing himself beyond himself that he makes man exist. This implies that mans understanding of himself is incomplete unless he pursues his own transcendent aims. This puts every experience that man undergoes to be subject to his own limited understanding. In a sense, this implies that human emotion blows out of proportion due to their own limited understanding of the situation.

Nietzsche, on the other hand, elaborates another philosopher’s discovery when he acknowledges self being the value one puts on himself. He agrees that all that man discovers are “human faculties”. The transcendental aspect christened “intellectual intuition” by Schelling gratifies the utmost yearnings of human beings. This view of self allows man to pursue his desire oblivious of the outcome as he is a slave to emotion and only aims at actualizing the goal.

Both philosophers agree that the definition of self is subjective rather than objective. The essence is to allow each person to define his own boundaries and limits. These might be shaped up by human experience, environment, emotions and individual human fears, but still give credence to the Nietzsche’s and Sartre’s view of self. This is the conclusion that self is the value one ultimately puts on himself. strengths and weaknesses remain relative in all scales.

Work Cited

Jackson, Michael R. Self- Esteem and Meaning: A Life Historical Investigation.

New York: SUNY Press, 1984, Print.

Write 2 pages thesis on the topic moma(2012):my review of diego rivera’s exhibition.

/in /by

Write 2 pages thesis on the topic moma(2012):my review of diego rivera’s exhibition. MOMA: Diego Rivera Murals Diego River was a Mexican mural painter in the early to mid-20th century. Rivera, who was married to famous artist Frida Kahlo, would come to be recognized as one of the contributing members of the Mexican Mural Movement. In 1931 a retrospective of his work was featured at the Museum of Modern Art greatly contributing to his appreciation in the United States. Today much of his work still resides in this museum. While Rivera’s work spans a wide array of subject matter, perhaps his most central area of exploration is the Mexican Revolution. This essay examines Rivera’s work at the Museum of Modern Art (MOMA) within this context of investigation.

An overarching qualitative examination of Rivera’s mural work demonstrates a central concern with events of oppression surrounding the Mexican Revolution. One notable work in this collection is titled ‘Liberation of the Peon’ (“MOMA”). The title refers to peonage, a system of indentured servitude wherein Mexican natives were forced by Spanish conquerors to work the land. This specific image depicts Mexican men freeing a peon who had been roped to a post. While the image certainly assumes dramatic license, one recognizes the power of its symbolic implications in demonstrating the significant plight and struggle of the Mexican people. One recognizes that even in the depiction of the horses is a somber expression that seemingly speaks to the core of Mexican experience.

Another prominent mural in the collection is ‘Agrarian Leader Zapata’ (“MOMA”). This work is a depiction of key Mexican Revolutionary figure Emiliano Zapata. Zapata is today recognized as a key supporter of Mexican agrarian reform. The image itself depicts Zapata standing beside the dead body of an agrarian farmer. Behind him are Mexican farmers holding equipment and bows and arrows, seemingly ready to fight. While the narrative qualities of the picture are powerful, one recognizes that it is perhaps Rivera’s formal articulations that are more impressionable. In these regards, Rivera depicts human figures in a slanted and slightly cubist form. In the historical context of the work this depiction seems to indicate that it is Spanish oppression that has systematically oppressed the very soul and being of the Mexican citizen. Another slightly similar mural is ‘the Uprising’ (“MOMA”). This image depicts the subsequent physical conflict between the Spanish and Mexican workers. This image partially implements a propagandistic element as a woman holding a baby is seen attempting to fend off a Spanish soldier with a sword. Rivera makes explicit the pained and angry expressions of the Mexican, while leaving blank expressions on the faces of the oppressors.

In conclusion, this essay has examined Diego Rivera’s murals at the Museum of Modern Art. It’s demonstrated that these murals place a great narrative and symbolic emphasis on the events surrounding the Mexican Revolution. In these Rivera implements a variety of formal techniques as a means of demonstrating the Mexican condition. Ultimately, while the murals depict narrative qualities of oppression, it is perhaps Rivera’s greatest artistry that in his process he is able to give direct insight into the soul of the revolution.

References

“Murals for the museum of modern art.” MOMA. N.p., 2012. Web. 19 Jan 2012.

.