Compose a 750 words assignment on comparison of the confederation of the united colonies of new england and the dominion of new england.

/in /by

Compose a 750 words assignment on comparison of the confederation of the united colonies of new england and the dominion of new england. Needs to be plagiarism free! Confederation of the United Colonies of New England and the Dominion of New England Introduction During the colonization of America by Britain, several colonies were established, which were based on different fundamentals. While some of the colonies were established as commercial colonies, others were established as religious colonies, while yet others were established as crown colonies. Nevertheless, a time came when the administration of these colonies was to be centralized, requiring the formation of unified colony camps that gave birth to two different camps, namely the United Colonies of New England and the Dominion of New England. While the United Colonies of New England was the first to be established in 1643, the Dominion of New England was established later in 1689 (Barnes, 27). The following is the history of the establishment of these united colony fronts, their forms of government structure and the ways in which they were different: History of the New England Confederation This is an alliance of the English colonies that was established on the basis of religion and defense. The alliance comprised of Massachusetts, Plymouth, Connecticut and New Haven regions, which formed the puritan colonies (The New England Confederation, 169). The puritan colonies comprised of an alliance of English Protestants that had been established in the 16th century. Thus, the formation of the New England Confederation in may 1643 was to bring these puritan colonies together to support the church, while also protecting the colonies against the other colonies that were inhabited by the Native Americans and the Dutch (The New England Confederation, 171). The desire to unite the colonies occupied by the British was sparked off by the war that occurred between two American native tribes of the Mohegan and Narragansetts, which threatened to destabilize the region and cause the disintegration of colonies (The New England Confederation, 185). This provided a good platform against which the British colonies negotiated for a unified alliance to support their church and protect their combined interests. However, the unity of the alliance was short-lived, disintegrating in 1654, after Massachusetts failed to join and support the British against Netherlands in the First Anglo-Dutch War, only to regain unity in 1676 during King Philip’s War, and finally dissolving in 1680 after the revocation of the charters that provided for the unity of the colonies (The New England Confederation, 172). History of the Dominion of New England The Dominion of New England refers to the administrative union of the English colonies that lasted the period 1686-1689, and eventually dissolved without achieving most of its objectives (Laws of the Dominion of New England, 204). This administrative unit was very expansive, stretching from Penobscot Bay in the north to Delaware River in the south (Barnes, 33). Considering that most of the British colonies operated differently, with some operating under the crown and others under the leadership of certain individuals, there was a need to bring these colonies under a unified system of governance, to enhance the control of their trade. The colonies also presented some problems to the king of England at the time, King Charles II, who postulated that such problems could only be overcome by uniting the colonies under one administrative unit (Laws of the Dominion of New England, 238). However, the unification of these colonies was particularly difficult, due to the resistance by some colonies which deemed the unification inappropriate. Massachusetts in particular proved to be the center of resistance, due to its intolerant nature of other churches other than the puritans, including the Kings own, Church of England (Barnes, 41). Nevertheless, a charter was eventually effected after a long period of struggle to unify the colonies, which eventually saw the colonies form the Dominion of New England in 1686 that lasted only a few years and collapsed in 1689 (Laws of the Dominion of New England, 212). Why did each entity come into existence? The New England Confederation came into existence with the objective of protecting the colonies against the other colonies that were inhabited by the Native Americans and the Dutch (The New England Confederation, 171). Additionally, the colonies united for the sake of supporting the church, since they were opposed to the intrusion of other churches into their regions. The doctrines of the protestant churches that had unified under the puritan colonies were more stringent as opposed to those of other churches which offered more freedom. Therefore, the formation of the New England Confederation was aimed at preserving the sanctity of the church (The New England Confederation, 188). On the other hand, the Dominion of New England came into existence to streamline the administration into fewer centers (Laws of the Dominion of New England, 247). The unification also sought to regulate trade, coordinate matters of defense for the colonies and to increase their religious freedoms (Barnes, 24). Explain the governmental structure of each The New England Confederation had a government structure made up of 8 commissioners, comprising of 2 commissioners drawn from each colony, which served as the governing directorate (The New England Confederation, 175). On the other hand, the Dominion of New England had a government structure that took the form of a council of representatives at the top, who were drawn from various colonies that formed the dominion. However, due to administrative costs and inconveniences, the dominion came under the administration of a single individual, starting with Sir Edmund Andros (Laws of the Dominion of New England, 253). In what ways were the two organizations different? The major difference between The New England Confederation and the Dominion of New England is the fact that, while the Dominion of New England was imposed on the colonies by the government, the formation of New England Confederation was a voluntary move by the colonies themselves to protect their interests (The New England Confederation, 176). Additionally, while the New England Confederation was ruled by a directorate of commissioners representing each colony, the Dominion of New England started under the governance of a council of representatives and later changed to run under the governance of a single individual (Barnes, 36). Works Cited Barnes, Viola F. The Dominion of New England: A Study in British Colonial Policy. New York: F. Ungar Pub. Co, 1960. Print. Laws of the Dominion of New England, 1686: From the Only Known Copy of the Original Issue, Now in the Archives of the State of New Hampshire. Concord, N.H: O.G. Hammond, 1928. Print. The New England Confederation. 1643: Articles of Confederation between the Plantations under the Governmente of Massachusetts, New-Plymouth, Connecticut, and Ye New-Haven in Combination. Boston: Directors of the Old South Work, 1906. Print.

Compose a 1250 words assignment on globalization and the society.

/in /by

Compose a 1250 words assignment on globalization and the society. Needs to be plagiarism free! (Pros and Cons of Globalization, 2012) Most of the time globalization is used to refer to a particular specific aspect- economic integration throughout the world. This essay will examine the term of globalization, how it has been achieved, what benefits and drawbacks it brings to peoples’ daily life. Based on these facts and arguments, this essay will finally consider from different points of view whether globalization is good for society or not. Globalization began along with the time of the industrial age. Industries produced goods in a mass quantity without any specific market orientation. therefore they started to sell products across the board. Export became more efficient for business, so they wanted to replace production to a place with more affordable labor and cheaper production cost. Thus, replacing production location allows businesses to produce more at a cheaper price in a market where demand is higher. Free Trade Agreement allows free moving to industries among different countries. therefore it brings welfare to all countries for several reasons. First of all, globalization provides an opportunity for finance. Before globalization, businesses were limited only to domestic sources of finance from investors. But today, countries become closer therefore limitations on finance sources fall. In a global economy, entrepreneurs have an opportunity to gain investment form any country. For example, a company based in Mexico, can easily get investments from the US, Canada, Europe or Asia. This practice is becoming more common globally. This opportunity is available not only for developed countries, but also for developing countries. For example, African countries can gain funds form countless international sources like Kiva International, an organization that provides funding to poorest, allowing them to turn ideas into businesses (Faiola, 2009). Economic integration with foreign countries makes economic growth more constant and faster than those countries that try to dissociate itself from all. China is a great illustration of international integration. To become a globally active nation, China has broken traditional principles of being individual and ignoring other countries. As a result, it could not be unnoticed that China is the fastest growing nation in the world nowadays. According to statistics, an open economy has a rate of growth of 2.5% higher than in a closed economy due to the process of globalization (Dreher, 2006). An open economy in this case has been achievable due to the globalization process that has taken place around the world allowing for different countries to financially interact with one another for mutual benefit. Business across the borders has proven to be a sustainable practice that allows the countries that practice to access markets that would have previously been inaccessible due to their location (Vujakovic, 2010). The open market has served to increase the financial wealth of a country as it has provided more opportunities to conduct business besides the local industries that are available. Globalization has enhanced the relationships that exist between countries thanks to their interaction with one another that has allowed them to get along and in the process reducing the prospect of war between countries (Scholte, 2005). Globalization has enhanced the bonds that exist between countries as they work together to enhance their financial and political strength meaning that there is little opportunity for them to come up with reasons for disagreements as they are in the process of working together for the common good of both of their nations.

 

Compose a 1750 words assignment on alpen bank. swot analysis.

/in /by

Compose a 1750 words assignment on alpen bank. swot analysis. Needs to be plagiarism free! The organization has hesitated to launch its credit card services because of poor infrastructure, population inexperience and low per capita income level of the Romanians. However, they have launched this credit card service and able to win the trust of customers. In the year 2000, the organization has entered in the European market. The objective of the study is to form an effective marketing strategy in order to clear cut the positioning strategy considering the credit card industry. A strategic SWOT analysis has been implemented below for Alpen. Strengths Alpen bank is one of the leading banking organizations in Romania. The bank is popular within the country due to the effective customer service and several differentiated customer service. Due to its quality customer service the organization has able to create positive brand awareness in Romania. As it is discussed earlier, premium banking services have increased the core competencies and reputation of the brand name in the Romanian market. Weaknesses Lower customer base is the biggest weakness of this brand. The organization has implemented credit card service facilities for its clients in Romania. The concept of the credit card was not familiar with the people of Romania. The organization has hesitated to enter in this credit card service business due to the effect of recession, low per capita income of people and inexperience of the people about the credit card services. Lack of awareness and low customer base is the significant weakness of the organization. Opportunities Now the potential opportunities for the credit card service of Alpen bank can be determined by evaluating the effects of following six important environmental factors to the company. Political: The organization has tried to enter in the European Union market to increase its international client base. The credit card industry is comprised of four key parties, such as Merchant acquirers, Merchants, Card Issuers and Network & Associations. However, the banking sector in Romania is least affected comparing to the other developed countries. Strict governmental regulations and ethical policy implementation has helped the organization to win the trust of the consumers. The support of several political parties and government can increase the core competency of the organization. Economical: The organization is overcoming the challenges of previous recession. The economy of Romania has able to overcome some effects of recession. The disposable income of middle class people is increasing significantly. Initially in the year 2006, the organization was trying to enter in the EU region due to the economic advantages of these areas. However, the organization had tried to target the premium customers due to the unfavorable economic condition. The high disposable income of the people of high income level will help the organization to generate high revenue. Social: The people of Romania were not that much aware about the credit card services. Therefore, it is necessary for the organization to create social awareness about the credit card service. It is a potential opportunity for the organization to increase its market share in Romania. The organization should concentrate on the untapped market. Moreover, changing life style and improved literacy rate will help the organization to create a huge customer base within the country. Technological: Technology is a necessary aspect for the growth of this industry. This credit card facility will encourage the people of modern society. Effective and advanced telecommunication facility, computer technology and developed terminals will help the customers to operate the credit cards comfortably.

 

unit 3 proposal designs discussion

/in /by

I need some assistance with these assignment. unit 3 proposal designs discussion Thank you in advance for the help! Before selecting the funding source of an organization, one should examine if the organization under consideration has enough funds to fund the various programs of a non-governmental organization. Where examining this aspect, it is important for the grant seeker to analyze what are the sources of these organizations funds, i.e. does the organization gets its funds in a legal manner, or does it get its funds in an illegal manner. If it gets the funds in a legal manner, how much can the organization give the grant seeker, if his or her applications are successful?

This is important for the grant seeker, because he or she will be able to quote a reasonable amount of money, in which the organization can afford to give (Karsh and Fox, 2009). The grant seeker can quote a large amount of money that the organization might be unable to provide. For example, an institution such as the Melinda and Bill Gates foundation gives from a few hundred to millions of dollars in terms of grants. On this basis, a grant seeker might not be limited on the amount of money that he or she will ask (Gregory, 2013).

Another issue that the grant seeker needs to analyze is the mission and vision of the organization. In seeking sources of funds, the grant seeker has to look if the funding organization under consideration provides funds for the activities or services that it engages in. For example, a grant seeker whose mission is to serve people in the agricultural field cannot seek for funds in an institution that provides funds for religious activities such as the Mustard Seed Foundation. It is a guarantee that the Mustard Seed Foundation won’t approve of their requests (Moore, 2010). However, if he or she applies for funds from institutions such as the Melinda and the Bill Gates foundation, chances are high that he or she may get the funds.

Another issue to look at is the application process, and the period upon which the applications are made. For example, the Monsanto fund requires that all funds must supported by a realistic goal, and it must have the descriptions of the project. This is in case the grant seeker needs to achieve success in his or her application. The Monsanto Fund is so serious about the quality of an applicant’s proposal, to an extent that it has given some tips on how to write a good application/proposal (Zunz, 2012).

Response to Roberts Discussion:

Roberts identifies the mission and vision of an organization as an issue that he will consider when choosing a source of fund. This is an issue that I will also consider, and this is because an organization will only fund an issue that is in line with its mission and vision. Another issue that Roberts agrees with me is the amount of money that the institution offers. This will make the grant seeker not to apply for a large amount of money, that the institution cannot afford, or too little money. Roberts further denotes that he would seek for the guidelines and the time frame of applying for the grant. The issues that Robert identifies are similar to mine, but the only difference is the priority he gives them and he does not factor in the manner in which these organizations raise their money. In importance, Roberts first identifies the mission of the organization, the amount of money the organization can offer, and the guidelines of applying for the fund.

Response to Joenella Discussion:

Joenella denotes that before looking for funds, she will analyze if her organization can raise the money through other channels apart from looking for grants. If it is unable to raise money from these other sources, then she will have to look at the mission of the company. This will help her to identify whether the organization can fund her activities. This clearly agrees with my approach and that of Roberts. Organizations will only fund a project that is in line with their mission and vision. However, Joenella discussion does not include the application process of requesting for the grants. This should be included in her approach.

References:

Gregory, J. (2013). Bill and Melinda Gates. New York: Childrens Press.

Karsh, E., & Fox, A.S. (2009). The only grant-writing book you’ll ever need. New York, NY:

Basic Books.

Moore, J. R. (2010). A practical guide to international philanthropy. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Zunz, O. (2012). Philanthropy in America: a history. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.